Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Take a look at.
http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0272.JPG This was perhaps the most dangerous piece of gas fitting I have directly seen to date. What was really concerning was that the bayonet had become unlatched and was just the grip of a sticky O-ring away from a very large escape of gas. A Riddor will be submitted. There may be an investigation... -- Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. The FAQ for uk.diy is at http://www.diyfaq.org.uk Gas fitting FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/GasFitting.html Sealed CH FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/SealedCH.html Choosing a Boiler FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/BoilerChoice.html |
#2
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Sirett wrote:
Take a look at. http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0272.JPG This was perhaps the most dangerous piece of gas fitting I have directly seen to date. What was really concerning was that the bayonet had become unlatched and was just the grip of a sticky O-ring away from a very large escape of gas. If the bayonet connector is on that end, what have they got on the other end of the flexible pipe? -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#3
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:55:12 +0000, John Rumm wrote:
Ed Sirett wrote: Take a look at. http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0272.JPG This was perhaps the most dangerous piece of gas fitting I have directly seen to date. What was really concerning was that the bayonet had become unlatched and was just the grip of a sticky O-ring away from a very large escape of gas. If the bayonet connector is on that end, what have they got on the other end of the flexible pipe? The other end which is 1/2" male went into an (unsecured) wall plate elbow. -- Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. The FAQ for uk.diy is at http://www.diyfaq.org.uk Gas fitting FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/GasFitting.html Sealed CH FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/SealedCH.html Choosing a Boiler FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/BoilerChoice.html |
#4
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Sirett coughed up some electrons that declared:
Take a look at. http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0272.JPG This was perhaps the most dangerous piece of gas fitting I have directly seen to date. What was really concerning was that the bayonet had become unlatched and was just the grip of a sticky O-ring away from a very large escape of gas. A Riddor will be submitted. There may be an investigation... Wonder if the same person makes mains extension leads with plugs on both ends... Given the number of adaptors in the picture, and the fact that he wasn't short of PTFE, what do you think possessed him to not just screw the other end of the hose on to the appliance in the first place? Is there any indication if it's paid for work or diy'er on crack? Tim |
#5
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:42:16 +0000, Tim S wrote:
Ed Sirett coughed up some electrons that declared: Take a look at. http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0272.JPG This was perhaps the most dangerous piece of gas fitting I have directly seen to date. What was really concerning was that the bayonet had become unlatched and was just the grip of a sticky O-ring away from a very large escape of gas. A Riddor will be submitted. There may be an investigation... Wonder if the same person makes mains extension leads with plugs on both ends... Given the number of adaptors in the picture, and the fact that he wasn't short of PTFE, what do you think possessed him to not just screw the other end of the hose on to the appliance in the first place? Is there any indication if it's paid for work or diy'er on crack? Unregistered builder/kitchen fitters. -- Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. The FAQ for uk.diy is at http://www.diyfaq.org.uk Gas fitting FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/GasFitting.html Sealed CH FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/SealedCH.html Choosing a Boiler FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/BoilerChoice.html |
#6
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Ed Sirett wrote: Given the number of adaptors in the picture, and the fact that he wasn't short of PTFE, what do you think possessed him to not just screw the other end of the hose on to the appliance in the first place? Is there any indication if it's paid for work or diy'er on crack? Unregistered builder/kitchen fitters. Makes you wonder how many of the wall cabinets stayed up... -- *You never really learn to swear until you learn to drive * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#7
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Ed Sirett wrote: Given the number of adaptors in the picture, and the fact that he wasn't short of PTFE, what do you think possessed him to not just screw the other end of the hose on to the appliance in the first place? Is there any indication if it's paid for work or diy'er on crack? Unregistered builder/kitchen fitters. Makes you wonder how many of the wall cabinets stayed up... nailed securely to a gas pipe probably... -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#8
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Sirett coughed up some electrons that declared:
Unregistered builder/kitchen fitters. Hope the book gets thrown at them... And there's me who worries about doing gas work because I'm not sure which flux is correct (ie not going to eat the pipe away in 5 years[1]) or if jointing compound should be used in certain cases... [1] I might as well ask now it's come up - is Fluxite (old fashioned brown stuff) considered gas safe, together with a 60/40 solder? Cheers Tim |
