Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 17, 2:50*pm, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
Damning how the Republicans have yet to pass Obama's jobs bill. And with every passing day, more and more *Americans are now going to vote Democrat to remove the Republicans who are preventing America from going back to work and make this Coutntry great again. Why vote for Republican when they are preventing you from getting a job, pay your bills and feed your kids? TMT Maybe. But all those oil field workers in the gulf that were put out of work by Obama are not likely to vote for Obama. And those blue collar workers that want to work on the Keystone pipeline are not candidates for voting for Obama. So with each passing day more and more people who voted for Obama are deciding they made a mistake. Dan |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 17, 8:39*pm, Hawke wrote:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dan How do you think they would feel about putting the Bush team back in office? Because if Romney get in that's exactly what we will get. Romney has no national political experience, he has no team to call on to help him, not yet. So he's reaching out for advisors and all the other people that are needed to help a president when he comes into office. If you look at who Romney is putting on his team it's a who's who of the Bush administration. Two well know names are Michael Chertoff, and Michael Hayden, who used to be in charge of Homeland security and the CIA. I saw a number of others as well and they were all the same people that worked for Bush. So if you think voting for Obama is a mistake you could do a lot worse. If you vote Romney in what you get is him and the whole team that Bush had working for him. Anyone who would like that group of people back in charge is plain nuts. We tried their way of doing things and it was disastrous. Obama is a much safer choice than going back to having the Bush team, minus Bush, running the country. Hawke You are arguing about what might happen. Romney may or may not be the Republican candidate. And he may or may not pick some former members of the Bush team. On the other hand we know who Obama has picked. And that is a good reason to not vote for Obama. Dan |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 17, 9:57*pm, " wrote:
On Nov 17, 8:39*pm, Hawke wrote: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dan How do you think they would feel about putting the Bush team back in office? Because if Romney get in that's exactly what we will get. Romney has no national political experience, he has no team to call on to help him, not yet. So he's reaching out for advisors and all the other people that are needed to help a president when he comes into office. If you look at who Romney is putting on his team it's a who's who of the Bush administration. Two well know names are Michael Chertoff, and Michael Hayden, who used to be in charge of Homeland security and the CIA. I saw a number of others as well and they were all the same people that worked for Bush. So if you think voting for Obama is a mistake you could do a lot worse. If you vote Romney in what you get is him and the whole team that Bush had working for him. Anyone who would like that group of people back in charge is plain nuts. We tried their way of doing things and it was disastrous. Obama is a much safer choice than going back to having the Bush team, minus Bush, running the country. Hawke You are arguing about what might happen. *Romney may or may not be the Republican candidate. *And he may or may not pick some former members of the Bush team. *On the other hand we know who Obama has picked. And that is a good reason to not vote for Obama. Dan- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Why is that a good reason? TMT |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 18, 3:48*pm, Hawke wrote:
Maybe you didn't understand what I just told you. I read an article and it said that Romney was in the process of picking out a team that was going to help and support him if he wins the election. The people he's looking at are all old hands from the Bush administration. So if Romney wins you can expect to hear all the names that you heard when Bush was in office. You remember all the people who gave Bush the bad advice that led to our current problems? A lot of them will be back in similar positions if Romney wins. That doesn't worry you? How about if I said Bush was going to come back and be president? Would that not worry you after seeing he was the worst president we've ever had? Romney may or may not be the Republican candidate. Let me know what article you read that said that Romney was picking out a team. Then I will read the article and decide if the article is credible. Then if the article really says what you say it does, and if it seems to be written by a credible source, I be able to decide to worry or not. Meanwhile we have Tim Geither. Froh the Washington Post. Over several years, Treasury secretary nominee Timothy F. Geithner failed to pay Social Security taxes, even though he was advised by his employer to do so, signed an agreement indicating that he understood that such payments were his responsibility and received extra pay from his employer specifically for that purpose. And Steven Chu Secretary of Energy. Of Solpndra fame. And Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis that wants Boeing to have all its eggs for assembling the Dream Liner in Washington State. Something tells me you wouldn't mind Bush being back in charge. Or that you seem to think Obama is doing a worse job than Bush did. Both of those ideas indicate to me that you have an inability to be objective. Hawke My objections to Obama is that he has not been effective. Dan |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 17, 3:44*pm, " wrote:
On Nov 17, 2:50*pm, Too_Many_Tools wrote: Damning how the Republicans have yet to pass Obama's jobs bill. And with every passing day, more and more *Americans are now going to vote Democrat to remove the Republicans who are preventing America from going back to work and make this Coutntry great again. Why vote for Republican when they are preventing you from getting a job, pay your bills and feed your kids? TMT Maybe. *But all those oil field workers in the gulf that were put out of work by Obama are not likely to vote for Obama. *And those blue collar workers that want to work on the Keystone pipeline are not candidates for voting for Obama. *So with each passing day more and more people who voted for Obama are deciding they made a mistake. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Dan LOL...better tell us why these people wouldn't vote for Obama. The oil field workers were screwed over by BP. The pipeline is one that no one wants in their backyard. Meanwhile every day the Republicans are not passing a jobs bill..and the whiners blame Obama when the ball is in their court. Even the Godfather pizza delivery man knows that the Republicans suck...he spits everytime I mention the name Cain...LOL. TMT |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|