Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Last winter I bought a small milling machine at an auction. It was set up as
a production mill with a hydraulic drive on the X drive; as far as I can tell it never had a leadscrew on this axis. The hydraulic pump looks pretty beat up, and I don't want to screw around with it, so I am now going to convert the mill to all leadscrew drive. I've got a few questions on doing this efficiently (meaning with as few missteps as possible). The mill is a Schaffner F7, made in Switzerland in the mid-70s. The table is about 7x30" and is supported on a knee. I built a RPC for it (largely using the design at http://www.frugalmachinist.com/rpc.html, but modifying it to have a power-fail safety circuit), and both vertical and horizontal spindles (ISO30 taper toolholders) work very nicely. Once I get this task done, I'll put up a project picture show in the Dropbox. Later on, I plan to add a DRO using the Shumatech project parts. I've taken the hydraulics off, and there is pretty good support for my plan: the table has ~1/2" thick aluminum endcaps that will be perfect for mounting the ends of the leadscrew. There is a 7/8+" hole through the casting supporting the table, so I can use that for the leadscrew. On one side of this casting is a good spot for attaching the thrust nut and the end caps should serve to anchor the leadscrew side to side. I've been looking at the MSC catalog and they have a 3/4" x 5 precision ground leadscrew (.003"/ft) and parts for a decent price (~$150-200 for leadscrew, thrust nuts and flanges plus two handles). I'm tending toward the 5 tpi screw so I get 0.200 advance per turn; easier both for keeping track of my milling and also for making an adjustable dial later on. Although the mill is constructed with metric fasteners, the Y and Z axis dials are in inches, so I'll stay with that. My questions: 1. Do you know of magazine articles or books that cover this kind of project? I haven't turned up anything at Village Press, and haven't come across any other projects like this. 2. I plan to use bearings on at least one end of the leadscrew. Should I attach the leadscrew on both ends of the table or just one? I plan to put a handle at each end, but I'm not sure if it's wise to fasten it to each end given the diversity of materials (cast iron table, aluminum endcaps, alloy steel leadscrew) and the thermal expansion differences. 3. What sort of bearings should I use at the ends of the leadscrews? Thrust would be simplest, and if I have to do both thrust and radial, I may want to do it in multiple steps since I need to get the mill working enough to be able to bore out the endcaps for radial. 4. How can I minimize backlash? I've been thinking that a pair of the thrust nuts with some Belleville washers between them will create enough tension to do this, but I've never done something like this before. I assume that I'll have to keep the thrust nuts aligned for this preload to work. Any suggestions? Reference books covering this? 5. Any better ideas? I'm not ready for ballscrews and automation, but will likely tackle that in a few years. This mill is far more rigid than any of the mill drills, and is still in great shape, so I don't consider buying something else a good path. 6. What's been your experience with the 3 foot lengths of precision ground leadscrew and shipping or handling damage? I might be able to just squeak by with a 3 foot length, but I've been thinking that the 6 foot length is safer since I can take the choicest section from the middle. Thanks, Pete Bergstrom (in St. Paul, MN) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Pete Bergstrom" wrote in
: My suggestion: Use INA combination thrust/radial bearings (both bearings in one package), and pre-load the screw. I would probably exchange the alum endcaps for steel of the same design, the set-up will be more rigid, the alum will deform under the bearings over time or heavy load, leading to increased backlash. How about a split-nut set-up for backlash compensation? You can either have two half-nuts with an adjuster, or to full nuts with one drilled for set- screws to press against the first to push them apart. You could do this with one nut, provided the length it comes in agrees to that method. -- Anthony You can't 'idiot proof' anything....every time you try, they just make better idiots. Remove sp to reply via email |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:54:14 -0500, "Pete Bergstrom"
wrote: Last winter I bought a small milling machine at an auction. It was set up as a production mill with a hydraulic drive on the X drive; as far as I can tell it never had a leadscrew on this axis. The hydraulic pump looks pretty beat up, and I don't want to screw around with it, so I am now going to convert the mill to all leadscrew drive. I've got a few questions on doing this efficiently (meaning with as few missteps as possible). The mill is a Schaffner F7, made in Switzerland in the mid-70s. The table is about 7x30" and is supported on a knee. I built a RPC for it (largely using the design at http://www.frugalmachinist.com/rpc.html, but modifying it to have a power-fail safety circuit), and both vertical and horizontal spindles (ISO30 taper toolholders) work very nicely. Once I get this task done, I'll put up a project picture show in the Dropbox. Later on, I plan to add a DRO using the Shumatech project parts. I've taken the hydraulics off, and there is pretty