Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
A letter from Ted Nugent
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:05:39 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote: "Jeff M" wrote in message m... On 6/1/2010 9:55 AM, rangerssuck wrote: On Jun 1, 8:19 am, Jeff wrote: On 6/1/2010 7:00 AM, rangerssuck wrote: [snip] I live in a suburb of New York. over 50% non-white minorities. I live on a very racially mixed street. No one I know in this town owns guns. When you read the police blotter in the local paper, it's all about the drug busts and DWI. Burglary is pretty much a non-issue. I wonder why that is. Whatever the reason is, it's probably not due to the alleged non-ownership of guns. Moreover, gun ownership is seldom the subject of casual conversation by responsible owners. Lots of folks won't tell you about the guns they own, especially if they sense your attitude. I never said that gun ownership or lack of it was the reason for the low rate of burglary here or in Gunnerland. Gunner, on the other hand, clearly implied that the low rate of burglary in his neighborhood was due to the fact that many houses have guns in them. Gunnerland, as he describes it, is an entirely fictional place. Others have documented the pathetic reality. Nonetheless, I'd imagine that, in reality, there are a few more gun owners in your neighborhood than you know about. However, I seriously doubt that rates of gun ownership are even correlated, much less causally related, to residential burglary rates, in any case. I haven't checked this for years, but there is some inverse correlation between burglary rates and gun ownership -- across INTERNATIONAL lines. I never tried to analyze it within the US. The few cities that outlaw guns have so many other variables involved that I question whether you could even do a good regression analysis on them. Of course, our rates of violent crime remain very high, relatively speaking, even with (or because of?) high rates of gun ownership in the US. If you want to try to correlate gun ownership on a *regional* basis with burglary, that can be done, but only in the nine census regions studied by the General Social Survey (GSS) conducted by the National Opinion Research Center. They do the only credible, regional survey of gun ownership. The fact that there are different numbers and types of metropolitan regions within those census regions makes it questionable how useful your conclusions would be, in any case. Based on having done such analyses before, I'd say you're in for four or five hours of work. And you may need a university account to get into the GSS for free; I haven't looked for over a decade. The University of CT, Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, publishes the data. Then you'll need to run those numbers against the FBI's Uniform Crime Report data, which is free online. Without that work, you'd just be blowing smoke or pulling opinions out of your butt, like most of the commenters in this thread. Hey, I can clear this up no problem. I bought my first gun in 40 years in 2005. I have bought at least one gun per year since then, and crime has dropped every year since then. It is therefore obvious that my buying guns reduces crime, I've done a public service, and my future selections should be subsidized with government funding. Ed, you make things far too complicated. G |
#2
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
A letter from Ted Nugent
"Don Foreman" wrote in message ... On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:05:39 -0400, "Ed Huntress" wrote: "Jeff M" wrote in message om... On 6/1/2010 9:55 AM, rangerssuck wrote: On Jun 1, 8:19 am, Jeff wrote: On 6/1/2010 7:00 AM, rangerssuck wrote: [snip] I live in a suburb of New York. over 50% non-white minorities. I live on a very racially mixed street. No one I know in this town owns guns. When you read the police blotter in the local paper, it's all about the drug busts and DWI. Burglary is pretty much a non-issue. I wonder why that is. Whatever the reason is, it's probably not due to the alleged non-ownership of guns. Moreover, gun ownership is seldom the subject of casual conversation by responsible owners. Lots of folks won't tell you about the guns they own, especially if they sense your attitude. I never said that gun ownership or lack of it was the reason for the low rate of burglary here or in Gunnerland. Gunner, on the other hand, clearly implied that the low rate of burglary in his neighborhood was due to the fact that many houses have guns in them. Gunnerland, as he describes it, is an entirely fictional place. Others have documented the pathetic reality. Nonetheless, I'd imagine that, in reality, there are a few more gun owners in your neighborhood than you know about. However, I seriously doubt that rates of gun ownership are even correlated, much less causally related, to residential burglary rates, in any case. I haven't checked this for years, but there is some inverse correlation between burglary rates and gun ownership -- across INTERNATIONAL lines. I never tried to analyze it within the US. The few cities that outlaw guns have so many other variables involved that I question whether you could even do a good regression analysis on them. Of course, our rates of violent crime remain very high, relatively speaking, even with (or because of?) high rates of gun ownership in the US. If you want to try to correlate gun ownership on a *regional* basis with burglary, that can be done, but only in the nine census regions studied by the General Social Survey (GSS) conducted by the National Opinion Research Center. They do the only credible, regional survey of gun ownership. The fact that there are different numbers and types of metropolitan regions within those census regions makes it questionable how useful your conclusions would be, in any case. Based on having done such analyses before, I'd say you're in for four or five hours of work. And you may need a university account to get into the GSS for free; I haven't looked for over a decade. The University of CT, Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, publishes the data. Then you'll need to run those numbers against the FBI's Uniform Crime Report data, which is free online. Without that work, you'd just be blowing smoke or pulling opinions out of your butt, like most of the commenters in this thread. Hey, I can clear this up no problem. I bought my first gun in 40 years in 2005. I have bought at least one gun per year since then, and crime has dropped every year since then. It is therefore obvious that my buying guns reduces crime, I've done a public service, and my future selections should be subsidized with government funding. Ed, you make things far too complicated. G Wow, Don. With analyses like that, you could be a politician. g -- Ed Huntress |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A letter from Ted Nugent | Metalworking | |||
A letter from Ted Nugent | Metalworking | |||
A letter from Ted Nugent | Metalworking | |||
A letter from Ted Nugent | Metalworking | |||
A letter from Ted Nugent | Metalworking |