Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
On Sun, 08 May 2011 22:15:00 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote: Ive got a 5hp PC3 vfd running my Gorton MasterMill. The top end voltage it is supposed to run on..is 230vts + about 5 volts It will run down to 200 volts. Im running it on single phase, been doing it for years. Now the power company has increased my 220 single phase to about 249 volts and when I try to start it..I keep getting OverVoltage Alarm. I cant get the power company to change the tap down to a normal voltage, let alone 220 volts How do I (cheaply) transform high voltage down 14-29 volts ac? Id hate to loose the VFD on this mill and have to run it off a RPC (which also puts out higher voltages) Gunner You may be able to increase the maximum voltage setting up to 255 volts using function code 2 , see page 7-3. http://tinyurl.com/3o6ljtw |
#82
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
On Thu, 12 May 2011 16:36:25 -0500, Benny Fishhole
wrote: On Sun, 08 May 2011 22:15:00 -0700, Gunner Asch wrote: Ive got a 5hp PC3 vfd running my Gorton MasterMill. The top end voltage it is supposed to run on..is 230vts + about 5 volts It will run down to 200 volts. Im running it on single phase, been doing it for years. Now the power company has increased my 220 single phase to about 249 volts and when I try to start it..I keep getting OverVoltage Alarm. I cant get the power company to change the tap down to a normal voltage, let alone 220 volts How do I (cheaply) transform high voltage down 14-29 volts ac? Id hate to loose the VFD on this mill and have to run it off a RPC (which also puts out higher voltages) Gunner You may be able to increase the maximum voltage setting up to 255 volts using function code 2 , see page 7-3. http://tinyurl.com/3o6ljtw Oops, make that function code 3 |
#83
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
Nice beard!
he looks just like you and sound just like you FLAT Put that in your fancy out of date browsers ------------- "PrecisionmachinisT" wrote in message newssOdnUng3rvRX1fQnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@scnresearch. com... "Bob Engelhardt" wrote in message ... PrecisionmachinisT wrote: ... Are YOU that stupid? You too - that's enough. Bob http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qHUb...1&feature=fvwp -- |
#84
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
The group doesn't need to know about you communication failures.
LOL ------------- "PrecisionmachinisT" wrote in message ... But since it's apparent you're just arguing for arguements then I'm done with it now goodbye TROLL -- |
#85
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
The biggest weapon against this crap is to use your killfilters. You sleep
much better and when they discover nobody listens to them they start to think about it. Usenet will be gone off the face of the earth in a few years dues to some that are purposely trying to destroy it. Most ISPs willnot handle it anymore. Stand by for a demo of some of this, shortly. --------------- "Bob Engelhardt" wrote in message ... Yeah, I know about Usenet, but RCM has always been different. An oasis in a desert of rudeness. It makes such a difference. On many groups it's so unpleasant reading even when the rudeness is not directed at you. Bob |
#86
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
PrecisionmachinisT wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message m... PrecisionmachinisT wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... PrecisionmachinisT wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message m... "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: Cross-Slide wrote: Maybe YOU are talking about an RPC, but the subject of the OP is " VFD question " It doesn't matter, since the transformer goes before anything else. It operates at line voltage, and in Gunner's case at a constant 60 Hz. It does matter, a set of transformers can most certainly come after a RPC, if you only have buck transformers large enough to handle the three phase current, not the single phase current. Why would you put three after the RPC when one at the input ddoes it right? Are you that stupid? Because in the case of an RPC, the entire downstream bus in all probability has excessive voltage imbalances when measured phase to phase and even even a few percent of voltage imbalance has a very profoundly negative effect on motor temtrature rise and energy losses to core heating.... Are YOU that stupid? Sigh. Are you saying that you will adjust each transformer as you change the load? Sigh.... What I'm saying is to balance the RPC output voltage first and THEN apply power factor correction on an as-needed basis at each individual load. And overvolt the RPC motor? Not very smart, is it? You ****ing moron--do I have to spell out every last detail ? --just a couple posts ago I told you about voltage imbalance and its effect on motor heating....which is a WAY more serious situation than is running 20% or so above ( or below nominal ) with BALANCED voltages. 1) Balance the converter, generally, capacitors are used. 2) Transform the output if needed ( notably, most 3ph transformers have taps which allow for a slight buck/ boost adjustment on a per-phase basis ) 3) Apply power factor at each load, if needed.... But since it's apparent you're just arguing for arguements then I'm done with it now goodbye TROLL You still didn't answer the problem with overvoltage on the RPC motor. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a Band-Aid™ on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
#87
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