good support for my plan: the table has ~1/2" thick aluminum endcaps that will be perfect for mounting the ends of the leadscrew. There is a 7/8+" hole through the casting supporting the table, so I can use that for the leadscrew. On one side of this casting is a good spot for attaching the thrust nut and the end caps should serve to anchor the leadscrew side to side. I've been looking at the MSC catalog and they have a 3/4" x 5 precision ground leadscrew (.003"/ft) and parts for a decent price (~$150-200 for leadscrew, thrust nuts and flanges plus two handles). I'm tending toward the 5 tpi screw so I get 0.200 advance per turn; easier both for keeping track of my milling and also for making an adjustable dial later on. Although the mill is constructed with metric fasteners, the Y and Z axis dials are in inches, so I'll stay with that. My questions: 1. Do you know of magazine articles or books that cover this kind of project? I haven't turned up anything at Village Press, and haven't come across any other projects like this. 2. I plan to use bearings on at least one end of the leadscrew. Should I attach the leadscrew on both ends of the table or just one? I plan to put a handle at each end, but I'm not sure if it's wise to fasten it to each end given the diversity of materials (cast iron table, aluminum endcaps, alloy steel leadscrew) and the thermal expansion differences. 3. What sort of bearings should I use at the ends of the leadscrews? Thrust would be simplest, and if I have to do both thrust and radial, I may want to do it in multiple steps since I need to get the mill working enough to be able to bore out the endcaps for radial. 4. How can I minimize backlash? I've been thinking that a pair of the thrust nuts with some Belleville washers between them will create enough tension to do this, but I've never done something like this before. I assume that I'll have to keep the thrust nuts aligned for this preload to work. Any suggestions? Reference books covering this? 5. Any better ideas? I'm not ready for ballscrews and automation, but will likely tackle that in a few years. This mill is far more rigid than any of the mill drills, and is still in great shape, so I don't consider buying something else a good path. 6. What's been your experience with the 3 foot lengths of precision ground leadscrew and shipping or handling damage? I might be able to just squeak by with a 3 foot length, but I've been thinking that the 6 foot length is safer since I can take the choicest section from the middle. Thanks, Pete Bergstrom (in St. Paul, MN) Pete, As Anthony said, replacing the aluminum pieces with steel would be best. Bronze nuts for the steel leadscrew will work best. You should be able to buy split nuts. These have a screw that pulls the two halves of the nut together to minimize backlash. Also available, but harder to adjust in the location you must put the nut in, are nuts which screw together. The thread that holds them together is a much finer pitch that the 5 TPI for the leadscrew. Screwing them in or out changes the backlash. If you are really going to put CNC on this mill later consider doing it now. The CNC should use ballscrews. They have much less friction. This lack of friction makes them unsuitable for a manual machine because they self feed easier. So when climb milling the table lock must be set to drag enough to prevent the cutter from dragging the work into it and breaking things. As far as shipping damage goes, if it arrives damaged send it back. And why should the choisest part of a new screw be in the middle? Are you planning to measure the lead error? If so, I guess you might find a three foot area in the six foot length that is best. BTW, I've bought acme screws several times in the last 25 years and they have always been much better than the maximum error allowed. But I've always bought USA made. I have seen leadscrews from Taiwan that were terrible. I made a little stepper driven X-Y stage to put on the Bridgeport for milling small complex curved parts and the screws it came with were visibly out of tolerance. The thread looked like the die was wobbling while cutting the threads. ERS |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete Bergstrom writes:
2. I plan to use bearings on at least one end of the leadscrew. Should I attach the leadscrew on both ends of the table or just one? I plan to put a handle at each end, but I'm not sure if it's wise to fasten it to each end given the diversity of materials (cast iron table, aluminum endcaps, alloy steel leadscrew) and the thermal expansion differences. 3. What sort of bearings should I use at the ends of the leadscrews? Thrust would be simplest, and if I have to do both thrust and radial, I may want to do it in multiple steps since I need to get the mill working enough to be able to bore out the endcaps for radial. The Bridgeport design uses a pair of precision angular contact bearings on one end and (to maintain alignment) an inexpensive radial bearing on the other. 4. How can I minimize backlash? I've been thinking that a pair of the thrust nuts with some Belleville washers between them will create enough tension to do this, but I've never done something like this before. I assume that I'll have to keep the thrust nuts aligned for this preload to work. Any suggestions? Reference books covering this? 5. Any better ideas? I'm not ready for ballscrews and automation, but will likely tackle that in a few years. If you're really going to undertake this kind of custom work, you might as well do it with ballscrews. The parts cost will not be that much more, and the effort about the same (even simpler in some respects), and the results will be worth it. Lotsa surplus ballscrews on eBay. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Pete Bergstrom
