Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Open Letter to Prof. Andrew George, University of DENVER, Dept ofPhysics, COLORADO, 80208 USA.
Open Letter to Prof. Andrew George, University of DENVER, Dept of
Physics, COLORADO, 80208 USA. Ref. Einstein’s Sep 1905 derivation predicts that, ‘When body emits Light Energy, its Mass must also Increase’. Abstract To draw scientific conclusions, the knowledge of the paper/topic and basic aspects of science is necessary. But it has not been so in Prof Andrew George’s comments regarding Ajay Sharma’s work on Einstein’s Sep. 1905 paper in the published in Galilean Electrodynamics. Ajay Sharma has confirmed in various publications that Einstein’s Sep. 1905 derivation contradicts law of conservation of matter under some conditions. This aspect is justified here. Under certain condition Einstein’s Sep 1905 derivation predicts Mass after emission (Ma) = Mass before emission (Mb) + (0.04L/10c –L/ c2) (1) Here ( 0.04L/10c –L/c2 ) is positive quantity. Hence ‘When light energy is EMITTED, mass of body must also INCREASE ’ Which is NOT justified. For complete 4 page article vist http://www.mrelativity.net/Default.htm or Email |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Attn: Sales Dept - Purchasing Dept - MIS Dept - IT Dept - | Electronics | |||
OT - An Open Letter | Metalworking | |||
An open letter to Shirley and Jonathan Cuff | Woodturning | |||
OT- Open Letter to John Kerry: | Metalworking |