Home Menu

Menu


Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work.

DIYbanter » Do - it - Yourself » Metalworking > OT - "Cites" for Gunner
Reply
Page 3 of 4 12 3 4
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #81   Report Post  
Ed Huntress
 
Posts: n/a
Default
"Cliff" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:01:14 -0500, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:

Thanks, that explains a lot.

You ain't seen nothin' yet.

What do you expect next, Ed? Or at least see hints
of?

My crystal ball is in the shop for repairs. Its fuel mileage has been going
to hell and it won't start on cold mornings.

If it ever gets running again, I want to see how we're going to get out of
this deficit. Either the economic policy of the US is being run by geniuses
who know more about economics than all of the economists around the world
put together, or they're unmitigated idiots.

Unmitigated Idiots has taken the lead at four furlongs, and it looks to me
like a good time to find a hedge-fund consultant.

--
Ed Huntress


Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #82   Report Post  
Cliff
 
Posts: n/a
Default
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:16:45 GMT, (Richard
Lewis) wrote:

Cliff wrote:

The thread seems to be titled "OT - "Cites" for Gunner".

Bu tyou didn't reply to *that* thread. The thread *you* replied to
started off with "In 2000, the whiners and the babies (read that as
democrats) blamed
the loss of florida on the great republican plot with the butterfly
ballot." and you began to question the facts ON FLORIDA.

YOU said "more people wanted Bush in power than gore",
not I VBG.

In the Florida recounts that are/were the topic, idiot.

Then why did you say "more people wanted Bush in power than gore"?

Did you hope that I would not find the actual numbers?

Don't the votes count? Don't you?

Typical democrap bull****.

Too bad that you don't like how the popular vote came out
or democracy.

The national popular vote means nothing....

Then why are you claiming that "more people wanted Bush in power
than gore" if it's meaningless? You seemed so very proud.

you said you understood the
electoral college. The popular vote in Florida, which is the topic,
you lost.

You lost.
Agenda #1 was wars.
Agenda #2 is lies.
Agenda #3 is ruining the US and as much more of the world
as possible.

Go whine somewhere else.

Taking gummer lessons?

IF you think that the numbers are in error take it up with those
that counted the votes. Or the shrubbie's lawyers that got the
feared recounts stopped so many times.

There were six recounts.....you lost every one, idiot.

You lost.
Why was Herr shrubbie, Enron, etc. so scared?

This clearly demonstrates that YOUR statement "the simple
fact that more people wanted Bush in power than gore."
is in fact a lie.

So you're still saying that gore won the six recounts?

50,999,897 50,456,002

One hundred million people voted in Florida then?

Like I said, idiot, feel free to disprove that anytime you want.

50,999,897 50,456,002

Do you winger always lie?

Do you democraps always bull****?

50,999,897 50,456,002

I already know well which half you are in. And that
you know nothing of the subject or the function Y=e((-X)**2).

Function? Doesn't take any function to understand that "half the
populatinon has an IQ below 100" is only possibly true if there are
none that are 100....and since the national average *is* 100 and Mr.
Bell called you an idiot, too.....

Can you count to 100?
Do you know what decimals are?

IQ's aren't registered in decimals, idiot.

So you don't know what decimals are ...... interesting.

For your statement to be true, that half the pop has an IQ of less
than 100, there can be NONE that are 100 even. Your statement is
bull**** and proven so.

You seem to be in the lower half.


ral

--
Cliff


You need to learn how to post.

You need to learn more than that one trick, pony. It's getting old.

ral
--
Cliff


You need to learn how to post.
Look at the trash you are leaving behind.
You are a winger, right?
--
Cliff
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #86   Report Post  
Cliff
 
Posts: n/a
Default
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 02:48:35 -0500, Cliff wrote:

50,999,897 50,456,002

I already know well which half you are in. And that
you know nothing of the subject or the function Y=e((-X)**2).

Function? Doesn't take any function to understand that "half the
populatinon has an IQ below 100" is only possibly true if there are
none that are 100....and since the national average *is* 100 and Mr.
Bell called you an idiot, too.....

