Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Nuclear power
One to wind TurNiP up.
http://transitionculture.org/2011/03...alexis-rowell/ Old but still relevent. |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Nuclear power
harry-the-troll is back.
-- F |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Nuclear power
On 27/05/13 08:47, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , harry wrote: One to wind TurNiP up. http://transitionculture.org/2011/03...ear-was-a-mist ake-even-before-fukushima-an-open-letter-to-chris-huhne-from-alexis-rowell/ Old but still relevent. No, old and irrelevant. Each one of these "points" is comprehensively demolished each time it's put forward. But you're too dim to notice. Exactly so. 17% of the worlds electricity, and the lowest death rate of any power generation industry overall. The facts speak for themselves. -- Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc-ra-cy) a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers. |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Nuclear power
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 27/05/13 08:47, Tim Streater wrote: In article , harry wrote: One to wind TurNiP up. http://transitionculture.org/2011/03...ear-was-a-mist ake-even-before-fukushima-an-open-letter-to-chris-huhne-from-alexis-rowell/ Old but still relevent. No, old and irrelevant. Bit like harry then. Exactly so. 17% of the worlds electricity, and the lowest death rate of any power generation industry overall. The facts speak for themselves. but harry is a born again green arse, their 'bible' dosent recognize the word 'fact' |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Nuclear power
On 27/05/2013 08:47, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , harry wrote: One to wind TurNiP up. http://transitionculture.org/2011/03...ear-was-a-mist ake-even-before-fukushima-an-open-letter-to-chris-huhne-from-alexis-rowell/ Old but still relevent. No, old and irrelevant. Each one of these "points" is comprehensively demolished each time it's put forward. But you're too dim to notice. +1 Colin Bignell |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Nuclear power
Tim Streater wrote:
In article , harry wrote: One to wind TurNiP up. http://transitionculture.org/2011/03...w-nuclear-was- a-mistake-even-before-fukushima-an-open-letter-to-chris-huhne-from-alexi s-rowell/ Old but still relevent. No, old and irrelevant. Each one of these "points" is comprehensively demolished each time it's put forward. But you're too dim to notice. First claimed point "Nuclear is too expensive" That's an easy one to test: Electricity prices Italy - Electricity domestic average 22p/kWh UK - Electricity domestic average 15.5p/kWh France - Electricity domestic average 14p/kWH Nuclear Generation Italy 0 TWH/pa UK 62.1 TWH/pa France 387.8 TWH/pa Gosh yes, nuclear has really pushed electricity prices up in France, not. So the first claim is a lie, that tends to indicate that it's not worth reading the rest of the ****. -- Burn Hollywood burn, burn down to the ground |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Nuclear power
On 27/05/2013 14:23, Steve Firth wrote:
Tim Streater wrote: In article , harry wrote: One to wind TurNiP up. http://transitionculture.org/2011/03...w-nuclear-was- a-mistake-even-before-fukushima-an-open-letter-to-chris-huhne-from-alexi s-rowell/ Old but still relevent. No, old and irrelevant. Each one of these "points" is comprehensively demolished each time it's put forward. But you're too dim to notice. First claimed point "Nuclear is too expensive" That's an easy one to test: Electricity prices Italy - Electricity domestic average 22p/kWh UK - Electricity domestic average 15.5p/kWh France - Electricity domestic average 14p/kWH Nuclear Generation Italy 0 TWH/pa UK 62.1 TWH/pa France 387.8 TWH/pa Gosh yes, nuclear has really pushed electricity prices up in France, not. So the first claim is a lie, that tends to indicate that it's not worth reading the rest of the ****. As I have commented before, if Harry believes it, it is probably wrong, irrespective of what 'it' is. Colin Bignell |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Nuclear power
On May 27, 2:23*pm, (Steve Firth) wrote:
