Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Using a surface plate, I've just checked my 12" high height gauge against
gauge blocks, with similar results for different gauge blocks. What I've noticed is that the machined measurement surface of the height gauge arm isn't parallel to the surface plate. (It's around 0.010" higher at the tip as compared to its height at a position 1.5" closer to the column.) The micrometer has (standard?) 0.0005" increments, so am I right in expecting something better than this? If the height gauge column is tilted with reference to the base, would I be able to check for this by sighting against a precision engineer's square? (Which I don't have, as yet.) I can't see any signs of damage to the height gauge - it's an APE Microball type, and was supplied in its fitted case. Many thanks for any advice. -- M Stewart Milton Keynes, UK http://www.megalith.freeserve.co.uk/oddimage.htm |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Quick query re skirting height | UK diy | |||
Total newby has urgent query. | UK diy | |||
Metal Working Machinery New and Used in Australia and for Export | Metalworking | |||
Need Advice of Finish Nail Gun to Buy - 15 or 16 gauge | Woodworking | |||
Review of the Osbourn 3 miter gauge | Woodworking |