On 2011-06-06, RogerN wrote:

Looks like Indiana is in the lead to defund Planned Parenthood. And,
immediate response from Obama and the Demoncraps that get campaign funds
from Planned Parenthood, wanting to withhold Medicare from Indiana and
telling lies. The Democraps lie about how this will defund women's
healthcare. Just Democrap lies, the money isn't taken away from women's
healthcare, just from the worlds largest abortion provider (sounds better
than the more accurate description of baby murderer). So, why can't the
funds go to women's health care services by those who don't provide
abortions? Because Planned Parenthood buys democrat politicians, they know
most Republican politicians aren't stupid enough, so they go with the stupid
ones, the Democrats!

A new Democrat test "Are you smarter than a fence post?". If not, you're
probably a Democrat.

My expectation is that this show politics will come to nothing and
Planned Parenthood will not be "defunded", in Indiana or elsewhere.

i

On Jun 6, 7:03*pm, Ignoramus21994 ignoramus21...@NOSPAM.
21994.invalid wrote:
On 2011-06-06, RogerN wrote:



Looks like Indiana is in the lead to defund Planned Parenthood. *And,
immediate response from Obama and the Demoncraps that get campaign funds
from Planned Parenthood, wanting to withhold Medicare from Indiana and
telling lies. *The Democraps lie about how this will defund women's
healthcare. *Just Democrap lies, the money isn't taken away from women's
healthcare, just from the worlds largest abortion provider (sounds better
than the more accurate description of baby murderer). *So, why can't the
funds go to women's health care services by those who don't provide
abortions? *Because Planned Parenthood buys democrat politicians, they know
most Republican politicians aren't stupid enough, so they go with the stupid
ones, the Democrats!

A new Democrat test "Are you smarter than a fence post?". *If not, you're
probably a Democrat.

My expectation is that this show politics will come to nothing and
Planned Parenthood will not be "defunded", in Indiana or elsewhere.

i

I agree.

And people like Roger will continue to be hypocrites about abortion
while denying children medical care and food/shelter.

The Republicans are trying to shore up their diminishing support in
the Religious Right.

Meanwhile they have not yet created any of those jobs they promised.

The death spiral of the GOP.

TMT

TMT

"Ignoramus21994" wrote in message
...
On 2011-06-06, RogerN wrote:

Looks like Indiana is in the lead to defund Planned Parenthood. And,
immediate response from Obama and the Demoncraps that get campaign funds
from Planned Parenthood, wanting to withhold Medicare from Indiana and
telling lies. The Democraps lie about how this will defund women's
healthcare. Just Democrap lies, the money isn't taken away from women's
healthcare, just from the worlds largest abortion provider (sounds better
than the more accurate description of baby murderer). So, why can't the
funds go to women's health care services by those who don't provide
abortions? Because Planned Parenthood buys democrat politicians, they
know
most Republican politicians aren't stupid enough, so they go with the
stupid
ones, the Democrats!

A new Democrat test "Are you smarter than a fence post?". If not, you're
probably a Democrat.

My expectation is that this show politics will come to nothing and
Planned Parenthood will not be "defunded", in Indiana or elsewhere.

i

In any case, it isn't likely to fly far:

Gallup Poll, 4/9-10/11

"As you may know, the federal government currently provides funding to
support some programs run by the organization called Planned Parenthood. Do
you think federal funding for Planned Parenthood should be eliminated
entirely, or do you think the federal government should continue to provide
funding to Planned Parenthood?"

Eliminate funding: 34%
Continue to provide: 65%
Unsu 1%

--
Ed Huntress

On Jun 6, 9:41*pm, Too_Many_Tools wrote:


Meanwhile they have not yet created any of those jobs they promised.

The death spiral of the GOP.

TMT

TMT

The ball is in Obama's court. So it is he that has not created many
of the jobs he promised. So we shall see whether it is the death
spiral of the Republicans or the death spiral of the Democrats at the
next general election.

Dan

wrote:
On Jun 6, 9:41 pm, Too_Many_Tools wrote:

Meanwhile they have not yet created any of those jobs they promised.

The death spiral of the GOP.

TMT

TMT

The ball is in Obama's court. So it is he that has not created many
of the jobs he promised. So we shall see whether it is the death
spiral of the Republicans or the death spiral of the Democrats at the
next general election.

Dan

an interesting idea?

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=123809


Is Obama unraveling?

Chief political correspondent Byron York wrote: "This is about the time Barack
Obama becomes bored with his job."

