Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41   Report Post  
Gunner
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 25 May 2005 04:52:56 -0700, jim rozen
wrote:

In article , Gunner says...

So which group of nations is big enough to take us down?


The last time we didn't even know the answer to that
question before it happened. Are you sure you want to
keep on asking it?

So which group took us down?

Nukeing
Mecca was something of a personal fantasy..but the day may not be all
that far in the furture. Its called A Last Resort.


They got pretty riled up when we flushed a koran. Just think
if the same thing happened to the Kaba.


They started killing each other over the rumor we had flushed a
qu'ran. If we nuked the Black Stone, perhaps they would wipe each
other out?
Jim


Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
  #42   Report Post  
Cliff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 24 May 2005 17:52:15 -0400, "Proto" wrote:

They by and large should have done as
their forebearers did..and planned ahead.

So what you are saying then they should be penalized for this.


Gunner probably inherited a lot of money.
--
Cliff
  #43   Report Post  
Gunner
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 May 2005 08:42:35 -0500, Rex B wrote:


They by and large should have done as

their forebearers did..and planned ahead.


So what you are saying then they should be penalized for this.


I do believe all should plan ahead and save for the years when they
cannot earn a living. I am currently, at 53, saving 1/3 of my gross
income toward retirement. I've been at 15% or more since my early 30s.
But I'm a long way from having enough to retire and live on in 10 years.
I also know that a devastating illness or a big lawsuit at any time
could make me penniless.

Rex



And SS was intended for exactly that..those that for various reasons
either lost it all or couldnt make it. Not as something to replace all
other means.

Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
  #44   Report Post  
Cliff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 25 May 2005 02:58:19 GMT, (Frank White)
wrote:


Bush says we NEED the Patriot Act to fight terrorists; and
even though there's little evidence that the Patriot Act has
actually been effective against terrorist activities


Looks like a large number of the military & "homeland
insecurtty" employees are known criminals or illegal
aliens or working on fake social security numbers in
any case.

Herr shrubbie's "port security" spending is less than
~5% of what everyone that knows about such things
says is needed.

Fake IDs seem easy to get & nobody checks much anyway ....

Nifty boondoggle.
--
Cliff

"...a terrorist would have to be really stupid to attack George's
office, because the odds of George being there are so slim. "

Ben Tripp
  #45   Report Post  
Cliff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 25 May 2005 02:58:19 GMT, (Frank White)
wrote:

I have no wish to see the US go from the
world's policeman to Nazi Germany II overnight and the
world preparing to put us down like a rabid dog.


The EU (among others) may already have long range
plans in motion, just in case.
They are not stupid.
--
Cliff


  #46   Report Post  
Cliff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 25 May 2005 02:58:19 GMT, (Frank White)
wrote:

"Considering the events of recent years,
the world has a long way to go to regain
its credibility and reputation with the US."
unknown


And THIS is another problem! I haven't been able to
Google it - I may be remembering it wrong - but I
recall the counter quote that "Nations are at their
most arrogant when they are in decline". Spain,
England, France, several of the Chinese dynasties
before they fall... I don't know if we're in decline
but I see worrisome signs: A crumbling infrastructure,
lack of focus on education, an increasing divide
between rich and poor,


You probably are a little better off now in the US IF
you make over US$ 200,000 per year or inherited
your wealth.

political/social/religious
divisiveness on a scale seldom seen before...

--
Cliff
  #47   Report Post  
Cliff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 May 2005 04:53:27 GMT, Gunner
wrote:

What do you classify your proposal that we nuke Mecca in
retaliation for further terrorist attacks as? Have you
actually THOUGHT of what the consequences of that would
be, international, economic, political, social, internal,
humanitarian? I have no wish to see the US go from the
world's policeman to Nazi Germany II overnight and the
world preparing to put us down like a rabid dog. If
your plan is not a bull**** idea, I don't know what is...


So which group of nations is big enough to take us down? Nukeing
Mecca was something of a personal fantasy..but the day may not be all
that far in the furture. Its called A Last Resort.


Not YOUR religion, eh, gummer?

BTW, Do you have ANY clue what nation Mecca is in?
(He's often quite confused by maps & suchlike too.)
--
Cliff
  #48   Report Post  
Cliff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 May 2005 04:35:54 GMT, Gunner
wrote:


But Roosevelt had indeed proposed a plan under which all workers would
have been allowed to make periodic voluntary payments in exchange for
certificates representing the amounts they had deposited. At 65,
workers would have been able to trade in their certificates for
annuities that paid up to $100 a month (the 1935 equivalent of some
$1,300 today) based on their total deposits plus interest. In fact,
Roosevelt expressly cited the need for private plans to become
available as the worst of the Depression passed:


And now we have IRAs, 401Ks, etc.

Gunner's just demented.
--
Cliff
  #49   Report Post  
Cliff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 May 2005 04:49:34 GMT, Gunner
wrote:

How does their being able to collect money from another pension have
anything to do with the SS trust fund?

First..there is NO trust fund.


Sure there is.
YOU just have to pay increased taxes to pay it back
as the republicans borrowed it all.
"Full faith & credit". Do YOU recall those words?

OTOH The neocons think that it's meaningless and
all tey have to do is BOROW another two trillion ++
US dollars (from what fool?) to add to their already
staggering deficits ....

President Participates in Social Security Roundtable in Ohio ......

[
THE PRESIDENT: By the way, I went to West Virginia the other day and
saw the asset base of the so-called Social Security trust: You know
what, it was about four or five file cabinets full of paper.
(Laughter.) It was the IOU left behind from one hand of government to
the other hand of government.
]

Plan A is to let/make you buy ("invest in") those worthless bonds
.... a "conservative investment" .....
--
Cliff

  #50   Report Post  
Larry Jaques
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 25 May 2005 02:58:19 GMT, the inscrutable
(Frank White) spake:

In article , says...


I don't think Gunner's a nutjob. But I have no idea what's
wrong with him, these days.

FW


Ditto, see below.


What are you referring to? That I dont share your view on the war in
Iraq?


Well, that, in part. But it goes deeper. Up until recently I
would have said that the tenets of your life were "Work hard,
play fair, follow the rules no matter what the other guy does,
and don't trust government (aka if someone from the government
comes up and says "We're here to help you", run for your life)".
But now...

Bush says we need to invade other countries in the name of
national security, you not only jump on the bandwagon, you
attack - without discussion or an explaination of why you
support him - anyone who says this was a BAD idea.

