Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 07 May 2010 02:45:43 +0100, Frank Erskine
wrote: On Thu, 6 May 2010 23:01:12 +0100, geoff wrote: In message , The Medway Handyman writes http://www.postsaver.co.uk/ No idea on price - and no stockist near me. OK until water gets in (which it will) and the post is permanently damp and then rots away like a good 'un The only satisfactory long-term protection process for timber is complete fungal treatment. Telegraph poles, for instance, are supposed to last at least 20 years - quite a few have lasted much longer than this. Although numerous treatment processes have been tried over the decades, the best (and probably the cheapest) has always been proper creosote, not just brushed on to the poles, but pressure/vacuum 'applied', hot, so that it gets right into the cellular core of the pole. Telegraph poles also have multiple longitudinal saw cuts around their perimeter to enable the preservative to penetrate further. |
#2
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 07 May 2010 09:41:25 +0100, Bruce wrote:
Telegraph poles also have multiple longitudinal saw cuts around their perimeter to enable the preservative to penetrate further. Can't say I've ever noticed that, at least not above ground. Spiral marks from them being turned yes but not saw cuts along the length. I have a feeling such cuts would weaken the pole anyway. Poles are vacuum treated, ie placed in a container, the air is pumped out which draws air and some moisture out of the timber. Then the treatment fluid is introduced followed by return to atmospheric pressure. The air then pushes the treatment much further into the timber if not all the way to the core. Unlike normal dipping or exterior application which really only gets to the top few mm. I can't see a real reason for requiring cuts. -- Cheers Dave. |
#3
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 07 May 2010 09:51:56 +0100 (BST), "Dave Liquorice"
wrote: On Fri, 07 May 2010 09:41:25 +0100, Bruce wrote: Telegraph poles also have multiple longitudinal saw cuts around their perimeter to enable the preservative to penetrate further. Can't say I've ever noticed that, at least not above ground. Spiral marks from them being turned yes but not saw cuts along the length. I have a feeling such cuts would weaken the pole anyway. Poles are vacuum treated, ie placed in a container, the air is pumped out which draws air and some moisture out of the timber. Then the treatment fluid is introduced followed by return to atmospheric pressure. The air then pushes the treatment much further into the timber if not all the way to the core. Unlike normal dipping or exterior application which really only gets to the top few mm. I can't see a real reason for requiring cuts. I'm sorry, I got my wires crossed. It was in a marine application, not for telegraph poles. Too little sleep. ;-) |
#4
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce wrote:
snip Telegraph poles, for instance, are supposed to last at least 20 years - quite a few have lasted much longer than this. Although numerous treatment processes have been tried over the decades, the best (and probably the cheapest) has always been proper creosote, not just brushed on to the poles, but pressure/vacuum 'applied', hot, so that it gets right into the cellular core of the pole. Telegraph poles also have multiple longitudinal saw cuts around their perimeter to enable the preservative to penetrate further. Didn't notice that when I cut up a discarded telegraph pole last year. What I did notice however was that the visible discolouration got got nowhere near the the centre of the pole. I need another section so I will take a closer look when I return to the remains. |
#5
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 07 May 2010 09:41:25 +0100, Bruce
wrote: On Fri, 07 May 2010 02:45:43 +0100, Frank Erskine wrote: On Thu, 6 May 2010 23:01:12 +0100, geoff wrote: In message , The Medway Handyman writes http://www.postsaver.co.uk/ No idea on price - and no stockist near me. OK until water gets in (which it will) and the post is permanently damp and then rots away like a good 'un The only satisfactory long-term protection process for timber is complete fungal treatment. Telegraph poles, for instance, are supposed to last at least 20 years - quite a few have lasted much longer than this. Although numerous treatment processes have been tried over the decades, the best (and probably the cheapest) has always been proper creosote, not just brushed on to the poles, but pressure/vacuum 'applied', hot, so that it gets right into the cellular core of the pole. Telegraph poles also have multiple longitudinal saw cuts around their perimeter to enable the preservative to penetrate further. I've never seen them amongst the hundreds of poles I've had dealings with. -- Frank Erskine |
#6
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Erskine wrote:
I've never seen them amongst the hundreds of poles I've had dealings with. What were they? Plumbers, plasterers? -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#7
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 07 May 2010 09:41:25 +0100, Bruce wrote:
On Fri, 07 May 2010 02:45:43 +0100, Frank Erskine wrote: On Thu, 6 May 2010 23:01:12 +0100, geoff wrote: In message , The Medway Handyman writes http://www.postsaver.co.uk/ No idea on price - and no stockist near me. OK until water gets in (which it will) and the post is permanently damp and then rots away like a good 'un The only satisfactory long-term protection process for timber is complete fungal treatment. Telegraph poles, for instance, are supposed to last at least 20 years - quite a few have lasted much longer than this. Although numerous treatment processes have been tried over the decades, the best (and probably the cheapest) has always been proper creosote, not just brushed on to the poles, but pressure/vacuum 'applied', hot, so that it gets right into the cellular core of the pole. Telegraph poles also have multiple longitudinal saw cuts I don't think so! -- The Wanderer The older I get the better I used to be! |
#8
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce wrote:
On Fri, 07 May 2010 02:45:43 +0100, Frank Erskine wrote: On Thu, 6 May 2010 23:01:12 +0100, geoff wrote: In message , The Medway Handyman writes http://www.postsaver.co.uk/ No idea on price - and no stockist near me. OK until water gets in (which it will) and the post is permanently damp and then rots away like a good 'un The only satisfactory long-term protection process for timber is complete fungal treatment. Telegraph poles, for instance, are supposed to last at least 20 years As a BT cable jointer who has to climb these things regularly, I can say that some in our area are over 40 years old and still as good as the day they were installed. - quite a few have lasted much longer than this. Although numerous treatment processes have been tried over the decades, the best (and probably the cheapest) has always been proper creosote, not just brushed on to the poles, but pressure/vacuum 'applied', hot, so that it gets right into the cellular core of the pole. Telegraph poles also have multiple longitudinal saw cuts around their perimeter to enable the preservative to penetrate further. Having worked in conjunction with the PEU (Pole Erection Unit) guys on many ocassions, I can categorically say that that is utter rubbish - they have no saw cuts anywhere. |
#9
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 May, 09:41, Bruce wrote:
On Fri, 07 May 2010 02:45:43 +0100, Frank Erskine wrote: On Thu, 6 May 2010 23:01:12 +0100, geoff wrote: In message , The Medway Handyman writes http://www.postsaver.co.uk/ No idea on price - and no stockist near me. OK until water gets in (which it will) and the post is permanently damp and then rots away like a good 'un The only satisfactory long-term protection process for timber is complete fungal treatment. Telegraph poles, for instance, are supposed to last at least 20 years - quite a few have lasted much longer than this. Although numerous treatment processes have been tried over the decades, the best (and probably the cheapest) has always been proper creosote, not just brushed on to the poles, but pressure/vacuum 'applied', hot, so that it gets right into the cellular core of the pole. Telegraph poles also have multiple longitudinal saw cuts around their perimeter to enable the preservative to penetrate further. eh? I've never seen any - and there's plenty of retired poles in use around here.... JimK |
#10
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce" wrote in message ... Telegraph poles also have multiple longitudinal saw cuts around their perimeter to enable the preservative to penetrate further. One other fundamental addition to the poles is the metal 'cap' which prevents water penetrating the end grain. many posts start splitting at top due to water getting into end grain ... |
#11
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 7 May 2010 14:12:17 +0100, Rick Hughes wrote:
"Bruce" wrote in message ... Telegraph poles also have multiple longitudinal saw cuts around their perimeter to enable the preservative to penetrate further. One other fundamental addition to the poles is the metal 'cap' which prevents water penetrating the end grain. many posts start splitting at top due to water getting into end grain ... Went out decades ago..... For them as may be interested, BBH are a major supplier of wood poles. http://www.bbhpreservingwood.co.uk/ -- The Wanderer Everyone brings happiness. Some as they arrive, others as they leave. |
#12
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Wanderer wrote:
For them as may be interested, BBH are a major supplier of wood poles. http://www.bbhpreservingwood.co.uk/ There's always plenty of creosote fumes coming off huge stacks of poles on the outskirts of Boston http://tinyurl.com/poles-streetview http://www.caldersandgrandidge.com |
#13
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Rick Hughes" writes: One other fundamental addition to the poles is the metal 'cap' which prevents water penetrating the end grain. The ones around my parents, which are at least 55 years old and still look fine, used to have rather ornate giant onion-shaped caps. About 20 years ago, BT came round and took all the caps off. My guess is that one had fallen off somewhere and they decided the liability was too high. I imagine they were a very heavy lump of cast iron. -- Andrew Gabriel [email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup] |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Water Heater Flushing: Good idea or bad idea? | Home Repair | |||
Good Idea - Bad Idea | Metalworking | |||
Good Idea | Home Repair | |||
Good/Bad Idea | Metalworking | |||
Well it seemed like a good idea... | Woodturning |