On Nov 17, 2:50*pm, Too_Many_Tools wrote:


Damning how the Republicans have yet to pass Obama's jobs bill.

And with every passing day, more and more *Americans are now going to
vote Democrat to remove the Republicans who are preventing America
from going back to work and make this Coutntry great again.

Why vote for Republican when they are preventing you from getting a
job, pay your bills and feed your kids?

TMT

Maybe. But all those oil field workers in the gulf that were put out
of work by Obama are not likely to vote for Obama. And those blue
collar workers that want to work on the Keystone pipeline are not
candidates for voting for
Obama. So with each passing day more and more people who voted for
Obama are deciding they made a
mistake.
Dan

On 11/17/2011 1:44 PM, wrote:
On Nov 17, 2:50 pm, wrote:


Damning how the Republicans have yet to pass Obama's jobs bill.

And with every passing day, more and more Americans are now going to
vote Democrat to remove the Republicans who are preventing America
from going back to work and make this Coutntry great again.

Why vote for Republican when they are preventing you from getting a
job, pay your bills and feed your kids?

TMT

Maybe. But all those oil field workers in the gulf that were put out
of work by Obama are not likely to vote for Obama. And those blue
collar workers that want to work on the Keystone pipeline are not
candidates for voting for
Obama. So with each passing day more and more people who voted for
Obama are deciding they made a
mistake.
Dan




How do you think they would feel about putting the Bush team back in
office? Because if Romney get in that's exactly what we will get. Romney
has no national political experience, he has no team to call on to help
him, not yet. So he's reaching out for advisors and all the other people
that are needed to help a president when he comes into office. If you
look at who Romney is putting on his team it's a who's who of the Bush
administration.

Two well know names are Michael Chertoff, and Michael Hayden, who used
to be in charge of Homeland security and the CIA. I saw a number of
others as well and they were all the same people that worked for Bush.
So if you think voting for Obama is a mistake you could do a lot worse.
If you vote Romney in what you get is him and the whole team that Bush
had working for him. Anyone who would like that group of people back in
charge is plain nuts. We tried their way of doing things and it was
disastrous. Obama is a much safer choice than going back to having the
Bush team, minus Bush, running the country.

Hawke

On Nov 17, 8:39*pm, Hawke wrote:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dan

How do you think they would feel about putting the Bush team back in
office? Because if Romney get in that's exactly what we will get. Romney
has no national political experience, he has no team to call on to help
him, not yet. So he's reaching out for advisors and all the other people
that are needed to help a president when he comes into office. If you
look at who Romney is putting on his team it's a who's who of the Bush
administration.

Two well know names are Michael Chertoff, and Michael Hayden, who used
to be in charge of Homeland security and the CIA. I saw a number of
others as well and they were all the same people that worked for Bush.
So if you think voting for Obama is a mistake you could do a lot worse.
If you vote Romney in what you get is him and the whole team that Bush
had working for him. Anyone who would like that group of people back in
charge is plain nuts. We tried their way of doing things and it was
disastrous. Obama is a much safer choice than going back to having the
Bush team, minus Bush, running the country.

Hawke


You are arguing about what might happen. Romney may or may not be the
Republican candidate. And he may or may not pick some former members
of the Bush team. On the other hand we know who Obama has picked.
And that is a good reason to not vote for Obama.


Dan

On Nov 17, 3:44*pm, " wrote:
On Nov 17, 2:50*pm, Too_Many_Tools wrote:



Damning how the Republicans have yet to pass Obama's jobs bill.

And with every passing day, more and more *Americans are now going to
vote Democrat to remove the Republicans who are preventing America
from going back to work and make this Coutntry great again.

Why vote for Republican when they are preventing you from getting a
job, pay your bills and feed your kids?

TMT

Maybe. *But all those oil field workers in the gulf that were put out
of work by Obama are not likely to vote for Obama. *And those blue
collar workers that want to work on the Keystone pipeline are not
candidates for voting for
Obama. *So with each passing day more and more people who voted for
Obama are deciding they made a
mistake.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Dan

LOL...better tell us why these people wouldn't vote for Obama.

The oil field workers were screwed over by BP.

The pipeline is one that no one wants in their backyard.

Meanwhile every day the Republicans are not passing a jobs bill..and
the whiners blame Obama when the ball is in their court.

Even the Godfather pizza delivery man knows that the Republicans
suck...he spits everytime I mention the name Cain...LOL.

