On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:00:05 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

Is this true?




VERY QUIETLY OBAMA'S CITIZENSHIP CASE REACHES THE SUPREME COURT


You bet, the Supreme Court has no choice but to hear the case in light
of this document...
http://amfoi.files.wordpress.com/200...cation1978.pdf

--
Ned Simmons

"Ned Simmons" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:00:05 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

Is this true?




VERY QUIETLY OBAMA'S CITIZENSHIP CASE REACHES THE SUPREME COURT


You bet, the Supreme Court has no choice but to hear the case in light
of this document...
http://amfoi.files.wordpress.com/200...cation1978.pdf

--
Ned Simmons

Ned, there are people here who are going to take that seriously. Be
prepared. d8-)

--
Ed Huntress

On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:30:02 -0500, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:


"Ned Simmons" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:00:05 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

Is this true?




VERY QUIETLY OBAMA'S CITIZENSHIP CASE REACHES THE SUPREME COURT


You bet, the Supreme Court has no choice but to hear the case in light
of this document...
http://amfoi.files.wordpress.com/200...cation1978.pdf

--
Ned Simmons

Ned, there are people here who are going to take that seriously. Be
prepared. d8-)

We owe it to every freedom loving American to get to the bottom of
this. There's so much of this stuff around there just has to be
something to it.

(OK, I'm paraphrasing someone who, after taking pains to distance
himself from those "conspiracy nuts," made an argument to that effect
in the birther thread.)

--
Ned Simmons

On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:22:01 -0500, Ned Simmons
wrote:

On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:00:05 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

Is this true?




VERY QUIETLY OBAMA'S CITIZENSHIP CASE REACHES THE SUPREME COURT


You bet, the Supreme Court has no choice but to hear the case in light
of this document...
http://amfoi.files.wordpress.com/200...cation1978.pdf


Other then that the PKI (Party Komunist Indonesia) was outlawed after
the 1965 upraising and no Indonesian would have willingly identify
themselves as a communist in 1978, and the street name being incorrect
- there is no Karl Marx Boulevard in Jakarta, and the structure and
format of the letter being totally foreign to Indonesian practice it
certainly looks authentic, doesn't it?

Regards,

J.B.

"Ned Simmons" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:30:02 -0500, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:


"Ned Simmons" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:00:05 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

Is this true?




VERY QUIETLY OBAMA'S CITIZENSHIP CASE REACHES THE SUPREME COURT


You bet, the Supreme Court has no choice but to hear the case in light
of this document...
http://amfoi.files.wordpress.com/200...cation1978.pdf

--
Ned Simmons

Ned, there are people here who are going to take that seriously. Be
prepared. d8-)

We owe it to every freedom loving American to get to the bottom of
this. There's so much of this stuff around there just has to be
something to it.

(OK, I'm paraphrasing someone who, after taking pains to distance
himself from those "conspiracy nuts," made an argument to that effect
in the birther thread.)

He's just so...so...*different*, you know? He's not a normal
chicken-fried-steak-and-sausage-gravy-loving 'Murican. Nosiree.

--
Ed Huntress

"Ed Huntress" wrote:

Ned, there are people here who are going to take that seriously. Be
prepared. d8-)


Had me going for a minute. My first thought was no, not Biden.

Wes
--
"Additionally as a security officer, I carry a gun to protect
government officials but my life isn't worth protecting at home
in their eyes." Dick Anthony Heller

"Wes" wrote in message
...
"Ed Huntress" wrote:

Ned, there are people here who are going to take that seriously. Be
prepared. d8-)


Had me going for a minute. My first thought was no, not Biden.

Wes

Jeez, I'm glad it was no more than a minute. g

BTW, and to further antagonize you, the real policy wonks out there think
that Biden is one of the best VPs in American history. He just stumbles over
his words and the right has piled on.

No, I'm not going to give you links.

--
Ed Huntress

"Ed Huntress" wrote:

Jeez, I'm glad it was no more than a minute. g

It was morning and I hadn't had my coffee.