#9
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim S wrote:
is Fluxite (old fashioned brown stuff) considered gas safe It was certainly the stuff that dad used to "liberate" from EMGAS stock for plumbing at home. |
#10
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:04:14 +0000, Tim S wrote:
[1] I might as well ask now it's come up - is Fluxite (old fashioned brown stuff) considered gas safe, together with a 60/40 solder? No! [throws book :-)] It must be heat-activated flux like LaCo and Fernox stuff - should say on the tin that it's OK for gas work. AIUI the idea is that the flux is only corrosive (necessary to cut through crap on the surface to wet the metal with solder) when it's hot, so when it cools down any that's run inside the joint doesn't corrode the pipe from the inside (since of course you can't flush out your gas pipework as you can with water services[1]. For the same reason you must apply flux to the pipe only, and not inside the fitting. And electrical solder would be out simply because it's not approved for gas work. All sounds very pedantic and arse-covering, I know, but as I hope you see there is method in at least some of the madness. I had to walk away from fitting a hob this week because it didn't have the manufacturer's instructions (or even a data plate) and was missing any fixing clamps. According to the customer (who'd bought it on the interweb) the MIs (which he's getting the seller to send) say that the hob is secured by the sealing strips. Sounds dodgy to me, but if that's what it says in the MIs then that's OK. However if I'd fitted it like that in the absence of instructions to that effect and there'd been any comeback I'd have had the book thrown at me. And why would there be any comeback? I don't know, but it can happen for unexpected reasons. I put a boiler in for someone in a flat and I ran the gas pipe at high level on a wall outside the flat to get into it. Some busybody in the residents' association took it upon themselves to winge about it to the freeholder's managing agents who got it inspected by another installer who covered his own arse by flagging up some sleeving where the pipework went through the wall as Not to Current Standards since (as he explained to me) he couldn't identify the material used for the sleeve so couldn't be sure it complied with the regs. I ended up spending about half a day chasing up that installer, writing to the agents, explaining the situation to the customer and so on. [1] Don't even think of it: how are you going to dry it out? And be sure it's dried out? -- John Stumbles -- http://yaph.co.uk I can't stand intolerance |
#11
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
YAPH wrote:
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:04:14 +0000, Tim S wrote: is Fluxite (old fashioned brown stuff) considered gas safe No! That seems at odds with this http://www.fernox.com/?cccpage=fluxite&sub=5 "UKWBF listed, used and approved by British Gas" heat-activated flux like LaCo That's certainly my choice these days. |
#12
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
YAPH coughed up some electrons that declared:
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:04:14 +0000, Tim S wrote: [1] I might as well ask now it's come up - is Fluxite (old fashioned brown stuff) considered gas safe, together with a 60/40 solder? No! [throws book :-)] It must be heat-activated flux like LaCo and Fernox stuff - should say on the tin that it's OK for gas work. AIUI the idea is that the flux is only corrosive (necessary to cut through crap on the surface to wet the metal with solder) when it's hot, so when it cools down any that's run inside the joint doesn't corrode the pipe from the inside (since of course you can't flush out your gas pipework as you can with water services[1]. For the same reason you must apply flux to the pipe only, and not inside the fitting. And electrical solder would be out simply because it's not approved for gas work. Cool - thanks for that. I'd read varying descriptions of whether Fluxite was OK or not, but nothing definitive. The only reason I thought of it was I still use it with 60/40 wet work and I'm fairly sure I'd seen it used with gas in the 70's. But I can see that a heat activated flux is sure not to cause problems. Cheers Tim |
#13
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
YAPH wrote: It must be heat-activated flux like LaCo and Fernox stuff - should say on the tin that it's OK for gas work. AIUI the idea is that the flux is only corrosive (necessary to cut through crap on the surface to wet the metal with solder) when it's hot, so when it cools down any that's run inside the joint doesn't corrode the pipe from the inside (since of course you can't flush out your gas pipework as you can with water services[1]. It's interesting that some seem to have invented the everlasting chemical reaction? Usually any residual corrosion caused by excess flux will come to an end long before it eats through the pipe. Even extremely corrosive active flux types only used on water pipes don't seem to etch in very far if not wiped off. Over many many years. -- *If at first you do succeed, try not to look too astonished. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#14
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
YAPH wrote:
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:04:14 +0000, Tim S wrote: [1] I might as well ask now it's come up - is Fluxite (old fashioned brown stuff) considered gas safe, together with a 60/40 solder? No! [throws book :-)] It must be heat-activated flux like LaCo and Fernox stuff - should say on the tin that it's OK for gas work. AIUI the idea is that the flux is only "Must" or "preferred"? I have always used Fry metals Powerflow which claims to be suitable for Gas[1], but I was not aware of that being heat activated particularly - its mildly acidic and certainly cleans copper on contact. (the residue if left on the outside of a pipe will usually encourage verdigris, but does not seem to etch or corrode the copper even after time). BES description is "Paste flux for copper and brass fittings for water, heating and gas services. British Gas plc, WRc plc approved." For the same reason you must apply flux to the pipe only, and not inside the fitting. Never really found that necessary in other circumstances either. Perhaps because I keep my spare fittings nice and clean in a box or bag... And electrical solder would be out simply because it's not approved for gas work. I assume that Tim probably meant 40/60 (ish) rather than 60/40 eutectic. (I did have to use electronics solder once in an emergency to repair a hot water connection to a basin - its surprising how much 26 AWG you need for a pipe joint compared to the more typical gauges intended for plumbing) -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#15
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 11:59:57 +0000, YAPH wrote:
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:04:14 +0000, Tim S wrote: [1] I might as well ask now it's come up - is Fluxite (old fashioned brown stuff) considered gas safe, together with a 60/40 solder? No! [throws book :-)] It must be heat-activated flux like LaCo and Fernox stuff - should say on the tin that it's OK for gas work. AIUI the idea is that the flux is only corrosive (necessary to cut through crap on the surface to wet the metal with solder) when it's hot, so when it cools down any that's run inside the joint doesn't corrode the pipe from the inside (since of course you can't flush out your gas pipework as you can with water services[1]. For the same reason you must apply flux to the pipe only, and not inside the fitting. And electrical solder would be out simply because it's not approved for gas work. All sounds very pedantic and arse-covering, I know, but as I hope you see there is method in at least some of the madness. I had to walk away from fitting a hob this week because it didn't have the manufacturer's instructions (or even a data plate) and was missing any fixing clamps. According to the customer (who'd bought it on the interweb) the MIs (which he's getting the seller to send) say that the hob is secured by the sealing strips. Sounds dodgy to me, but if that's what it says in the MIs then that's OK. However if I'd fitted it like that in the absence of instructions to that effect and there'd been any comeback I'd have had the book thrown at me. And why would there be any comeback? I don't know, but it can happen for unexpected reasons. I put a boiler in for someone in a flat and I ran the gas pipe at high level on a wall outside the flat to get into it. Some busybody in the residents' association took it upon themselves to winge about it to the freeholder's managing agents who got it inspected by another installer who covered his own arse by flagging up some sleeving where the pipework went through the wall as Not to Current Standards since (as he explained to me) he couldn't identify the material used for the sleeve so couldn't be sure it complied with the regs. I ended up spending about half a day chasing up that installer, writing to the agents, explaining the situation to the customer and so on. Thatis a mattwer of how you interpret the phrase in the regs that says "[the sleeving] must be of a material capable of carrying gas". A strict interpretation would be that the sleeve must be steel or copper. A looser interpretation would be that the sleeve must be a material that COULD carry gas but MIGHT not be used for that purpose. -- Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. The FAQ for uk.diy is at http://www.diyfaq.org.uk Gas fitting FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/GasFitting.html Sealed CH FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/SealedCH.html Choosing a Boiler FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/BoilerChoice.html |
#16
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
YAPH coughed up some electrons that declared:
some sleeving where the pipework went through the wall as Not to Current Standards since (as he explained to me) he couldn't identify the material used for the sleeve so couldn't be sure it complied with the regs. Silly question: the sleeving isn't there to carry gas, but rather to protect the pipe surely? Cheers Tim |
#17
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "YAPH" wrote in message ... I had to walk away from fitting a hob this week because it didn't have the manufacturer's instructions (or even a data plate) and was missing any fixing clamps. According to the customer (who'd bought it on the interweb) the MIs (which he's getting the seller to send) say that the hob is secured by the sealing strips. Sounds dodgy to me, but if that's what it says in the MIs then that's OK. It sounds so dodgy that I wouldn't have bought it let alone fixed it if it didn't have a mechanical fixing. However if I'd fitted it like that in the absence of instructions to that effect and there'd been any comeback I'd have had the book thrown at me. Even if you follow the instructions there is still a duty of care on your part. |
#18
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed Sirett" wrote in message ... Take a look at. http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0272.JPG This was perhaps the most dangerous piece of gas fitting I have directly seen to date. What was really concerning was that the bayonet had become unlatched and was just the grip of a sticky O-ring away from a very large escape of gas. A Riddor will be submitted. There may be an investigation... Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. Oh my God !!! As John Rumm has asked. What is holding the other end of the flexible tubing? I suppose this was an unofficial installation? Surely, it must be. And for the sake of a quarter turn, it could have been a lovely disaster. Thankfully, in a way, it is on an appliance that does not move about much. It wouldn't be anywhere near Wigan, would it? |