PrecisionmachinisT wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message m... PrecisionmachinisT wrote: "Pete C." wrote in message ster.com... "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: Cross-Slide wrote: Maybe YOU are talking about an RPC, but the subject of the OP is " VFD question " It doesn't matter, since the transformer goes before anything else. It operates at line voltage, and in Gunner's case at a constant 60 Hz. It does matter, a set of transformers can most certainly come after a RPC, if you only have buck transformers large enough to handle the three phase current, not the single phase current. Why would you put three after the RPC when one at the input ddoes it right? Are you that stupid? I'm not stupid, but you may be if you are that clueless as to the context and the point I made about the transformer sizing. If you have for example three 1KVA transformers on hand but no 3KVA transformers, it's a pretty easy choice to use the three you have downstream rather than buy a new transformer to use upstream. OK, if a hack job pleases you. A "hack job" utilizing parts you already have on hand vs. spending money buying new parts will please most HSM folks. We are talking HSM here, not in a factory where you would have real three phase power anyway. Even within a factory environment it is perfectly sound engineering to parallel transformers. Three transformers on the individual phases isn't 'parallel'. Oh I see....and the moon is made of cheese, too.... You can't fix stupid. Certainly seems true in the case of YOUR stupidity. Yawn... -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a Band-Aid™ on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
#88
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
On May 12, 4:52*pm, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote: "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: Cross-Slide wrote: Maybe YOU are talking about an RPC, but the subject of the OP is " VFD question " * *It doesn't matter, since the transformer goes before anything else. It operates at line voltage, and in Gunner's case at a constant 60 Hz. It does matter, a set of transformers can most certainly come after a RPC, if you only have buck transformers large enough to handle the three phase current, not the single phase current. * *Why would you put three after the RPC when one at the input ddoes it right? *Are you that stupid? I'm not stupid, but you may be if you are that clueless as to the context and the point I made about the transformer sizing. If you have for example three 1KVA transformers on hand but no 3KVA transformers, it's a pretty easy choice to use the three you have downstream rather than buy a new transformer to use upstream. * *OK, if a hack job pleases you. A "hack job" utilizing parts you already have on hand vs. spending money buying new parts will please most HSM folks. We are talking HSM here, not in a factory where you would have real three phase power anyway. * *The OP has a problem with a VFD with an overvoltage condition on it's input. *Please explain how your hack job on the output will fix that. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a Band-Aid™ on it, because it's Teflon coated. I don't see, in the original question where it is specified that the OV error is coming from the VFD or from the mill. If the error condition is in the VFD, then of course you have to fix the input voltage. If it's on the mill, and you're only using the VFD to generate 3-phase and not as a speed control, it would seem perfectly reasonable to correct the voltage at the output, assuming you had three smaller transformers as opposed to one large one. Please explain why that wouldn't work. I'm not trying to play gotcha - I really am interested in whether there is a reason not to do this. |
#89
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message m... PrecisionmachinisT wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message m... PrecisionmachinisT wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... PrecisionmachinisT wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message m... "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: Cross-Slide wrote: Maybe YOU are talking about an RPC, but the subject of the OP is " VFD question " It doesn't matter, since the transformer goes before anything else. It operates at line voltage, and in Gunner's case at a constant 60 Hz. It does matter, a set of transformers can most certainly come after a RPC, if you only have buck transformers large enough to handle the three phase current, not the single phase current. Why would you put three after the RPC when one at the input ddoes it right? Are you that stupid? Because in the case of an RPC, the entire downstream bus in all probability has excessive voltage imbalances when measured phase to phase and even even a few percent of voltage imbalance has a very profoundly negative effect on motor temtrature rise and energy losses to core heating.... Are YOU that stupid? Sigh. Are you saying that you will adjust each transformer as you change the load? Sigh.... What I'm saying is to balance the RPC output voltage first and THEN apply power factor correction on an as-needed basis at each individual load. And overvolt the RPC motor? Not very smart, is it? You ****ing moron--do I have to spell out every last detail ? --just a couple posts ago I told you about voltage imbalance and its effect on motor heating....which is a WAY more serious situation than is running 20% or so above ( or below nominal ) with BALANCED voltages. 1) Balance the converter, generally, capacitors are used. 2) Transform the output if needed ( notably, most 3ph transformers have taps which allow for a slight buck/ boost adjustment on a per-phase basis ) 3) Apply power factor at each load, if needed.... But since it's apparent you're just arguing for arguements then I'm done with it now goodbye TROLL You still didn't answer the problem with overvoltage on the RPC motor. Did too--learn to read Just one post ago--where I told you about voltage imbalance and it's effect on motor heating and how that is a WAY more serious situation than running at 20% or so above ( or below ) nominal nameplate with BALANCED voltages. Also I said "goodbye troll"... But apparently you have some serious reading comprehension problems and so into the bozo bin you go. plonk -- |
#90
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
"Josepi" wrote in message ... The group doesn't need to know about you communication failures. LOL ------------- "PrecisionmachinisT" wrote in message ... But since it's apparent you're just arguing for arguements then I'm done with it now goodbye TROLL Let him argue the point with the engineers at GE http://www.geindustrial.com/publibrary/checkout/Paralleling?TNR=White%20Papers|Paralleling|generic Or at square D http://ecatalog.squared.com/techlib/...008926802f9112 |
#91
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
Again?