Bush says we should privatize Social Security, you accept his
proposal as Gospel, ignoring even the Republican economists
who point out problems. Like that it may well cost TRILLIONS
(yes, the "T" word) to implement his plan at a time when the
government is already facing record deficets. And that there's
little popular support for such an idea.

Bush says we NEED the Patriot Act to fight terrorists; and
even though there's little evidence that the Patriot Act has
actually been effective against terrorist activities; and even
though your challenge to name one innocent person who's been
hurt by the law has been answered repeatedly and extensively
in the positive; and even though folks from all over the
spectrum worry about it endangering civil liberties, you
insist anyone who wants this act repealed is a leftist whack-
hole.

It's like you've chucked the fourth tenet and become, not
just a Bush supporter, but a Saturday Night Live parody of a
Bush supporter. Or the guy in "1984" who was reprogrammed to
love Big Brother...

I assume the first two tenets are still in place. But some
of your comments make me think you've also tossed "Follow the
rules" (or international law, the Golden Rule, basic humanity,
etc) for "kill them all and let God sort them out".

Wrath, I would point out, is one of the Seven Deadly Sins...

Or that I tend to not let bull**** remain unanswered?


You don't?

What do you classify your proposal that we nuke Mecca in
retaliation for further terrorist attacks as? Have you
actually THOUGHT of what the consequences of that would
be, international, economic, political, social, internal,
humanitarian? I have no wish to see the US go from the
world's policeman to Nazi Germany II overnight and the
world preparing to put us down like a rabid dog. If
your plan is not a bull**** idea, I don't know what is...

I don't know who's doing your thinking for you thse days, but
you should fire them. They're not doing a good job.

Or that
my capacity for being nice to buffoons has gotten smaller and smaller?

Gunner


"Considering the events of recent years,
the world has a long way to go to regain
its credibility and reputation with the US."
unknown


And THIS is another problem! I haven't been able to
Google it - I may be remembering it wrong - but I
recall the counter quote that "Nations are at their
most arrogant when they are in decline". Spain,
England, France, several of the Chinese dynasties
before they fall... I don't know if we're in decline
but I see worrisome signs: A crumbling infrastructure,
lack of focus on education, an increasing divide
between rich and poor, political/social/religious
divisiveness on a scale seldom seen before...

Decline CAN be reversed, but it takes people willing
to work together, identify the problems, and figure
out how to fix them.

Finding such people isn't easy...


AMEN, Frank. I didn't snip any of it because it was so good.

The Shrub (or RNC) has somehow thoroughly brainwashed poor Gunner into
believing their every twisted thought, no matter how liberal or sick
it may be. It's downright scary! Maybe Big Brother is trying another
one of those "LSD-in-the-public-water" experiments in California.

Let's hope he recovers soon, before Shrub and followers push more than
a billion otherwise mellow Arabs (and/or the hundreds of millions of
sheeple here in the US) over the edge. Without the ****-stirring, the
few Arab terrorists don't have the societal backing they need to
continue their crap on nearly as large a front as they have now.


--
REMEMBER: First you pillage, then you burn.
---
http://diversify.com Full Service Website Development


  #51   Report Post  
Cliff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 25 May 2005 13:28:29 GMT, (Frank White)
wrote:

In a perfect world the first part of Marx's little ditty would be
the truth of our income tax system.


"Philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the
point is to change it."

Karl Marx
--Theses on Feuerbach

??
--
Cliff
  #52   Report Post  
Proto
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gunner wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2005 17:52:15 -0400, "Proto" wrote:


The reason so many people have only Social Security, as they by and
large, were told that SS would be there to bail them out when they
retired. A Retirement account. Something it was NEVER intended to
be.


This is what I am trying to find out. Where does it say just WHAT it
was intended to be? I have heard many say what it was not intended
to be. Who can explain to me their idea of what it is supposed to
be.


"Columnist Ellen Goodman claimed that conservatives were saying "that
FDR himself endorsed personal accounts." James Roosevelt, a grandson
of the former president, called it an "outrageous distortion" that
might warrant Mr. Hume's firing. Former labor secretary Robert Reich
called the citing of Roosevelt's interest in private annuities "just
one example of how the Republican propaganda machine is lying to the
American people about Bush's plan for Social Security, just as it has
lied about so much else."





But Roosevelt had indeed proposed a plan under which all workers would
have been allowed to make periodic voluntary payments in exchange for
certificates representing the amounts they had deposited. At 65,
workers would have been able to trade in their certificates for
annuities that paid up to $100 a month (the 1935 equivalent of some
$1,300 today) based on their total deposits plus interest. In fact,
Roosevelt expressly cited the need for private plans to become
available as the worst of the Depression passed: "I am greatly hoping
that repeated promises of private investment and private initiative to
relieve the government in the immediate future of much of the burden
it has assumed will be fulfilled."
But Congress balked. In an article this month titled "When Congress
Killed Private Accounts," National Journal notes that Rep. Frederick
Vinson of Kentucky, who later became Treasury secretary under
President Truman, helped kill the private annuity plan, saying he saw
no "particular need" for it at that time. But he also told his House
colleagues, "Many of us think the time will come when the voluntary
annuity plan, which rounds out the security program for the aged, will
be written into law." Yes, the plan proposed by Roosevelt and rejected
by Congress in 1935 is substantially different from the one Mr. Bush
is advocating. But taking into account 70 years of progress in
financial instruments, there are also many similarities.
No one really knows how FDR would have thought about fixing Social
Security today, 70 years after he brought it into existence and 60
years after his death. That's because Roosevelt was anything but an
ideologue. The historian Eric Goldman wrote of FDR that "he trusted no
system except the system of endless experimentation." FDR himself said
in a speech at Oglethorpe University that "this country needs . . .
bold, persistent experimentation. It is common sense to take a method
and try it: If it fails, admit it frankly and try another. But above
all, try something."
I suspect that, whatever his views might be on personal accounts
today, FDR would have little use for liberals who attack them without
any suggestions of their own on how to "try something."

http://www.lewrockwell.com/bresiger/bresiger6.html

this may answer your questions

I have no questions. I just want someone of the ones that repeat what they
hear about SS to explain in their own words what it was intended for if not
a supplementary income. It is very easy to repeat something and to post
links but to explain it means that you understand what you are saying.

"The reason so many people have only Social Security, as they by and
large, were told that SS would be there to bail them out when they
retired. A Retirement account. Something it was NEVER intended to
be."

Who told these people is what I want to know. Are they the same ones that
are now saying it is not a retirement account? I bet they are. Can you say
"Bait and Switch".




