Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
5204 bearing vs. McMaster 3204
I need a bearing for the turbine on my irrigation traveler. Yesterday is
when I needed it. Can't wait for the manufacturer's part. The bearing says 5204 2RS on the side. This is it: http://www.vxb.com/page/bearings/PRO...FSCTWAodvwJgMg McMaster Carr has a 3204 bearing with the same size. Part number 5885K72 http://www.mcmaster.com/ (you have to enter the part number) A search for 3204 bearing comes up empty on bearing stores. So, is this the right part? |
#2
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
5204 bearing vs. McMaster 3204
"Karl Townsend" wrote in
link.net: http://www.vxb.com/page/bearings/PRO...NCHvI0CFSCTWAo dvwJgMg Is there much axial load on the shaft that bearing supports? The 5204 being an angular contact bearing is designed to handle moderate axial loading. The 3204 is better at handling high radial loads. Anyway, not equivalent to each other but might work for a few days if there is no other option. |
#3
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
5204 bearing vs. McMaster 3204
"Karl Townsend" wrote in message link.net... |I need a bearing for the turbine on my irrigation traveler. Yesterday is | when I needed it. Can't wait for the manufacturer's part. | | The bearing says 5204 2RS on the side. This is it: | http://www.vxb.com/page/bearings/PRO...FSCTWAodvwJgMg | | McMaster Carr has a 3204 bearing with the same size. Part number 5885K72 | http://www.mcmaster.com/ (you have to enter the part number) | | A search for 3204 bearing comes up empty on bearing stores. | | So, is this the right part? | It depends on your special requirements. Physical dimensions and max RPM properties are identical for both. What other parameters do you need that might not be provided by the bearing from McMaster? |
#4
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
5204 bearing vs. McMaster 3204
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:16:56 GMT, "Karl Townsend"
wrote: The bearing says 5204 2RS on the side. This is it: http://www.vxb.com/page/bearings/PRO...FSCTWAodvwJgMg McMaster Carr has a 3204 bearing with the same size. Part number 5885K72 http://www.mcmaster.com/ (you have to enter the part number) A search for 3204 bearing comes up empty on bearing stores. So, is this the right part? It appears to be. The contact angle may not be exactly the same, but any port in a storm. -- Ned Simmons |
#5
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
5204 bearing vs. McMaster 3204
Karl Townsend writes:
The bearing says 5204 2RS on the side. This is it: http://www.vxb.com/page/bearings/PRO...NCHvI0CFSCTWAo dvwJgMg McMaster Carr has a 3204 bearing with the same size. Part number 5885K72 http://www.mcmaster.com/ (you have to enter the part number) A search for 3204 bearing comes up empty on bearing stores. So, is this the right part? According to my notes, a 5xxx differs from a 3xxx only in that the 3 has extra balls via a filling slot and 5 has a normal ball count (fewer). Both are double-row angular contact. So the 3204 is a compatible *upgrade* from the 5204. See my notes he http://groups.google.com/group/rec.c...1ff55aa6677d38 |
#6
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
5204 bearing vs. McMaster 3204
According to my notes, a 5xxx differs from a 3xxx only in that the 3 has extra balls via a filling slot and 5 has a normal ball count (fewer). Both are double-row angular contact. So the 3204 is a compatible *upgrade* from the 5204. See my notes he http://groups.google.com/group/rec.c...1ff55aa6677d38 Thanks for the details on bearings. I was going to order the McMaster part anyway. Now I won't have to bother with changing it back out to the original. Karl |
#7
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
5204 bearing vs. McMaster 3204
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:43:10 GMT, "Karl Townsend"
wrote: According to my notes, a 5xxx differs from a 3xxx only in that the 3 has extra balls via a filling slot and 5 has a normal ball count (fewer). Both are double-row angular contact. So the 3204 is a compatible *upgrade* from the 5204. See my notes he http://groups.google.com/group/rec.c...1ff55aa6677d38 Thanks for the details on bearings. I was going to order the McMaster part anyway. Now I won't have to bother with changing it back out to the original. Karl The only caution I would add is that McM/Carr doesn't give you a full description to determine if this is an actual interchange. If it does have a filler slot be careful if you have considerable thrust loads as the balls can ride up on the raceway and run over the notch causing damage. This is why most manufacturers have reduced or eliminated their offerings of max type bearings |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
McMaster-Car equivalent in UK | Metalworking | |||
Value of McMaster, MSC et al catalogs | Metalworking | |||
#98 McMaster Carr Catalog | Metalworking | |||
mcmaster carr 111 | Metalworking |