Just can't keep a good troll down? Posts may be trolls but most people aren't. LOL ---------- "PrecisionmachinisT" wrote in message news:qeydne5UCNIR51HQnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@scnresearch. com... Also I said "goodbye troll"... But apparently you have some serious reading comprehension problems and so into the bozo bin you go. plonk -- |
#92
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
PrecisionmachinisT wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message m... PrecisionmachinisT wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message m... PrecisionmachinisT wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... PrecisionmachinisT wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message m... "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: Cross-Slide wrote: Maybe YOU are talking about an RPC, but the subject of the OP is " VFD question " It doesn't matter, since the transformer goes before anything else. It operates at line voltage, and in Gunner's case at a constant 60 Hz. It does matter, a set of transformers can most certainly come after a RPC, if you only have buck transformers large enough to handle the three phase current, not the single phase current. Why would you put three after the RPC when one at the input ddoes it right? Are you that stupid? Because in the case of an RPC, the entire downstream bus in all probability has excessive voltage imbalances when measured phase to phase and even even a few percent of voltage imbalance has a very profoundly negative effect on motor temtrature rise and energy losses to core heating.... Are YOU that stupid? Sigh. Are you saying that you will adjust each transformer as you change the load? Sigh.... What I'm saying is to balance the RPC output voltage first and THEN apply power factor correction on an as-needed basis at each individual load. And overvolt the RPC motor? Not very smart, is it? You ****ing moron--do I have to spell out every last detail ? --just a couple posts ago I told you about voltage imbalance and its effect on motor heating....which is a WAY more serious situation than is running 20% or so above ( or below nominal ) with BALANCED voltages. 1) Balance the converter, generally, capacitors are used. 2) Transform the output if needed ( notably, most 3ph transformers have taps which allow for a slight buck/ boost adjustment on a per-phase basis ) 3) Apply power factor at each load, if needed.... But since it's apparent you're just arguing for arguements then I'm done with it now goodbye TROLL You still didn't answer the problem with overvoltage on the RPC motor. Did too--learn to read Just one post ago--where I told you about voltage imbalance and it's effect on motor heating and how that is a WAY more serious situation than running at 20% or so above ( or below ) nominal nameplate with BALANCED voltages. Also I said "goodbye troll"... But apparently you have some serious reading comprehension problems and so into the bozo bin you go. plonk You need to get help with those anger issues, before you have a stroke. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a Band-Aid™ on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
#93
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
PrecisionmachinisT wrote: "Josepi" wrote in message ... The group doesn't need to know about you communication failures. LOL ------------- "PrecisionmachinisT" wrote in message ... But since it's apparent you're just arguing for arguements then I'm done with it now goodbye TROLL Let him argue the point with the engineers at GE http://www.geindustrial.com/publibrary/checkout/Paralleling?TNR=White%20Papers|Paralleling|generic Or at square D http://ecatalog.squared.com/techlib/...008926802f9112 Both of those support my position. Nice try. Did you even read them? They have nothing to do with either VFD or RPC installations. At the 2 MW rating in the articles, they are small substation grade transformers. Not something you could use for a home shop. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a Band-Aid™ on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
#94
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: PrecisionmachinisT wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message m... "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: Cross-Slide wrote: Maybe YOU are talking about an RPC, but the subject of the OP is " VFD question " It doesn't matter, since the transformer goes before anything else. It operates at line voltage, and in Gunner's case at a constant 60 Hz. It does matter, a set of transformers can most certainly come after a RPC, if you only have buck transformers large enough to handle the three phase current, not the single phase current. Why would you put three after the RPC when one at the input ddoes it right? Are you that stupid? Because in the case of an RPC, the entire downstream bus in all probability has excessive voltage imbalances when measured phase to phase and even even a few percent of voltage imbalance has a very profoundly negative effect on motor