#19
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BigWallop wrote:
"Ed Sirett" wrote in message ... Take a look at. http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0272.JPG This was perhaps the most dangerous piece of gas fitting I have directly seen to date. What was really concerning was that the bayonet had become unlatched and was just the grip of a sticky O-ring away from a very large escape of gas. A Riddor will be submitted. There may be an investigation... Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. Oh my God !!! As John Rumm has asked. What is holding the other end of the flexible tubing? I suppose this was an unofficial installation? Surely, it must be. And for the sake of a quarter turn, it could have been a lovely disaster. Thankfully, in a way, it is on an appliance that does not move about much. It wouldn't be anywhere near Wigan, would it? Speaking of which: "The massive explosion which tore through a block of Wigan flats WAS caused by gas. Fire investigators are satisfied that the blast at Blake Close, Worsley Mesnes, was due to an escape of gas in the flat. The source of the escape and its cause has not been determined but the fire department's findings have been reported to Greater Manchester Police, who are carrying out their own investigations. A spokesman for Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue said: "We can confirm that the blast was caused by a leakage of gas, ignited by a source within the premises. "The fire investigation has been conducted and police have been briefed on the findings."" http://www.wigantoday.net/wigannews/Leaking-gas-caused-flats-explosion.4766485.jp (It feels like Have I Got News For You, quoting from obscure publications with vaguely amusing titles.) I guess a digital camera has become an essential tool for gas fitters - and probably many others - these days? -- Rod Hypothyroidism is a seriously debilitating condition with an insidious onset. Although common it frequently goes undiagnosed. www.thyromind.info www.thyroiduk.org www.altsupportthyroid.org |
#20
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:41:08 +0000, Rod wrote:
I guess a digital camera has become an essential tool for gas fitters - and probably many others - these days? Since several have asked - the other end. http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0273.JPG The "Gas Installer" has a section call "Eye Spy" which publishes the most staggering examples of creative gas use. If selected they give prizes like combustion analysers or locking pipe carriers. -- Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. The FAQ for uk.diy is at http://www.diyfaq.org.uk Gas fitting FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/GasFitting.html Sealed CH FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/SealedCH.html Choosing a Boiler FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/BoilerChoice.html |
#21
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Sirett wrote:
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:41:08 +0000, Rod wrote: I guess a digital camera has become an essential tool for gas fitters - and probably many others - these days? Since several have asked - the other end. http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0273.JPG Just to be sure, for the uneducated(including me!), the pipe out of the floor has the bayonet fitting at the top? So the other end of the flexi should be a straight bolt on to the pipe from the cooker? I presume all the unions/connectors used were there as they didnt have the right type of coupling to do a direct flexipipe to cooker pipe? Ta Alan. -- To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'. |
#22
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A.Lee wrote:
Ed Sirett wrote: On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:41:08 +0000, Rod wrote: I guess a digital camera has become an essential tool for gas fitters - and probably many others - these days? Since several have asked - the other end. http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0273.JPG Just to be sure, for the uneducated(including me!), the pipe out of the floor has the bayonet fitting at the top? It should have had - but as pictured it only has the wall mounting elbow (that the bayonet fitting would normally screw into) on the pipe end (and even that is rotated 90 degrees such that it could not be screwed to the wall). Our ingenious fitter has been rather creative and managed to fit the hose back to front, with the supposedly wall mounted bayonet connector on the cooker end. This means the automatic valve in the female bit of bayonet connector that would normally prevent the escape of gas from the pipe when the hose is removed, now gets removed with the cooker - leaving a flexi pipe connected direct to the house gas supply, with no way of turning it off (other than at the meter). So the other end of the flexi should be a straight bolt on to the pipe from the cooker? Yup I presume all the unions/connectors used were there as they didnt have the right type of coupling to do a direct flexipipe to cooker pipe? The other (non bayonet) end usually screws in quite nicely without the need for any titting about ;-) (The cooker will normally have a 1/2" BSP female connection that the matching taper end thread of the hose would screw into - it might be that the shiney pipe with what lookes like a male end has also been added by the creative installer to allow clearance for the bayonet connector!) Ta Alan. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#23
