Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I want to recharge the refrigerant in my auto air conditioner. I've
assembled all the necessary tools except for one item. My vacuum pump is outfitted with a 3/4" female NPT fitting and the discharge tube from the gauge set is a R134a female fitting. I plan on machining an adapter to get the 2 fittings connected to each other. But I can't figure out what the thread size is on the R134a. Please enlighten me! Gary |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
gary writes:
I plan on machining an adapter to get the 2 fittings connected to each other. Beware you don't commit an EPA felony. Such adapters are not government approved. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:59:03 -0500, Richard J Kinch
wrote: gary writes: I plan on machining an adapter to get the 2 fittings connected to each other. Beware you don't commit an EPA felony. Such adapters are not government approved. What the (heck) are you talking about? They don't have to be "government approved". Unless they've made some serious changes since I took and passed the test, there are no approvals processes or "lists of approved machinery..." You just have to use procedures to reduce accidental or incidental release of CFC's and HCFC's as much as possible. And deliberate release is instant trouble. A car using R-134a is running an HFC. No chlorine. -- Bruce -- |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce L. Bergman writes:
They don't have to be "government approved". The EPA via the Clean Air Act regulates what fittings can be used with what refrigerants. Not the marketplace, not engineering standards, not the convenience or expedience of you or me or the OP. I don't agree with the despotism of the government, I'm just warning you. The law makes us all criminals, even for things like cutting metal. The tender mercies of the bureaucrats decide who is punished and who is given lenience. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:40:58 -0500, Richard J Kinch
wrote: Bruce L. Bergman writes: They don't have to be "government approved". The EPA via the Clean Air Act regulates what fittings can be used with what refrigerants. Not the marketplace, not engineering standards, not the convenience or expedience of you or me or the OP. I don't agree with the despotism of the government, I'm just warning you. The law makes us all criminals, even for things like cutting metal. The tender mercies of the bureaucrats decide who is punished and who is given lenience. The service fittings permanently installed on the vehicle or stationary system, yes. If you do a conversion from R12 to R134a or another refrigerant you have to change the fittings to the proper style to avoid accidentally mixing refrigerants. But not an adapter made so you can hook up your service manifold hoses to the car or refrigerator being serviced, or hook up the hose from your vacuum pump to your service manifold. They may be stupid MF's working for the government, but they ain't THAT stupid. It's the mouth breathing politicians who wrote the impossible to follow laws the bureaucrats are trying to (selectively) enforce who *are* that stupid. Which is why politicians are like diapers - they need to be changed often, and for the same reasons. -- Bruce -- |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce L. Bergman writes:
But not an adapter ... The EPA holds that if certain fittings are required, then adapters to circumvent them are not permitted, since that defeats the very purpose of the fittings, namely to make impossible the mixing or confusing of refrigerants. While the utility of adapters is obvious, you're supposed to have a separate set of gages and hoses for each refrigerant. That's the governmental logic: intelligent economizing must give way to backstopping presumed stupidity. As Uncle Al sez, environmentalism is expensive, shoddy, and deadly. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce L. Bergman wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:40:58 -0500, Richard J Kinch wrote: Bruce L. Bergman writes: They don't have to be "government approved". The EPA via the Clean Air Act regulates what fittings can be used with what refrigerants. Not the marketplace, not engineering standards, not the convenience or expedience of you or me or the OP. I don't agree with the despotism of the government, I'm just warning you. The law makes us all criminals, even for things like cutting metal. The tender mercies of the bureaucrats decide who is punished and who is given lenience. The service fittings permanently installed on the vehicle or stationary system, yes. If you do a conversion from R12 to R134a or another refrigerant you have to change the fittings to the proper style to avoid accidentally mixing refrigerants. But not an adapter made so you can hook up your service manifold hoses to the car or refrigerator being serviced, or hook up the hose from your vacuum pump to your service manifold. They may be stupid MF's working for the government, but they ain't THAT stupid. Want to bet! It's the mouth breathing politicians who wrote the impossible to follow laws the bureaucrats are trying to (selectively) enforce who *are* that stupid. Which is why politicians are like diapers - they need to be changed often, and for the same reasons. -- Bruce -- True, It is a shame that the Constitution was written by folks who felt that serving in government was such a PIA that nobody would WANT to do it. Term limits were not considered because of that. I'd like to see term limits for ALL elected offices. Never going to happen though. -- Steve W. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well we noticed this really old thread and see that it still gets lots of hits on Google. So if anyone is still looking...
Gary: "But I can't figure out what the thread size is on the R134a. Please enlighten me!" I grabbed a bolt and checked if it screws in to the R134a in or out. It fits. 1/4" - 24 Meaning a 1/4" diameter bolt with 24 threads per inch (fine thread) Someone should confirm this.... but does that help anyone? |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, December 22, 2017 at 6:03:17 AM UTC-8, wrote:
Well we noticed this really old thread and see that it still gets lots of hits on Google. So if anyone is still looking... Gary: "But I can't figure out what the thread size is on the R134a. Please enlighten me!" I grabbed a bolt and checked if it screws in to the R134a in or out. It fits. 1/4" - 24 Meaning a 1/4" diameter bolt with 24 threads per inch (fine thread) Someone should confirm this.... but does that help anyone? thank you for posting the actual answer! I can't believe I had to read through 8 years of useless rants to find the answer. thanks again. |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
replying to melkie.au, fyiman wrote:
I don't have an R134a fitting handy so I can't check it, but ... The "normal" thread pitch for a standard 1/4" bolt is 20 threads per inch (TPI). The "normal" thread pitch for a */fine/* 1/4" bolt is 28 TPI, not 24. So, if it was a fine-thread 1/4" bolt, it's 28 TPI. Otherwise, if not, perhaps you could check it with a thread guage. -- for full context, visit https://www.polytechforum.com/metalw...ze-185313-.htm |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
what size thread? | Metalworking | |||
What size thread is CATV? | Home Repair | |||
Looking for a thread size | Woodturning | |||
thread size | UK diy | |||
What hole size for 1/2-20 thread? | Metalworking |