Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Which is cheaper?
Is it cheaper to keep my CH on low all day, 8am-8pm, so that it is kept on a
low temp or is it better to have it on full blast 2 hours am and two pm. I am just wondering which is the most cost effective way of keeping the house warm. As I have a special needs daughter the house needs to be fairly warm. thanks |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Which is cheaper?
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:46:10 -0000, "BarryTaylor"
wrote: Is it cheaper to keep my CH on low all day, 8am-8pm, so that it is kept on a low temp or is it better to have it on full blast 2 hours am and two pm. I am just wondering which is the most cost effective way of keeping the house warm. As I have a special needs daughter the house needs to be fairly warm. thanks It's cheaper to insulate fully before twiddling with the thermostat and controls. If daughter needs to be warm then letting the house get cold when she's in it and awake isn't a good idea. -- http://www.orderonlinepickupinstore.co.uk Ah fetch it yourself if you can't wait for delivery http://www.freedeliveryuk.co.uk Or get it delivered for free |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Which is cheaper?
On 19 Dec, 22:04, Mogga wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:46:10 -0000, "BarryTaylor" wrote: Is it cheaper to keep my CH on low all day, 8am-8pm, so that it is kept on a low temp or is it better to have it on full blast 2 hours am and two pm. I am just wondering which is the most cost effective way of keeping the house warm. As I have a special needs daughter the house needs to be fairly warm. thanks It's cheaper to insulate fully before twiddling with the thermostat and controls. If daughter needs to be warm then letting the house get cold when she's in it and awake isn't a good idea. --http://www.orderonlinepickupinstore.co.uk Ah fetch it yourself if you can't wait for deliveryhttp://www.freedeliveryuk.co.uk Or get it delivered for free Barry - that is not a fair question to ask this forum. We cannot make the judgement, nor is it fair to ask our advise in the circumstances you state. You must take the advise of the authorities that have identified your daughter as being special needs and whether she needs to have constant temperature or not. The reason I say this is that 'special needs' does cover a wide range of disability and it is only with that information that an opinion can be passed - and with all due respect, there would need to be a specialist with that area of knowledge on this forum to be able to assist you. Rob |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Which is cheaper?
Barry - that is not a fair question to ask this forum. We cannot make
the judgement, nor is it fair to ask our advise in the circumstances you state. You must take the advise of the authorities that have identified your daughter as being special needs and whether she needs to have constant temperature or not. The reason I say this is that 'special needs' does cover a wide range of disability and it is only with that information that an opinion can be passed - and with all due respect, there would need to be a specialist with that area of knowledge on this forum to be able to assist you. Rob Seconded. As a general principle, if you switch off heating when you don't need it you will use less energy. You will all be more comfortable the longer the heating is on, but it will cost more. I don't think I would be going for "short, sharp blasts" here, I'd be draft proofing, insulating, keeping internal doors shut, and perhaps dropping the thermostat a degree or two to make savings. |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Which is cheaper?
In message
, robgraham writes On 19 Dec, 22:04, Mogga wrote: On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:46:10 -0000, "BarryTaylor" wrote: Is it cheaper to keep my CH on low all day, 8am-8pm, so that it is kept on a low temp or is it better to have it on full blast 2 hours am and two pm. I am just wondering which is the most cost effective way of keeping the house warm. As I have a special needs daughter the house needs to be fairly warm. thanks It's cheaper to insulate fully before twiddling with the thermostat and controls. If daughter needs to be warm then letting the house get cold when she's in it and awake isn't a good idea. --http://www.orderonlinepickupinstore.co.uk Ah fetch it yourself if you can't wait for deliveryhttp://www.freedeliveryuk.co.uk Or get it delivered for free Barry - that is not a fair question to ask this forum. Why not ? It was a fairly simple question, giving a bit of background as to why I think that the answer is that, since keeping his daughter comfortable is prolly the most important consideration, on all day is prolly the only way to go On twice would be cheaper -- geoff |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Which is cheaper?
As I have a special needs daughter the house needs to be fairly warm.
Have you looked into seeing if any grants are available, or assistance with energy efficiency measures such as cavity wall insulation ? http://www.eaga.co.uk http://www.energysavingtrust.org.uk/...energy_saving_ grants_and_offers http://www.warmfront.co.uk/do-i-qualify.htm |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Which is cheaper?
"BarryTaylor" wrote in message ... Is it cheaper to keep my CH on low all day, 8am-8pm, so that it is kept on a low temp or is it better to have it on full blast 2 hours am and two pm. I am just wondering which is the most cost effective way of keeping the house warm. As I have a special needs daughter the house needs to be fairly warm. thanks And you can't work that out for yourself? I was about to tell you about the many benefits you could claim, including for heating and insulation - but you probably wouldn't do anything about it. I can't believe there are so many thick people about. What did you do before newsgroups? How did you survive. |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Which is cheaper?
Ian wrote:
"BarryTaylor" wrote in message ... Is it cheaper to keep my CH on low all day, 8am-8pm, so that it is kept on a low temp or is it better to have it on full blast 2 hours am and two pm. I am just wondering which is the most cost effective way of keeping the house warm. As I have a special needs daughter the house needs to be fairly warm. thanks And you can't work that out for yourself? I was about to tell you about the many benefits you could claim, including for heating and insulation - but you probably wouldn't do anything about it. I can't believe there are so many thick people about. What did you do before newsgroups? How did you survive. Given that the guy's specifically asking about costs, not how to heat his house effectively (which I agree would be a no-brainer), I think your reply is totally unwarranted. David |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Which is cheaper?
Ian wrote:
"BarryTaylor" wrote in message ... Is it cheaper to keep my CH on low all day, 8am-8pm, so that it is kept on a low temp or is it better to have it on full blast 2 hours am and two pm. I am just wondering which is the most cost effective way of keeping the house warm. As I have a special needs daughter the house needs to be fairly warm. thanks And you can't work that out for yourself? I was about to tell you about the many benefits you could claim, including for heating and insulation - but you probably wouldn't do anything about it. I can't believe there are so many thick people about. What did you do before newsgroups? How did you survive. Here is the great thing about newsgroups. He asks a specific question, but you want to tell him about something different and then make assumptions that he is useless, thick and inept. 90% of the time people do not provide enough information in the original question to provide the compete answer, and people have to make certain assumptions, but you are stretching things. There is nothing wrong with asking about it, there is something wrong with jumping to wild conclusions based upon so little information. |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Which is cheaper?
On Dec 20, 1:18 am, "Ian" wrote:
"BarryTaylor" wrote in message ... Is it cheaper to keep my CH on low all day, 8am-8pm, so that it is kept on a low temp or is it better to have it on full blast 2 hours am and two pm. I am just wondering which is the most cost effective way of keeping the house warm. As I have a special needs daughter the house needs to be fairly warm. thanks And you can't work that out for yourself? I was about to tell you about the many benefits you could claim, How many do you claim? I'd like to know how my hard earned tax payments are being spent. including for heating and insulation - but you probably wouldn't do anything about it. I can't believe there are so many thick people about. Just look in the mirror. What did you do before newsgroups? How did you survive. What about you? MBQ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Which is cheaper to run? | UK diy | |||
cheaper lumber than HD? | Home Repair | |||
Is gas still cheaper than electric in CT? | Home Ownership | |||
Cheaper SDS - any good? | UK diy | |||
Cheaper SDS - any good? | UK diy |