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed Sirett" wrote in message ... On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:41:08 +0000, Rod wrote: I guess a digital camera has become an essential tool for gas fitters - and probably many others - these days? Since several have asked - the other end. http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0273.JPG An interesting (non) use of a backplate elbow !!!! Dave |
#24
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 11:43:07 +0000, Dave wrote:
"Ed Sirett" wrote in message ... On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:41:08 +0000, Rod wrote: I guess a digital camera has become an essential tool for gas fitters - and probably many others - these days? Since several have asked - the other end. http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0273.JPG An interesting (non) use of a backplate elbow !!!! Dave In the repair I turned it 90 degrees and fixed a block behind it and screwed the plate through the block to the wall. -- Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. The FAQ for uk.diy is at http://www.diyfaq.org.uk Gas fitting FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/GasFitting.html Sealed CH FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/SealedCH.html Choosing a Boiler FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/BoilerChoice.html |
#25
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:11:48 +0000, Ed Sirett wrote:
The "Gas Installer" has a section call "Eye Spy" which publishes the most staggering examples of creative gas use. If selected they give prizes like combustion analysers or locking pipe carriers. Look forward to seeing your snapshots in there Ed! -- John Stumbles -- http://yaph.co.uk 87.5% of statistics are made up |
#26
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:57:30 +0000, BigWallop wrote:
"Ed Sirett" wrote in message ... Take a look at. http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0272.JPG This was perhaps the most dangerous piece of gas fitting I have directly seen to date. What was really concerning was that the bayonet had become unlatched and was just the grip of a sticky O-ring away from a very large escape of gas. A Riddor will be submitted. There may be an investigation... Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. Oh my God !!! As John Rumm has asked. What is holding the other end of the flexible tubing? The whole things is reversed i.e. Bayonet is on cooker and plain end on supply (instead of bayonet elbow). I suppose this was an unofficial installation? Surely, it must be. And for the sake of a quarter turn, it could have been a lovely disaster. Thankfully, in a way, it is on an appliance that does not move about much. Not even the 1/4 turn just a few mm of movement held by friction of an O- ring. I got called in because the cooker had stopped because the self sealing had blocked the supply into the cooker. It wouldn't be anywhere near Wigan, would it? No, London N10. -- Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. The FAQ for uk.diy is at http://www.diyfaq.org.uk Gas fitting FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/GasFitting.html Sealed CH FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/SealedCH.html Choosing a Boiler FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/BoilerChoice.html |
#27
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed Sirett" wrote in message ... On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:57:30 +0000, BigWallop wrote: "Ed Sirett" wrote in message ... Take a look at. http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0272.JPG This was perhaps the most dangerous piece of gas fitting I have directly seen to date. What was really concerning was that the bayonet had become unlatched and was just the grip of a sticky O-ring away from a very large escape of gas. A Riddor will be submitted. There may be an investigation... Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. Oh my God !!! As John Rumm has asked. What is holding the other end of the flexible tubing? The whole things is reversed i.e. Bayonet is on cooker and plain end on supply (instead of bayonet elbow). I suppose this was an unofficial installation? Surely, it must be. And for the sake of a quarter turn, it could have been a lovely disaster. Thankfully, in a way, it is on an appliance that does not move about much. Not even the 1/4 turn just a few mm of movement held by friction of an O- ring. I got called in because the cooker had stopped because the self sealing had blocked the supply into the cooker. It wouldn't be anywhere near Wigan, would it? No, London N10. Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. It is unbelievable that this is still happening. I thought you lot talking about that Rogue Traders was just a laugh, but there really needs to be someone who can police these sorts of jobs. Not on a random basis, but have someone check it out after it's supposed to be complete. I know you CORGI guys have to self police your works, but can't you get the job of following up on any kitchen installation / renovations etc? Because that is a killer waiting to happen. As soon as I looked at the first photo' I thought, No, that can't be the back of the stove. Surely not. And now I see the second photograph of the elbow dangling in mid air, I realise that something really needs to be done about these real cowboys, before more Wigan explosions occur. The Sparks shouted about the Part P building control requirement, but I think that gas installations and alterations should also be policed in the same way now. And it's cost cutting measures that are causing this to happen. Isn't it lucky that the self seal plunger wasn't damaged. Good luck with it, by the way. And good luck with your competition entry, as well. :-) |
