Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
CAT 5e
Sorry for the basic question but what is recommended to be the
smallest advisable radius for 'fixed' cabling and also what is the advised separation distance between VHF/UHF and Sat Co-axel ? I keep getting conflicting advise, is there a definitive answer...... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
":::Jerry::::" wrote in message eenews.net... Sorry for the basic question but what is recommended to be the smallest advisable radius for 'fixed' cabling and also what is the advised separation distance between VHF/UHF and Sat Co-axel ? I keep getting conflicting advise, is there a definitive answer...... Minimum static bend radius for Cat5e solid is 40mm. The leakage from Sat/TV Coax is so small at normal operating frequencies that no forced separation is required. Chuck |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Chuck Bodgers wrote:
The leakage from Sat/TV Coax is so small at normal operating frequencies that no forced separation is required. That assumes you are talking CT100 grade co-ax. The leakage from many so called "low-loss" co-ax cables can be significant. Overview: http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/coaxialcablescreening.html Serious detail: http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/coaxcablequalityhmdim.htm -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
John Rumm wrote:
Chuck Bodgers wrote: The leakage from Sat/TV Coax is so small at normal operating frequencies that no forced separation is required. That assumes you are talking CT100 grade co-ax. The leakage from many so called "low-loss" co-ax cables can be significant. Overview: http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/coaxialcablescreening.html Serious detail: http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/coaxcablequalityhmdim.htm However CAT5 cable consists of twisted pair conductors, each pair of which is driven and received by a balanced device. In other words any interference picked up on the cores should be cancelled at the cable's termination device. I run two CAT 5 cables a distance of some 7 metres tied together with the feed from my satellite dish (admittedly CT-100) and there's no problem. In any case you should always use CT-100, not just for satellite dishes, but also good practice for TV and FM aerial downleads. -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Mark Carver wrote:
However CAT5 cable consists of twisted pair conductors, each pair of Yup realise that ;-) In any case you should always use CT-100, not just for satellite dishes, but also good practice for TV and FM aerial downleads. I think that was the point I was making. Much better for DTTV as well which is more succeptable to impulse noise. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|