Tim Streater wrote: In article , *harry wrote: One to wind TurNiP up. http://transitionculture.org/2011/03...w-nuclear-was- a-mistake-even-before-fukushima-an-open-letter-to-chris-huhne-from-alexi s-rowell/ Old but still relevent. No, old and irrelevant. Each one of these "points" is comprehensively demolished each time it's put forward. But you're too dim to notice. First claimed point "Nuclear is too expensive" That's an easy one to test: Electricity prices Italy - Electricity domestic average 22p/kWh UK - Electricity domestic average 15.5p/kWh France - Electricity domestic average 14p/kWH Nuclear Generation Italy 0 TWH/pa UK * * *62.1 TWH/pa France *387.8 TWH/pa Tch Much of the French nuclear plant is due for replacemant. The we'll see the true cost. Taxpayer subsidised, in debt, in danger of default. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear..._and_economics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear...Nuclear_safety |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Nuclear power
On Mon, 27 May 2013 09:03:56 -0700, harry wrote:
Taxpayer subsidised, Pot. Kettle. Black. -- Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org My posts (including this one) are my copyright and if @diy_forums on Twitter wish to tweet them they can pay me Β£30 a post *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Nuclear power
On 27/05/13 17:03, harry wrote:
On May 27, 2:23 pm, (Steve Firth) wrote: Tim Streater wrote: In article , harry wrote: One to wind TurNiP up. http://transitionculture.org/2011/03...w-nuclear-was- a-mistake-even-before-fukushima-an-open-letter-to-chris-huhne-from-alexi s-rowell/ Old but still relevent. No, old and irrelevant. Each one of these "points" is comprehensively demolished each time it's put forward. But you're too dim to notice. First claimed point "Nuclear is too expensive" That's an easy one to test: Electricity prices Italy - Electricity domestic average 22p/kWh UK - Electricity domestic average 15.5p/kWh France - Electricity domestic average 14p/kWH Nuclear Generation Italy 0 TWH/pa UK 62.1 TWH/pa France 387.8 TWH/pa Tch Much of the French nuclear plant is due for replacemant. The we'll see the true cost. Taxpayer subsidised, in debt, in danger of default. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear..._and_economics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear...Nuclear_safety France shows that a 80% nuclear wont break the bank. Finland reckons its the cheapest alterntaive bar none. Areva reactors are overpriced at the moment, but they are not the only game in town. But even at worst case prices the Areva reactor still knocks wind/solar+ backup into the tall grass. Cheapest generation is coal.,Cheapest zero carbon is nuclear. Take your pick. Renewable is neither cheap nor low carbon. Its total pants. -- Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc-ra-cy) a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers. |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Nuclear power
On May 27, 7:24*pm, The Natural Philosopher
wrote: On 27/05/13 17:03, harry wrote: On May 27, 2:23 pm, (Steve Firth) wrote: Tim Streater wrote: In article , * harry wrote: One to wind TurNiP up. http://transitionculture.org/2011/03...w-nuclear-was- a-mistake-even-before-fukushima-an-open-letter-to-chris-huhne-from-alexi s-rowell/ Old but still relevent. No, old and irrelevant. Each one of these "points" is comprehensively demolished each time it's put forward. But you're too dim to notice. First claimed point "Nuclear is too expensive" That's an easy one to test: Electricity prices Italy - Electricity domestic average 22p/kWh UK - Electricity domestic average 15.5p/kWh France - Electricity domestic average 14p/kWH Nuclear Generation Italy 0 TWH/pa UK * * *62.1 TWH/pa France *387.8 TWH/pa Tch Much of the French nuclear plant is due for replacemant. The we'll see the true cost. Taxpayer subsidised, in debt, in danger of default. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear...nagement_and_e... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear...Nuclear_safety France shows that a 80% nuclear wont break the bank. Finland reckons its the cheapest alterntaive bar none. Areva reactors are overpriced at the moment, but they are not the only game in town. But even at worst case prices the Areva reactor still knocks wind/solar+ backup into the tall grass. Cheapest generation is coal.,Cheapest zero carbon is nuclear. Take your pick. Renewable is neither cheap nor low carbon. Its total pants. -- Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc-ra-cy) a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers. We seem to be rushing headlong into total dependance on gas. We need coal to bridge the gap between now and when we get new nuke plants built. Time for Harry's friends to get all their objections in. Philip |
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Nuclear power
harry wrote:
On May 27, 2:23 pm, (Steve Firth) wrote: Tim Streater wrote: In article , harry wrote: One to wind TurNiP up. http://transitionculture.org/2011/03...w-nuclear-was- a-mistake-even-before-fukushima-an-open-letter-to-chris-huhne-from-alexi s-rowell/ Old but still relevent. No, old and irrelevant. Each one of these "points" is comprehensively demolished each time it's put forward. But you're too dim to notice. First claimed point "Nuclear is too expensive" That's an easy one to test: Electricity prices Italy - Electricity domestic average 22p/kWh UK - Electricity domestic average 15.5p/kWh France - Electricity domestic average 14p/kWH Nuclear Generation Italy 0 TWH/pa UK 62.1 TWH/pa France 387.8 TWH/pa Tch Much of the French nuclear plant is due for replacemant. The we'll see the true cost. Taxpayer subsidised, in debt, in danger of default. Unlike domestic solar and windpower eh. Harold? Oh no, you're telling pork pies, again, "renewables" are subsidised to the hilt and are the most expensive form of electricity, ever. If you want to end up paying 50p/unit for electricity vote for "renewables". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear..._and_economics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear...Nuclear_safety As ever links posted without comment, presumably to try to give the impression that there is a nuclear safety and an economic problem with nuclear. Using the source that it is created and edited by morons. The first link says nothing bad about the economics of nuclear power in France, so quite what you think is damning about it is a mystery. The second link tries to cast FUD on nuclear but the truth is that French nuclear incidents are notable by their absence. The ASN is simply being hyper-cautious. You might want to address the fact that coal fired power stations have emitted more radioactive material than all of the nuclear power stations in the world and all of the A-bomb tests in the world combined. But I bet you won't. I also bet you won't dare to comment on how much fossil fuel is used to create photovoltaic panels. In further confirmation that the so-called greens are lying ****bags the "Alexis Rowell" article that you linked to was published in the self-interest magazine that he edits, yet it is described as a "guest publication". A bit of honesty would have helped, don't you think[1]. [1] Yes you don't. -- Burn Hollywood burn, burn down to the ground |
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Nuclear power
"Steve Firth" wrote in message .. . harry wrote: On May 27, 2:23 pm, (Steve Firth) wrote: Tim Streater wrote: In article , harry wrote: One to wind TurNiP up. http://transitionculture.org/2011/03...w-nuclear-was- a-mistake-even-before-fukushima-an-open-letter-to-chris-huhne-from-alexi s-rowell/ Old but still relevent. No, old and irrelevant. Each one of these "points" is comprehensively demolished each time it's put forward. But you're too dim to notice. First claimed point "Nuclear is too expensive" That's an easy one to test: Electricity prices Italy - Electricity domestic average 22p/kWh UK - Electricity domestic average 15.5p/kWh France - Electricity domestic average 14p/kWH Nuclear Generation Italy 0 TWH/pa UK 62.1 TWH/pa France 387.8 TWH/pa Tch Much of the French nuclear plant is due for replacemant. The we'll see the true cost. Taxpayer subsidised, in debt, in danger of default. Unlike domestic solar and windpower eh. Harold? But that's completely irrelevant to the argument posit that the "French" nuclear price is, or in this case isn't, the achievable price in an unsubsidised world tim |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Nuclear power
On 27/05/13 21:10, tim...... wrote:
"Steve Firth" wrote in message .. . harry wrote: On May 27, 2:23 pm, (Steve Firth) wrote: Tim Streater wrote: In article , harry wrote: One to wind TurNiP up. http://transitionculture.org/2011/03...w-nuclear-was- a-mistake-even-before-fukushima-an-open-letter-to-chris-huhne-from-alexi s-rowell/ Old but still relevent. No, old and irrelevant. Each one of these "points" is comprehensively demolished each time it's put forward. But you're too dim to notice. First claimed point "Nuclear is too expensive" That's an easy one to test: Electricity prices Italy - Electricity domestic average 22p/kWh UK - Electricity domestic average 15.5p/kWh France - Electricity domestic average 14p/kWH Nuclear Generation Italy 0 TWH/pa UK 62.1 TWH/pa France 387.8 TWH/pa Tch Much of the French nuclear plant is due for replacemant. The we'll see the true cost. Taxpayer subsidised, in debt, in danger of default. Unlike domestic solar and windpower eh. Harold? But that's completely irrelevant to the argument posit that the "French" nuclear price is, or in this case isn't, the achievable price in an unsubsidised world tim government calculated cost price of nuclear was 6-8p a unit. IF you don't shut it down tax it out of existence, make owners sign in blood on massive insurance policies designed to rebuild the country from scratch if someone drops a fuel rod and decomission to a level where its less radioactive than the inside of an empty lead box after you have finished etc etc. ALL of which have been proposed by the Liberal 'democrats'. -- Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc-ra-cy) a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers. |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Nuclear power