#28
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
BigWallop wrote: The Sparks shouted about the Part P building control requirement, but I think that gas installations and alterations should also be policed in the same way now. And it's cost cutting measures that are causing this to happen. There is no way you'll stop cowboy builders by legislation. The meja love to go on about DIY - but the vast majority of such problems are not DIY but done by someone being paid for the work. The reason is pretty simple - few would choose to live in a place where they know there's a possibility of a gas leak, etc. The cowboy builder walks away after making the mess. -- *Many people quit looking for work when they find a job * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#29
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:04:10 +0000, BigWallop wrote:
It is unbelievable that this is still happening. I thought you lot talking about that Rogue Traders was just a laugh, but there really needs to be someone who can police these sorts of jobs. Not on a random basis, but have someone check it out after it's supposed to be complete. I know you CORGI guys have to self police your works, but can't you get the job of following up on any kitchen installation / renovations etc? Because that is a killer waiting to happen. By the book, (one of) the kitchen fitters is/are meant to have a CORGI membership. If the house was rented than annual inspections are mandatory. It would almost certainly have been picked up. If we come across stuff like this we have procedures to follow if we can't fix things there and then. Finally for really serious faults like this. We are required to report them to the HSE who will try to find out who and stop them before someone else does/might get hurt. Isn't it lucky that the self seal plunger wasn't damaged. yes because if it had failed to work the cooker would have remained working until the end fell out. Good luck with it, by the way. And good luck with your competition entry, as well. :-) -- Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. The FAQ for uk.diy is at http://www.diyfaq.org.uk Gas fitting FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/GasFitting.html Sealed CH FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/SealedCH.html Choosing a Boiler FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/BoilerChoice.html |
#30
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Sirett wrote:
If the house was rented than annual inspections are mandatory. It would almost certainly have been picked up. Interesting. I had such an inspection recently, but I don't think the guy pulled the cooker out from the wall to have a look at its connection. I believe he did do a manometer leak test on the house as a whole (I wasn't looking over his shoulder noting everything he did) but AIUI the cooker you showed wasn't actually leaking yet. Pete |
#31
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Sirett coughed up some electrons that declared:
If the house was rented than annual inspections are mandatory. It would almost certainly have been picked up. I'm not so sure Ed. When I was trying to sell my late parent's house (ha!), the first thing I did was book a CORGI chap in for a Landlord's Gas Safety check plus boiler service, partly so I'd feel happy leaving it on unattended as frost protection and partly to show the buyers. For that I did get: Boiler cleaned; Flue smoke tested; I didn't get: [1]Any sort of leak test on the pipework, no manometers, just enough fairy foam to test the joints he re-assembled; No check on the cooker connection; Boiler condemned due to lazy valve (you may remember, it came up here ages ago). [1] is rather relevant because upstairs the gas pipe is in 22mm copper across notched joists just under the flooring with no iron plates, so pipe damage quite likely. It was definately a lot less thorough in scope than an electrical PIR, and I can do the latter well enough for my own purposes. Cheers Tim |
#32
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , BigWallop
wrote The Sparks shouted about the Part P building control requirement, but I think that gas installations and alterations should also be policed in the same way now. And it's cost cutting measures that are causing this to happen. Have you considered it's the price charged by a Corgi or Part P registered companies that is causing the problem in the first place? When the cost of registration is so high it leaves plenty of scope for the cowboys[1] to easily undercut the price. More regulation will not stop the problem. It only works when _everybody_ is prepared to obey the rules. Offer someone a cheaper price, cash in hand, no questions asked and there will be a lot of takers. Programs like rouge traders only go to prove that the threat of being caught out is no deterrent. They often have the same people trading under different names and even when it results in a prosecution the presenters proudly state their actions resulted in the cowboy getting a few hour of community service. [1] According to the Corgi site, even their officially registered members should be treated as cowboys if the are doing work 'off the book' for friends and relatives. -- Alan news2006 {at} amac {dot} f2s {dot} com |
#33
