On Sunday, September 8, 2013 9:17:38 PM UTC-7, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 20:47:13 -0700, Jim Kucharek

wrote:



On 9/8/2013 7:48 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:

On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 15:58:46 -0700, Jim Kucharek

wrote:



On 9/8/2013 3:44 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:

On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 13:59:29 -0700, Jim Kucharek

wrote:



On 9/8/2013 8:59 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:

On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 07:52:47 -0700, Jim Kucharek

wrote:





The KKK was the terrorist wing of the Democrat Party.



It wasn't a wing of any party. It was not controlled by the party, nor

did it control the party.



There have been three distinct KKK organizations, and only the first,

which existed from 1865 to 1874, was tightly linked with the Democratic

Party in the south. Klan members outside the south belonged to both

parties.



The second Klan expanded with new chapters in the Midwest and

West, where for a time, its members were courted by both

Republicans and Democrats. The KKK state organizations endorsed

candidates from either party that supported its goals;

Prohibition in particular helped the Klan and some Republicans to

make common cause in the Midwest.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan





This silly effort you've been making to try to tar the Democratic party

of today with the KKK is a failure.



In your ass it is. The KKK has countless times been shown to be the

terrorist arm of the DNC, long ago and today.



It was not an arm of the Democratic Party, and it has had no connection

with the party for over 50 years.



Your effort is a failure. No surprise - your point is wrong.



Your denial is a failure.



Your abject failure to substantiate your point is the reason for your

overall failure.



The KKK has had no connection with the Democrats for over 50 years.



Really?



Yes. There has been no link.



And again you lie.



plink



Gunner setting the stopwatch to see how long it takes for him to dig

up another nym



9:17 PM PST





"The socialist movement takes great pains to circulate frequently new labels for its ideally constructed state.

Each worn-out label is replaced by another which raises hopes of an ultimate solution of the insoluble basic

problem of Socialism, until it becomes obvious that nothing has been changed but the name.

The most recent slogan is "State Capitalism."[Fascism] It is not commonly realized that this covers nothing more

than what used to be called Planned Economy and State Socialism, and that State Capitalism, Planned Economy,

and State Socialism diverge only in non-essentials from the "classic" ideal of egalitarian Socialism. - Ludwig von Mises (1922)

That Mark Wieber continues to debate with the Pimple and his many aliases says as much about Mark Wieber as it does about the Pimple.

They're both liars and they both deserve each other.