temtrature rise and energy losses to core heating.... Are YOU that stupid? Sigh. Are you saying that you will adjust each transformer as you change the load? No, I'm saying you use what you have and if you have three small transformers that will do the job after the RPC, you use those instead of buying a new transformer. So, you are going to use them on the output to protect the load, but not the VFD or the RPC? It's not about "protecting" it's about eliminating alarms and making the machine run. What good will they do on the output, if the three phase motor in your RPC is saturating and smoking, or on fire? No three phase motor is going to have an issue with 249V, that is within acceptable limits. You do know that if the three transformers are identical, they can be run in parallel? Well duh. Do you think that three transformers found in someone's odds and ends pile are going to be identical? |
#95
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: Cross-Slide wrote: Maybe YOU are talking about an RPC, but the subject of the OP is " VFD question " It doesn't matter, since the transformer goes before anything else. It operates at line voltage, and in Gunner's case at a constant 60 Hz. It does matter, a set of transformers can most certainly come after a RPC, if you only have buck transformers large enough to handle the three phase current, not the single phase current. Why would you put three after the RPC when one at the input ddoes it right? Are you that stupid? I'm not stupid, but you may be if you are that clueless as to the context and the point I made about the transformer sizing. If you have for example three 1KVA transformers on hand but no 3KVA transformers, it's a pretty easy choice to use the three you have downstream rather than buy a new transformer to use upstream. OK, if a hack job pleases you. A "hack job" utilizing parts you already have on hand vs. spending money buying new parts will please most HSM folks. We are talking HSM here, not in a factory where you would have real three phase power anyway. The OP has a problem with a VFD with an overvoltage condition on it's input. Please explain how your hack job on the output will fix that. We're talking about an RPC, not a VFD. As for overvoltage, 249V on single phase 120/240V service is not an overvoltage condition per utility standards. |
#96
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
"Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: PrecisionmachinisT wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message m... "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: Cross-Slide wrote: Maybe YOU are talking about an RPC, but the subject of the OP is " VFD question " It doesn't matter, since the transformer goes before anything else. It operates at line voltage, and in Gunner's case at a constant 60 Hz. It does matter, a set of transformers can most certainly come after a RPC, if you only have buck transformers large enough to handle the three phase current, not the single phase current. Why would you put three after the RPC when one at the input ddoes it right? Are you that stupid? Because in the case of an RPC, the entire downstream bus in all probability has excessive voltage imbalances when measured phase to phase and even even a few percent of voltage imbalance has a very profoundly negative effect on motor temtrature rise and energy losses to core heating.... Are YOU that stupid? Sigh. Are you saying that you will adjust each transformer as you change the load? No, I'm saying you use what you have and if you have three small transformers that will do the job after the RPC, you use those instead of buying a new transformer. So, you are going to use them on the output to protect the load, but not the VFD or the RPC? It's not about "protecting" it's about eliminating alarms and making the machine run. Which can't be done with transformers on the output. Just like you can't fix a low line voltage with transformers on the output. I recently repaired a pipe bending machine that was reporting low line voltage. It had two problems: The idiot electrician used a single pole breaker and fed 120 VAC to the machine. With the proper breaker and connecting his red wire to the other pole instead of the neutral gave me 208 volts, but the machine was sluggish. A boost transformer took it to 244 volts, and it perfomed like it was supposed to. What good will they do on the output, if the three phase motor in your RPC is saturating and smoking, or on fire? No three phase motor is going to have an issue with 249V, that is within acceptable limits. Then there is no need for transformers to drive the machine's motor, is there? You do know that if the three transformers are identical, they can be run in parallel? Well duh. Do you think that three transformers found in someone's odds and ends pile are going to be identical? Duh, yourself. It depends on who's shop you find them. I had three identical 208 primary 6 v 400A secondary transformers for years. They came from a set of four, mounted on a steel plate and connected to give 1600A at 6 volts. I have had up to 35 identical transformers from mainframe computers. We scrapped tractor trailer loads of mainframes that ran on 208 three phase 60 Hz and had tons of good used transformers until the local surplus places ran out and bought 2000 to 3000 pounds from us. I sold most of them by the pound. Even if the transformers aren't exactly the same, matching turns ratios can be run in parallel without problems. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a Band-Aid™ on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