Can you count to 100?
Do you know what decimals are?

IQ's aren't registered in decimals, idiot.

So you don't know what decimals are ...... interesting.

For your statement to be true, that half the pop has an IQ of less
than 100, there can be NONE that are 100 even. Your statement is
bull**** and proven so.

You seem to be in the lower half.

Check it out:
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004...ion-IQ2004.htm

HTH
--
Cliff
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #89   Report Post  
Richard Lewis
 
Posts: n/a
Default
Cliff wrote:

In the Florida recounts that are/were the topic, idiot.

Then why did you say "more people wanted Bush in power than gore"?

Because in Florida, the thread you replied to, you lot of whining
babies lost all six recounts. To "lose a recount", you tend to have
less votes than the winner, idiot.

Then why are you claiming that "more people wanted Bush in power
than gore" if it's meaningless? You seemed so very proud.

In the Florida recounts that you've questioned, you have yet to
disprove that your lot lost six recounts.

Proud to be a republican? We ain't the ones whining and crying.

ROFLMAO!!!!!

Your next whine?

ral



Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #90   Report Post  
Richard Lewis
 
Posts: n/a
Default
Cliff wrote:

Check it out:
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004...ion-IQ2004.htm

ROFLMAO!!!!!

You lot of whiners are still passing around that load of long-debunked
bull****?

And you question *my* IQ?

That bull**** chart was created as a joke after the 2000 election and
passed around....and you lot of idiots think changing the names will
keep someone from noticing?

Try this one on for size, idiot....

http://www.zombietime.com/iq_of_2004_voters_by_state/

ral

HTH
--
Cliff


Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #91   Report Post  
Richard Lewis
 
Posts: n/a
Default
Cliff wrote:

So they were not finished.

Yes, they were.

As it ended up, many more should have been recounted as well.

Why? Six recounts proved that not a one of the original counts was
statistically wrong. A hundred more of the same wouldn't prove
anything that the original count didn't.

BTW, 50,999,897 50,456,002 and you need to learn how to post.
This is, after all, Usenet.

Suck the burrito **** from my asshole, idiot.

ral
--
Cliff


Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #92   Report Post  
Richard Lewis
 
Posts: n/a
Default
Cliff wrote:

You look like an idiot whining winger G.

And yet it's *you* who's been whining over Florida for four years,
idiot?

ROFLMAO!!!!!

ral




--
Cliff


Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #93   Report Post  
Richard Lewis
 
Posts: n/a
Default
Bob Brock wrote:

I'm not sure that he is a winger. It's just that gummer is his idol.
The idiot part.....well facts are facts afterall.

Go back to whacking off your poodle, bobbie.

ROFLMAO!!!!!

ral


Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #94   Report Post  
Mike Left Santa Cruz
 
Posts: n/a
Default
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 05:01:19 GMT, (Richard
Lewis) wrote:

Cliff wrote:

Check it out:
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004...ion-IQ2004.htm

ROFLMAO!!!!!

You lot of whiners are still passing around that load of long-debunked
bull****?

And you question *my* IQ?

That bull**** chart was created as a joke after the 2000 election and
passed around....and you lot of idiots think changing the names will
keep someone from noticing?

Try this one on for size, idiot....

http://www.zombietime.com/iq_of_2004_voters_by_state/

ral

HTH
--
Cliff


Who would think CA would rank so low on the IQ chart....??
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #95   Report Post  
Mike Left Santa Cruz
 
Posts: n/a
Default
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 05:01:19 GMT, (Richard
Lewis) wrote:

Cliff wrote:

Check it out:
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004...ion-IQ2004.htm

ROFLMAO!!!!!

You lot of whiners are still passing around that load of long-debunked
bull****?

And you question *my* IQ?

That bull**** chart was created as a joke after the 2000 election and
passed around....and you lot of idiots think changing the names will
keep someone from noticing?

Try this one on for size, idiot....

http://www.zombietime.com/iq_of_2004_voters_by_state/

ral

HTH
--
Cliff


Wow... White is bright!! Is Michael and Clif from Alabama and
Georgia??


