Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Friday Challenge.
cross posted to rcm. Thanks for letting us use the dropbox Inspired by Anthony, here's another "How would you do it?" A couple of years ago we got an email from a customer who wanted a = special part grounded. After taking one look at the pics I thought "No way!" = The part was impossible to grind, at least on our equipment. =20 I called the customer back and told him: "Sorry, but this is out of our league" and quickly forgot the whole thing - or so I thought, because = later that day the light bulb inside my head actually began emitting light. A flickering and shimmering glow, but still a light. I had an idea! http://www.metalworking.com/DropBox/ Search for "pigtail" (four files)=20 About the part: The "pigtail" is a core for a mold, forming a helix hollow inside the finished molded part. The size is approx. 3" dia. at the base, the length is about 7" and the tail is 3/4" thick. The last two inches of the tail has a taper. The pigtail is bolted on the flange of a guide spindle, and runs inside= a large multi-thread bronze nut. When the core is pulled from the mold, = the threads provide the necessary rotating motion to unscrew the core. So here's the deal: The part was to be grounded on the cylindrical (white) part of the tail roundness +- 0.0005" as it had to seal against the stripping plate. The fillet at the base, and the tapered part should also have a "grind quality" surface finish. Actual size was not too important. There was a catch, though. The roundness of the tail was measured perpendicular to the centerline of the helix, not the centerline of the = part. The part came from the customer hardned and pre-milled to about 0.05 oversize. Since they only had 3axis VMC, the part was milled from four = sides rotating the part 90 degrees each time. (I did suggest the part could be milled to finished size, but they didn't think it was possible to achieve= the necessary finish/roundness.) The grinder I used was a Jungner US-450 CNC with four axis - think of = an ordinary lathe, and swap X with Z & Y with X. Tool up&down =3D third = axis [X] Spindle =3D fourth axis [b] ) =20 =20 The Siemens 810 control only allow for three axis to move simultaneously. To make an already too long story short; I somehow managed to solve the task, but it did make my head hurt at times. =20 How would you have done it? For those interested in the challenge, I'll post the solution on Monday. (not like that spoil sport & teaser, Anthony) G =20 --=20 -JN- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Petrol Grass Trimmer Recommendation (McCulloch, Talon or Challenge) | UK diy | |||
Friday pop quiz, kiddies! | Home Repair | |||
Do you have Past Woodpeck Weekly Special Email? | Woodworking | |||
Argos Challenge SDS Drill | UK diy | |||
Free Mailstation - modification challenge | Electronics |