#97
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
"Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: "Pete C." wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: Cross-Slide wrote: Maybe YOU are talking about an RPC, but the subject of the OP is " VFD question " It doesn't matter, since the transformer goes before anything else. It operates at line voltage, and in Gunner's case at a constant 60 Hz. It does matter, a set of transformers can most certainly come after a RPC, if you only have buck transformers large enough to handle the three phase current, not the single phase current. Why would you put three after the RPC when one at the input ddoes it right? Are you that stupid? I'm not stupid, but you may be if you are that clueless as to the context and the point I made about the transformer sizing. If you have for example three 1KVA transformers on hand but no 3KVA transformers, it's a pretty easy choice to use the three you have downstream rather than buy a new transformer to use upstream. OK, if a hack job pleases you. A "hack job" utilizing parts you already have on hand vs. spending money buying new parts will please most HSM folks. We are talking HSM here, not in a factory where you would have real three phase power anyway. The OP has a problem with a VFD with an overvoltage condition on it's input. Please explain how your hack job on the output will fix that. We're talking about an RPC, not a VFD. As for overvoltage, 249V on single phase 120/240V service is not an overvoltage condition per utility standards. A common RPC uses a 208 Volt three phase motor, not a 240 volt single phase. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a Band-Aid™ on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
#98
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
VFD question
On Mon, 09 May 2011 06:40:28 -0500, "Pete C."
wrote: Gunner Asch wrote: On Mon, 09 May 2011 00:06:29 -0700, Gunner Asch wrote: On Mon, 09 May 2011 01:19:57 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: Gunner Asch wrote: Ive got a 5hp PC3 vfd running my Gorton MasterMill. The top end voltage it is supposed to run on..is 230vts + about 5 volts It will run down to 200 volts. Im running it on single phase, been doing it for years. Now the power company has increased my 220 single phase to about 249 volts and when I try to start it..I keep getting OverVoltage Alarm. I cant get the power company to change the tap down to a normal voltage, let alone 220 volts How do I (cheaply) transform high voltage down 14-29 volts ac? Id hate to loose the VFD on this mill and have to run it off a RPC (which also puts out higher voltages) How much current do you need? A simple buck transformer will do the job, as long as it's secondary can handle the current. I believe its 5.7kva Gunner Ok...Im going to look REALLY stupid here. Sigh..blame it on the stroke. Or not..shrug Ive got a BUNCH of 120/240 transformers..all marked 120/240 12/24 So if I wire one up to 240..does it mean that it will REDUCE the voltage -24 volts? Or is the output 24 volts? I see I havent gotten everything back from the stroke....sigh If you do a search on "buck boost wiring" you will find references for how to wire one of your transformers to "buck" your 249V down to 225V. Basically, the 24V secondary goes in series with the feed to your RPC, and the primary just connects to the line. The secondary amp rating at 24V has to be enough to handle the load of your RPC/machine. http://www.jhlarson.com/ind_tables/G...uckboost01.htm If your transformers are large enough to handle the single phase load see single phase diagram A and you'll need only one transformer. http://www.jhlarson.com/ind_tables/G...uckboost03.htm If the transformers are only large enough for the three phase load you'll need to use three of them after the RPC. See diagram F, which is really the same as the single phase setup in triplicate. Do plenty of voltage checks before trying to run anything to ensure you have it wired correctly to "buck" to 225V rather than "boost" to 273V. While I was clearing out one of the storage sheds..I found a 30 amp, 230-208 transformer last night. Id lined up the biggest of 4 single phase transformers (8kva) for installation today..and then I found this one!! Yay!!! I gave it a quick shot of Rustolem last night after wiring SO cable to it..so when its dry..Ill install it and see if it does what its supposed to do. Its 3ph..but it should work nicely when only using 2 of the 3 windings. VBG Yay!!! Gunner One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|