Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Split threads
Any idea why yesterday we saw so many threads appearing as multiple
short threads - or individual posts - instead of nicely threaded as usual? Sure we get the odd one from time to time, but rarely lots. Current release Thunderbird, using Berlin server here. Apologies to anyone expecting nut-splitter thread... -- Rod |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Split threads
Well did the thread originally start with TOT: by any chance.
We proved a while back that most Microsoft news reading software struggles with these subject lines and can often take out the TOT: completely. Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "polygonum" wrote in message ... Any idea why yesterday we saw so many threads appearing as multiple short threads - or individual posts - instead of nicely threaded as usual? Sure we get the odd one from time to time, but rarely lots. Current release Thunderbird, using Berlin server here. Apologies to anyone expecting nut-splitter thread... -- Rod |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Split threads
Brian Gaff wrote:
Well did the thread originally start with TOT: by any chance. We proved a while back that most Microsoft news reading software struggles with these subject lines and can often take out the TOT: completely. Thunderbird doesn't split a thread just because the subject changes, it goes by the references in headers. Usually thread splitting is caused by web based usenet interfaces such as google groups. |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Split threads
On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:15:23 +0100, Brian Gaff wrote:
Well did the thread originally start with TOT: by any chance. We proved a while back that most Microsoft news reading software struggles with these subject lines and can often take out the TOT: completely. Proper software doesn't thread on the Subject: header line but on the References: one which contains all the Message-ID's of all the messages in the thread. The normal way threads get broken is by postings from Google Groups. -- Cheers Dave. |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Split threads
On 02/05/2013 09:43, Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:15:23 +0100, Brian Gaff wrote: Well did the thread originally start with TOT: by any chance. We proved a while back that most Microsoft news reading software struggles with these subject lines and can often take out the TOT: completely. Proper software doesn't thread on the Subject: header line but on the References: one which contains all the Message-ID's of all the messages in the thread. The normal way threads get broken is by postings from Google Groups. Well a lot of them were subject "Unknown blade" by various posters. But I think there were some others like "Socket set". -- Rod |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Split threads
On Thu, 02 May 2013 11:45:36 +0100, polygonum wrote:
On 02/05/2013 09:43, Dave Liquorice wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:15:23 +0100, Brian Gaff wrote: Well did the thread originally start with TOT: by any chance. We proved a while back that most Microsoft news reading software struggles with these subject lines and can often take out the TOT: completely. Proper software doesn't thread on the Subject: header line but on the References: one which contains all the Message-ID's of all the messages in the thread. The normal way threads get broken is by postings from Google Groups. Well a lot of them were subject "Unknown blade" by various posters. But I think there were some others like "Socket set". "Unknown Blade" threaded perfectly here in both Demon/Turnpike and Eternal September/Pan. |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Split threads
On 02/05/2013 12:23, Bill wrote:
On Thu, 02 May 2013 11:45:36 +0100, polygonum wrote: On 02/05/2013 09:43, Dave Liquorice wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:15:23 +0100, Brian Gaff wrote: Well did the thread originally start with TOT: by any chance. We proved a while back that most Microsoft news reading software struggles with these subject lines and can often take out the TOT: completely. Proper software doesn't thread on the Subject: header line but on the References: one which contains all the Message-ID's of all the messages in the thread. The normal way threads get broken is by postings from Google Groups. Well a lot of them were subject "Unknown blade" by various posters. But I think there were some others like "Socket set". "Unknown Blade" threaded perfectly here in both Demon/Turnpike and Eternal September/Pan. I think it might be to do with my killfile and the member of it. :-) (I think that funny things happen depending on order of arrival, killfile rule(s), etc.) Apologies for raising the issue. -- Rod |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Difference between MPT and NPT threads? | Home Repair | |||
O/T(ish) - BSP threads | UK diy | |||
More on odd threads.... | Metalworking | |||
5/16-27 threads | Metalworking | |||
Wandering threads....... | UK diy |