Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Ground rod question
On Fri, 02 May 2008 16:56:08 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok
I think Martin is generalizing incorrectly about the skin effect, which applies only to high frequency AC. It's a phenomenon that becomes important at radio frequencies. At DC, or at low frequencies, conduction is uniform, or nearly so, across the whole section of a conductor. Of course, copper has something like 10 times the conductivity of steel, so you have to take the thickness of the copper cladding into account, too. Most of the copper coated ground rods I see are electroplated and the plating is maybe 0.0005 thick. I don't believe it carries much current. Lightning events do have high-frequency content so skin effect does come into play. But you're right, .0005" of copper won't make much difference. Consider that even steel has far higher conductivity than the earth into which it's driven. Making a ground rod more conductive than steel would serve no useful purpose. A better course for low-Z ground is to use more ground rods, because surface area is what determines effectiveness. The diameter can be smaller and resistance can be higher than the cables coming out of a welder because it only handles high current during very short transient events, and even tens of volts of drop are acceptable during lightning transients. Residential utility ground current should be very low, well under an amp and more like milliamps. There is a substantial neutral wire running back to the pole transformer. The reason for a groud reference is to prevent the system from attaining a common-mode voltage significantly above ground potential --e.g., 120 volts line to neutral but neutral is 400 volts above ground due to static buildup somewhere so the terminal voltages w.r.t. gnd are 400 and 520. Zap! Copper is a better choice for corrosion protection because zinc is very vulnerable to even weak acids. Slightly acidic soil would eat the zinc off a galvanized steel rod rather quickly. |
#2
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Ground rod question
You could get a better conduction path by stringing a bare copper wire (say
8 ga.) next to the steel rod, than by plating the rod. 'course, that doesn't provide any corrosion protection, but my point is that doesn't do anything for you electrically. As far as a lightning strike is concerned, the current is enormous, producing a voltage drop so high that lightning may even jump LATERALLY from a tree trunk to a person standing under the tree. In order to get to the ground rod, the current will have traveled from the roof somewhere, probably along several paths. I believe that the ground rod is mainly there to establish that the house neutral is not floating, as Don Foreman said (more eloquently.) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HOT & GROUND REVERSED QUESTION | Home Repair | |||
Ground rod question | Metalworking | |||
Ground rod question | Metalworking | |||
Ground wire question | Home Repair | |||
ground rod question | Home Repair |