Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey.
There are graphic languages for welding, showing anotations on blueprints, and languages for schematics of piping and ladder diagrams for hydraulic, computer, pneumatic, and other fluidic logic. Is there a graphic language for machine tools? Two approaches, two things to express: 1) Configuration: "Set up the rotary table in the center of the mill bed and index five slots radially." 2) Work flow: "Rough the spindle on the lathe, grind to fit the bearing, and slot the key on the shaper." Recent reading in KSRM (Kinetic Self-Replicating Machines) convinces me that while it is well accepted that a serial, compact notation for machine tool configuration and work flow would faciliate self-replication (my specialty), I have found no such graphic language or compact notation. We are bogged down in blueprints with unnecessary detail distracting from the view needed for replication. Degrees of freedom can be described readily with graphics. There's no need to draw a blueprint of the whole machine; a lathe is "merely" a constrained headstock with a powered rotary DOF and essential no others, while a lathe carriage or mill ways are "merely" independent, orthogonal, linear degrees of freedom. Graphic communication of the existence of a stop or index in a DOF might be an arrow to a cross line for a stop, or an arrow to a point for an index. Things like that. A lot like the GDT symbols, but not applied to blueprints, merely standing alone. An alchemy of machine tool potential and operation. Things like stiffness, mass, and feed or power input might be shown in a little matrix of low-precision numbers in suitable units. Some combinatorics are in order, and relevant: 0 DOF: The relationship is rigid. Work in vise. 1 DOF: Must be either but not both of one rotary or one axial DOF. Ram motion, rotary table, spindle, punch. 2 DOF: Can be either two linear, two rotary, or one linear / one rotary. Powered spindle stroke on mill or DP, end mill flute grinder setup, lathe carriage and cross feed, mill table, drill press cross vise, rotary table on fourth axis tilt fixture used for machining turbine blades. 3 DOF: Combinatorically, this can all be set down. The full potential of all 11 coordinate systems appears here, but we'd usually think of cylindrical, spherical, and Cartesian. 6 DOF: Item is free and unconstrained. Work in transit, and work to which equipment or jig is fastened to guide other work, perhaps. Maybe a little XYZ system for linear contraints, and a little cube with circles on it for rotary contraints, or something like that. Just a sketch language for hashing out how things are fixed and free, and how they are powered, fed with screws or rams or a handle, and what cuts, and what holds or guides the work. Should be applicable to everything from molding ash quarter round on a table saw or filing the end of a cut rod square by hand without a vise, to turbine blades and profiles of titanium hip implants. Doug Goncz Replikon Research Falls Church, VA 22044-0394 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tool Definitions | Woodworking | |||
Tool Definitions | Metalworking | |||
For peer review, new FAQ section: Power Tools. | UK diy | |||
"homemade" tool steel | Metalworking | |||
Basics on Depth of Cuts | Metalworking |