  #53   Report Post  
Lazyike67
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cliff wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 04:53:27 GMT, Gunner
wrote:


What do you classify your proposal that we nuke Mecca in
retaliation for further terrorist attacks as? Have you
actually THOUGHT of what the consequences of that would
be, international, economic, political, social, internal,
humanitarian? I have no wish to see the US go from the
world's policeman to Nazi Germany II overnight and the
world preparing to put us down like a rabid dog. If
your plan is not a bull**** idea, I don't know what is...


So which group of nations is big enough to take us down? Nukeing
Mecca was something of a personal fantasy..but the day may not be all
that far in the furture. Its called A Last Resort.



Not YOUR religion, eh, gummer?

BTW, Do you have ANY clue what nation Mecca is in?
(He's often quite confused by maps & suchlike too.)


it in Texas? What about Utah?

Ike..
  #54   Report Post  
Gunner
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 May 2005 15:37:35 -0400, "Proto" wrote:


http://www.lewrockwell.com/bresiger/bresiger6.html

this may answer your questions

I have no questions. I just want someone of the ones that repeat what they
hear about SS to explain in their own words what it was intended for if not
a supplementary income. It is very easy to repeat something and to post
links but to explain it means that you understand what you are saying.

"The reason so many people have only Social Security, as they by and
large, were told that SS would be there to bail them out when they
retired. A Retirement account. Something it was NEVER intended to
be."

Who told these people is what I want to know. Are they the same ones that
are now saying it is not a retirement account? I bet they are. Can you say
"Bait and Switch".


Perhaps you should ask the politicians of the past 60 yrs?

Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
  #55   Report Post  
Gunner
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 May 2005 08:59:43 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:


Let's hope he recovers soon, before Shrub and followers push more than
a billion otherwise mellow Arabs (and/or the hundreds of millions of
sheeple here in the US) over the edge. Without the ****-stirring, the
few Arab terrorists don't have the societal backing they need to
continue their crap on nearly as large a front as they have now.



Bush has been president since 1979?

Your bias, your hate and your spew is noted. As is your apparent
attempt at revisionism



November 4, 1979 Teran, Iran

U.S. Embassy Taken Over

A group of Iranian students who were angry at the United States
attacked and seized its embassy in Tehran, Iran. They were supported
by the countries leader, Ayatollah Khomeini.

Details
1982 - 1991
Lebanon 18 Americans Kidnapped

David Dodge was the president of the American University in Beirut. He
was kidnapped the first time while he was on his way home from work.
He was released, but he was kidnapped again. This time he was killed.
His murder was called the most gruesome abduction, torture, and
killing of a United States citizen. The terrorists videotaped his
torture and murder. A group called the Organization of the Oppressed
on Earth claimed responsibility, but the real suspects are the
Hezbollah guerillas.

Details
April 18, 1983
Beirut, Lebanon
Truck Bombing of U.S. Embassy

A large vehicle packed with explosives is driven quickly into the U.S.
Embassy compound in Beirut. When it explodes it kills 63 people. A
group of terrorists called the Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility.

Details
October 23, 1983
Beirut, Lebanon Truck Bombing of U.S. Marine Barracks

A large truck bomb with 2,500 pounds of TNT smashed through the main
gate of the U.S. Marine headquarters in Beirut. 241 U.S. servicement
are killed when it expoldes. A French paratrooper base is blown up
just a few minutes later and 58 French soldiers are killed. A
terrorist group called the Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility.

Details
December 12, 1983
Kuwait City, Kuwait

U.S. Embassy Annex Attacked

A truck loaded with explosives crashed into the U.S. Embassy anex in
Kuwait. Four people were killed and at least 62 were injured. A
terrorist group called the Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility.

Details
September 20, 1984
Beirut, Lebanon

U.S. Embassy Compound Attacked

A van filled with explosives sped through several barriers and groups
of U.S. soldiers and stopped about 30 feet in front of the embassy
annex. The driver of the van and 12 soldiers and visitors to the annex
were killed. A terrorist group called the Islamic Jihad claimed
responsibility.

Details
April 12, 1985
Madrid, Spain

Restaurant Bombing

A bomb exploded in a restaurant where U.S. soldiers liked to eat. The
explosion killed 18 Spaniard citizens and injured 82 other people.
Only 15 of the Americans were injured, but none were killed.

Details
June 13, 1985
Beirut, Lebanon/
Algiers, Algeria

TWA Flight 847

This airliner took off in Rome, Italy, but was hijacked and forced to
fly to Beirut, Lebanon. Mohammed Hamadei from the terrorist group
Hezbollah, Hassan Izz-al-Din from Lebanon, and Ali Atwa another
terrorist hijacked the plane.

Details

August 8, 1985
Frankfurt, Germany



Rhein-Main Airbase Bombing

Two Americans and 20 others are injured when a Volkswagon car loaded
with explosives blew up at the U.S. Rhein-Main air base in Frankfurt,
Germany. Two terrorist groups, West German Red Army faction and the
French Direct Action, claimed responsibility for the bombing.

Details
October 7, 1985
Port Said, Egypt

The Ship Achille Lauro is Hijacked

Achille Lauro cruise ship hijacked by four Palistinian men who are
members of the Palestine Liberation Organization. They murder a
handicapped man from New York and throw his body overboard.

Details
November 23, 1985
Valeta, Malta Egyptair Flight 648 Hijacked

Three Arab men from the terrorist group Abu Nidal Organization
hijacked this plane and forced it to land in Valletta, Malta. There
was a 30 hour standoff between the hijackers and the Egyptian
comandos.

Details
December 27, 1985
Rome, Italy and Vienna, Austria

Grenades and Guns are used to Massacre Passengers at Rome and Vienna
Airport

At the same time two groups of terrorists, one in Rome and one in
Vienna, charge up to the counters of Israel's El Air airline. They
throw grenades at the tourists getting ready to fly on the airline.


Details
April 02, 1986
Athens, Greece

TWA Flight 840 Bombed

As the plane was beginning to land in Athens a plastic explosive bomb
exploded under the seat of the passenger sitting in seat 10F. Four
people were killed and nine others were wounded. The terrorist group
called Ezzedine Kassam Unit of the Arab Revolutionary Cells claimed
responsibility.Details




April 05, 1986
West Berlin


La Belle Disco in Berlin Bombed



The La Belle is a nightclub that was popular with the United States
servicemen. Two United States soldiers and one Turkish woman were
killed in the explosion

December 21, 1988
Lockerbie, Scotland


Pan Am Flight 103 Bombing

The bomb that blew up this flight was packed in a small radio case. It
was left on the plane by a terrorist that got off of the plane at an
earlier stop. The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
terrorist group claimed responsibility. The bombing was carried out so
that they could take revenge on America when one of its warships
accidentally mistook a Palestinian passenger plane as a war plane and
shot it down.

