Are these roughly the same strength? COuld a person use any of them to
build a trailer?

In article , stryped wrote:
Are these roughly the same strength? COuld a person use any of them to
build a trailer?

Damn, Google must be broken again....

Do you EVER look anything up on your own?

On Jun 18, 8:24*am, stryped wrote:
Are these roughly the same strength? COuld a person use any of them to
build a trailer?

Someone who knew how to design it could. WW2 four engine heavy
bombers were made from aluminum sheet 1/16" and thinner.

"stryped" wrote in message
...
Are these roughly the same strength? COuld a person use any of them to
build a trailer?


Sure!

On Jun 18, 8:39*am, "kelly" wrote:
"stryped" wrote in message

...

Are these roughly the same strength? COuld a person use any of them to
build a trailer?

Sure!

But be careful of the ferromanurium.

"cavedweller" wrote in message
...
On Jun 18, 8:39 am, "kelly" wrote:
"stryped" wrote in message

...

Are these roughly the same strength? COuld a person use any of them to
build a trailer?

Sure!

But be careful of the ferromanurium.


And check for black stools.

"Robert Swinney" wrote in message
...

Bob Swinney
"stryped" wrote in message
...
Are these roughly the same strength? COuld a person use any of them to
build a trailer?


Machinery's Handbook is your friend.


Noooo, Google is your friend!

Machinery's Handbook is your friend.

Bob Swinney
"stryped" wrote in message
...
Are these roughly the same strength? COuld a person use any of them to
build a trailer?

True - you make a good point Bob!


"Robert Swinney" wrote in message
...
Errrr . . . OK. But the 2 make a powerful pair.

Bob Swinney
"kelly" wrote in message
. au...

"Robert Swinney" wrote in message
...

Bob Swinney
"stryped" wrote in message
...
Are these roughly the same strength? COuld a person use any of them to
build a trailer?


Machinery's Handbook is your friend.


Noooo, Google is your friend!

Errrr . . . OK. But the 2 make a powerful pair.

Bob Swinney
"kelly" wrote in message . au...

"Robert Swinney" wrote in message
...

Bob Swinney
"stryped" wrote in message
...
Are these roughly the same strength? COuld a person use any of them to
build a trailer?


Machinery's Handbook is your friend.


Noooo, Google is your friend!

stryped fired this volley in news:c16352ba-8d16-
:

Are these roughly the same strength? COuld a person use any of them to
build a trailer?

Gee, Stryper... another "duh!" moment.

Did you ever wonder WHY one thing might be called Schedule-80, and
another Schedule-40? Did you ever look at _anything_ concerning what
those terms might mean?

(So the steel man says, "Joe, go out to that big stack of tubing out
there, and label half of it 'Schedule-40', and the other half 'Schedule-
80' so we can make our orders...")

LLoyd

On Jun 18, 10:06*am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
stryped fired this volley in news:c16352ba-8d16-
:

Are these roughly the same strength? COuld a person use any of them to
build a trailer?

Gee, Stryper... another "duh!" moment.

Did you ever wonder WHY one thing might be called Schedule-80, and
another Schedule-40? *Did you ever look at _anything_ concerning what
those terms might mean?

(So the steel man says, "Joe, go out to that big stack of tubing out
there, and label half of it 'Schedule-40', and the other half 'Schedule-
80' so we can make our orders...")

LLoyd

They are the same, +/- 3dB.

jsw

Jim Wilkins fired this volley in news:b010b8da-1c07-
:

They are the same, +/- 3dB.

Then sch-160 is only 6dB over sch-40 G

LLoyd

On Jun 18, 9:06*am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
stryped fired this volley in news:c16352ba-8d16-
:

Are these roughly the same strength? COuld a person use any of them to
build a trailer?

Gee, Stryper... another "duh!" moment.

Did you ever wonder WHY one thing might be called Schedule-80, and
another Schedule-40? *Did you ever look at _anything_ concerning what
those terms might mean?

(So the steel man says, "Joe, go out to that big stack of tubing out
there, and label half of it 'Schedule-40', and the other half 'Schedule-
80' so we can make our orders...")

LLoyd

I've always looked up pipe sizes in appropriate charts and I've always
assumed that the schedule #'s were some abritrary number set by an
industry standard, but I found a formula for it: Pipe schedule = 1000
* (pressure / allowable stress) where pressure = internal working pipe
pressure and allowable stress is for the material used.
http://www.cheresources.com/invision...pipe-schedule/

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:51:52 -0700 (PDT), cavedweller
wrote:

On Jun 18, 8:39*am, "kelly" wrote:
"stryped" wrote in message

...

Are these roughly the same strength? COuld a person use any of them to
build a trailer?

Sure!

But be careful of the ferromanurium.

And the frolapse has to be tacked properly.


One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
Gunner Asch