On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:35:33 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Gunner Asch wrote:

On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:57:46 -0800 (PST), "
wrote:

On Jan 26, 12:08 am, Ed Huntress wrote:

But wait a minute, Dan: You say that if she detaches the umbilical
cord, which is a part of her and attached to the thing that's inside
of her which is also, therefore, a part of her, she would be indicted
for manslaughter.

But it IS her. The thing inside of her IS PHYSICALLY A PART OF HER. It
isn't a "separate thing" unless and until it's born and they cut the
cord. It's tissue that is contiguous with her body, on the inside, no
less. It isn't attached to the man in the equation, or to anyone else
-- most especially not to you. So what business is it of yours?

The DNA shtick is a cute one, BTW. It sounds like you're making it up
as you go along, and your idea is truly stupid.

--
Ed Huntress

I think your idea are truly stupid. You need to learn a bit more
about biology. The fetus is not physically part of her.

Dan

Ill bet that Ed thinks a Siamese twin is a tissue mass......


Very likely. He thinks that a torch carrying Democrat, wearing a
white sheet is a Republican.

Well, actually, he probably is. He might have been a Democrat before
the mid-'70s or so. But he's surely a Republican now.

--
Ed Huntress

Gunner Asch wrote:

Dan..you are thinking too small They actually should be able to
terminate until the age of majority, or 18 yrs of age.


Or register as a Libertarian. ;-)


--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.