Details
January 25, 1993
Langley, Virginia


CIA Employees in Langley, VA are Shot

A Pakisini man, Mir Aimal Kasi, who lived in Virginia drove up to the
CIA building in Langley, Virginia and shot two CIA agents. He was
angry because he believed that the United States were mistreating
Muslims who lived in the Middle East.

Details

February 26, 1993
New York, New York


1993 World Trade Center in New York Bombed

A group of Muslim terrorists are arrested after a rented van packed
with explosives and driven into the World Trade Center's underground
parking garage. Six people were killed and more than 1,000 are injured
in this terrorist attack

Details

November 13, 1995
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia


U.S. Military Complex in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia is Bombed

Seven people are killed when a powerful car bomb explodes in front of
a military center run by the United States military. Three terrorist
groups: Islamic Movement for Change, the Tigers of the Gulf, and the
Combatant Partisans of God claim responsibility for the bombing of
this military center.

Details

June 25, 1996
Dhahran, Saudi Arabia


Khobar Towers in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia are Bombed

A fuel truck was parked 35 yards away from a United States military
compound. When the truck blew up 19 American soldiers were killed and
500 more people were wounded. The Movement for Islamic Change claimed
responsibility for the bombing.

Details

August 07, 1998
Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

U.S. Embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania are
Bombed

These terrorist attacks happened almost at the same time. More than
5,000 people were injured and 224 were killed when the buildings that
they were working in collapsed during the explosions.

Details

October 12, 2000
Aden, Yemen


USS Cole Bombed

The USS Cole was docked in Aden Yemen for refueling. A small craft
pulled alongside the ship and two terrorists set off the bomb. The two
terrorists were killed and so were 17 U.S. Navy seamen when the
explosion blew a 20 by 40 foot hole in the side of the ship.

Details

September 11, 2001
New York City, Washington, D.C.

World Trade Center is Destroyed and the Pentagon is Attacked

Terrorists hijack 4 domestic flights from Boston airport. Two of the
planes slam in to the two World Trade Center towers, causing them to
collapse. A third flight crashes into the Pentagon, and a fourth
crashes in Pennsylvania.

Details
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner


  #56   Report Post  
Gunner
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 May 2005 15:37:35 -0400, "Proto" wrote:


I have no questions.


Then why did you ask so many?

Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
  #57   Report Post  
Proto
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gunner wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 15:37:35 -0400, "Proto" wrote:


I have no questions.


Then why did you ask so many?


I only asked one and never got the answer.


Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner



  #58   Report Post  
Gunner
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 26 May 2005 05:30:23 -0400, "Proto" wrote:

Gunner wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 15:37:35 -0400, "Proto" wrote:


I have no questions.


Then why did you ask so many?


I only asked one and never got the answer.


sure you did.

Gunner


Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner



"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
  #60   Report Post  
Larry Jaques
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 26 May 2005 07:45:48 GMT, the inscrutable Gunner
spake:

On Wed, 25 May 2005 08:59:43 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:

Let's hope he recovers soon, before Shrub and followers push more than
a billion otherwise mellow Arabs (and/or the hundreds of millions of
sheeple here in the US) over the edge. Without the ****-stirring, the
few Arab terrorists don't have the societal backing they need to
continue their crap on nearly as large a front as they have now.


Bush has been president since 1979?


Q: Have global anti-American feelings increased or decreased since
Shrub was put into office?
A: Anyone but the blind or biased can see that the increase.


Yes, we have been attempting to push the Arabs around longer and have
had bases in their countries (which they hate with a religious
ferver), but it wasn't until Shrub was in office that they (through
bin Laden) categorically stated their main problems with us. By
"they", I mean the relatively few terrorists, not all 1.5B Arabs.
We've done nothing to appease their major objections: They want US
bases off their soil, they want us to stop telling them what to do,
etc. While removing these objections probably won't stop the
terrorism, it will go a long way to removing their growing fears and
anger and should stop most of it. The crazies will do as they've
always done, but we have to stop giving them reasons to attack us.

So, what do YOU do when a large bully pushes you around, Gunner?


Your bias, your hate and your spew is noted. As is your apparent
attempt at revisionism


That bloody tape has been played so often for so long that I can now
hear -scratches- on it. The hate is in Shrub's corner. I haven't
killed 150+ thousand souls, putting at least that many families (if
not 1000% more) into the growing armies of those who want to see us
dead. Why do we _knowingly_ continue to fuel that flame?

You and a few D.C. consultants & generals believe that (a few
hard-core) Muslim leaders want our extinction. The rest of us,
including the majority of D.C. consultants (from what I've read),
don't. Who's right? Nobody will know until those in power here stop
stirring the **** and fanning the flames.

Biased, hatefully, and spewingly yours, LJ.


--
REMEMBER: First you pillage, then you burn.
---
http://diversify.com Full Service Website Development


  #61   Report Post  
Frank White
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , says...

On 25 May 2005 02:58:19 GMT, (Frank White)
wrote:


Or that I tend to not let bull**** remain unanswered?


You don't?


Seldom


What do you classify your proposal that we nuke Mecca in
retaliation for further terrorist attacks as? Have you
actually THOUGHT of what the consequences of that would
be, international, economic, political, social, internal,
humanitarian? I have no wish to see the US go from the
world's policeman to Nazi Germany II overnight and the
world preparing to put us down like a rabid dog. If
your plan is not a bull**** idea, I don't know what is...


So which group of nations is big enough to take us down? Nukeing
Mecca was something of a personal fantasy..but the day may not be all
that far in the furture. Its called A Last Resort.

One I agree with btw.


OK, let's run through the probable way such a move will
unfold...

We'll say this doesn't comes out of nowhere or is even
totally insane. We'll say that first there's a MAJOR
Islamic terrorist attack - maybe even nuclear - on a US city
and after days of newsclips showing dead US children, burned
and mangled bodies, and survivors with horrific injuries, the
whole country is crazed for vengence and the Pres announces
he'll engage in violent retribution for any further attacks.

Then the terrorists blow up ANOTHER US city.

The Pres, between a hard rock and a place and under massive
pressure (and probably pretty angry himself) but with no
clue as to where the terrorists tehmselves are, hits back at
Islam in general by nuking Mecca. Probably saying "THAT
will learn them!"

