Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
Just an idea. Is there much involved in PAT testing? I'm vaguely thinking of offering it as a service to the 200+ business's on a local estate - if I can earn a few bob doing so. Testers seem to be available for around £250 with a basic pass/fail function. Do I need to be certified? (you know what I mean :-) ) -- Dave The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk 01634 717930 07850 597257 |
#2
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "The Medway Handyman" wrote in message .uk... Hi Just an idea. Is there much involved in PAT testing? I'm vaguely thinking of offering it as a service to the 200+ business's on a local estate - if I can earn a few bob doing so. Testers seem to be available for around £250 with a basic pass/fail function. Do I need to be certified? (you know what I mean :-) ) -- Dave The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk 01634 717930 07850 597257 You definitely need proof of competency, the tester itself needs calibration regularly. If you want to test everything then you need to spend a lot more than 250 quid. Indemnity against mistakes and good record keeping are needed too. Most businesses use a firm that comes in and tests everything, the usual sort of fee is three pounds per item. So my guess is it would be a hard way to get a living. Mrcheerful (recently did a PAT course) |
#3
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Medway Handyman wrote:
Hi Just an idea. Is there much involved in PAT testing? I'm vaguely thinking of offering it as a service to the 200+ business's on a local estate - if I can earn a few bob doing so. Testers seem to be available for around £250 with a basic pass/fail function. Do I need to be certified? (you know what I mean :-) ) Yes, you should definitely have certification if offering as a professional service. It's a C&G 2377-002. I did mine the other month - it's not hard [1] and is a 1 day course via the IET and a short exam on a subsequent day. You should not use a pass/go tester (these are for people to do a quick verification on equipment) - you need to record *actual* numbers on the inspection sheet (so future inspectors can see if there are any trends developing). Here's a pointer (other course providers are available): http://www.iee.org/Events/Courses/Short/cg2_gen.cfm Look at something more like a Seaward Europa or at least something that is fully functional. Testers with computer hook ups or accessories to print labels and forms will save time but are not essential. Public liability insurance would be advisable (in case someone trips over you while you are on their premises - that sort of thing). Cheers Tim [1] Not hard, but you *need* the bloke to go through it as some stuff is not obvious until you've heard it. |
#4
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The Medway Handyman wrote: Hi Just an idea. Is there much involved in PAT testing? I'm vaguely thinking of offering it as a service to the 200+ business's on a local estate - if I can earn a few bob doing so. Testers seem to be available for around £250 with a basic pass/fail function. Do I need to be certified? (you know what I mean :-) ) I did a PAT (not a PAT testing) course a few years ago at work and it was a piece of ****, a waste of two days. If I were wanting to set myself up as you do I think that I would teach myself and just take the exam. I think you need to spend about £400 for a reasonable tester though in practice 90% of faults are found on visual inspection - frayed cords and wrong fuses. I think that a Go/NOGO tester is perfectly adequate but the full tester with results entered into a form will make the customer feel that he is getting a more professional service :-) The whole process is as much about record keeping as about technology.. Another thing to consider is your attitude to failed appliances. A lot of customers will expect you to repair the failed appliance. Whilst that isn't practical for major failures, being prepared to change a fuse or replace the plug mcould give you an advantages over competitors who stick to the "you only pay for the testing" line. And you will get irrate customers who just don't believe that grandads old reading lamp can possible be unsafe. |
#5
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The message
from "mrcheerful ." contains these words: So my guess is it would be a hard way to get a living. One of the teaching assistants at the kids' school does their PAT testing. Turned out to be cheaper than outsourcing it - she's appropriately qualified and IIRC uses suitably calibrated equipment loaned as a favour to the school by someone. -- Skipweasel Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. |
#6
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The message
from Tim S contains these words: [1] Not hard, but you *need* the bloke to go through it as some stuff is not obvious until you've heard it. Out of interest - are you supposed to take the backs of such plugs as you can and check the security of the terminal screws? Checking the fuse value make sense, of course, and while you're at it checking nothing's loose would make sense. -- Skipweasel Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. |
#7
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The message .com
from "dcbwhaley" contains these words: And you will get irrate customers who just don't believe that grandads old reading lamp can possible be unsafe. I don't suppose there are many situations in which Grandad's old reading lamp would get tested in the first place. -- Skipweasel Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. |
#8
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Medway Handyman wrote:
