Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lack of maintenance is rife!
A metal railway bridge near me used to be blasted and painted every few years when I was kid - now it is flaking with rust and hasn't been touched for about 25 years. A pub garden I sat in for a pint showed that no-one had taken an interest since installing a patio heater. The slabs need power washing - the picnic tables need de-crapping and maintaining. In the toilet the push down taps either shut off immediately or rune for 10 mins. At work, no-one replaces failed light bulbs as it now needs a requisition to be completed and signed by the head of the function. It will then be fixed within the 7 day service level agreement by the people who wander past it several time a day and stand around waiting for something to do. Etc Etc Regards John |
#2
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DerbyBoy wrote:
A metal railway bridge near me used to be blasted and painted every few years when I was kid - now it is flaking with rust and hasn't been touched for about 25 years. Doesn't it get shaken off regularly by the double decker buses and artic trailers ramming it? |
#6
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:33:35 +0100, Frank Erskine
wrote: On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 22:01:02 +0100, "DerbyBoy" No-one wrote: Lack of maintenance is rife! A metal railway bridge near me used to be blasted and painted every few years when I was kid - now it is flaking with rust and hasn't been touched for about 25 years. Do It Yourself :-) Wire brush and Dettol. ;-) Derek G. -- This Looks like Finito Ruperto. |
#7
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:33:35 +0100, Frank Erskine wrote:
A metal railway bridge near me used to be blasted and painted every few years when I was kid - now it is flaking with rust and hasn't been touched for about 25 years. Road lobby starving the railways of business and goverment not being interested in maintaining the countries infrastucture. Do It Yourself :-) Ah, Camerobs "Big Society". (oo, I like that genuine typo!) -- Cheers Dave. |
#8
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim Streater wrote:
In article o.uk, "Dave Liquorice" wrote: On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:33:35 +0100, Frank Erskine wrote: A metal railway bridge near me used to be blasted and painted every few years when I was kid - now it is flaking with rust and hasn't been touched for about 25 years. Road lobby starving the railways of business and goverment not being interested in maintaining the countries infrastucture. The rail lobby is a few anoraks. The road lobby is everyone else. That's assuming either lobby can be said to exist. The railways only run because of a massive subsidy, so they are obviously using a disproportionate amount of society's resources compared to other methods of transportation. and we don't subsidise road construction, maintenance. highway patrols,. street lights, ? |
#9
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Windmill wrote:
"DerbyBoy" No-one writes: At work, no-one replaces failed light bulbs as it now needs a requisition to be completed and signed by the head of the function. It will then be fixed within the 7 day service level agreement by the people who wander past it several time a day and stand around waiting for something to do. Someone who used to teach in a small local school told me she had to sneak around after hours replacing light bulbs, because she wasn't allowed to do that and the local Council would take years to get round to it. http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2004/mar/27/uknews -- Adam |
#10
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andy Burns" wrote in message o.uk... DerbyBoy wrote: A metal railway bridge near me used to be blasted and painted every few years when I was kid - now it is flaking with rust and hasn't been touched for about 25 years. Doesn't it get shaken off regularly by the double decker buses and artic trailers ramming it? Oh yes! they had the same problem with the Forth rail bridge until the chunks started falling off from a great height and onto pedestrians, ships and vehicles, H&S were in there like an express train (ha ha) didnt take them long to start sorting it, mind you it took a few years to get it sorted they had to cover the bridge in sheets to stop it falling below. |
#11
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim Streater wrote:
That's assuming either lobby can be said to exist. The railways only run because of a massive subsidy, The largest use of the railways is rail freight which receives no public subsidy, is profitable, was why the railways were built in the first place, and is struggling to expand because of the restricted infrastructure. JGH |
#12
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Liquorice" wrote in message