says... 2. I plan to use bearings on at least one end of the leadscrew. Should I attach the leadscrew on both ends of the table or just one? I plan to put a handle at each end, but I'm not sure if it's wise to fasten it to each end given the diversity of materials (cast iron table, aluminum endcaps, alloy steel leadscrew) and the thermal expansion differences. What hardinge does in this case is to fix the handle/dial end of the leadscrew with an effective thrust bearing, at the dial end. The far end of the screw is simply supported in a radial bearing, but the clearances are such that the turned down end of the screw is allowed to float axially inside the bearing. 3. What sort of bearings should I use at the ends of the leadscrews? Thrust would be simplest, and if I have to do both thrust and radial, I may want to do it in multiple steps since I need to get the mill working enough to be able to bore out the endcaps for radial. You can approximate a thrust bearing by loading two radial bearings up against each other. 4. How can I minimize backlash? I've been thinking that a pair of the thrust nuts with some Belleville washers between them will create enough tension to do this, but I've never done something like this before. I assume that I'll have to keep the thrust nuts aligned for this preload to work. Any suggestions? Reference books covering this? There are *two* kinds of backlash you need to consider. The first is the sort that happens when you push/pull on the handle itself, and the imperfect thrust bearings allow the entire leadscrew to shift axially with respect to the slide. If you are using radials loaded against each other, or true thrust bearings, this is trivial to get down to around a thousanth or less. As others have suggested the bronze nut you choose for the leadscrew will have some natural lash which you can reduce by making it a split nut of some sort. I myself happen to be partial to hardinge's two-part nuts that thread together. I would do it that way. 5. Any better ideas? I'm not ready for ballscrews and automation, Others have mentioned using ball screws. If you are planning on running this as a manual machine, do NOT use ballscrews. The lack of friction in those means the table will walk away from whatever cut you are taking, or hog in if you are climb milling. Unless you put a lock on the table and on the shaft, it will not work well. Jim -- ================================================== please reply to: JRR(zero) at pkmfgvm4 (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com ================================================== |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Richard J Kinch wrote: Pete Bergstrom writes: [ ... ] 5. Any better ideas? I'm not ready for ballscrews and automation, but will likely tackle that in a few years. If you're really going to undertake this kind of custom work, you might as well do it with ballscrews. The parts cost will not be that much more, and the effort about the same (even simpler in some respects), and the results will be worth it. Lotsa surplus ballscrews on eBay. If you *do* put ballscrews into a manual mill, be sure to also provide a brake for the handwheel so the work can't drive the ballscrew. (It normally can, if you don't have either a stepper or a servo motor loading the handwheel to prevent rotation. A climb milling cut on an axis with ballscrews can get *very* exciting *very* suddenly. :-) Good Luck, DoN. -- Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "jim rozen" wrote in message ... In article , Pete Bergstrom says... 2. I plan to use bearings on at least one end of the leadscrew. Should I attach the leadscrew on both ends of the table or just one? I plan to put a handle at each end, but I'm not sure if it's wise to fasten it to each end given the diversity of materials (cast iron table, aluminum endcaps, alloy steel leadscrew) and the thermal expansion differences. What hardinge does in this case is to fix the handle/dial end of the leadscrew with an effective thrust bearing, at the dial end. The far end of the screw is simply supported in a radial bearing, but the clearances are such that the turned down end of the screw is allowed to float axially inside the bearing. Excellent idea and it seems very simple to do. 3. What sort of bearings should I use at the ends of the leadscrews? Thrust would be simplest, and if I have to do both thrust and radial, I may want to do it in multiple steps since I need to get the mill working enough to be able to bore out the endcaps for radial. You can approximate a thrust bearing by loading two radial bearings up against each other. I'm primarily attracted to thrust bearings because of space issues, but simplicity is important too. I don't know a lot about bearings, but my understanding is that a good thrust bearing will have some control over radial movement while primarily working to control axial movement. It seems like that's exactly what I need. 4. How can I minimize backlash? I've been thinking that a pair of the thrust nuts with some Belleville washers between them will create enough tension to do this, but I've