Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
tesla turbine questions
Does anyone know of any good links?
Id like to see units that are running on propane or diesel, and are completely self sustaining..... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Haaken Hveem wrote:
Does anyone know of any good links? Id like to see units that are running on propane or diesel, and are completely self sustaining..... The only Tesla turbines I've seen ran on steam. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Look up Frank Germano. Looks like his site is gone though.
http://my.execpc.com/~teba/ they've be around for a while. Karl "Haaken Hveem" wrote in message ... Does anyone know of any good links? Id like to see units that are running on propane or diesel, and are completely self sustaining..... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:52:27 -0000, Haaken Hveem wrote:
Does anyone know of any good links? Id like to see units that are running on propane or diesel, and are completely self sustaining..... Can't be done. Anyone selling you plans to do it, is just selling you false hope. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On 3 Mar 2005 16:03:46 GMT, Dave Hinz wrote:
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:52:27 -0000, Haaken Hveem wrote: Does anyone know of any good links? Id like to see units that are running on propane or diesel, and are completely self sustaining..... Can't be done. Anyone selling you plans to do it, is just selling you false hope. Why not, please? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
--They're remarkably inefficient. Been there, done that, don't
bother. The Tesla turbine's one saving grace is its lack of things to be bumped into, hence it's niche market is in the pumping of live fish. It's a much better drive-ee than drive-er, so to speak. -- "Steamboat Ed" Haas : Blah blah blah blah Hacking the Trailing Edge! : blah blah blah... http://www.nmpproducts.com/intro.htm ---Decks a-wash in a sea of words--- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:42:42 -0600, Don Foreman wrote:
On 3 Mar 2005 16:03:46 GMT, Dave Hinz wrote: On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:52:27 -0000, Haaken Hveem wrote: Does anyone know of any good links? Id like to see units that are running on propane or diesel, and are completely self sustaining..... Can't be done. Anyone selling you plans to do it, is just selling you false hope. Why not, please? The laws of conservation of energy. "completely self sustaining" would require that there be no losses to heat, friction, or anything else. That doesn't even get into the problem of extracting energy from this mythical device, which would require it to produce more energy than it creates. Tesla had some great ideas, but he had some stinkers too. Greater-than-unity devices fall into the latter category, and for some reason, Tesla's name seems to attract people who ignore the laws of physics. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Hinz" wrote in message
... The laws of conservation of energy. "completely self sustaining" would require that there be no losses to heat, friction, or anything else. Well presumably, he actually means something which will keep spinning, like how you can make a jet engine out of an automotive turbo. It doesn't produce much if any thrust, but it does sustain itself (given fuel of course). Tim -- "California is the breakfast state: fruits, nuts and flakes." Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:51:42 -0600, Tim Williams wrote:
"Dave Hinz" wrote in message ... The laws of conservation of energy. "completely self sustaining" would require that there be no losses to heat, friction, or anything else. Well presumably, he actually means something which will keep spinning, like how you can make a jet engine out of an automotive turbo. It doesn't produce much if any thrust, but it does sustain itself (given fuel of course). Many of the people hawking "tesla-like devices" pretend that the "given fuel, of course" clause doesn't apply. That's my point, is all. Dave |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On 3 Mar 2005 18:52:09 GMT, Dave Hinz wrote:
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:42:42 -0600, Don Foreman wrote: On 3 Mar 2005 16:03:46 GMT, Dave Hinz wrote: On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:52:27 -0000, Haaken Hveem wrote: Does anyone know of any good links? Id like to see units that are running on propane or diesel, and are completely self sustaining..... Can't be done. Anyone selling you plans to do it, is just selling you false hope. Why not, please? The laws of conservation of energy. "completely self sustaining" would require that there be no losses to heat, friction, or anything else. That doesn't even get into the problem of extracting energy from this mythical device, which would require it to produce more energy than it creates. Tesla had some great ideas, but he had some stinkers too. Greater-than-unity devices fall into the latter category, and for some reason, Tesla's name seems to attract people who ignore the laws of physics. Haaken's mention of "running on propane or diesel" indicates to me that he recognizes the need for a source of energy. I'll leave it to Haaken to clarify what he meant by 'self sustaining". |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Well, a turbine has ( usually ) a compressor , a burner , and a turbine.
By the patents, it looks like tesla planned to use a pulsating burner to prowide enough flow of air to spin the turbine. By self sustaining , i meant that the turbine delivers enough power to , well , power a blower. That is needed to induce enough air flow in the cumbustor.... "Don Foreman" skrev i melding ... On 3 Mar 2005 18:52:09 GMT, Dave Hinz wrote: On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:42:42 -0600, Don Foreman wrote: On 3 Mar 2005 16:03:46 GMT, Dave Hinz wrote: On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:52:27 -0000, Haaken Hveem wrote: Does anyone know of any good links? Id like to see units that are running on propane or diesel, and are completely self sustaining..... Can't be done. Anyone selling you plans to do it, is just selling you false hope. Why not, please? The laws of conservation of energy. "completely self sustaining" would require that there be no losses to heat, friction, or anything else. That doesn't even get into the problem of extracting energy from this mythical device, which would require it to produce more energy than it creates. Tesla had some great ideas, but he had some stinkers too. Greater-than-unity devices fall into the latter category, and for some reason, Tesla's name seems to attract people who ignore the laws of physics. Haaken's mention of "running on propane or diesel" indicates to me that he recognizes the need for a source of energy. I'll leave it to Haaken to clarify what he meant by 'self sustaining". |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More gas questions | Home Repair | |||
HF turbine HVLP $30 !! | Woodworking | |||
Questions about Pest or Termite Control | Home Ownership | |||
Questions about Pest and Termite Control | Home Repair | |||
Footings, frost-heave , and related questions ??? | Home Repair |