ll.co.uk... On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:33:35 +0100, Frank Erskine wrote: A metal railway bridge near me used to be blasted and painted every few years when I was kid - now it is flaking with rust and hasn't been touched for about 25 years. Road lobby starving the railways of business and goverment not being interested in maintaining the countries infrastucture. Do It Yourself :-) Ah, Camerobs "Big Society". (oo, I like that genuine typo!) Camoron? Jim K |
#13
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"SS" wrote in message
... "Andy Burns" wrote in message o.uk... DerbyBoy wrote: A metal railway bridge near me used to be blasted and painted every few years when I was kid - now it is flaking with rust and hasn't been touched for about 25 years. Doesn't it get shaken off regularly by the double decker buses and artic trailers ramming it? Oh yes! they had the same problem with the Forth rail bridge until the chunks started falling off from a great height and onto pedestrians, ships and vehicles, H&S were in there like an express train (ha ha) didnt take them long to start sorting it, mind you it took a few years to get it sorted they had to cover the bridge in sheets to stop it falling below. Hopefully they did a little more than that?! Jim K |
#14
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
"ARWadsworth" wrote: Windmill wrote: "DerbyBoy" No-one writes: At work, no-one replaces failed light bulbs as it now needs a requisition to be completed and signed by the head of the function. It will then be fixed within the 7 day service level agreement by the people who wander past it several time a day and stand around waiting for something to do. Someone who used to teach in a small local school told me she had to sneak around after hours replacing light bulbs, because she wasn't allowed to do that and the local Council would take years to get round to it. http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2004/mar/27/uknews The electrician at work (large supermarket chain) told me that he is NOT allowed to change plugs on appliances, We had to get a bloke who drove an 80 mile round trip to supply a new cable for the vacuum cleaner. We sell electric plugs and in the past have taken them off the shelf, but now everything needs a risk assessment for health and saftey. -- http://www.stephen.hull.btinternet.co.uk From the Wirral Peninsula. Coach painting tips and techniques + Land Rover colour codes "Whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble". Henry Royce |
#15
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/08/2011 11:51, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Tim Streater wrote: In article o.uk, "Dave Liquorice" wrote: On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:33:35 +0100, Frank Erskine wrote: A metal railway bridge near me used to be blasted and painted every few years when I was kid - now it is flaking with rust and hasn't been touched for about 25 years. Road lobby starving the railways of business and goverment not being interested in maintaining the countries infrastucture. The rail lobby is a few anoraks. The road lobby is everyone else. That's assuming either lobby can be said to exist. The railways only run because of a massive subsidy, so they are obviously using a disproportionate amount of society's resources compared to other methods of transportation. and we don't subsidise road construction, maintenance. highway patrols,. street lights, ? Local roads, pavements, etc. are paid for from council funds and are used by everyone, be they pedestrian, cyclist or driver. Part of that money is provided from central government as grants, the rest from council tax and council charges for services. Classified roads are paid for from central government. Total spending on transport as a whole (including trains and buses) is a fraction of the tax collected from fuel and road fund license. The rest of the money goes into the general pot, part of which is going to the local roads, railways, buses, etc. So no, I would say that road construction and maintenance isn't subsidised. Highway patrols are just police, like we have everywhere else in society and street lights are of far more importance to pedestrians than drivers. SteveW |
#16
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/08/2011 12:22, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , The Natural Philosopher wrote: Tim Streater wrote: In article o.uk, "Dave Liquorice" wrote: On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:33:35 +0100, Frank Erskine wrote: A metal railway bridge near me used to be blasted and painted every few years when I was kid - now it is flaking with rust and hasn't been touched for about 25 years. Road lobby starving the railways of business and goverment not being interested in maintaining the countries infrastucture. The rail lobby is a few anoraks. The road lobby is everyone else. That's assuming either lobby can be said to exist. The railways only run because of a massive subsidy, so they are obviously using a disproportionate amount of society's resources compared to other methods of transportation. and we don't subsidise road construction, maintenance. highway patrols,. street lights, ? I thought the point of the road tax was to cover that. That is what was claimed when it was introduced. However, these days, it simply goes into central government funds. It is also about £3 billion short of what is actually spent on roads. Plus of course the various taxes on fuel. Those bring in a lot more to the central government funds. Colin Bignell |