Mecca isn't just an incredibly holy place for Islams, though,
it's one of Saudi Arabia's major cities. Chuck full of
MILLIONS of innocent civilians. So after the nuking, on
Arab TV, we get newsclips of dead ARAB children, burned and
mangled ARAB bodies, and ARAB survivors with horrific injuries,
all played over and over minute by minute.

Combine that with that with the sacrilege of destroying the
Holiest of Moslem Holies - like desecrating Korans but a
million million times worse - AND an unprovoked attack on a
civilian target, and it's not hard to imagine every Arab and
Moslem throughout the world, regardless of nationality,
personal inclination, or economic status, joining as one to
scream "JIHAD!!"

And this time not just the ravings of lone terrorists, but
the start of an actual, Honest to God unholy war.

No American - heck, no Caucasian - would be safe outside of
their own borders, rage would be running so high Moslems
would shoot first and probably not even ask questions later.

Oil shipments to the US from any Arab country would stop.
Immediately. I suspect many tankers on route to the US would
either turn away or dump the oil at sea rather than be seen
delivering to the US. We've got about a 30 day supply and
NO way to crank domesitc production up enough to match the
loss in supply. The US economy would tank, WORSE than in the
Depression.

Anything US, and anyone and everything doing business with the
US would become a terrorist target. And not just for grandstand
moves like airliner kamikaze attacks: beatings, firebombings,
drive by shootings, attacks large and small would rain down
on everything, everywhere. There would be no safety.

US allies would desert us like we had cooties/AIDS/leperosy/
the Plague, all at once. I doubt anyone but Israel would
stay on our side, and THEY'D probably be so hard put to survive
in the rage wave sweeping the world they wouldn't be any help.
In fact I can see Putin decalring that he will not put up with
American nuclear terrorism and he is putting Russia's nuclear
aresenal on a "launch on warning" footing, and immediately being
hearalded as the world's savior, his image completely refurbished
and Russia restored to superpower status by a world frightened
of the US bully. And with other nuclear powers being forced by
public opinion to follow his lead and support him.

Even Britian.

And in the US, MASSIVE dislocation as folks realize we are now
responsible for a Holocaust, and those who regard this as a
major crime against humanity clashing - in the military, in
government, in the streets - with those who think of it as
getting our own back. The fighting would probably become
physical, and combined with the economic effects of an oil
boycott (gas expensive at $2.50 a gallon? Try gas as $250 a
gallon!) and in six months the country could be defeated by
a bunch of Girl Scouts, we'd be so smashed up.

Personal fantasy? Sounds like a nightmare, to me.

I don't know who's doing your thinking for you thse days, but
you should fire them. They're not doing a good job.


I think for myself thank you veddyveddymuch. I still believe and
practice personal responsiblity and adherence to honor, truth and
justice.


I refuse to believe this. You're an intelligent man and some of
the things you've said recently are definately NOT intelligent.

Somebody's influencing you. Somebody not too bright...

You sound like you get your daily arguments via Fax from the DNC.


(EXTREMELY heavy sigh)

You're DOING it again! Insisting that anyone who disagrees with
you is a leftist whack-hole! Or a Democrat, which you seem to
think is the same thing.

Listen.

Listen carefully.

I have something important to tell you.

There is NO damn difference between Republicians and Democrats,
these days! It's all cosmetic! They're both, at the core,
power hungry nutbars whose answer to everything is to spend and
spend YOUR money on THEIR pet projects, regardless of whether
the money is coming from record deficits, record taxes, or
both! If Kerry were in office he'd be doing EXACTLY the same
things as Bush, except that instead of wanting to spend trillions
privatizing Social Security, he'd probably want to spend trillions
on national health insurance. THEY ARE THE SAME JERKS!!!!!!!!!

You might want to take a red hot poker and burn 'No Difference'
into your forehead so you don't keep forgetting that...

Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner


AGAIN with the 'older brother engaging in behavior modification
through violence' motif! What are you trying to say here????

FW

  #62   Report Post  
Gunner
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 26 May 2005 14:24:28 GMT, (Frank White)
wrote:


I think for myself thank you veddyveddymuch. I still believe and
practice personal responsiblity and adherence to honor, truth and
justice.


I refuse to believe this. You're an intelligent man and some of
the things you've said recently are definately NOT intelligent.

Somebody's influencing you. Somebody not too bright...

You sound like you get your daily arguments via Fax from the DNC.


(EXTREMELY heavy sigh)

You're DOING it again! Insisting that anyone who disagrees with
you is a leftist whack-hole! Or a Democrat, which you seem to
think is the same thing.

Listen.

Listen carefully.

I have something important to tell you.

There is NO damn difference between Republicians and Democrats,
these days! It's all cosmetic! They're both, at the core,
power hungry nutbars whose answer to everything is to spend and
spend YOUR money on THEIR pet projects, regardless of whether
the money is coming from record deficits, record taxes, or
both! If Kerry were in office he'd be doing EXACTLY the same
things as Bush, except that instead of wanting to spend trillions
privatizing Social Security, he'd probably want to spend trillions
on national health insurance. THEY ARE THE SAME JERKS!!!!!!!!!

You might want to take a red hot poker and burn 'No Difference'
into your forehead so you don't keep forgetting that...

Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner


AGAIN with the 'older brother engaging in behavior modification
through violence' motif! What are you trying to say here????

FW



Your opinions are noted.

Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
  #63   Report Post  
Gunner
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 26 May 2005 06:35:18 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:


Bush has been president since 1979?


Q: Have global anti-American feelings increased or decreased since
Shrub was put into office?
A: Anyone but the blind or biased can see that the increase.


Yes, we have been attempting to push the Arabs around longer and have
had bases in their countries (which they hate with a religious
ferver), but it wasn't until Shrub was in office that they (through
bin Laden) categorically stated their main problems with us. By
"they", I mean the relatively few terrorists, not all 1.5B Arabs.
We've done nothing to appease their major objections: They want US
bases off their soil, they want us to stop telling them what to do,
etc. While removing these objections probably won't stop the
terrorism, it will go a long way to removing their growing fears and
anger and should stop most of it. The crazies will do as they've
always done, but we have to stop giving them reasons to attack us.

So, what do YOU do when a large bully pushes you around, Gunner?


Your bias, your hate and your spew is noted. As is your apparent
attempt at revisionism


That bloody tape has been played so often for so long that I can now
hear -scratches- on it. The hate is in Shrub's corner. I haven't
killed 150+ thousand souls, putting at least that many families (if
not 1000% more) into the growing armies of those who want to see us
dead. Why do we _knowingly_ continue to fuel that flame?

