View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
RangersSuck RangersSuck is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,104
Default California: 11 Counties Have More Voters than Voting-Age Citizens

On Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 2:32:38 PM UTC-4, raykeller wrote:
http://www.breitbart.com/california/...itbart+News%29

Judicial Watch Warns California: 11 Counties Have More Voters than
Voting-Age Citizens

Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog organization, has sent a letter to
California Secretary of State Alex Padilla on behalf of the Election
Integrity Project, noting that there are 11 counties in the state with more
registered voters, and alleging that the state may be out of compliance with
Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).

The letter reads, in part:

NVRA Section 8 requires states to conduct reasonable list maintenance so
as to maintain an accurate record of eligible voters for use in conducting
federal elections.1 As you may know, Congress enacted Section 8 of the NVRA
to protect the integrity of the electoral process. Allowing the names of
ineligible voters to remain on the voting rolls harms the integrity of the
electoral process and undermines voter confidence in the legitimacy of
elections.

â?¦

As the top election official in California, it is your responsibility
under federal law to coordinate Californiaâ?Ts statewide effort to conduct a
program that reasonably ensures the lists of eligible voters are accurate..

Judicial Watch lays out the specifics: â?o[T]here were more total registered
voters than there were adults over the age of 18 living in each of the
following eleven (11) counties: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles
(112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo
(111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo
(110%).â? The letter notes that the percentage in L.A. Country may be as
high as 144%. What not Riverside???


The letter contains a threat to sue the Secretary of State if Padilla does
not remove from the rolls â?opersons who have become ineligible to vote by
reason of death, change in residence, or a disqualifying criminal
conviction, and to remove non-citizens who have registered to vote
unlawfully.â? It gives Padilla 14 days to respond, and 90 days to correctÂ
alleged violations of the law.

...


How many of the ineligible actually voted? I expect that number to be somewhere very close to zero.