testing

In message , Arthur
writes
testing

****** - post tests to a test newsgroup

--
geoff

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:25:23 GMT, raden wrote:

In message , Arthur
writes
testing

****** - post tests to a test newsgroup



maby the person is new to news groups, why would you use such strong
launguage, it is you that should get a life moron
bob

Arthur wrote in message ...
testing

OK, ignoring test.
Why are YOU reading this?
M.K.

****** - post tests to a test newsgroup



maby the person is new to news groups, why would you use such strong
launguage, it is you that should get a life moron
bob


You're absolutely right Bob.

I've had a run-in with this humourless, foul mouthed, confrontational,
dictarorial, big mouthed waste of space myself.

Rather then hovering around dictating how people should behave on here it's
a shame he doesn't spare us all and post entirely in a test NG himself.

In message , burbeck
writes
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:25:23 GMT, raden wrote:

In message , Arthur
writes
testing

****** - post tests to a test newsgroup



maby the person is new to news groups, why would you use such strong
launguage, it is you that should get a life moron
bob

No, if he's new to newsgroups, he should familiarise himself with how
they work and protocol.

I take it you're another clueless newbie

--
geoff

No, if he's new to newsgroups, he should familiarise himself with how they
work and protocol.

I take it you're another clueless newbie

--
geoff

Still the jumped-up, self appointed police man of the news group I see.

Shame you have to waste endless time and bandwidth on here trying to
supposedly educate people.

In message , RedOnRed
writes

****** - post tests to a test newsgroup



maby the person is new to news groups, why would you use such strong
launguage, it is you that should get a life moron
bob


You're absolutely right Bob.

I've had a run-in with this humourless, foul mouthed, confrontational,
dictarorial, big mouthed waste of space myself.

What, me ?


--
geoff

In article , "RedOnRed" 123
@abc.net says...
No, if he's new to newsgroups, he should familiarise himself with how they
work and protocol.

I take it you're another clueless newbie

--
geoff

Still the jumped-up, self appointed police man of the news group I see.

Still incapable of even the simplest stuff like not quoting people's
sigs, I see. Usenet doesn't on the whole have official appointees to
police groups - it relies on community-spirited individuals who have
a clue how it works to volunteer their services.

Shame you have to waste endless time and bandwidth on here trying to
supposedly educate people.

Shame some people don't seem to realise it would all fall apart
without a general consensus of adherence to published standards.

Still incapable of even the simplest stuff like not quoting people's
sigs, I see. Usenet doesn't on the whole have official appointees to
police groups - it relies on community-spirited individuals who have
a clue how it works to volunteer their services.

That's funny, you seem to have included the sig yourself in your reply. Tut,
tut shame on you you naughty boy!

I assume that obviously you were using it to make a point and it wasn't a
gaff which in some people's books warrants verbal abuse on here.

Or perhaps in your red misted, rush of blood to head pedantry you just left
it in accidentally, thus inadvertently making a tart of yourself in the
process?

We may never know and quite frankly ever care.

In article , RedOnRed
wrote:

That's funny, you seem to have included the sig yourself in your reply. Tut,
tut shame on you you naughty boy!


It is a well know fact of Usenet that any flame must include at least one
typoo r mistook to be valid.

--
AJL Electronics (G6FGO) Ltd : Satellite and TV aerial systems
http://www.classicmicrocars.co.uk : http://www.ajlelectronics.co.uk