UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default Siting a Shed - Building Regs

I want to put a shed in the garden. Just a small one, probably about
6' by 8'. As far as I can make out such a structure would be exempt
from building control under schedule 2 - Exempt building and work. It
would appear to come under class VI - small detached buildings. The
relevant section stating:


CLASS VI

Small detached buildings

1. A detached single story building, having a floor area which does not
exceed 30m2, which contains no sleeping accommodation and is a
building-
(a) no point of which is less than one metre from the boundary of its
curtilage; or
(b) which is constructed substantially of non-combustible material.

2. A detached building designed and intended to shelter people from the
effects of nuclear, chemical or conventional weapons, and not used for
any other purpose, if-
(a) its floor area does not exceed 30m2; and
(b) the excavation for the building is no closer to any exposed part of
another building or structure than a distance equal to the depth of the
excavation plus one metre.

3. A detached building, having a floor area which does not exceed 15m2,
which contains no sleeping accommodation


A 6' x 8' shed would therefore come under subsection 3, being a
detached building with a floor area of less than 15m^2. If it comes
under subsection 3 then there is no restriction on location. Of course
it also matches the description of subsection 1, a detached building
with a floor area of less than 30m^2. If it comes under subsection 1
then it must be at least 1m from a boundary unless it is constructed of
non-combustible material. The person that I spoke to in the local
building control office thought that this was the case but couldn't
say what, if anything, then came under subsection 3. If that is the
case then as far as I can see subsection 3 is irrelevant. The guidance
notes from the ODPM are no more helpful.

Has anyone on this newsgroup come across this before or can anyone shed
[sic] any light on it? I would really prefer to place it near the
boundary, my neighbour has no objection, and would prefer not to have
to go for a metal storage solution.

Many Thanks,

Andrew


Oh, and before anyone asks it is most definitely not intended to
shelter people from the effects of a nuclear attack, just store a
lawnmower and bikes.

  #2   Report Post  
Christian McArdle
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Has anyone on this newsgroup come across this before or can anyone shed
[sic] any light on it? I would really prefer to place it near the
boundary, my neighbour has no objection, and would prefer not to have
to go for a metal storage solution.


Yes, you can put a wooden garden shed next to the fence, just like the
approximately 15 million or so similarly located such buildings.

Christian.


  #3   Report Post  
Phil L
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:
:: I want to put a shed in the garden. Just a small one, probably
:: about 6' by 8'. As far as I can make out such a structure would be
:: exempt from building control under schedule 2 - Exempt building
:: and work. It would appear to come under class VI - small detached
:: buildings. The relevant section stating:
::
::
:: CLASS VI
::
:: Small detached buildings
::
:: 1. A detached single story building, having a floor area which
:: does not exceed 30m2, which contains no sleeping accommodation and
:: is a building-
:: (a) no point of which is less than one metre from the boundary of
:: its curtilage; or
:: (b) which is constructed substantially of non-combustible material.
::
:: 2. A detached building designed and intended to shelter people
:: from the effects of nuclear, chemical or conventional weapons, and
:: not used for any other purpose, if-
:: (a) its floor area does not exceed 30m2; and
:: (b) the excavation for the building is no closer to any exposed
:: part of another building or structure than a distance equal to the
:: depth of the excavation plus one metre.
::
:: 3. A detached building, having a floor area which does not exceed
:: 15m2, which contains no sleeping accommodation
::
::
:: A 6' x 8' shed would therefore come under subsection 3, being a
:: detached building with a floor area of less than 15m^2. If it comes
:: under subsection 3 then there is no restriction on location. Of
:: course it also matches the description of subsection 1, a detached
:: building with a floor area of less than 30m^2. If it comes under
:: subsection 1 then it must be at least 1m from a boundary unless it
:: is constructed of non-combustible material. The person that I
:: spoke to in the local building control office thought that this
:: was the case but couldn't say what, if anything, then came under
:: subsection 3. If that is the case then as far as I can see
:: subsection 3 is irrelevant. The guidance notes from the ODPM are
:: no more helpful.
::
:: Has anyone on this newsgroup come across this before or can anyone
:: shed [sic] any light on it? I would really prefer to place it near
:: the boundary, my neighbour has no objection, and would prefer not
:: to have to go for a metal storage solution.
::
:: Many Thanks,
::
:: Andrew
::
::
:: Oh, and before anyone asks it is most definitely not intended to
:: shelter people from the effects of a nuclear attack, just store a
:: lawnmower and bikes.

If it's a timber shed, then you can put it where you like, if it's a brick
built single skinned shed, then it has to go at least 1 metre from your
boundary fence.

Building regulations don't cover temporary structures like sheds,
greenhouses or wendy houses, this is why they are called *building* regs,
anything else can be taken down and shifted.

--
If God had intended us to drink beer, He would have given us stomachs.


  #4   Report Post  
Chris J Dixon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Phil L wrote:

wrote:
:: I want to put a shed in the garden. Just a small one, probably
:: about 6' by 8'. As far as I can make out such a structure would be
:: exempt from building control under schedule 2 - Exempt building
:: and work. It would appear to come under class VI - small detached
:: buildings. The relevant section stating:
::
:: CLASS VI
::
:: Small detached buildings
::
:: 1. A detached single story building, having a floor area which
:: does not exceed 30m2, which contains no sleeping accommodation and
:: is a building-
:: (a) no point of which is less than one metre from the boundary of
:: its curtilage; or
:: (b) which is constructed substantially of non-combustible material.
::
If it's a timber shed, then you can put it where you like, if it's a brick
built single skinned shed, then it has to go at least 1 metre from your
boundary fence.

