Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Motorised valves or multiple pumps??
Reading here of various problems with motorised valves from time to
time, I wonder if it might be better to install multiple pumps instead when I re-do my heating system. Any thoughts/experiences? Bob |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Motorised valves or multiple pumps??
In article ,
Graham. wrote: On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:59:20 +0100, Bob Minchin wrote: Reading here of various problems with motorised valves from time to time, I wonder if it might be better to install multiple pumps instead when I re-do my heating system. Any thoughts/experiences? Bob I would just steer clear of 3 port mid-position valves, the 2 port ones are reliable, and when they do fail it's the motor, and that's easy and cheap to replace. The "wet" parts of my Honeywell Motorised Valves are about 35 years old. They do fail eventually. I had to replace one, fitted in 1988, a couple of yeasr ago. The O-Ring failed resulting in a steady drip of water. -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.18 |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Motorised valves or multiple pumps??
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:59:20 +0100, Bob Minchin
wrote: Reading here of various problems with motorised valves from time to time, I wonder if it might be better to install multiple pumps instead when I re-do my heating system. Any thoughts/experiences? Bob I would just steer clear of 3 port mid-position valves, the 2 port ones are reliable, and when they do fail it's the motor, and that's easy and cheap to replace. The "wet" parts of my Honeywell Motorised Valves are about 35 years old. -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Motorised valves or multiple pumps??
On Jun 1, 4:59*pm, Bob Minchin
wrote: Reading here of various problems with motorised valves from time to time, I wonder if it *might be better to install multiple pumps instead when I re-do my heating system. Any thoughts/experiences? Bob Multiple pumps are no easier to balance than any other way of dividing the output of a heating system. In fact slightly worse, you can actually get flow reversal if one pump is shut down whilst another is running |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Motorised valves or multiple pumps??
On 01/06/2012 18:35, harry wrote:
On Jun 1, 4:59 pm, Bob wrote: Reading here of various problems with motorised valves from time to time, I wonder if it might be better to install multiple pumps instead when I re-do my heating system. Any thoughts/experiences? Bob Multiple pumps are no easier to balance than any other way of dividing the output of a heating system. In fact slightly worse, you can actually get flow reversal if one pump is shut down whilst another is running I used two pumps with a 2 boiler installation. Simply add a non-return valve for each pump. |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Motorised valves or multiple pumps??
In article , Bob Minchin
writes Reading here of various problems with motorised valves from time to time, I wonder if it might be better to install multiple pumps instead when I re-do my heating system. Any thoughts/experiences? Just thoughts but I think the risk of gravity or other spurious circulation in the pump off loop(s) is too great, it doesn't take much flow to get a rad to the just warm stage. -- fred it's a ba-na-na . . . . |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Motorised valves or multiple pumps??
On 1 Jun,
Graham. wrote: On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:59:20 +0100, Bob Minchin wrote: Reading here of various problems with motorised valves from time to time, I wonder if it might be better to install multiple pumps instead when I re-do my heating system. Any thoughts/experiences? Bob I would just steer clear of 3 port mid-position valves, the 2 port ones are reliable, and when they do fail it's the motor, and that's easy and cheap to replace. The "wet" parts of my Honeywell Motorised Valves are about 35 years old. My current system originally had 3 port valves, changed* / repaired on average every 6 months. Since modifying for 2 port valves I've only had one change in near 20 years. * Usually micro-switches. I kept a spare head and changed just the switches after the first two failures. -- B Thumbs Change lycos to yahoo to reply |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Motorised valves or multiple pumps??
On 01/06/2012 16:59, Bob Minchin wrote:
Reading here of various problems with motorised valves from time to time, I wonder if it might be better to install multiple pumps instead when I re-do my heating system. Any thoughts/experiences? Bob I wouldn't! If you have multiple zones with a single boiler, and one pump per zone - which I think is what you're suggesting - you'll need some logic to fire the boiler when one or more zones are calling for heat. This is so easy with multiple 2-port valves and a single pump. You'll also need to make sure that there's no unintended flow in zones which are nor calling for heat. A non-running pump doesn't block the flow in the way in which a closed zone valve does. Also, if your boiler needs pump over-run with a by-pass circuit, I've no idea how to implement that with multiple pumps! -- Cheers, Roger ____________ Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom checked. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CH motorised valves gripe | UK diy | |||
Motorised valves | UK diy | |||
switching motorised valves | UK diy | |||
motorised valves | UK diy | |||
Motorised valves: suppliers? | UK diy |