Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I found this in a 1908 Audel's Millwright's Manual.
If you square the diameter of a circle and multiply by .7854, you get the area of the circle. Also,4 X 0.7854 = Pi. With a little thought, you can get along without pi, if you want to. Okay, "So What?" you say. Well, note that .7854 means that a circle that just fits into its enscribed square contains 78.54% of the area of that square. And that's about 80%. So, an easy way to ESTIMATE the area of a circle in your head is to simply think "8 tenths of the area of the enscribed square = the area". Example: A guy offers you a piece of steel just for coming and getting it off the place RIGHT NOW! You need to know the approximate weight of a 5" diameter bar of steel that is 5 feet long, so you can decide whether you will be able to lift it into your car trunk by yourself. So, 5 X 5 = 25. 80% of 25 (in your head) is 20. That's area of the circle. 20 X 60 (5 feet in inches) is 1200. There's the volume of the bar! That's all there is to it! Now for the weight: A cubic inch of steel weighs 0.283 pounds think 2 Ate 3 (cannibalism of numbers???). 0.283 is about .3 So the bar weighs 1200 X .3 = (in your head) about 360 pounds. Sorry, Maybe you can lift it, but I'd have to pass on this one!!! Well, maybe I could------ Pete Stanaitis |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's another handy shortcut involving pi: pi = 3.1416... which is very
close to 3 1/7, which is not too far from 3 1/8. An old sheet metal man showed me this. If you multiply the diameter of a sheet metal pipe by 3 1/8, you get pretty close to the circumference, and it comes out in fractions that you can read on a ruler. (The little bit extra helps make the seam. :-) |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete & sheri wrote:
I found this in a 1908 Audel's Millwright's Manual. If you square the diameter of a circle and multiply by .7854, you get the area of the circle. Also,4 X 0.7854 = Pi. With a little thought, you can get along without pi, if you want to. Okay, "So What?" you say. Well, note that .7854 means that a circle that just fits into its enscribed square contains 78.54% of the area of that square. And that's about 80%. So, an easy way to ESTIMATE the area of a circle in your head is to simply think "8 tenths of the area of the enscribed square = the area". Example: A guy offers you a piece of steel just for coming and getting it off the place RIGHT NOW! You need to know the approximate weight of a 5" diameter bar of steel that is 5 feet long, so you can decide whether you will be able to lift it into your car trunk by yourself. So, 5 X 5 = 25. 80% of 25 (in your head) is 20. That's area of the circle. 20 X 60 (5 feet in inches) is 1200. There's the volume of the bar! That's all there is to it! Now for the weight: A cubic inch of steel weighs 0.283 pounds think 2 Ate 3 (cannibalism of numbers???). 0.283 is about .3 So the bar weighs 1200 X .3 = (in your head) about 360 pounds. Sorry, Maybe you can lift it, but I'd have to pass on this one!!! Well, maybe I could------ Pete Stanaitis Nonsense I don't believe this for one second . Let me see if I have it right . 5 inch hunk of steel 5 feet long and anyone that frequents this newsgroup would pass on it ? Ha ha , yea more likely they would be tripping over each other to get there first . If anything we would see 50 posts on how this Rube Goldberg would lift it easier/safer then that Rube Goldberg . Followed by 100 posts on whether Bush or Kerry in office would affect how many jobs would be saved from going to China because you kept this hunk of steel from being shipped to them as scrap . That and anyone that tried to get between my and that hunk of steel better be well armed . Opps there goes another 100 posts to determine in gun packing metal scrongers threaten the world as we know it , :-) Ken Cutt |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I couldn't agree with you more. As soon as I wrote the post, I started
thinking of how I'd do it. I just got out of the hospital yesterday, being told not to lift more than 20 pounds for 2 weeks, so that makes it even more interesting. This sort of thing does happen to me fairly often, though, so it is an issue to be dealt with. On the other hand, those pieces are often ALMOST what I need for that next project, but not quite. Pete Stanaitis ------------- Ken Cutt wrote: Nonsense I don't believe this for one second . Let me see if I have it right . 5 inch hunk of steel 5 feet long and anyone that frequents this newsgroup would pass on it ? Ha ha , yea more likely they would be tripping over each other to get there first . If anything we would see 50 posts on how this Rube Goldberg would lift it easier/safer then that Rube Goldberg . Followed by 100 posts on whether Bush or Kerry in office would affect how many jobs would be saved from going to China because you kept this hunk of steel from being shipped to them as scrap . That and anyone that tried to get between my and that hunk of steel better be well armed . Opps there goes another 100 posts to determine in gun packing metal scrongers threaten the world as we know it , :-) Ken Cutt |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete & sheri wrote:
I couldn't agree with you more. As soon as I wrote the post, I started thinking of how I'd do it. I just got out of the hospital yesterday, being told not to lift more than 20 pounds for 2 weeks, so that makes it even more interesting. This sort of thing does happen to me fairly often, though, so it is an issue to be dealt with. On the other hand, those pieces are often ALMOST what I need for that next project, but not quite. Pete Stanaitis ------------- I hate to admit to this but I seem to work the opposite . If I get a hunk of metal like this , umm , well does not have to fit an upcoming project because I start inventing projects to fit it . Ken Cutt |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leo Lichtman wrote:
Here's another handy shortcut involving pi: pi = 3.1416... which is very close to 3 1/7, which is not too far from 3 1/8. An old sheet metal man showed me this. If you multiply the diameter of a sheet metal pipe by 3 1/8, you get pretty close to the circumference, and it comes out in fractions that you can read on a ruler. (The little bit extra helps make the seam. :-) 3 1/8 3 1/7. Where does that little bit extra come from? -- Bill Kaiser There are three ways to do a job: good, cheap, and quick. You can have any two. A good, cheap job won't be quick. A good, quick job won't be cheap. A cheap, quick job won't be good. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|