TMT

On Nov 17, 9:57*pm, " wrote:
On Nov 17, 8:39*pm, Hawke wrote:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dan







How do you think they would feel about putting the Bush team back in
office? Because if Romney get in that's exactly what we will get. Romney
has no national political experience, he has no team to call on to help
him, not yet. So he's reaching out for advisors and all the other people
that are needed to help a president when he comes into office. If you
look at who Romney is putting on his team it's a who's who of the Bush
administration.

Two well know names are Michael Chertoff, and Michael Hayden, who used
to be in charge of Homeland security and the CIA. I saw a number of
others as well and they were all the same people that worked for Bush.
So if you think voting for Obama is a mistake you could do a lot worse.
If you vote Romney in what you get is him and the whole team that Bush
had working for him. Anyone who would like that group of people back in
charge is plain nuts. We tried their way of doing things and it was
disastrous. Obama is a much safer choice than going back to having the
Bush team, minus Bush, running the country.

Hawke

You are arguing about what might happen. *Romney may or may not be the
Republican candidate. *And he may or may not pick some former members
of the Bush team. *On the other hand we know who Obama has picked.
And that is a good reason to not vote for Obama.

Dan- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Why is that a good reason?

TMT

On 11/17/2011 7:57 PM, wrote:
On Nov 17, 8:39 pm, wrote:
Dan

How do you think they would feel about putting the Bush team back in
office? Because if Romney get in that's exactly what we will get. Romney
has no national political experience, he has no team to call on to help
him, not yet. So he's reaching out for advisors and all the other people
that are needed to help a president when he comes into office. If you
look at who Romney is putting on his team it's a who's who of the Bush
administration.

Two well know names are Michael Chertoff, and Michael Hayden, who used
to be in charge of Homeland security and the CIA. I saw a number of
others as well and they were all the same people that worked for Bush.
So if you think voting for Obama is a mistake you could do a lot worse.
If you vote Romney in what you get is him and the whole team that Bush
had working for him. Anyone who would like that group of people back in
charge is plain nuts. We tried their way of doing things and it was
disastrous. Obama is a much safer choice than going back to having the
Bush team, minus Bush, running the country.

Hawke


You are arguing about what might happen. Romney may or may not be the
Republican candidate. And he may or may not pick some former members
of the Bush team. On the other hand we know who Obama has picked.
And that is a good reason to not vote for Obama.


Dan



Maybe you didn't understand what I just told you. I read an article and
it said that Romney was in the process of picking out a team that was
going to help and support him if he wins the election. The people he's
looking at are all old hands from the Bush administration. So if Romney
wins you can expect to hear all the names that you heard when Bush was
in office. You remember all the people who gave Bush the bad advice that
led to our current problems? A lot of them will be back in similar
positions if Romney wins. That doesn't worry you? How about if I said
Bush was going to come back and be president? Would that not worry you
after seeing he was the worst president we've ever had?

Something tells me you wouldn't mind Bush being back in charge. Or that
you seem to think Obama is doing a worse job than Bush did. Both of
those ideas indicate to me that you have an inability to be objective.

Hawke

On Nov 18, 3:48*pm, Hawke wrote:

Maybe you didn't understand what I just told you. I read an article and
it said that Romney was in the process of picking out a team that was
going to help and support him if he wins the election. The people he's
looking at are all old hands from the Bush administration. So if Romney
wins you can expect to hear all the names that you heard when Bush was
in office. You remember all the people who gave Bush the bad advice that
led to our current problems? A lot of them will be back in similar
positions if Romney wins. That doesn't worry you? How about if I said
Bush was going to come back and be president? Would that not worry you
after seeing he was the worst president we've ever had?


Romney may or may not be the Republican candidate. Let me know what
article you read that said that Romney was picking out a team. Then I
will read the article and decide if the article is credible. Then
if the article really says what you say it does, and if it seems to be
written by a credible source, I be able to decide to worry or not.

Meanwhile we have Tim Geither. Froh the Washington Post.

Over several years, Treasury secretary nominee Timothy F. Geithner
failed to pay Social Security taxes, even though he was advised by his
employer to do so, signed an agreement indicating that he understood
that such payments were his responsibility and received extra pay from
his employer specifically for that purpose.

And Steven Chu Secretary of Energy. Of Solpndra fame.

And Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis that wants Boeing to have all
its eggs for assembling the Dream Liner in Washington State.

Something tells me you wouldn't mind Bush being back in charge. Or that
you seem to think Obama is doing a worse job than Bush did. Both of
those ideas indicate to me that you have an inability to be objective.

Hawke

My objections to Obama is that he has not been effective.


Dan