On Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 2:32:38 PM UTC-4, raykeller wrote:
http://www.breitbart.com/california/...itbart+News%29

Judicial Watch Warns California: 11 Counties Have More Voters than
Voting-Age Citizens

Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog organization, has sent a letter to
California Secretary of State Alex Padilla on behalf of the Election
Integrity Project, noting that there are 11 counties in the state with more
registered voters, and alleging that the state may be out of compliance with
Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).

The letter reads, in part:

NVRA Section 8 requires states to conduct reasonable list maintenance so
as to maintain an accurate record of eligible voters for use in conducting
federal elections.1 As you may know, Congress enacted Section 8 of the NVRA
to protect the integrity of the electoral process. Allowing the names of
ineligible voters to remain on the voting rolls harms the integrity of the
electoral process and undermines voter confidence in the legitimacy of
elections.

â?¦

As the top election official in California, it is your responsibility
under federal law to coordinate Californiaâ?Ts statewide effort to conduct a
program that reasonably ensures the lists of eligible voters are accurate..

Judicial Watch lays out the specifics: â?o[T]here were more total registered
voters than there were adults over the age of 18 living in each of the
following eleven (11) counties: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles
(112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo
(111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo
(110%).â? The letter notes that the percentage in L.A. Country may be as
high as 144%. What not Riverside???


The letter contains a threat to sue the Secretary of State if Padilla does
not remove from the rolls â?opersons who have become ineligible to vote by
reason of death, change in residence, or a disqualifying criminal
conviction, and to remove non-citizens who have registered to vote
unlawfully.â? It gives Padilla 14 days to respond, and 90 days to correctÂ
alleged violations of the law.

...

How many of the ineligible actually voted? I expect that number to be somewhere very close to zero.

On 8/5/2017 3:22 PM, rangerssuck wrote:
On Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 2:32:38 PM UTC-4, raykeller wrote:
http://www.breitbart.com/california/...itbart+News%29

Judicial Watch Warns California: 11 Counties Have More Voters than
Voting-Age Citizens

Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog organization, has sent a letter to
California Secretary of State Alex Padilla on behalf of the Election
Integrity Project, noting that there are 11 counties in the state with more
registered voters, and alleging that the state may be out of compliance with
Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).

The letter reads, in part:

NVRA Section 8 requires states to conduct reasonable list maintenance so
as to maintain an accurate record of eligible voters for use in conducting
federal elections.1 As you may know, Congress enacted Section 8 of the NVRA
to protect the integrity of the electoral process. Allowing the names of
ineligible voters to remain on the voting rolls harms the integrity of the
electoral process and undermines voter confidence in the legitimacy of
elections.

â?¦

As the top election official in California, it is your responsibility
under federal law to coordinate Californiaâ?Ts statewide effort to conduct a
program that reasonably ensures the lists of eligible voters are accurate.

Judicial Watch lays out the specifics: â?o[T]here were more total registered
voters than there were adults over the age of 18 living in each of the
following eleven (11) counties: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles
(112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo
(111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo
(110%).â? The letter notes that the percentage in L.A. Country may be as
high as 144%. What not Riverside???


The letter contains a threat to sue the Secretary of State if Padilla does
not remove from the rolls â?opersons who have become ineligible to vote by
reason of death, change in residence, or a disqualifying criminal
conviction, and to remove non-citizens who have registered to vote
unlawfully.â? It gives Padilla 14 days to respond, and 90 days to correctÂ
alleged violations of the law.

...

How many of the ineligible actually voted? I expect that number to be somewhere very close to zero.

That's because you're a leftard wallowing in denial.

On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 12:28:44 PM UTC-4, Seaview wrote:
On 8/5/2017 3:22 PM, rangerssuck wrote:
On Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 2:32:38 PM UTC-4, raykeller wrote:
http://www.breitbart.com/california/...itbart+News%29

Judicial Watch Warns California: 11 Counties Have More Voters than
Voting-Age Citizens

Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog organization, has sent a letter to
California Secretary of State Alex Padilla on behalf of the Election
Integrity Project, noting that there are 11 counties in the state with more
registered voters, and alleging that the state may be out of compliance with
Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).

The letter reads, in part:

NVRA Section 8 requires states to conduct reasonable list maintenance so
as to maintain an accurate record of eligible voters for use in conducting
federal elections.1 As you may know, Congress enacted Section 8 of the NVRA
to protect the integrity of the electoral process. Allowing the names of
ineligible voters to remain on the voting rolls harms the integrity of the
electoral process and undermines voter confidence in the legitimacy of
elections.

â?¦

As the top election official in California, it is your responsibility
under federal law to coordinate Californiaâ?Ts statewide effort to conduct a
program that reasonably ensures the lists of eligible voters are accurate.

Judicial Watch lays out the specifics: â?o[T]here were more total registered
voters than there were adults over the age of 18 living in each of the
following eleven (11) counties: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles
(112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo
(111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo
(110%).â? The letter notes that the percentage in L.A. Country may be as
high as 144%. What not Riverside???


The letter contains a threat to sue the Secretary of State if Padilla does
not remove from the rolls â?opersons who have become ineligible to vote by
reason of death, change in residence, or a disqualifying criminal
conviction, and to remove non-citizens who have registered to vote
unlawfully.â? It gives Padilla 14 days to respond, and 90 days to correctÂ
alleged violations of the law.

...

How many of the ineligible actually voted? I expect that number to be somewhere very close to zero.

That's because you're a leftard wallowing in denial.

Answer the question, if you can. How many of the ineligible actually voted?

On 8/6/2017 10:07 PM, rangerssuck wrote:
That's because you're a leftard wallowing in denial.
Answer the question, if you can. How many of the ineligible actually voted?