#17
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/08/2011 13:52, J.G.Harston wrote:
Tim Streater wrote: That's assuming either lobby can be said to exist. The railways only run because of a massive subsidy, The largest use of the railways is rail freight which receives no public subsidy, is profitable, was why the railways were built in the first place, and is struggling to expand because of the restricted infrastructure. The amount of money spent on railways per 1000 tonne km carried in 2007-8 was £385.90. For roads, the figure was £48.07. Colin Bignell |
#18
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 22:20:09 +0100, Nightjar
wrote: On 03/08/2011 13:52, J.G.Harston wrote: Tim Streater wrote: That's assuming either lobby can be said to exist. The railways only run because of a massive subsidy, The largest use of the railways is rail freight which receives no public subsidy, is profitable, was why the railways were built in the first place, and is struggling to expand because of the restricted infrastructure. The amount of money spent on railways per 1000 tonne km carried in 2007-8 was £385.90. For roads, the figure was £48.07. Would you have a source for that? I believe the figures are usually expressed per million tonne/km and the the cost appears to be an order of magnitude higher than some in mainland Europe. Thanks, Nick |
#19
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 22:45:40 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote: In article , Nightjar wrote: On 03/08/2011 13:52, J.G.Harston wrote: Tim Streater wrote: That's assuming either lobby can be said to exist. The railways only run because of a massive subsidy, The largest use of the railways is rail freight which receives no public subsidy, is profitable, was why the railways were built in the first place, and is struggling to expand because of the restricted infrastructure. The amount of money spent on railways per 1000 tonne km carried in 2007-8 was £385.90. For roads, the figure was £48.07. I expect some of that goes to pay the goods train drivers who sit all day with their train in a siding in Cambridge station. Presumably waiting for a slot where their train can go south without impeding passenger traffic. I used to see these frequently from my office window. Well presumably you can't blame the drivers, who don't actually have any say in the matter... Your posting does seem to imply that they are to blame. -- Frank Erskine |
#20
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim Streater writes:
I expect some of that goes to pay the goods train drivers who sit all day with their train in a siding in Cambridge station. Presumably waiting for a slot where their train can go south without impeding passenger traffic. I used to see these frequently from my office window. And they seem to sit with a huge diesel idling and creating almost subsonic noise, noise which if you're unlucky will resonate in some room cavities and which can be oddly disturbing. -- Windmill, Use t m i l l @ O n e t e l J.R.R. Tolkien: . c o m All that is gold does not glister / Not all who wander are lost |
#21
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
wrote: The electrician at work (large supermarket chain) told me that he is NOT allowed to change plugs on appliances, We had to get a bloke who drove an 80 mile round trip to supply a new cable for the vacuum cleaner. A rule obviously written by one with no clue. What is so special about the 'got in bloke' who does the repair? -- *One of us is thinking about sex... OK, it's me. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#22
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:29:14 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote: In article , wrote: The electrician at work (large supermarket chain) told me that he is NOT allowed to change plugs on appliances, We had to get a bloke who drove an 80 mile round trip to supply a new cable for the vacuum cleaner. A rule obviously written by one with no clue. What is so special about the 'got in bloke' who does the repair? He's the Dalai Lama ? Derek G. -- This Looks like Finito Ruperto. |
#23
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , wrote: The electrician at work (large supermarket chain) told me that he is NOT allowed to change plugs on appliances, We had to get a bloke who drove an 80 mile round trip to supply a new cable for the vacuum cleaner. A rule obviously written by one with no clue. What is so special about the 'got in bloke' who does the repair? He's the guy who won the contract by being 5p per hour cheaper :-( tim |