BTW, and to further antagonize you, the real policy wonks out there think
that Biden is one of the best VPs in American history. He just stumbles over
his words and the right has piled on.

The wonks love him? That is proof enough for me, in a negative sense.


No, I'm not going to give you links.

I've seen enough of JB on C-Span over the years. My opinion is fully formed.

Wes
--
"Additionally as a security officer, I carry a gun to protect
government officials but my life isn't worth protecting at home
in their eyes." Dick Anthony Heller

"Wes" wrote in message
...
"Ed Huntress" wrote:

Jeez, I'm glad it was no more than a minute. g

It was morning and I hadn't had my coffee.

BTW, and to further antagonize you, the real policy wonks out there think
that Biden is one of the best VPs in American history. He just stumbles
over
his words and the right has piled on.

The wonks love him? That is proof enough for me, in a negative sense.

That was based on judgments about what he's doing in White House meetings
etc. Apparently he's a major contributor, with more policy experience and
political experience than almost any of the rest of them.



No, I'm not going to give you links.

I've seen enough of JB on C-Span over the years. My opinion is fully
formed.

Wes

He's one of the better ones in national politics.

--
Ed Huntress

No, I'm not going to give you links.
I've seen enough of JB on C-Span over the years. My opinion is fully
formed.

Wes

He's one of the better ones in national politics.

Perfect example of right wing thinking, or lack thereof. Biden is a
smart, well educated, experienced, and knowledgeable politician. By all
the reports he's doing the job well and is well suited to the position.
With that said, you just have to know that no right winger is going to
like him. They would take the inexperienced, poorly educated, woman from
Alaska over him any day of the week. And you wonder why we had
problems when they got to choose who would run the country?


Hawke

"Hawke" wrote in message
...

No, I'm not going to give you links.
I've seen enough of JB on C-Span over the years. My opinion is fully
formed.

Wes

He's one of the better ones in national politics.

Perfect example of right wing thinking, or lack thereof. Biden is a smart,
well educated, experienced, and knowledgeable politician. By all the
reports he's doing the job well and is well suited to the position. With
that said, you just have to know that no right winger is going to like
him. They would take the inexperienced, poorly educated, woman from Alaska
over him any day of the week. And you wonder why we had problems when they
got to choose who would run the country?


Hawke

It's hard to understand what Wes found on C-Span that sets him against
Biden, because anyone except the right-wing nutjobs generally say he's one
of the best. When Obama chose him, he drew praise from Dick Luger (R-IN),
Chuck Hagel (R-NE), and other Republicans, for his experience and his
quality in the Senate. Before he was a candidate, even more of them spoke
very well of him.

He does have a bad case of chronic foot-in-mouth, but that isn't the
substance that matters. The antagonism toward him is mostly mindless
partisanship.

--
Ed Huntress

I know one ****ing thing. Even IF Obama is a citizen, he's no "American".

Steve

"Hawke" wrote in message
...


Alaska over him any day of the week. And you wonder why we had problems
when they got to choose who would run the country?


I hate to break this to you, the problems are worse now that he is running
the country.

"Steve B" wrote in message
...
I know one ****ing thing. Even IF Obama is a citizen, he's no "American".

Steve

Well, we're going to fix that, Steve. We've re-considered the terms, and
we're going to require that all presidential candidates be born and living
in the original 13 states, and be able to trace their genealogy to at least
two direct ancestors who fought in the American Revolution -- on the
revolutionary side.

That will get rid of the come-latelies and foreign subversives from the
Territories. Maybe I'll consider running myself. Don't worry about that,
because we're not going to allow you to vote on it, anyway. d8-)

Reed ma' liyups -- No Mo' Texans!

--
Ed Huntress

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:14:37 -0500, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:


"Steve B" wrote in message
...
I know one ****ing thing. Even IF Obama is a citizen, he's no "American".

Steve

Well, we're going to fix that, Steve. We've re-considered the terms, and
we're going to require that all presidential candidates be born and living
in the original 13 states, and be able to trace their genealogy to at least
two direct ancestors who fought in the American Revolution -- on the
revolutionary side.

