wrote:
Is this carpet any good?

It's much superior to the foam-backed stuff, anyway. It is
normally glued down, but:

They say it will take hard wear but looks quite "frail".

It *will* take hard wear, but is always better over underlay.
The best underlay is the felt-type stuff, too. It'n not often
seen, but is certainly available from carpet shops other than
Carper Rote and other big retailers who are interested in
standardisation. You want 42oz I should think, probably around
=A33.5 a metre. Using underlay is much better, you won't get
"tramlines" so easily, your carpet will last longer. Felt
underlay will also outlast your carpet, unlike rubber which
is unlikely to do so. I guess your felt-backed carpet is
about =A36-7/metre, so you will be looking at about =A311/metre
overall.




__________________________________________________ ______________
Sent via the PAXemail system at paxemail.com

"jerrybuilt " ] wrote in message
...

wrote:
Is this carpet any good?

It's much superior to the foam-backed stuff, anyway. It is
normally glued down, but:

This depends upon what you mean by superior. In the flat
I am selling there is a room with a foam back and two rooms
that have just had felt back put down. The foam back is much
more comfortable to walk on.

They say it will take hard wear but looks quite "frail".

It *will* take hard wear, but is always better over underlay.

To me this defeats the object of buying felt back. Hessian
backed carpet is available at the same price as felt backed
so if you're going to underlay why buy felt backed?

Tim

The best underlay is the felt-type stuff, too. It'n not often
seen, but is certainly available from carpet shops other than
Carper Rote and other big retailers who are interested in
standardisation. You want 42oz I should think, probably around
£3.5 a metre. Using underlay is much better, you won't get
"tramlines" so easily, your carpet will last longer. Felt
underlay will also outlast your carpet, unlike rubber which
is unlikely to do so. I guess your felt-backed carpet is
about £6-7/metre, so you will be looking at about £11/metre
overall.




__________________________________________________ ______________
Sent via the PAXemail system at paxemail.com

tim wrote:

"jerrybuilt " ] wrote in message
...


wrote:
Is this carpet any good?


It's much superior to the foam-backed stuff, anyway. It is
normally glued down, but:


This depends upon what you mean by superior. In the flat
I am selling there is a room with a foam back and two rooms
that have just had felt back put down. The foam back is much
more comfortable to walk on.


They say it will take hard wear but looks quite "frail".


It *will* take hard wear, but is always better over underlay.


To me this defeats the object of buying felt back. Hessian
backed carpet is available at the same price as felt backed
so if you're going to underlay why buy felt backed?

Tim

The best underlay is the felt-type stuff, too. It'n not often
seen, but is certainly available from carpet shops other than
Carper Rote and other big retailers who are interested in
standardisation. You want 42oz I should think, probably around
£3.5 a metre. Using underlay is much better, you won't get
"tramlines" so easily, your carpet will last longer. Felt
underlay will also outlast your carpet, unlike rubber which
is unlikely to do so. I guess your felt-backed carpet is
about £6-7/metre, so you will be looking at about £11/metre
overall.




__________________________________________________ ______________
Sent via the PAXemail system at paxemail.com






Foam back might be nicer to walk on, but longevity is crap. Been here
10 years, carpet worn out after 2-3 years. It's now got no pile in the
through-ways, and is showing threads in several places. No way would I
use foam backed unless substantial underlay was also used - even then I
think I'd pay for a non-foam backing.

Velvet

wrote:
In article , Velvet
writes

Foam back might be nicer to walk on, but longevity is crap. Been here
10 years, carpet worn out after 2-3 years. It's now got no pile in the
through-ways, and is showing threads in several places. No way would I
use foam backed unless substantial underlay was also used - even then I
think I'd pay for a non-foam backing.

Velvet


You must have cheap foam backed then, as with all types there's cheap
and there's expensive, we have a mixture of hessian and foam backed, we
are/were waiting for the foam backed to wear out so we could replace it
with "something decent", eight years and still waiting, having second
thoughts about replacing it now.

Oh, almost without question the cheapest going, given it was put in by
the landlord... of course, me being a tenant, I'm not about to replace
it, and I can't see the new landlord having the money to do it any time
soon either. False economy really, though if it's normal for tenants to
destroy carpets within 5 years I can understand why they opt for the
cheapest of the cheap. Been here twice that now, but probably will
never see replacement, despite having looked after it as best I can...
*sigh*.

Sometimes it seems being a good tenant over many years leaves me worse
off than being a bad one and moving from place to place...

Velvet