You and a few D.C. consultants & generals believe that (a few
hard-core) Muslim leaders want our extinction. The rest of us,
including the majority of D.C. consultants (from what I've read),
don't. Who's right? Nobody will know until those in power here stop
stirring the **** and fanning the flames.

Biased, hatefully, and spewingly yours, LJ.


You snipped out all the attacks on the US that you claim are Bush's
fault. Ill put them back in, just to be fair:

November 4, 1979 Teran, Iran

U.S. Embassy Taken Over

A group of Iranian students who were angry at the United States
attacked and seized its embassy in Tehran, Iran. They were supported
by the countries leader, Ayatollah Khomeini.

Details
1982 - 1991
Lebanon 18 Americans Kidnapped

David Dodge was the president of the American University in Beirut. He
was kidnapped the first time while he was on his way home from work.
He was released, but he was kidnapped again. This time he was killed.
His murder was called the most gruesome abduction, torture, and
killing of a United States citizen. The terrorists videotaped his
torture and murder. A group called the Organization of the Oppressed
on Earth claimed responsibility, but the real suspects are the
Hezbollah guerillas.

Details
April 18, 1983
Beirut, Lebanon
Truck Bombing of U.S. Embassy

A large vehicle packed with explosives is driven quickly into the U.S.
Embassy compound in Beirut. When it explodes it kills 63 people. A
group of terrorists called the Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility.

Details
October 23, 1983
Beirut, Lebanon Truck Bombing of U.S. Marine Barracks

A large truck bomb with 2,500 pounds of TNT smashed through the main
gate of the U.S. Marine headquarters in Beirut. 241 U.S. servicement
are killed when it expoldes. A French paratrooper base is blown up
just a few minutes later and 58 French soldiers are killed. A
terrorist group called the Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility.

Details
December 12, 1983
Kuwait City, Kuwait

U.S. Embassy Annex Attacked

A truck loaded with explosives crashed into the U.S. Embassy anex in
Kuwait. Four people were killed and at least 62 were injured. A
terrorist group called the Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility.

Details
September 20, 1984
Beirut, Lebanon

U.S. Embassy Compound Attacked

A van filled with explosives sped through several barriers and groups
of U.S. soldiers and stopped about 30 feet in front of the embassy
annex. The driver of the van and 12 soldiers and visitors to the annex
were killed. A terrorist group called the Islamic Jihad claimed
responsibility.

Details
April 12, 1985
Madrid, Spain

Restaurant Bombing

A bomb exploded in a restaurant where U.S. soldiers liked to eat. The
explosion killed 18 Spaniard citizens and injured 82 other people.
Only 15 of the Americans were injured, but none were killed.

Details
June 13, 1985
Beirut, Lebanon/
Algiers, Algeria

TWA Flight 847

This airliner took off in Rome, Italy, but was hijacked and forced to
fly to Beirut, Lebanon. Mohammed Hamadei from the terrorist group
Hezbollah, Hassan Izz-al-Din from Lebanon, and Ali Atwa another
terrorist hijacked the plane.

Details

August 8, 1985
Frankfurt, Germany



Rhein-Main Airbase Bombing

Two Americans and 20 others are injured when a Volkswagon car loaded
with explosives blew up at the U.S. Rhein-Main air base in Frankfurt,
Germany. Two terrorist groups, West German Red Army faction and the
French Direct Action, claimed responsibility for the bombing.

Details
October 7, 1985
Port Said, Egypt

The Ship Achille Lauro is Hijacked

Achille Lauro cruise ship hijacked by four Palistinian men who are
members of the Palestine Liberation Organization. They murder a
handicapped man from New York and throw his body overboard.

Details
November 23, 1985
Valeta, Malta Egyptair Flight 648 Hijacked

Three Arab men from the terrorist group Abu Nidal Organization
hijacked this plane and forced it to land in Valletta, Malta. There
was a 30 hour standoff between the hijackers and the Egyptian
comandos.

Details
December 27, 1985
Rome, Italy and Vienna, Austria

Grenades and Guns are used to Massacre Passengers at Rome and Vienna
Airport

At the same time two groups of terrorists, one in Rome and one in
Vienna, charge up to the counters of Israel's El Air airline. They
throw grenades at the tourists getting ready to fly on the airline.


Details
April 02, 1986
Athens, Greece

TWA Flight 840 Bombed

As the plane was beginning to land in Athens a plastic explosive bomb
exploded under the seat of the passenger sitting in seat 10F. Four
people were killed and nine others were wounded. The terrorist group
called Ezzedine Kassam Unit of the Arab Revolutionary Cells claimed
responsibility.Details




April 05, 1986
West Berlin


La Belle Disco in Berlin Bombed



The La Belle is a nightclub that was popular with the United States
servicemen. Two United States soldiers and one Turkish woman were
killed in the explosion

December 21, 1988
Lockerbie, Scotland


Pan Am Flight 103 Bombing

The bomb that blew up this flight was packed in a small radio case. It
was left on the plane by a terrorist that got off of the plane at an
earlier stop. The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
terrorist group claimed responsibility. The bombing was carried out so
that they could take revenge on America when one of its warships
accidentally mistook a Palestinian passenger plane as a war plane and
shot it down.

Details
January 25, 1993
Langley, Virginia


CIA Employees in Langley, VA are Shot

A Pakisini man, Mir Aimal Kasi, who lived in Virginia drove up to the
CIA building in Langley, Virginia and shot two CIA agents. He was
angry because he believed that the United States were mistreating
Muslims who lived in the Middle East.

Details

February 26, 1993
New York, New York


1993 World Trade Center in New York Bombed

A group of Muslim terrorists are arrested after a rented van packed
with explosives and driven into the World Trade Center's underground
parking garage. Six people were killed and more than 1,000 are injured
in this terrorist attack

Details

November 13, 1995
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia


U.S. Military Complex in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia is Bombed

Seven people are killed when a powerful car bomb explodes in front of
a military center run by the United States military. Three terrorist
groups: Islamic Movement for Change, the Tigers of the Gulf, and the
Combatant Partisans of God claim responsibility for the bombing of
this military center.

Details

June 25, 1996
Dhahran, Saudi Arabia


Khobar Towers in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia are Bombed

A fuel truck was parked 35 yards away from a United States military
compound. When the truck blew up 19 American soldiers were killed and
500 more people were wounded. The Movement for Islamic Change claimed
responsibility for the bombing.

Details

August 07, 1998
Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

U.S. Embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania are
Bombed

These terrorist attacks happened almost at the same time. More than
5,000 people were injured and 224 were killed when the buildings that
they were working in collapsed during the explosions.