never done something like this before. I assume that I'll have to keep the thrust nuts aligned for this preload to work. Any suggestions? Reference books covering this? There are *two* kinds of backlash you need to consider. The first is the sort that happens when you push/pull on the handle itself, and the imperfect thrust bearings allow the entire leadscrew to shift axially with respect to the slide. If you are using radials loaded against each other, or true thrust bearings, this is trivial to get down to around a thousanth or less. I'm not sure what you mean by imperfect versus true thrust bearings. Can you say more? I meant the bronze nut and flange (like MSC has on page 3890 online) when I said thrust nut, since that is what I'd attach to the knee casting. No bearing involved there. The ends of the Acme rod would be supported by a radial bearing at one table end as you described above and thrust bearings at the other end. As others have suggested the bronze nut you choose for the leadscrew will have some natural lash which you can reduce by making it a split nut of some sort. I myself happen to be partial to hardinge's two-part nuts that thread together. I would do it that way. Are there pictures or drawings of this arrangement available somewhere? For example, if I buy CDs from lathes.co.uk, would it be on there? A manual from Hardinge? I'll probably jump in and get it working with one bronze nut and simple end bearings first, and then refine it with some of the suggestions I've been given. 5. Any better ideas? I'm not ready for ballscrews and automation, Others have mentioned using ball screws. If you are planning on running this as a manual machine, do NOT use ballscrews. The lack of friction in those means the table will walk away from whatever cut you are taking, or hog in if you are climb milling. Unless you put a lock on the table and on the shaft, it will not work well. Oh, and I really do like climb milling results, based on the couple of projects I've milled to date. As far as I can see, I don't think I have a lock on the X axis for the table (there is a lock handle that might work for either X or Y, but it looks to have been misused since it swings freely and I can't tell which axis it applies to), so I'll eventually have to put one on. Using ball screws would move this up in urgency, but I'm hoping that putting a lock on the shaft will get things going for this initial step. Thanks!! Pete |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Anthony" wrote in message ... "Pete Bergstrom" wrote in : My suggestion: Use INA combination thrust/radial bearings (both bearings in one package), and pre-load the screw. I would probably exchange the alum endcaps for steel of the same design, the set-up will be more rigid, the alum will deform under the bearings over time or heavy load, leading to increased backlash. I think I've found these now in MSC's catalog. They look like they'll do very nicely! How about a split-nut set-up for backlash compensation? You can either have two half-nuts with an adjuster, or to full nuts with one drilled for set- screws to press against the first to push them apart. You could do this with one nut, provided the length it comes in agrees to that method. Thanks!! Pete |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eric R Snow" wrote in message ... As Anthony said, replacing the aluminum pieces with steel would be best. Bronze nuts for the steel leadscrew will work best. You should be able to buy split nuts. These have a screw that pulls the two halves of the nut together to minimize backlash. Also available, but harder to adjust in the location you must put the nut in, are nuts which screw together. The thread that holds them together is a much finer pitch that the 5 TPI for the leadscrew. Screwing them in or out changes the backlash. Ah, that kind of nut sounds like a really good way to go. Do you have any leads on where to find these? I haven't seen them in MSC or McMaster. If you are really going to put CNC on this mill later consider doing it now. The CNC should use ballscrews. They have much less friction. This lack of friction makes them unsuitable for a manual machine because they self feed easier. So when climb milling the table lock must be set to drag enough to prevent the cutter from dragging the work into it and breaking things. That's kind of a way out, and I'd rather have a working mill than an ongoing project right now. Thanks for the pointers. As far as shipping damage goes, if it arrives damaged send it back. And why should the choisest part of a new screw be in the middle? Are you planning to measure the lead error? Nope, just have come to expect damage in handling, even with something labeled precision. Your points are good. If so, I guess you might find a three foot area in the six foot length that is best. BTW, I've bought acme screws several times in the last 25 years and they have always been much better than the maximum error allowed. But I've always bought USA made. I have seen leadscrews from Taiwan that were terrible. I made a little stepper driven X-Y stage to put on the Bridgeport for milling small complex curved parts and the screws it came with were visibly out of tolerance. The thread looked like the die was wobbling while cutting the threads. I've been trying to keep to American-made materials in projects; with this one it's a no-brainer. Thanks!! Pete |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|