Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I own a property that together with 15 other properties has a property
management company to manage general communal maintenance and ensure that restrictive covenants are adhered to; the company was apparently set up by the developers and passed onto the residents. My problem is that the directors are running concerns like a club, they unfairly interpret the covenants, and they do not correspond when asked reasonable questions about the company. They now as a result of a couple of residents having a reasonable dispute with the company over personal bullying and simple plans to develop loft spaces as has been done successfully by other residents within the covenants, wish to alter the articles of association / the covenants to give the Directors greater powers. Is this acceptable if ALL shareholders do not agree? I believe they are pulling the wool over certain elderly residents who believe that they are acting in good faith and don't wish to rock the boat. Further, during meetings the minutes do not follow accurately events and agreements made within the meeting; can audio recordings be imposed for reference to be held by the company secretary? To date residents have employed solicitors to attempt to resolve with little or no progress, the company simply tries to wear down the resident into moving if they don't fit in with the two directors. Gerard |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
the irs on gains from casualty and theft | Home Ownership | |||
Mild fence property line "dispute" | Home Ownership | |||
OT Guns more Guns | Metalworking | |||
NH property value assessed HOW? | Home Ownership |