Details

October 12, 2000
Aden, Yemen


USS Cole Bombed

The USS Cole was docked in Aden Yemen for refueling. A small craft
pulled alongside the ship and two terrorists set off the bomb. The two
terrorists were killed and so were 17 U.S. Navy seamen when the
explosion blew a 20 by 40 foot hole in the side of the ship.

Details

September 11, 2001
New York City, Washington, D.C.

World Trade Center is Destroyed and the Pentagon is Attacked

Terrorists hijack 4 domestic flights from Boston airport. Two of the
planes slam in to the two World Trade Center towers, causing them to
collapse. A third flight crashes into the Pentagon, and a fourth
crashes in Pennsylvania.

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
  #64   Report Post  
Larry Jaques
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 26 May 2005 15:37:36 GMT, the inscrutable Gunner
spake:

On Thu, 26 May 2005 06:35:18 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:


Bush has been president since 1979?


Q: Have global anti-American feelings increased or decreased since
Shrub was put into office?
A: Anyone but the blind or biased can see that the increase.


Yes, we have been attempting to push the Arabs around longer and have
had bases in their countries (which they hate with a religious
ferver), but it wasn't until Shrub was in office that they (through
bin Laden) categorically stated their main problems with us. By
"they", I mean the relatively few terrorists, not all 1.5B Arabs.
We've done nothing to appease their major objections: They want US
bases off their soil, they want us to stop telling them what to do,
etc. While removing these objections probably won't stop the
terrorism, it will go a long way to removing their growing fears and
anger and should stop most of it. The crazies will do as they've
always done, but we have to stop giving them reasons to attack us.

So, what do YOU do when a large bully pushes you around, Gunner?


Your bias, your hate and your spew is noted. As is your apparent
attempt at revisionism


That bloody tape has been played so often for so long that I can now
hear -scratches- on it. The hate is in Shrub's corner. I haven't
killed 150+ thousand souls, putting at least that many families (if
not 1000% more) into the growing armies of those who want to see us
dead. Why do we _knowingly_ continue to fuel that flame?

You and a few D.C. consultants & generals believe that (a few
hard-core) Muslim leaders want our extinction. The rest of us,
including the majority of D.C. consultants (from what I've read),
don't. Who's right? Nobody will know until those in power here stop
stirring the **** and fanning the flames.

Biased, hatefully, and spewingly yours, LJ.


You snipped out all the attacks on the US that you claim are Bush's
fault.


I did no such thing. Reread my post without your twisting it this
time, Gunner. I acknowledged that terrorists had been active prior
to Shrub's reign but I'm worried about his causing a critical mass in
the Islamic people which would ensure global wipeout of us OR them.
Why have we failed to heed their pleas, requests, and finally
warnings? Why has the US continued a known antagonistic policy with
the Arab nations? Have you read "Imperial Hubris: Why the West is
Losing the War on Terror" yet? (They're available inexpensively from
www.Amazon.com, $0.64 paperback, $7.30 hardcover) Scheuer points out
that it's our actions, not our values, that they hate. Why doesn't
Washington take the bloody hint?


Ill put them back in, just to be fair:


If you didn't want to discuss it, why not say so? Why the silly games?
OTOH, why didn't you address any of my questions or statements?


November 4, 1979 Teran, Iran

--tragic news snipped once again--

Going back to a time before we were trying to run Arab countries for
them, how many terrorist attacks were there by them on us? Any? I
don't recall any, but feel free to prove me wrong.


Back to the immediate future, (when this "war" fails, and you know
it's going to) the next war will be a downright nastyass job compared
to this cakewalk. Got several years worth of stored food, water, and
air yet?


--
REMEMBER: First you pillage, then you burn.
---
http://diversify.com Full Service Website Development
  #65   Report Post  
Proto
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gunner wrote:
On 26 May 2005 14:24:28 GMT, (Frank White)
wrote:


I think for myself thank you veddyveddymuch. I still believe and
practice personal responsiblity and adherence to honor, truth and
justice.


I refuse to believe this. You're an intelligent man and some of
the things you've said recently are definately NOT intelligent.

Somebody's influencing you. Somebody not too bright...

You sound like you get your daily arguments via Fax from the DNC.


(EXTREMELY heavy sigh)

You're DOING it again! Insisting that anyone who disagrees with
you is a leftist whack-hole! Or a Democrat, which you seem to
think is the same thing.

Listen.

Listen carefully.

I have something important to tell you.

There is NO damn difference between Republicians and Democrats,
these days! It's all cosmetic! They're both, at the core,
power hungry nutbars whose answer to everything is to spend and
spend YOUR money on THEIR pet projects, regardless of whether
the money is coming from record deficits, record taxes, or
both! If Kerry were in office he'd be doing EXACTLY the same
things as Bush, except that instead of wanting to spend trillions
privatizing Social Security, he'd probably want to spend trillions
on national health insurance. THEY ARE THE SAME JERKS!!!!!!!!!

You might want to take a red hot poker and burn 'No Difference'
into your forehead so you don't keep forgetting that...

Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and
us) off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when
you give them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner


AGAIN with the 'older brother engaging in behavior modification
through violence' motif! What are you trying to say here????

FW



Your opinions are noted.

Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner


Hey Gunner, what kind of cat?




  #66   Report Post  
Dan
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"Gunner" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 24 May 2005 17:52:15 -0400, "Proto" wrote:



Now we have high income pensioners with one or more pension fund
drawing SS at the same time. This puts one hell of a drain on the
system.


How does their being able to collect money from another pension have
anything to do with the SS trust fund?


In a real sense this is true, just like there is no "retirement fund" at
companies
that have retirement plans (though employee-owned plans, such as 401K,
actually do have retirement funds).

Dan


--
"...a terrorist would have to be really stupid to attack George's office,
because the odds of George being there are so slim. "

Ben Tripp


  #67   Report Post  
Dan
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"Frank White" wrote

Somebody's influencing you. Somebody not too bright...


Don't fall into the trap that someone disseminating stupidity is
therefore stupid. P. T. Barnum was a very intelligent person.

Dan


--
"...a terrorist would have to be really stupid to attack George's office,
because the odds of George being there are so slim. "

Ben Tripp


  #68   Report Post  
shu
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"Cliff" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:24:55 -0500, "shu" wrote:

Shu, PLEASE LEARN HOW TO POST !!!
REMOVE PRIOR CUTLINED SIGS !!

THEN TRY NOT TOP-POSTING CUTLINES.



awww, is the posting nazi upset with me, do you think i actually *care* what
you think about the way i post??
You have far too much time on your hands.