IQ averages in US States – best estimate available

from actual SAT and ACT scores below

adjusted for the fact that the IQ’s of these test takers are about 10
points above average

104 IQ New Hampshire

103 IQ Massachusetts, Oregon, Wisconsin

102 IQ Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota,
Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Vermont, Washington

101 IQ Alaska, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, New York, Ohio, Utah,
Wyoming

100 IQ Arizona, California, Idaho, Maine, Nevada, New Jersey,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Virginia, West Virginia

99 IQ Delaware, Hawaii, Indiana

98 IQ Arkansas, Florida

97 IQ Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, North Carolina,
Tennessee, Texas

96 IQ New Mexico

95 IQ District of Columbia

94 IQ Mississippi, South Carolina



Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #96   Report Post  
Ed Huntress
 
Posts: n/a
Default
"Mike Left Santa Cruz" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 05:01:19 GMT, (Richard
Lewis) wrote:

Cliff wrote:

Check it out:
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004...ion-IQ2004.htm

ROFLMAO!!!!!

You lot of whiners are still passing around that load of long-debunked
bull****?

And you question *my* IQ?

That bull**** chart was created as a joke after the 2000 election and
passed around....and you lot of idiots think changing the names will
keep someone from noticing?

Try this one on for size, idiot....

http://www.zombietime.com/iq_of_2004_voters_by_state/

ral

HTH
--
Cliff


Wow... White is bright!! Is Michael and Clif from Alabama and
Georgia??


IQ averages in US States - best estimate available

from actual SAT and ACT scores below

adjusted for the fact that the IQ's of these test takers are about 10
points above average

104 IQ New Hampshire

103 IQ Massachusetts, Oregon, Wisconsin

102 IQ Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota,
Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Vermont, Washington

101 IQ Alaska, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, New York, Ohio, Utah,
Wyoming

100 IQ Arizona, California, Idaho, Maine, Nevada, New Jersey,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Virginia, West Virginia

99 IQ Delaware, Hawaii, Indiana

98 IQ Arkansas, Florida

97 IQ Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, North Carolina,
Tennessee, Texas

96 IQ New Mexico

95 IQ District of Columbia

94 IQ Mississippi, South Carolina

Sorry, Mike, but these are some of the most useless statistics of all. Some
of the trend these numbers show is correct, but another part of it is all
wet. For example, go to the SAT resources and take a look at the percentages
of kids who even TAKE the SATs in those states.

NJ, for example, is near the top in the percentage of test-takers.
Mississippi and South Carolina are near the bottom. So, the SAT scores
grossly UNDERestimate actual state-wide averages, for all students, in NJ
and other states with a high percentage of test-takers, while Mississippi's
and S. Carolina's, believe it or not, 'way OVERestimate theirs. g

If anyone doesn't follow this, BTW, there's a good chance he's from a state
with a low percentage of SAT test-takers. d8-)

Ed Huntress



Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #97   Report Post  
Jeffrey C. Dege
 
Posts: n/a
Default
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 00:48:52 -0500, Ed Huntress wrote:

Sorry, Mike, but these are some of the most useless statistics of all. Some
of the trend these numbers show is correct, but another part of it is all
wet. For example, go to the SAT resources and take a look at the percentages
of kids who even TAKE the SATs in those states.

Yep.

In some states, the ACT is taken by nearly everyone, and the SAT only
if a particular college requires it. In others, it's the other way round.

Comparing the average SAT scores of a state in which 80% of the high
school students take the test with the average SAT scores of a state in
which only 10% take the test doesn't tell you much.

--
Is it just or reasonable, that most voices against the main end of
government should enslave the less number that would be free? More just
it is, doubtless, if it come to force, that a less number compel a
greater to retain, which can be no wrong to them, their liberty, than
that a greater number, for the pleasure of their baseness, compel a less
most injuriously to be their fellow slaves. They who seek nothing but
their own just liberty, have always the right to win it, whenever they
have the power, be the voices never so numerous that oppose it.
- John Milton
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #98   Report Post  
Cliff
 
Posts: n/a
Default
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 05:01:19 GMT, (Richard
Lewis) wrote:

Cliff wrote:

Check it out:
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004...ion-IQ2004.htm

ROFLMAO!!!!!