tim...... wrote:
Unlike domestic solar and windpower eh. Harold? But Those *******s who snip all context, eh tim? -- Burn Hollywood burn, burn down to the ground |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Nuclear power
On May 27, 8:05*pm, (Steve Firth) wrote:
harry wrote: On May 27, 2:23 pm, (Steve Firth) wrote: Tim Streater wrote: In article , *harry wrote: One to wind TurNiP up. http://transitionculture.org/2011/03...w-nuclear-was- a-mistake-even-before-fukushima-an-open-letter-to-chris-huhne-from-alexi s-rowell/ Old but still relevent. No, old and irrelevant. Each one of these "points" is comprehensively demolished each time it's put forward. But you're too dim to notice.. First claimed point "Nuclear is too expensive" That's an easy one to test: Electricity prices Italy - Electricity domestic average 22p/kWh UK - Electricity domestic average 15.5p/kWh France - Electricity domestic average 14p/kWH Nuclear Generation Italy 0 TWH/pa UK * * *62.1 TWH/pa France *387.8 TWH/pa Tch Much of the French nuclear plant is due for replacemant. The we'll see the true cost. Taxpayer subsidised, in debt, in danger of default. Unlike domestic solar and windpower eh. Harold? Oh no, you're telling pork pies, again, "renewables" are subsidised to the hilt and are the most expensive form of electricity, ever. If you want to end up paying 50p/unit for electricity vote for "renewables". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear...nagement_and_e... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear...Nuclear_safety As ever links posted without comment, presumably to try to give the impression that there is a nuclear safety and an economic problem with nuclear. Using the source that it is created and edited by morons. The first link says nothing bad about the economics of nuclear power in France, so quite what you think is damning about it is a mystery. The second link tries to cast FUD on nuclear but the truth is that French nuclear incidents are notable by their absence. The ASN is simply being hyper-cautious. You might want to address the fact that coal fired power stations have emitted more radioactive material than all of the nuclear power stations in the world and all of the A-bomb tests in the world combined. But I bet you won't. I also bet you won't dare to comment on how much fossil fuel is used to create photovoltaic panels. In further confirmation that the so-called greens are lying ****bags the "Alexis Rowell" article that you linked to was published in the self-interest magazine that he edits, yet it is described as a "guest publication". A bit of honesty would have helped, don't you think[1]. [1] Yes you don't. -- Burn Hollywood burn, burn down to the ground The link says the French nuclear is subsidised to the hilt and in danger of going bust without further cash from the French taxpayer. Also much plant is old and in need of renewal. Then we'll see the true cost. Let them privatise it so it has to stand alone. EDF is haggling for government subsidies in this country re the Hinckley point project The current price paid for FIT electricity is £0.1544/Kwh and falling. http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/Sustainabili...r%202012 .pdf New nuclear power is expected to double present electricity costs. http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21839684 So spouting your usual drivel |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Nuclear power
On Mon, 27 May 2013 23:17:57 -0700, harry wrote:
The link says the French nuclear is subsidised to the hilt and in danger of going bust without further cash from the French taxpayer. Also much plant is old and in need of renewal. Then we'll see the true cost. Let them privatise it so it has to stand alone. And do the same to the renewables programmes. -- Terry Fields |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So Nuclear Power is cheap? | UK diy | |||
the UK IS doing something with nuclear power.. | UK diy | |||
OT Nuclear power and Saudi Arabia. | Home Repair | |||
A considered and sensible look at Nuclear Power | UK diy | |||
Nuclear power plant explodes | Metalworking |