*bunch of moronic replies from cliff deleted here*


BTW, Your spelling & suchlike seems to have improved.
On the wagon? LOL ...

sod off, ******.


It was of very limited duration anyway it seems.
Who REALLY wrote it?


Cliff, I actually did it for you. I can write very well when I want to.
I just love to (hear) you bitch about grammer, and spelling.


Some of us have jobs, in the case of posts to CNC machines I generally have
very little time to write anything at all, so your lucky to get what I give
you.
If you don't like the way I write, Stop reading it. ^_^
It's really that simple...


********
shu


BTW, Have you considered getting an education? I've
heard that some of the more liberal schools will allow you
to wear your jackboots ...
--
Cliff


Btw have you considored getting your head examined? you have a mental
disease of some sort.. a personality disorder at best.
I'm thinking of sticking you back on ignore, your creeping back towards ad
hominem.
**********
shu

  #69   Report Post  
Bob Brock
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 26 May 2005 21:36:39 -0500, "shu" wrote:



"Cliff" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:24:55 -0500, "shu" wrote:

Shu, PLEASE LEARN HOW TO POST !!!
REMOVE PRIOR CUTLINED SIGS !!

THEN TRY NOT TOP-POSTING CUTLINES.



awww, is the posting nazi upset with me, do you think i actually *care* what
you think about the way i post??
You have far too much time on your hands.


Well, I don't...

plink with prejudice
  #70   Report Post  
Cliff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 26 May 2005 21:36:39 -0500, "shu" wrote:

BTW, Have you considered getting an education? I've
heard that some of the more liberal schools will allow you
to wear your jackboots ...
--
Cliff


Such a slow learner, like most whining wingers.

[
Shu, PLEASE LEARN HOW TO POST !!!
REMOVE PRIOR CUTLINED SIGS !!

THEN TRY NOT TOP-POSTING CUTLINES.

]

Btw have you considored getting your head examined? you have a mental
disease of some sort.. a personality disorder at best.
I'm thinking of sticking you back on ignore, your creeping back towards ad
hominem.


Was it the jackboots? What color are they? Red?
--
Cliff


  #71   Report Post  
Gunner
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 26 May 2005 15:50:16 -0400, "Proto" wrote:

Gunner wrote:
On 26 May 2005 14:24:28 GMT, (Frank White)
wrote:


I think for myself thank you veddyveddymuch. I still believe and
practice personal responsiblity and adherence to honor, truth and
justice.

I refuse to believe this. You're an intelligent man and some of
the things you've said recently are definately NOT intelligent.

Somebody's influencing you. Somebody not too bright...

You sound like you get your daily arguments via Fax from the DNC.

(EXTREMELY heavy sigh)

You're DOING it again! Insisting that anyone who disagrees with
you is a leftist whack-hole! Or a Democrat, which you seem to
think is the same thing.

Listen.

Listen carefully.

I have something important to tell you.

There is NO damn difference between Republicians and Democrats,
these days! It's all cosmetic! They're both, at the core,
power hungry nutbars whose answer to everything is to spend and
spend YOUR money on THEIR pet projects, regardless of whether
the money is coming from record deficits, record taxes, or
both! If Kerry were in office he'd be doing EXACTLY the same
things as Bush, except that instead of wanting to spend trillions
privatizing Social Security, he'd probably want to spend trillions
on national health insurance. THEY ARE THE SAME JERKS!!!!!!!!!

You might want to take a red hot poker and burn 'No Difference'
into your forehead so you don't keep forgetting that...

Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and
us) off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when
you give them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner

AGAIN with the 'older brother engaging in behavior modification
through violence' motif! What are you trying to say here????

FW



Your opinions are noted.

Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner


Hey Gunner, what kind of cat?

Any kind. They are all good.

Particularly with a good white wine.

Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
  #72   Report Post  
Cliff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 26 May 2005 21:38:23 -0500, "shu" wrote:

Ed, do you seriously think you're going to get out, what you put in to
social security?
do you think social security is an issue to be ignored?


Don't you trip over the jackboots with your head screwed on
backwards?

Do you expect to make a profit on your health or term life
insurance?

If we, the taxpayers, do not pay a bit for all who will? The
neocons will just do it with their deficits, right?
And who, in the end, will pay for those?
--
Cliff
  #73   Report Post  
Cliff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 26 May 2005 23:49:46 -0400, Bob Brock
wrote:

On Thu, 26 May 2005 21:36:39 -0500, "shu" wrote:



"Cliff" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:24:55 -0500, "shu" wrote:

Shu, PLEASE LEARN HOW TO POST !!!
REMOVE PRIOR CUTLINED SIGS !!

THEN TRY NOT TOP-POSTING CUTLINES.



awww, is the posting nazi upset with me, do you think i actually *care* what
you think about the way i post??
You have far too much time on your hands.


Well, I don't...

plink with prejudice


Aw, Bob, she's really not that bad.
Probably even kind of cute in those boots .....
--
Cliff
  #74   Report Post  
Bob Brock
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 27 May 2005 02:25:03 -0400, Cliff wrote:

On Thu, 26 May 2005 23:49:46 -0400, Bob Brock
wrote:

On Thu, 26 May 2005 21:36:39 -0500, "shu" wrote:



"Cliff" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:24:55 -0500, "shu" wrote:

Shu, PLEASE LEARN HOW TO POST !!!
REMOVE PRIOR CUTLINED SIGS !!

THEN TRY NOT TOP-POSTING CUTLINES.


awww, is the posting nazi upset with me, do you think i actually *care* what
you think about the way i post??
You have far too much time on your hands.


Well, I don't...

plink with prejudice


Aw, Bob, she's really not that bad.
Probably even kind of cute in those boots .....


No enough time to waste on children and/or fools Cliff. Since he
doesn't mind being foolish and I don't have too much time on my hands,
I'll ignore him.

Now, bummer being both a fool and childish is a pet project. Him I
will make time for, but not too much. His posts do more to make the
neo-cons and bush look like a close minded and foolish sect that has
taken over the white house than most people could do if they tried.

I hope he keeps up the good work.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT - Republican Bans 50 calibre BMG [email protected] Metalworking 1 January 13th 05 10:10 PM
OT-: Frist Voter Fraud Arrest!!!! Gunner Metalworking 27 December 19th 04 07:54 PM
OT Guns more Guns Cliff Metalworking 519 December 12th 04 05:52 AM
OT Republican in 2004........ Tim Daneliuk Woodworking 42 November 8th 04 05:54 PM
PULLEYS OR SHEAVES? Grant Erwin Metalworking 7 June 25th 04 07:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"