Several million, you leftard spaniel felcher.

On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 11:33:01 AM UTC-4, Seaview wrote:
On 8/6/2017 10:07 PM, rangerssuck wrote:
That's because you're a leftard wallowing in denial.
Answer the question, if you can. How many of the ineligible actually voted?

Several million, you leftard spaniel felcher.

you're even crazier than I thought. Do you REALLY believe that or are you doing this for sport? Do you have any real data (other than Trump says so) to back up that absurd statement?

On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 10:01:08 -0700 (PDT), rangerssuck
wrote:

On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 11:33:01 AM UTC-4, Seaview wrote:
On 8/6/2017 10:07 PM, rangerssuck wrote:
That's because you're a leftard wallowing in denial.
Answer the question, if you can. How many of the ineligible actually voted?

Several million, you leftard spaniel felcher.

you're even crazier than I thought. Do you REALLY believe that or are you doing this for sport? Do you have any real data (other than Trump says so) to back up that absurd statement?

Sport. He gave up pulling the wings off of flies to do this.

--
Ed Huntress

On 8/7/2017 11:01 AM, rangerssuck wrote:
On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 11:33:01 AM UTC-4, Seaview wrote:
On 8/6/2017 10:07 PM, rangerssuck wrote:
That's because you're a leftard wallowing in denial.
Answer the question, if you can. How many of the ineligible actually voted?

Several million, you leftard spaniel felcher.

you're even crazier than I thought.

Truth hurts, no?

Do you REALLY believe that or are you doing this for sport?

Oh it's true enough.

Do you have any real data (other than Trump says so) to back up that absurd statement?

Yup:

http://truthfeed.com/breaking-hillar...itizens/35700/

According to Gregg Philips of votefraud.org, three million illegal
aliens voted! This was voters fraud on a massive scale!
We have verified more than three million votes cast by non-citizens.
We are joining .@TrueTheVote to initiate legal action. #unrigged

On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 12:07:37 AM UTC-4, rangerssuck wrote:



Answer the question, if you can. How many of the ineligible actually voted?

I can not answer your question. Based on how some readers of RCM are interested in politics, I would guess there are some ineligible voters that voted more than once.

My question is " Do you think it is a good thing that voter rolls are not purged? " Would it not be reasonable to require people registering to vote, to state their previous place of registration, if any? And require the officials to notify the previous place that the person is now registered in a new location. THere may not be a lot of fraud going on, but don't you lock your house when you go somewhere. Sure there is not a lot of theft in your town, but most people consider it prudent to not create opportunity for crime.

Dan

On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 10:55:29 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 12:07:37 AM UTC-4, rangerssuck wrote:



Answer the question, if you can. How many of the ineligible actually voted?

I can not answer your question. Based on how some readers of RCM are interested in politics, I would guess there are some ineligible voters that voted more than once.

My question is " Do you think it is a good thing that voter rolls are not purged? " Would it not be reasonable to require people registering to vote, to state their previous place of registration, if any? And require the officials to notify the previous place that the person is now registered in a new location. THere may not be a lot of fraud going on, but don't you lock your house when you go somewhere. Sure there is not a lot of theft in your town, but most people consider it prudent to not create opportunity for crime.

Dan

If you sample 1,000 voters who are registered in two or more states
(they're easy to find; there are an estimated 7,000,000 of them), and
then check to see how many voted in multiple states (also easy; check
the voter records in each state for which those multiple-state
registrants are registered), you'll be able to measure the size of the
problem -- if any.

Then you'll know whether it's worth requiring states to notify voting
authorities in the (previous) states to which those voters are
registered.

Based on the research that's been done over the past few decades, the
likely answer is that it isn't worth the trouble, because the
multiple-state voters appear to be a small fraction of one percent of
all voters.

--
Ed Huntress

On 8/7/2017 12:06 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:
multiple-state voters appear to be a small fraction of one percent of
all voters.


http://www.lovethispic.com/blog/1273...ed-for-hillary

So, just how extensive was the voter fraud? According to a voting fraud
investigation agency, VoterFraud.org, an astounding 3 million votes were
cast by non-citizens. The bombshell revelation was made after the group
completed an analysis of a database containing 180 million voter
registrations.



€œNumber of non-citizen votes exceeds 3 million. Consulting legal team,€�
tweeted Gregg Phillips, who heads up the fraud reporting agency.


Its safe to assume that virtually all of the votes cast by these 3
million illegals wouldve been for Hillary Clinton, meaning that Trump
wouldve won in a landslide against Hillary in the popular vote as well.
States where this fraud went on wouldve been in locations allowing
people to vote with no identification, including California, Illinois,
Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New
Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania,
Vermont, West Virginia, Wyoming, and Washington, D.C.

On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 2:06:29 PM UTC-4, Ed Huntress wrote:


If you sample 1,000 voters who are registered in two or more states
(they're easy to find; there are an estimated 7,000,000 of them), and
then check to see how many voted in multiple states (also easy; check
the voter records in each state for which those multiple-state
registrants are registered), you'll be able to measure the size of the
problem -- if any.

Then you'll know whether it's worth requiring states to notify voting
authorities in the (previous) states to which those voters are
registered.

Based on the research that's been done over the past few decades, the
likely answer is that it isn't worth the trouble, because the
multiple-state voters appear to be a small fraction of one percent of
all voters.

--
Ed Huntress

So do you lock your house up when you go somewhere? From your answer on purging the voter rolls, your answer ought to be that there is little theft in your area and it is not worth the effort because only a small fraction of the local residents are thief's.

Dan