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alan" wrote in message ... In message , BigWallop wrote The Sparks shouted about the Part P building control requirement, but I think that gas installations and alterations should also be policed in the same way now. And it's cost cutting measures that are causing this to happen. Have you considered it's the price charged by a Corgi or Part P registered companies that is causing the problem in the first place? When the cost of registration is so high it leaves plenty of scope for the cowboys[1] to easily undercut the price. More regulation will not stop the problem. It only works when _everybody_ is prepared to obey the rules. Offer someone a cheaper price, cash in hand, no questions asked and there will be a lot of takers. Programs like rouge traders only go to prove that the threat of being caught out is no deterrent. They often have the same people trading under different names and even when it results in a prosecution the presenters proudly state their actions resulted in the cowboy getting a few hour of community service. [1] According to the Corgi site, even their officially registered members should be treated as cowboys if the are doing work 'off the book' for friends and relatives. It is CORGI registerd operatives that cannot do work do work for pay unless they are CORGI registered in their own right. -- Alan news2006 {at} amac {dot} f2s {dot} com |
#34
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BigWallop wrote:
It is unbelievable that this is still happening. I thought you lot talking about that Rogue Traders was just a laugh, but there really needs to be someone who can police these sorts of jobs. Not on a random basis, but have someone check it out after it's supposed to be complete. I know you CORGI guys have to self police your works, but can't you get the job of following up on any kitchen installation / renovations etc? Because that is a killer waiting to happen. As soon as I looked at the first photo' I thought, No, that can't be the back of the stove. Surely not. And now I see the second photograph of the elbow dangling in mid air, I realise that something really needs to be done about these real cowboys, before more Wigan explosions occur. Gosh, you sound just like a NuLabia cabinet minister ;-) The Sparks shouted about the Part P building control requirement, but I think that gas installations and alterations should also be policed in the same way now. And it's cost cutting measures that are causing this to Well think through the implications of that. Have the Part P regulations make electrical systems safer? The *rise* in deaths from electrocution that has followed would suggest not. Remember also that you can't legislate against cowboys - who almost by definition don't take any notice of legislation anyway. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#35
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:46:21 +0000, Ed Sirett wrote:
Take a look at. http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0272.JPG I can count 3 faults on that installation! -- John Stumbles -- http://yaph.co.uk What is a simile like? |
#36
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "YAPH" wrote in message ... On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:46:21 +0000, Ed Sirett wrote: Take a look at. http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0272.JPG I can count 3 faults on that installation! John Stumbles -- http://yaph.co.uk The bit that is getting me, is that all the correct parts are there, but in the wrong place and order. How and why? :-) |
#37
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:52:52 +0000, BigWallop wrote:
"YAPH" wrote in message ... On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:46:21 +0000, Ed Sirett wrote: Take a look at. http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0272.JPG I can count 3 faults on that installation! John Stumbles -- http://yaph.co.uk The bit that is getting me, is that all the correct parts are there, but in the wrong place and order. How and why? :-) Because all the joints are 1/2" BSP. And because the original installed did not know the right order. I had a one fitting over [1] after correcting it all, (including removing the water PTFE tape). The order I left them in was: 1) Wall plate elbow now secured to the wall. 2) The bayonet socket (open end downwards). 3) The hose, unstrained U-shape. 4) The 1/2" Barrel. 5) The 1/2" Taper male to internal flat face coupling. I used Hawk White to seal everything. [1] A 1/2" male iron to 15mm compression elbow being used as a 1/2" male- male elbow. -- Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. The FAQ for uk.diy is at http://www.diyfaq.org.uk Gas fitting FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/GasFitting.html Sealed CH FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/SealedCH.html Choosing a Boiler FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/BoilerChoice.html |
#38
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:52:52 +0000, BigWallop wrote:
The bit that is getting me, is that all the correct parts are there, but in the wrong place and order. How and why? :-) Eric: I'm playing the right notes. But not necessarily in the right order! -- John Stumbles 87.5% of statistics are made up |
#39
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
YAPH coughed up some electrons that declared:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:46:21 +0000, Ed Sirett wrote: Take a look at. http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/HNTphotos/100_0272.JPG I can count 3 faults on that installation! Please do tell ![]() My uneducated list would be: a) The wrong way round hose, obviously b) The unsecured pipe at the other end as previously mentioned c) But what's c? Is it that the weight of the gas hose will have a tendency to undo the connection on the back of the cooker; or the other end being jointed with what looks like hemp and green compound? Looking forward to finding out ![]() Cheers Tim |
#40
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim S wrote:
c) But what's c? No isolating valve? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT - New One piece Bearings versus two piece style | Metalworking | |||
Toilet questions- 1 piece versus 2 piece toilets | Home Ownership |