"He's in his second year as president and he's discovered that even with all the
powers of office, he can't do everything he wants to do, like remake America.
Doing stuff is hard. In the past, prosaic work has held little appeal for Obama,
and it's prompted him to think about moving on." ("Has Obama become bored with
being president?"; The Washington Examiner; Jan. 29)

Perhaps Obama is bored – perhaps he is bored and chafing at having the brakes
put on his stated goal of "fundamentally changing America." Allowing for
whichever, we can say that Obama is a narcissist, and greater love hath no man
than he hath for himself. Add to his narcissism his arrogance, egotism and the
appearance that he alone is worthy. Egotism is a defining component of a
person's personality. It is one's disposition, and it is neither bendable nor
pliable – whereas arrogance is a reflection of one's core personality, which
brings me to the reason for my posit pursuant to Obama's emotional stability.

I know there are no few who will excoriate me for the mere suggestion of this –
so be it. But is it possible we are witnessing the subtle unraveling of Obama?

What can we learn about Barack Obama by analyzing his personality quirks? Find
out what the experts say in Whistleblower magazine's "Narcissist in Chief" edition

Byron wrote: "What Obama wanted was political power, and that is what sent him
to Harvard Law School. 'He was constantly thinking about his path to
significance and power,' another organizer, Mike Kruglik, told me. He said, 'I
need to go there [Harvard] to find out more about power. How do powerful people
think? What kind of networks do they have? How do they connect to each other?'"

I believe we are looking at a man who believed that, as president, he would be
beyond constraint.

With his newly minted presidential power he expected the world to be his oyster
and America to be his pearl to reconstruct as he saw fit. But, he very quickly
found the American people would only let themselves be pushed so far. At this
point he surely realizes that the world at large won't bow before him and that
the world's "bad guys" have less respect for him than they had for Clinton. And,
he is finding out the hard way that politicians are the last ones you want in
your foxhole when you're under fire.

Obama expected to simply speak things into being, both here and around the
world. Instead, he finds himself subjugated on a politically unsustainable
island of his making, surrounded by the moral equivalent of myiasis.

Health-care reform was to be the crowning achievement of his first year in
office. But after a year of hurled insults by Obama and his minions, others had
the last laugh. The only thing he brought back from Copenhagen was a bruised ego
that theretofore had led him to believe that just by showing up he would return
triumphantly with the 2016 Olympic games for Chicago in hand.

He has suffered growing mistrust and contempt for his policies. After his
distasteful State of the Union performance, even liberals – including the New
York Times and Dr. Lamont Hill – were critical of him. Eric Michael Dyson has
criticized him. He has a perfect record when campaigning for other candidates –
three losses, no victories. He is being betrayed by the words from his own
mouth. Don't think for a moment these things haven't bothered him.

I believe this is in large part his reason for lashing out. Reasonable people
may find defeat and/or things not going their way a bitter pill, but they don't
verbally accost and make a public display of Supreme Court justices to their
faces – and you certainly do not do it with erroneous facts. It is an especially
vulgar display when it comes from a sitting president. He insulted Republicans
at their luncheon where he was their guest – insisting they had accused him of
Bolshevik plots. To everyone's surprise, he claimed not to be an ideologue. He
is becoming increasingly adroit at blaming everyone else for his political
failings. He has routinely been condescending and insulting to voters.

It seems that much of what he says is instantly disproved and/or shown to be
Chicago-style verbal thuggery. He is bruised and angry, as evidenced by his
recent comments. The American people oppose his agendas at every turn, and still
he promises not to retreat from his positions. He, in effect, told an
interviewer that ignoring the will of the people will potentially make him a
"really good one-term president."

No one denies that being president falls far short of being an easy job – and as
Roosevelt and Nixon proved, it is not a job for those who believe themselves
above the people and the laws of the land. Is it possible Obama is fraying
around the emotional edges? And if certain people are right in their suspicions
– is this the first time?

--

Richard Lamb
http://www.home.earthlink.net/~cavelamb
http://www.home.earthlink.net/~sv_temptress

On Jun 6, 10:39*pm, " wrote:
On Jun 6, 9:41*pm, Too_Many_Tools wrote:



Meanwhile they have not yet created any of those jobs they promised.

The death spiral of the GOP.

TMT

TMT

The ball is in Obama's court. *So it is he that has not created many
of the jobs he promised. *So we shall see whether it is the death
spiral of the Republicans or the death spiral of the Democrats at the
next general election.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dan

Republicans fought tooth and claw five months ago for the $585 BILLION
24 month tax cut.

Five months = 121 BILLION...so where are the jobs that the Republicans
promised would happen if the tax cuts were passed?

That 121 BILLION could have been tax revenues to stimulate the job
growth...it isn't happening.

The closer the elections come, the more you will hear about the
failure of the Republican tax cuts.

TMT

"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message
...



where are the jobs that the Republicans promised would happen if the tax
cuts were passed?

China, you silly goose...

--