That will get rid of the come-latelies and foreign subversives from the
Territories. Maybe I'll consider running myself. Don't worry about that,
because we're not going to allow you to vote on it, anyway. d8-)

Reed ma' liyups -- No Mo' Texans!

Plus you will be invited to all of the DAR events :-)

Regards,

J.B.

In article , "Steve B" wrote:
I know one ****ing thing. Even IF Obama is a citizen, he's no "American".

snort No argument there.

On Dec 23, 8:14*am, "Ed Huntress" wrote:

Well, we're going to fix that, Steve. We've re-considered the terms, and
we're going to require that all presidential candidates be born and living
in the original 13 states, and be able to trace their genealogy to at least
two direct ancestors who fought in the American Revolution -- on the
revolutionary side.

That will get rid of the come-latelies and foreign subversives from the
Territories. Maybe I'll consider running myself. Don't worry about that,
because we're not going to allow you to vote on it, anyway. d8-)

Reed ma' liyups -- No Mo' Texans!

--
Ed Huntress

The problem with that is all the states other than the original 13 are
likely to secede. And that would leave the US without any oil and not
much manufacturing. Just Ca and Texas together would probably have an
economy as large as the original 13 states.

Dan

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:14:37 -0500, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:


"Steve B" wrote in message
...
I know one ****ing thing. Even IF Obama is a citizen, he's no
"American".

Steve

Well, we're going to fix that, Steve. We've re-considered the terms, and
we're going to require that all presidential candidates be born and living
in the original 13 states, and be able to trace their genealogy to at
least
two direct ancestors who fought in the American Revolution -- on the
revolutionary side.

That will get rid of the come-latelies and foreign subversives from the
Territories. Maybe I'll consider running myself. Don't worry about that,
because we're not going to allow you to vote on it, anyway. d8-)

Reed ma' liyups -- No Mo' Texans!

Plus you will be invited to all of the DAR events :-)

My grandmother was DAR and WCTU. I have extra points all around. g

--
Ed Huntress

wrote in message
...
On Dec 23, 8:14 am, "Ed Huntress" wrote:

Well, we're going to fix that, Steve. We've re-considered the terms, and
we're going to require that all presidential candidates be born and living
in the original 13 states, and be able to trace their genealogy to at
least
two direct ancestors who fought in the American Revolution -- on the
revolutionary side.

That will get rid of the come-latelies and foreign subversives from the
Territories. Maybe I'll consider running myself. Don't worry about that,
because we're not going to allow you to vote on it, anyway. d8-)

Reed ma' liyups -- No Mo' Texans!

--
Ed Huntress

The problem with that is all the states other than the original 13 are
likely to secede. And that would leave the US without any oil and not
much manufacturing. Just Ca and Texas together would probably have an
economy as large as the original 13 states.

Dan

Heh, heh...have you looked in Ft. Knox lately? Have you checked those silos?
Have you noticed all of the truck traffic headed east these days? Do you
wonder why soldiers from Ft. Dix are guarding the roads in and out of the
New Jersey Pine Barrens? Have you noticed that the south end of Manhatten
has sunk a full six inches over the past ten years?

Carry on....d8-)

--
Ed Huntress

On Dec 23, 4:45*pm, "Ed Huntress" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Dec 23, 8:14 am, "Ed Huntress" wrote:



Well, we're going to fix that, Steve. We've re-considered the terms, and
we're going to require that all presidential candidates be born and living
in the original 13 states, and be able to trace their genealogy to at
least
two direct ancestors who fought in the American Revolution -- on the
revolutionary side.

That will get rid of the come-latelies and foreign subversives from the
Territories. Maybe I'll consider running myself. Don't worry about that,
because we're not going to allow you to vote on it, anyway. d8-)

Reed ma' liyups -- No Mo' Texans!