You lot of whiners are still passing around that load of long-debunked
bull****?

And you question *my* IQ?

That bull**** chart was created as a joke after the 2000 election and
passed around....and you lot of idiots think changing the names will
keep someone from noticing?

Try this one on for size, idiot....

http://www.zombietime.com/iq_of_2004_voters_by_state/

Rather amusing bit of blog from someone that calls it
racial and also says "I would like to repeat here that I personally do
not ascribe to the validity of IQ tests, nor of standardized tests in
general."

Did you spot his major error(s) & logical flaws?

IF so, please enumerate them.
Did you miss any?
--
Cliff
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #99   Report Post  
Cliff
 
Posts: n/a
Default
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 00:48:52 -0500, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:

If anyone doesn't follow this, BTW, there's a good chance he's from a state
with a low percentage of SAT test-takers. d8-)

Richard Lewis?
--
Cliff
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #105   Report Post  
Richard Lewis
 
Posts: n/a
Default
Cliff wrote:

Some of your silly claims G.

Then it wasn't "cites for gunner", idiot.

Jeeezus christ what an idiot!

BTW, 50,999,897 50,456,002

Need help with the math?

Six recounts lost.....need help with the whining?

ral

HTH
--
Cliff


Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #107   Report Post  
Richard Lewis
 
Posts: n/a
Default
Cliff wrote:

On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 00:48:52 -0500, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:

If anyone doesn't follow this, BTW, there's a good chance he's from a state
with a low percentage of SAT test-takers. d8-)

Richard Lewis?

Sorry, dude. You floated that air biscuit the same way you declared
that six recounts doesn't prove anything. Is it three or four times
now you've been proven to be an idiot?

What's your next bull**** claim?

ral

--
Cliff


Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #108   Report Post  
Richard Lewis
 
Posts: n/a
Default
Cliff wrote:

Rather amusing bit of blog

Yeah, and it totally proves you to be an idiot yet again.

Did you spot his major error(s) & logical flaws?

You mean the parts where he declared you to be an idiot?

ROFLMAO!!!!!

ral

IF so, please enumerate them.
Did you miss any?
--
Cliff


Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #109   Report Post  
Richard Lewis
 
Posts: n/a
Default
Cliff wrote:

BTW, 50,999,897 50,456,002 ....

And your point is?

The best part is that *you're* the one whining over losing.

ROFLMAO!!!!

ral

--
Cliff


Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #111   Report Post  
Richard Lewis
 
Posts: n/a
Default
Cliff wrote:

Sounds just like a winger with Monica envy, first
thing that comes to mind is to abuse the dogs,

You obviously don't know bobbie.

ROFLMAO!!!!!

Cry some more, idiot.

ral

Try Gummer's latest method. Maglites(s) IIRC ...

HTH
--
Cliff


Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #119   Report Post  
Kathy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Richard Lewis" wrote in message
link.net...
Cliff wrote:

BTW, 50,999,897 50,456,002 ....

And your point is?

The best part is that *you're* the one whining over losing.

ROFLMAO!!!!

ral


You may be too dense to realize it but you've lost too.


Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #120   Report Post  
Gunner
 
Posts: n/a
Default
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 09:45:46 -0500, "Kathy"
wrote:


"Richard Lewis" wrote in message
hlink.net...
Cliff wrote:

BTW, 50,999,897 50,456,002 ....

And your point is?

The best part is that *you're* the one whining over losing.

ROFLMAO!!!!

ral


You may be too dense to realize it but you've lost too.

How so, Cupcake?

Gunner

"Gunner, you are the same ridiculous liberal f--k you ever where."
Scipio
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply
Page 3 of 4 12 3 4
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nice write up about LEDs Gunner Metalworking 242 June 13th 04 04:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"

 

Contact Us DIY Banter Forum Home Privacy Statement