#24
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 04/08/2011 00:43, Nick Odell wrote:
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 22:20:09 +0100, Nightjar wrote: On 03/08/2011 13:52, J.G.Harston wrote: Tim Streater wrote: That's assuming either lobby can be said to exist. The railways only run because of a massive subsidy, The largest use of the railways is rail freight which receives no public subsidy, is profitable, was why the railways were built in the first place, and is struggling to expand because of the restricted infrastructure. The amount of money spent on railways per 1000 tonne km carried in 2007-8 was £385.90. For roads, the figure was £48.07. Would you have a source for that? I believe the figures are usually expressed per million tonne/km and the the cost appears to be an order of magnitude higher than some in mainland Europe. www.taxpayersalliance.com/transportspending.pdf Page 4 Colin Bignell |
#25
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , wrote: The electrician at work (large supermarket chain) told me that he is NOT allowed to change plugs on appliances, We had to get a bloke who drove an 80 mile round trip to supply a new cable for the vacuum cleaner. A rule obviously written by one with no clue. What is so special about the 'got in bloke' who does the repair? The bloke who fixed or supplied the vacuum cleaner works for the same supermarket but I don't know in what category as he was wearing the same store uniform as everyone else and not the official electricians name or logo. Stephen. -- http://www.stephen.hull.btinternet.co.uk From the Wirral Peninsula. Coach painting tips and techniques + Land Rover colour codes "Whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble". Henry Royce |
#26
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
"tim...." wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , wrote: The electrician at work (large supermarket chain) told me that he is NOT allowed to change plugs on appliances, We had to get a bloke who drove an 80 mile round trip to supply a new cable for the vacuum cleaner. A rule obviously written by one with no clue. What is so special about the 'got in bloke' who does the repair? He's the guy who won the contract by being 5p per hour cheaper :-( tim There's truth in that statement, its all about cost cutting IMO as contracts have recently been awarded to cheaper tenders. Stephen. -- http://www.stephen.hull.btinternet.co.uk From the Wirral Peninsula. Coach painting tips and techniques + Land Rover colour codes "Whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble". Henry Royce |
#27
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#28
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... In message "tim...." wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , wrote: The electrician at work (large supermarket chain) told me that he is NOT allowed to change plugs on appliances, We had to get a bloke who drove an 80 mile round trip to supply a new cable for the vacuum cleaner. A rule obviously written by one with no clue. What is so special about the 'got in bloke' who does the repair? He's the guy who won the contract by being 5p per hour cheaper :-( tim There's truth in that statement, Oh I know there is (that's why I made it). Used to work for a company that tendered out all of its travel to the agency who offered the biggest rebate of their booking commission (when such a thing existed). Travel costs immediately when up 50% as said travel agency would only make bookings at full rack rate because rooms/flights/car-hire sold through discount channels didn't pay any commission. tim |
#29
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
Hugh - Was Invisible wrote: On 04/08/2011 17:35, wrote: In wrote: "Dave Plowman wrote in message ... In , wrote: The electrician at work (large supermarket chain) told me that he is NOT allowed to change plugs on appliances, We had to get a bloke who drove an 80 mile round trip to supply a new cable for the vacuum cleaner. A rule obviously written by one with no clue. What is so special about the 'got in bloke' who does the repair? He's the guy who won the contract by being 5p per hour cheaper :-( tim There's truth in that statement, its all about cost cutting IMO as contracts have recently been awarded to cheaper tenders. Stephen. like the school that asked for tenders for window cleaning. Accepted lowest quote without realising that it included only exterior windows. Cost them a fortune to get the inside windows done. or two plumbers talking in local pub. Savvy plumber: I got that big local authority contract by tendering at xxx per property. Naive one: I couldn't make a profit at that price. Savvy plumber: But I know that 35 percent are non-standard and I can charge what I like for those. (I used to deal with a household name civil engineering and building firm. They quoted below cost for the basic contract but had a team dealing with all the extras for unforeseen ground conditions, amendments etc.) We have the suit/bean counter guy who has come in to try and save the company money by paying him a million or some such ludicrous amount, then after a year or two he will leave the company and the aftermath. Stephen. -- http://www.stephen.hull.btinternet.co.uk From the Wirral Peninsula. Coach painting tips and techniques + Land Rover colour codes "Whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble". Henry Royce |