--
Ed Huntress
The problem with that is all the states other than the original 13 are
likely to secede. And that would leave the US without any oil and not
much manufacturing. Just Ca and Texas together would probably have an
economy as large as the original 13 states.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dan

Heh, heh...have you looked in Ft. Knox lately? Have you checked those silos?
Have you noticed all of the truck traffic headed east these days? Do you
wonder why soldiers from Ft. Dix are guarding the roads in and out of the
New Jersey Pine Barrens? Have you noticed that the south end of Manhatten
has sunk a full six inches over the past ten years?

Carry on....d8-)

--
Ed Huntress

The truck traffic must be the empties coming to fetch the people
moving out.

MA, PA, NJ, and NY are all expected to lose one congressional seat
after the next census. Texas expect to gain three of those four.

As you say, carry on.

Dan

wrote in message
...
On Dec 23, 4:45 pm, "Ed Huntress" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Dec 23, 8:14 am, "Ed Huntress" wrote:



Well, we're going to fix that, Steve. We've re-considered the terms, and
we're going to require that all presidential candidates be born and
living
in the original 13 states, and be able to trace their genealogy to at
least
two direct ancestors who fought in the American Revolution -- on the
revolutionary side.

That will get rid of the come-latelies and foreign subversives from the
Territories. Maybe I'll consider running myself. Don't worry about that,
because we're not going to allow you to vote on it, anyway. d8-)

Reed ma' liyups -- No Mo' Texans!

--
Ed Huntress
The problem with that is all the states other than the original 13 are
likely to secede. And that would leave the US without any oil and not
much manufacturing. Just Ca and Texas together would probably have an
economy as large as the original 13 states.

Dan

Heh, heh...have you looked in Ft. Knox lately? Have you checked those
silos?
Have you noticed all of the truck traffic headed east these days? Do you
wonder why soldiers from Ft. Dix are guarding the roads in and out of the
New Jersey Pine Barrens? Have you noticed that the south end of Manhatten
has sunk a full six inches over the past ten years?

Carry on....d8-)

--
Ed Huntress

The truck traffic must be the empties coming to fetch the people
moving out.

MA, PA, NJ, and NY are all expected to lose one congressional seat
after the next census. Texas expect to gain three of those four.

As you say, carry on.

Dan

Of course! We've been doing that for years. We take our mental defectives
and moral degenerates and offer them $100 and a box of "Palin for President"
campaign buttons if they promise to head west and never come back. Most of
them take us up on it. Have you looked around?

d8-)

--
Ed Huntress

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:29:46 -0500, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:


"cavelamb" wrote in message
om...
Ed Huntress wrote:
"cavelamb" wrote in message
news Hmmmm....

I think you are wrong there, Ed.
Or maybe you have an inordinate share of morons?



http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...JOVMfM_o&pos=8

Where is it wrong, Richard? We're sending the moral degenerates and
mental defectives away -- our population is decreasing and we're losing
seats in Congress.

Our loss is your gain. If you want to identify them, look for the people
selling "Palin for President" buttons. d8-)



Hmmm, ok.

Must be genetic then.
Because there sure are a lot of them coming down...

Hell, yes. Enjoy their company, they're yours now. And we have a little more
elbow room. g


N.J. housing should decrease in price with the lower demand making it
easier for residents to upgrade their residences. Texas real estate
(the original savings and loan people) booming, maybe offset the 11
percent drop in US new house sales I see in the news.

Something for everyone :-)

Regards,

J.B.

Lib Loo wrote:


"Hawke" wrote in message
...


Alaska over him any day of the week. And you wonder why we had
problems when they got to choose who would run the country?


I hate to break this to you, the problems are worse now that he is
running the country.


No, they're not.

"Hawke" wrote in message
...
Lib Loo wrote:


"Hawke" wrote in message
...


Alaska over him any day of the week. And you wonder why we had problems
when they got to choose who would run the country?


I hate to break this to you, the problems are worse now that he is
running the country.


No, they're not.

So he's not running the country then, just being an imposter. Thanks for
confirming what we all suspected.