On Nov 18, 3:48*pm, Hawke wrote:

Maybe you didn't understand what I just told you. I read an article and
it said that Romney was in the process of picking out a team that was
going to help and support him if he wins the election. The people he's
looking at are all old hands from the Bush administration. So if Romney
wins you can expect to hear all the names that you heard when Bush was
in office. You remember all the people who gave Bush the bad advice that
led to our current problems? A lot of them will be back in similar
positions if Romney wins. That doesn't worry you? How about if I said
Bush was going to come back and be president? Would that not worry you
after seeing he was the worst president we've ever had?


Romney may or may not be the Republican candidate. Let me know what
article you read that said that Romney was picking out a team. Then I
will read the article and decide if the article is credible. Then
if the article really says what you say it does, and if it seems to be
written by a credible source, I be able to decide to worry or not.

Meanwhile we have Tim Geither. Froh the Washington Post.

Over several years, Treasury secretary nominee Timothy F. Geithner
failed to pay Social Security taxes, even though he was advised by his
employer to do so, signed an agreement indicating that he understood
that such payments were his responsibility and received extra pay from
his employer specifically for that purpose.

And Steven Chu Secretary of Energy. Of Solpndra fame.

And Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis that wants Boeing to have all
its eggs for assembling the Dream Liner in Washington State.

Something tells me you wouldn't mind Bush being back in charge. Or that
you seem to think Obama is doing a worse job than Bush did. Both of
those ideas indicate to me that you have an inability to be objective.

Hawke

My objections to Obama is that he has not been effective.


Dan