#30
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() We have the suit/bean counter guy who has come in to try and save the company money by paying him a million or some such ludicrous amount, then after a year or two he will leave the company and the aftermath. Stephen. "Whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble". Henry Royce .....and people believe this is a profitable business. The only profitable businesses are those that really add value by taking raw materials and producing something of higher value. Too many are getting a quick buck from creating a service need and moving it to themselves. |
#31
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:31:32 +0100, Nightjar
wrote: On 04/08/2011 00:43, Nick Odell wrote: On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 22:20:09 +0100, Nightjar wrote: On 03/08/2011 13:52, J.G.Harston wrote: Tim Streater wrote: That's assuming either lobby can be said to exist. The railways only run because of a massive subsidy, The largest use of the railways is rail freight which receives no public subsidy, is profitable, was why the railways were built in the first place, and is struggling to expand because of the restricted infrastructure. The amount of money spent on railways per 1000 tonne km carried in 2007-8 was £385.90. For roads, the figure was £48.07. Would you have a source for that? I believe the figures are usually expressed per million tonne/km and the the cost appears to be an order of magnitude higher than some in mainland Europe. www.taxpayersalliance.com/transportspending.pdf Page 4 Thanks. Makes jolly interesting reading. All the numbers in the document come from verifiable government sources. Unfortunately they are all different government sources and aren't joined up in any way. What's happened here is that the analyst has taken the total amount of taxpayer input to the railways and divided it amongst the the total number of freight tonne/kms carried and then taken the taxpayer input into roads and done the same there. Then, and quite separately and I'm sure without any intention to mislead, they have taken the same total amounts of taxpayer inputs and divided it amongst passenger/kms instead. Clearly, the whole pot can't be divided in it's entirety into freight and then divided again in its entirety into passengers so something must be wrong and I'd suggest it's all wrong. Sorry to have butted in: I was just flicking through the rant on my way to something else and those numbers gave me a vision of a goods train chugging south with the driver throwing handfuls of twenty-pound notes out of the window and since those numbers are so spectacular I guessed that something must be awry. Nick |
#32
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Snip
He's the guy who won the contract by being 5p per hour cheaper :-( There's truth in that statement, its all about cost cutting IMO as contracts have recently been awarded to cheaper tenders. like the school that asked for tenders for window cleaning. Accepted lowest quote without realising that it included only exterior windows. Cost them a fortune to get the inside windows done. You mean they didn't read the quotes properly. two plumbers talking in local pub. Savvy plumber: I got that big local authority contract by tendering at xxx per property. Naive one: I couldn't make a profit at that price. Savvy plumber: But I know that 35 percent are non-standard and I can charge what I like for those. The local authority didn't read the quote properly. And they should be writing the contract. (I used to deal with a household name civil engineering and building firm. They quoted below cost for the basic contract but had a team dealing with all the extras for unforeseen ground conditions, amendments etc.) You mean *you* didn't read the quote properly. :-) Sorry I wasn't clear. I did not contract with the company. I had other dealings with them. Making profits out of amendments etc. is or at least was pretty standard. |
#33
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 04/08/2011 23:09, Nick Odell wrote:
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:31:32 +0100, Nightjar wrote: On 04/08/2011 00:43, Nick Odell wrote: On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 22:20:09 +0100, Nightjar wrote: On 03/08/2011 13:52, J.G.Harston wrote: Tim Streater wrote: That's assuming either lobby can be said to exist. The railways only run because of a massive subsidy, The largest use of the railways is rail freight which receives no public subsidy, is profitable, was why the railways were built in the first place, and is struggling to expand because of the restricted infrastructure. The amount of money spent on railways per 1000 tonne km carried in 2007-8 was £385.90. For roads, the figure was £48.07. Would you have a source for that? I believe the figures are usually expressed per million tonne/km and the the cost appears to be an order of magnitude higher than some in mainland Europe. www.taxpayersalliance.com/transportspending.pdf Page 4 Thanks. Makes jolly interesting reading. All the numbers in the document come from verifiable government sources. Unfortunately they are all different government sources and aren't joined up in any way. What's happened here is that the analyst has taken the total amount of taxpayer input to the railways and divided it amongst the the total number of freight tonne/kms carried and then taken the taxpayer input into roads and done the same there. Then, and quite separately and I'm sure without any intention to mislead, they have taken the same total amounts of taxpayer inputs and divided it amongst passenger/kms instead. Clearly, the whole pot can't be divided in it's entirety into freight and then divided again in its entirety into passengers so something must be wrong and I'd suggest it's all wrong. I am aware of the shortcomings of the figures, as presented. I suspect, from my own problems in pinning them down, due to any hard data on how to split the expenditure accurately. However, they do show that, although road and rail get similar amounts spent on them, the expenditure on roads is significantly less per unit km carried, which makes it better value for money. Sorry to have butted in: I was just flicking through the rant on my way to something else and those numbers gave me a vision of a goods train chugging south with the driver throwing handfuls of twenty-pound notes out of the window Probably heading North, then running out of notes, given that London and the SE get the lion's share of transport expenditu http://www.campaignforhsr.com/press-...don-south-east and since those numbers are so spectacular I guessed that something must be awry. Colin Bignell |
#34
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
"DerbyBoy" No-one wrote: We have the suit/bean counter guy who has come in to try and save the company money by paying him a million or some such ludicrous amount, then after a year or two he will leave the company and the aftermath. ....and people believe this is a profitable business. The only profitable businesses are those that really add value by taking raw materials and producing something of higher value. Too many are getting a quick buck from creating a service need and moving it to themselves. Seems to be the norm now, a kind of asset stripping process. Stphen. -- http://www.stephen.hull.btinternet.co.uk From the Wirral Peninsula. Coach painting tips and techniques + Land Rover colour codes "Whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble". Henry Royce |
#35
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
Huge wrote: On 2011-08-04, wrote: We have the suit/bean counter guy who has come in to try and save the company money by paying him a million or some such ludicrous amount, then after a year or two he will leave the company and the aftermath. Ah, a bungie consultant. Or ... Q: Why are consultants like seagulls? A: Because they have big bills and hover around squawking at you, before crapping on you and flying off, leaving you with a mess. (Amusingly, while Googling for this joke, I found a firm called ... Seagull Consultants!) I like that comparison! LOL Stephen. -- http://www.stephen.hull.btinternet.co.uk From the Wirral Peninsula. Coach painting tips and techniques + Land Rover colour codes "Whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble". Henry Royce |
#36
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Derek G. wrote:
A rule obviously written by one with no clue. What is so special about the 'got in bloke' who does the repair? He's the Dalai Lama ? I've met him, he's a fairly down-to-earth bloke and does know how to change a plug. JGH |
#37
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 07/08/2011 14:01, J.G.Harston wrote:
Derek G. wrote: He's the Dalai Lama ? I've met him, he's a fairly down-to-earth bloke and does know how to change a plug. You met the Dalai Lama and talked about changing plugs??? Andy |
#38
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember Andy Champ saying something like: He's the Dalai Lama ? I've met him, he's a fairly down-to-earth bloke and does know how to change a plug. You met the Dalai Lama and talked about changing plugs??? The medieval ******** that was Tibet probably didn't have any plugs, save those in the DL's palace. |
#39
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Maintenance - lack of. | UK diy | |||
Lack of hot water | Home Repair | |||
Maintenance - lack of (a bit OT) | UK diy | |||
ON TOPIC (RANT) MidAmerican Extrusions (RANT) | Metalworking | |||
Home maintenance vs. condo maintenance | Home Repair |