Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Martin
 
Posts: n/a
Default subfloor for tiles?

Hi,

most places (literature) I looked, durock is recommended as a subfloor for
floor tiles. I have currently 5/8" subfloor, and was gonna screw on 5/8" on
top of it to get the recommended 1-1/4" for plywood subfloroor, but now i am
not sure if I should skip the 2nd layer and just install duroc. The main
reason to go with plywood is that I have about 5 sheets of it. The main
reason for duroc, is that it is thinner, and wouldn't increase the floor
height so much. Plywood is supposed to be flexing more, but if you secure
it at recommended intervals with proper screws, is that still a problem?
So my questions a
1 - are both options acceptable? (1-1/4" plywood) or 5/8" plywood with duroc
on top?
2 - is the durock instead of plywood going to make huge difference?

The area to cover is cc. 100sqft, - 28 sqft for tub island.
Does the additional flooring need to go under the tub island, or can the
island rest directly on the main subfloor?


Thanks.

m.


  #2   Report Post  
G Henslee
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Martin,

Keep in mind there are other backerboard products on the market today
that offer height as well as density advantages over the old duroc
stuff. I've used the Hardibacker products on both floor and a
countertop on several occasions and am well pleased.

Your proposed 2 layers of 5/8 plywood (over a well constructed subfloor)
is a sufficient and acceptable base, but with such a small area the cost
for backer wouldn't be extremely expensive either.

As for the island cabinet, your underlayment and tile don't need to go
underneath it as long as your toe space is adequate.

Martin wrote:
Hi,

most places (literature) I looked, durock is recommended as a subfloor for
floor tiles. I have currently 5/8" subfloor, and was gonna screw on 5/8" on
top of it to get the recommended 1-1/4" for plywood subfloroor, but now i am
not sure if I should skip the 2nd layer and just install duroc. The main
reason to go with plywood is that I have about 5 sheets of it. The main
reason for duroc, is that it is thinner, and wouldn't increase the floor
height so much. Plywood is supposed to be flexing more, but if you secure
it at recommended intervals with proper screws, is that still a problem?
So my questions a
1 - are both options acceptable? (1-1/4" plywood) or 5/8" plywood with duroc
on top?
2 - is the durock instead of plywood going to make huge difference?

The area to cover is cc. 100sqft, - 28 sqft for tub island.
Does the additional flooring need to go under the tub island, or can the
island rest directly on the main subfloor?

  #3   Report Post  
the_tool_man
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Martin:

I just finished ripping out the old tile floor in my bathroom. The
builder used 2 layers of 5/8" plywood, just as you suggested. However,
at every plywood seam, the tiles cracked because of seasonal expansion
and contraction of the plywood. Because of this, I will never
recommend installation of tile directly onto plywood.

I have replaced the upper layer of plywood in the bathroom with a layer
of 1/2" Durock and a layer of 1/4" Hardibacker (it had to be at least
5/8" thick for cosmetic reasons). It feels like a concrete slab, now.

Three years ago, I replaced the hardwood floor in my laundry room with
tile. I used 1/2" Durock on the 5/8" subfloor, and have had no issues
whatsoever with the floor. This room sees heavy through traffic every
day, and a heavy, vibrating washing machine.

Regards,
John.

Martin wrote:
Hi,

most places (literature) I looked, durock is recommended as a

subfloor for
floor tiles. I have currently 5/8" subfloor, and was gonna screw on

5/8" on
top of it to get the recommended 1-1/4" for plywood subfloroor, but

now i am
not sure if I should skip the 2nd layer and just install duroc. The

main
reason to go with plywood is that I have about 5 sheets of it. The

main
reason for duroc, is that it is thinner, and wouldn't increase the

floor
height so much. Plywood is supposed to be flexing more, but if you

secure
it at recommended intervals with proper screws, is that still a

problem?
So my questions a
1 - are both options acceptable? (1-1/4" plywood) or 5/8" plywood

with duroc
on top?
2 - is the durock instead of plywood going to make huge difference?

The area to cover is cc. 100sqft, - 28 sqft for tub island.
Does the additional flooring need to go under the tub island, or can

the
island rest directly on the main subfloor?


Thanks.

m.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"