Just an idea. Is there much involved in PAT testing? Start by buying a copy of the definitive book: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Practice-Ser...460993-9212442 -- Andy |
#9
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Medway Handyman wrote:
Hi Just an idea. Is there much involved in PAT testing? I'm vaguely thinking of offering it as a service to the 200+ business's on a local estate - if I can earn a few bob doing so. PAT testing where I work seems to be little more than a visual inspection. In a previous existence, I was sure that someone occasionally put a megger across input sockets on some of our computer servers, but that was stopped after some expensive kit was damaged ;-) I expect that some "proper" testing should and does take place, depending on the type of equipment. We can wait weeks for someone to make up and PAT test a 13A trailing lead, or I can walk into any local supermarket and buy one, but I am not supposed to use it at work until the PAT guy has eyeballed it and affixed his sticker. Modesty prevents me from saying whether my time is expensive enough that we actually take the unapproved route or not... [Frankly, anyone on minimum wage would be wasting company money if they had to wait !] -- "Next time you wave, use ALL of your fingers!!" |
#10
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() [1] Not hard, but you *need* the bloke to go through it as some stuff is not obvious until you've heard it. Can you give us some examples of the not obvious stuff? |
#11
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guy King wrote:
The message from Tim S contains these words: [1] Not hard, but you *need* the bloke to go through it as some stuff is [not obvious until you've heard it. Out of interest - are you supposed to take the backs of such plugs as you can and check the security of the terminal screws? Checking the fuse value make sense, of course, and while you're at it checking nothing's loose would make sense. Yes, and to check the fuse is ASTA compliant too. Cheers Tim |
#12
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I expect that some "proper" testing should and does take place,
depending on the type of equipment. We can wait weeks for someone to make up and PAT test a 13A trailing lead, or I can walk into any local supermarket and buy one, but I am not supposed to use it at work until the PAT guy has eyeballed it and affixed his sticker. Technically, I thought you didn't need to PAT test new stuff in its first year. Christian. |
#13
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Nov 7, 4:34 pm, "John Laird" wrote: The Medway Handyman wrote: Hi Just an idea. Is there much involved in PAT testing? I'm vaguely thinking of offering it as a service to the 200+ business's on a local estate - if I can earn a few bob doing so.PAT testing where I work seems to be little more than a visual inspection. In a previous existence, I was sure that someone occasionally put a megger across input sockets on some of our computer servers, but that was stopped after some expensive kit was damaged ;-) I expect that some "proper" testing should and does take place, depending on the type of equipment. We can wait weeks for someone to make up and PAT test a 13A trailing lead, or I can walk into any local supermarket and buy one, but I am not supposed to use it at work until the PAT guy has eyeballed it and affixed his sticker. Modesty prevents Whenever I've come across PAT testing, there is no requirement for PAT testing of brand new items. MBQ |
#14
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#16
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Tim S writes: Yes, you should definitely have certification if offering as a professional service. It's a C&G 2377-002. I did mine the other month - it's not hard [1] and is a 1 day course via the IET and a short exam on a subsequent day. You should not use a pass/go tester (these are for people to do a quick verification on equipment) - you need to record *actual* numbers on the inspection sheet (so future inspectors can see if there are any trends developing). Here's a pointer (other course providers are available): http://www.iee.org/Events/Courses/Short/cg2_gen.cfm I did 2377-001 and 2377-002 at a local technical college for a quarter of the price IEE charge for just one of them. Public liability insurance would be advisable (in case someone trips over you while you are on their premises - that sort of thing). Another problem you'll find is a number of companies will insist you belong to NICEIC in order to do PAT testing but won't care about you being 2377-002 qualified. This is completely wrong, but it will still be a problem for you. -- Andrew Gabriel |
#17
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Christian McArdle" writes: I expect that some "proper" testing should and does take place, depending on the type of equipment. We can wait weeks for someone to make up and PAT test a 13A trailing lead, or I can walk into any local supermarket and buy one, but I am not supposed to use it at work until the PAT guy has eyeballed it and affixed his sticker. Technically, I thought you didn't need to PAT test new stuff in its first year. There are no hard and fast rules, just guidelines. You can start off using the guidelines, but you should modify those in the light of your experience, e.g. if you are picking up failures, then you may need to increase testing frequency, and conversely if you aren't ever finding problems, you could use this to justify decreasing the testing frequency if you have appropriate record keeping to show this. The testing period for different things in different situations varies enormously, from some things almost never needing testing, through to other things requiring daily testing (e.g. a fairground ride). So you can't claim a blanket no need to test new items for a year. -- Andrew Gabriel |