That seems to be exactly the opposite of what section 1 above
states.

However, as has already been said, there are many millions of
wooden sheds sited in such a way.

Chris
--
Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK


Have dancing shoes, will ceilidh.
  #7   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Class IV discusses exemptions for 'temporary buildings' and that is
defined as any building which is not intended to remain where erected
for more than 28 days. I hope my shed will last al little longer than
that :-)

Andrew

  #8   Report Post  
John Anderton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 21:45:02 GMT, "Phil L"
wrote:

::
a wooden
shed requires no building regulations, plans or anything else.


Not according to my local planners and building control department.

If it's big enough to exceed the planning/building control limits then
it needs planning permission/to conform to building regs.

Cheers,

John
  #9   Report Post  
John Anderton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 20:57:01 GMT, "Phil L"
wrote:


If it's a timber shed, then you can put it where you like, if it's a brick
built single skinned shed, then it has to go at least 1 metre from your
boundary fence.


Nope. If it's a shed of any material smaller than 10 cubic metres in
external volume (i.e. about 6' x 8') then (barring weird covenants)
you can put it where you like as long as it's not closer to the road
than your house

If it's higher than 4 metres (with a pitched roof or 3 metres without)
or covers more than 50% of the garden (in conjunction with all other
sheds etc.) or is bigger than 10 cubic metres and is within 5 metres
of the house the you need planning permission (see here :
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1995/Uks...4.htm#IDARND3D Class
E) and, as stated higher up the thread if it's really big (greater
than 15 square metres floor area) building regs kick in.

Building regulations don't cover temporary structures like sheds,
greenhouses or wendy houses, this is why they are called *building* regs,
anything else can be taken down and shifted.


Nice theory but wrong. Building regs and planning regs do cover sheds
and wendy houses over certain limits (which most sheds and wendy
houses don't exceed)

Cheers,

John
  #10   Report Post  
Mike
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Anderton" wrote in message
...

Nope. If it's a shed of any material smaller than 10 cubic metres in
external volume (i.e. about 6' x 8') then (barring weird covenants ...


or living in a conservation area or National park ...

you can put it where you like as long as it's not closer to the road
than your house





  #11   Report Post  
John Anderton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:40:53 +0100, "Mike" wrote:


"John Anderton" wrote in message
.. .

Nope. If it's a shed of any material smaller than 10 cubic metres in
external volume (i.e. about 6' x 8') then (barring weird covenants ...


or living in a conservation area or National park ...

you can put it where you like as long as it's not closer to the road
than your house


I don't know about National parks but certainly in the conservation
area I live in anything under 10 cubic metres is still OK,

Cheers,

John
  #12   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Christian McArdle wrote:
Of course it also matches the description of subsection 1, a
detached building with a floor area of less than 30m^2.


P.S. There's no "of course" about it. The proposed building is not described
under subsection 1, as subsection 1 defines a building of less than 30m2
that is either far from the boundary or non-combustible. As it is
combustible and within 1m of the boundary, it fails to meet the description
and subsection 1 is not applicable.


There is some confusion about all this. Particularly about the
relationship between planning permission and building regulations. The
crossover seems to vary between councils. Pop along to
http://www.grantham-online.co.uk/planning/need.asp and click on
"Buildings or Enclosures". That suggests you can cover half the
garden in sheds if you want. There is no mention of the 1m rule.

But then if you telephone the planners (not the building inspectors) at
the same council, you get a different answer. AFAIK around here /any/
combustible building, temporary or otherwise, has to be at least a
metre from the boundary. But you don't get that in writing, oh dear me
no.

  #13   Report Post  
John Anderton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 4 Jun 2005 09:31:00 -0700, wrote:

There is some confusion about all this. Particularly about the
relationship between planning permission and building regulations. The
crossover seems to vary between councils. Pop along to
http://www.grantham-online.co.uk/planning/need.asp and click on
"Buildings or Enclosures". That suggests you can cover half the
garden in sheds if you want. There is no mention of the 1m rule.

But then if you telephone the planners (not the building inspectors) at
the same council, you get a different answer. AFAIK around here /any/
combustible building, temporary or otherwise, has to be at least a
metre from the boundary. But you don't get that in writing, oh dear me
no.


It sounds suspiciously like your planners have difficulty reading
legal documents. It's not uncommon, I've met at least one who didn't
seem able to comprehend a simple sentence in an HMSO document. OTOH
I've also met several very knowledgable and helpful planners, you win
some, you lose some,

Cheers,

John
  #14   Report Post  
Christian McArdle
 
Posts: n/a
Default

But then if you telephone the planners (not the building inspectors) at
the same council, you get a different answer. AFAIK around here /any/
combustible building, temporary or otherwise, has to be at least a
metre from the boundary. But you don't get that in writing, oh dear me
no.


Whatever their interpretation, they can do nothing about it. You are
entitled by law to do so, unless there is a conservation area or something.

If they took you to court, you'd win.

Christian.


  #15   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Christian McArdle wrote:
If they took you to court, you'd win.


I don't want to annoy them. They'll only put the council tax up by 13%
again, and reband me house two bands up...

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Building regs liability chris French UK diy 34 March 22nd 05 07:33 PM
Building Regs Submission - Best Approach Part P TheScullster UK diy 3 March 9th 05 11:13 PM
Exemption from building regs??? antz UK diy 4 January 14th 05 08:05 AM
Conservatory building regs Sapient Fridge UK diy 8 August 22nd 04 08:35 PM
Mains fire detectors. Building Regs vs manufacturer's recommendations Hugo Nebula UK diy 2 July 15th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"