Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Steel Bath - Equipotential Bonding versus RDBOs
Hi all, On Friday I will be fitting a new bath which for reasons unrelated to this thread (well, not entirely I suppose) will be made of steel. Our bathroom currently has no equipotential bonding, and I am aware that in order to comply with the regs I will either need to install equipotential bonding or upgrade my installation to meet the 17th edition regs. Now, I'm aware that there is probably more to the 17th Edition than simply sticking some RCBOs in my CU, but I was wondering if that would be enough to nagate the need for me to install equipotential bonding. At the moment, my CU is a split load that consists of the following (please bear in mind it's a small terraced house): RCD Side Whole house sockets (ring) Kitchen Sockets (ring) Oven (radial) Immersion Heater (radial) Non-RCD side Upstairs lighting (including bathroom fan) Downstairs lighting Now, I understand the dangers of putting either of the lighting circuits on the RCD side, but what if I replced them with RCBOs? Would this be enough to not require equipotential bonding as there would be no circuits in the house without RCD protection. Any thoughts/opinions welcomed. Thanks, Richard. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Equipotential bonding in practice | UK diy | |||
Equipotential bonding in bathrroms | UK diy | |||
equipotential bonding - is this right? | UK diy | |||
Equipotential bonding | UK diy | |||
Equipotential bonding in bathroom | UK diy |