#18
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , mrcheerful
.. writes "The Medway Handyman" wrote in message o.uk... Hi Just an idea. Is there much involved in PAT testing? I'm vaguely thinking of offering it as a service to the 200+ business's on a local estate - if I can earn a few bob doing so. Testers seem to be available for around £250 with a basic pass/fail function. Do I need to be certified? (you know what I mean :-) ) -- Dave The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk 01634 717930 07850 597257 You definitely need proof of competency, the tester itself needs calibration regularly. If you want to test everything then you need to spend a lot more than 250 quid. Indemnity against mistakes and good record keeping are needed too. Most businesses use a firm that comes in and tests everything, the usual sort of fee is three pounds per item. So my guess is it would be a hard way to get a living. Mrcheerful (recently did a PAT course) Did you get a PAT on the back ? -- geoff |
#19
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owain wrote:
There is no *requirement* for PATing full stop under H&SAWA (AFAIK) It's in the Electricity at Work Regulations 1989: 4(2) As may be necessary to prevent danger, all systems shall be maintained so as to prevent, so far as is reasonably practicable, such danger. -- Andy |
#20
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andy Wade" wrote in message ... Owain wrote: There is no *requirement* for PATing full stop under H&SAWA (AFAIK) It's in the Electricity at Work Regulations 1989: 4(2) As may be necessary to prevent danger, all systems shall be maintained so as to prevent, so far as is reasonably practicable, such danger. Nothing in that paragraph says you have to do PATs to achieve compliance. A PAT is one way to demonstrate that you have taken steps to comply with the regulation, but it is not the only way and it is not even applicable to some equipment covered by that regulation. Colin Bignell |
#21
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owain wrote:
Andy Wade wrote: Owain wrote: There is no *requirement* for PATing full stop under H&SAWA (AFAIK) It's in the Electricity at Work Regulations 1989: Which IIRC are delegated legislation under H&SAWA 4(2) As may be necessary to prevent danger, all systems shall be maintained so as to prevent, so far as is reasonably practicable, such danger. Yup, I still don't see the magic words "Portable Appliance Testing with a PAT Meter"... Owain Quite right. The conclusion at my course was that PAT testing is not required specifically under any legislation, but no-one can really think of a better way of satisfying "due care" etc. any other way, in the general case. In other words, PAT testing is not required verbatim but it's still the best way currently to meet the safety requirements. At my previous job we did catch the odd (1 in several thousand) pre-moulded IEC leads where the earth was not up to scratch, when it was a brand new lead - which is why our stuff was tested from new. The other reason it was tested on the way in was to get it on the books, thus knowing when the next due test was. That is over the top for many sites, but for us it was a suitable procedure that worked. PAT testing and visual inspections should be applied sensibly according to the site and conditions - that was drummed into us on the course. In my view, for a small site, there's more to be said for training the other staff to visually inspect their own kit on a frequent basis with reasonable frequencies of formal inspections. Where that is not reliable (too many staff, staff have cat-like attitudes etc), then it's more sensible to bring in a stronger by-the-book frequent regime of formal inspections and testing. Cheers Tim |
#22
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nightjar nightjar@ wrote:
Nothing in that paragraph says you have to do PATs to achieve compliance. A PAT is one way to demonstrate that you have taken steps to comply with the regulation, but it is not the only way and it is not even applicable to some equipment covered by that regulation. Fair comment, but what other method(s) do you think would satisfy the HSE, in the context of small appliances? I take it as read that "PAT testing" is interpreted as set out in the IEE code of practice - i.e. with as much, in fact more, emphasis on the inspection as on the testing. Are any other options set out in the HSE's Memorandum of guidance on the EAWR (a publication I'll admit to not being very familiar with)? -- Andy |
#23
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andy Wade" wrote in message ... nightjar nightjar@ wrote: Nothing in that paragraph says you have to do PATs to achieve compliance. A PAT is one way to demonstrate that you have taken steps to comply with the regulation, but it is not the only way and it is not even applicable to some equipment covered by that regulation. Fair comment, but what other method(s) do you think would satisfy the HSE, in the context of small appliances? Over the decades, I have never come across a factory inspector who took the least interest in portable appliances. They occasionally show an interest in the wiring of 3-phase machinery, but have always been happy with a look at the risk assessment file and the information that I worked in the Engineering Department of an Electricity Board and take personal responsibility for regular inspections. Things might be different if they saw anything untoward with any wiring though and the situation might change as the book learning inspectors replace the hands-on ones. .... Are any other options set out in the HSE's Memorandum of guidance on the EAWR (a publication I'll admit to not being very familiar with)? Long time since I opened that. Colin Bignell |
#24
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The Medway Handyman wrote: Just an idea. Is there much involved in PAT testing? Yes, a shedload of marketing work. If you can land yourself a regular gig with a local college / large office etc. then you're laughing. Otherwise it's a near full-time job to bring in enough work to keep you busy. There are plenty of "PAT test specialists" around these days, which usually means a clueless herbert with a logoed-up car (or huge 4x4, oddly) and the idiot's manual clenched firmly in the other hand. OTOH, the tester is affordable and the two relevant courses are cheap and commonplace at any tech college. A trained monkey can do them. One of the faults of PAT testing is that it's dumbed down so that chimps can indeed cope. I would hate the idea of "being a PAT tester" all day. If you're already trotting around suitable premises (i.e. moderately large commercial, as no-one else bothers) then it could be a useful profit-making sideline to a more interesting job. Do the sums first though, and see just how much you could expect to make. Record rip-off I've seen so far was £20 / item being charged to small traders for testing by the "official" testing provider for the market. Now that deal just _stank_ of back-handers. |
#26
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The Medway Handyman wrote: Not sure if £3 per item is that profitable? Well it worked for McDonalds! £3 is profitable provided that costs are low and volume is high. This means that: * You're only doing simple PAT testing (any mis-fitted plugs or blown fuses have to be chargeable repairs, not just done as freebies). * You're doing each test quickly and cheaply. It's a box of cables presented to you, not a walk through a whole building spending 10 minutes hunting each one down. * A "customer" isn't just a visit to test one kettle, it's either a shop walk-in with it, or it's a useful volume at each site you visit. "Useful" might vary, depending on if you're already going there anyway. (today's office has about 150 visible PAT-testables that I can see). |
#27
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
* A "customer" isn't just a visit to test one kettle, it's either a shop walk-in with it, or it's a useful volume at each site you visit. "Useful" might vary, depending on if you're already going there anyway. (today's office has about 150 visible PAT-testables that I can see). Wow! 150? That would be well worth doing at £3 each if I,m on site anyway. Food for thought............. -- Dave The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk 01634 717930 07850 597257 |
#28
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"Andy Dingley " writes: means that: * You're only doing simple PAT testing (any mis-fitted plugs or blown fuses have to be chargeable repairs, not just done as freebies). * You're doing each test quickly and cheaply. It's a box of cables presented to you, not a walk through a whole building spending 10 minutes hunting each one down. You really should walk to the appliance. Part of the test is to ensure it's suitable for the purpose and the environment. You might find nothing wrong with a hot air stripper, but if you actually see it's being used as a hair drier, that's a PAT test failure. There are lots of possibilities for appliances which are not appropriately robust for the usage, e.g. a domestic kettle which is in constant use by an office of 100 people, and is either going to break before the next PAT test, or is going to need PAT testing far more often than the employer is prepared to undertake, in which case it needs replacing with a commercial one which is designed for that usage. You won't see this unless you see where it's used. -- Andrew Gabriel |
#29
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , The Medway
Handyman writes wrote: * A "customer" isn't just a visit to test one kettle, it's either a shop walk-in with it, or it's a useful volume at each site you visit. "Useful" might vary, depending on if you're already going there anyway. (today's office has about 150 visible PAT-testables that I can see). Wow! 150? That would be well worth doing at £3 each if I,m on site anyway. Food for thought............. When we had our electronics development lab done earlier this year, 6 benches used by 3 Engineers, I think we had over 150 items. Took the kid doing the testing about 2 hours. Yes it was a joke. Several items should not have passed really, but did. Money for old rope, ISTR about 1.20 or 1.50 an item. BTW, whats the general rule on detachable power leads? We had them tested as separate items, as they get swapped between gear all the time. -- steve |
#30
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The message
from Owain contains these words: If you have to go round all the offices and wait for Sharrun to save her file before she lets you crawl under her desk to find the plug for her peecee, no. Depends whether Sharrun has a nice arse or not. -- Skipweasel Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. |
#31
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-11-10 03:34:12 +0000, Guy King said:
The message from Owain contains these words: If you have to go round all the offices and wait for Sharrun to save her file before she lets you crawl under her desk to find the plug for her peecee, no. Depends whether Sharrun has a nice arse or not. I think you're confusing her with Traycaayy...... |
#32
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Andrew Gabriel wrote: You really should walk to the appliance. Part of the test is to ensure it's suitable for the purpose and the environment. That much is OK - what I was talking about was the open-ended invitation to PAT test two dozen appliances (exact serial numbers listed, all of them must be tested), but with no indication as to where they are. If you can find it, you can test it. If you can't find it, you've soon lost your £3. |
#33
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Nov 8, 11:21 pm, "The Medway Handyman" wrote: wrote: I would hate the idea of "being a PAT tester" all day.Me too If you're already trotting around suitable premises (i.e. moderately large commercial, as no-one else bothers) then it could be a useful profit-making sideline to a more interesting job.That was the idea, I'm moving towards doing more commercial stuff because there is a large industrial estate a few miles away with 400 business's on it and I can mail them very cheaply. Do the sums first though, and see just how much you could expect to make.Not sure if £3 per item is that profitable? If it's an office full of PCs on desks then you can also offer the telephone handset, keyboard and mouse cleaning service at the same time. MBQ |
#34
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy Hall wrote:
On 2006-11-10 03:34:12 +0000, Guy King said: The message from Owain contains these words: If you have to go round all the offices and wait for Sharrun to save her file before she lets you crawl under her desk to find the plug for her peecee, no. Depends whether Sharrun has a nice arse or not. I think you're confusing her with Traycaayy...... Easily done around here - Chatham is the Chav capital of the UK :-) Next generation will be called Chardonnay-Mercedes and Megan-Storm :-) -- Dave The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk 01634 717930 07850 597257 |
#35
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The message k
from "The Medway Handyman" contains these words: Next generation will be called Chardonnay-Mercedes and Megan-Storm :-) There's a small girl round here called Armani. How's that for aspirational naming? -- Skipweasel Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. |
#36
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:12:30 UTC, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote: Andy Hall wrote: On 2006-11-10 03:34:12 +0000, Guy King said: The message from Owain contains these words: If you have to go round all the offices and wait for Sharrun to save her file before she lets you crawl under her desk to find the plug for her peecee, no. Depends whether Sharrun has a nice arse or not. I think you're confusing her with Traycaayy...... Easily done around here - Chatham is the Chav capital of the UK :-) Next generation will be called Chardonnay-Mercedes and Megan-Storm :-) And that's only the boys....! When you get to the summer holidays, you can do an article on outdoor games. e.g. go to Shorne Woods, cut down some trees, take them to Rochester Bridge and play Pooh Sticks! Lots of stuff on trimming and shaping for best effect.... -- The information contained in this post is copyright the poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by Avenue Supplies, http://avenuesupplies.co.uk |
#37
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Owain
writes The Medway Handyman wrote: Not sure if £3 per item is that profitable? If they bring them to you in one room, possibly. If you have to go round all the offices and wait for Sharrun to save her file before she lets you crawl under her desk to find the plug for her peecee, no. Her peecee ? never heard it called that before -- geoff |
#38
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Bob Eager
writes On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:12:30 UTC, "The Medway Handyman" wrote: Andy Hall wrote: On 2006-11-10 03:34:12 +0000, Guy King said: The message from Owain contains these words: If you have to go round all the offices and wait for Sharrun to save her file before she lets you crawl under her desk to find the plug for her peecee, no. Depends whether Sharrun has a nice arse or not. I think you're confusing her with Traycaayy...... Easily done around here - Chatham is the Chav capital of the UK :-) Next generation will be called Chardonnay-Mercedes and Megan-Storm :-) And that's only the boys....! When you get to the summer holidays, you can do an article on outdoor games. e.g. go to Shorne Woods, cut down some trees, take them to Rochester Bridge and play Pooh Sticks! Lots of stuff on trimming and shaping for best effect.... Or watching the local intelligentsia setting fire to a litter bin down the side of Sainsburys Oh what fun it was watching the fire brigade putting it out -- geoff |
#39
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:12:30 GMT, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote: Andy Hall wrote: On 2006-11-10 03:34:12 +0000, Guy King said: The message from Owain contains these words: If you have to go round all the offices and wait for Sharrun to save her file before she lets you crawl under her desk to find the plug for her peecee, no. Depends whether Sharrun has a nice arse or not. I think you're confusing her with Traycaayy...... Easily done around here - Chatham is the Chav capital of the UK :-) Next generation will be called Chardonnay-Mercedes and Megan-Storm :-) Or Demi-Marie. -- Frank Erskine |
#40
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:34:03 +0000, Frank Erskine
wrote: Easily done around here - Chatham is the Chav capital of the UK :-) Next generation will be called Chardonnay-Mercedes and Megan-Storm :-) Or Demi-Marie. Or even : Bain-Marie or Demi-Glace DG |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pardon Lottery | Metalworking | |||
Safely testing 22 kV capacitors | Metalworking | |||
Cost of electrical testing | UK diy | |||
How much to charge for elec testing? | UK diy | |||
Laws requiring portable appliance testing and electrical installation testing if any? | UK diy |