On Mon, 10 May 2021 10:44:18 -0500, you wrote:

On 5/9/2021 2:56 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 5/9/2021 3:19 PM, Snag wrote:
On 5/9/2021 1:36 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 5/9/2021 12:57 PM, Snag wrote:
On 5/9/2021 8:55 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 5/9/2021 1:07 AM, Nomen Nescio wrote:



Oh, forgot to add in my reply.* You know that Nomen Nescio is a bull****
anonymous sender used to hide real sources.

I think anonymous sources often have nothing to lose being honest about
how they see any topic. Noone can hunt them down, threaten them, or
intimidate them into being quiet because someone threatens them into
submission.
--
Maggie

Many, many people have been stalked and doxed because they used a nym
that could be traced by crazy morons. The fact that some denigrate the
source because it was posted by someone using a remailer shows what
closed minded fools they really are. Their way or the highway. Ignore
these morons. Some in the group will find my posts worth reading and
considering.

Let's face it, almost all the posters left on Usenet are here because
they cannot function in a Web forum. Their attitudes would have them
censored from the forum in short order. In other words, they are
always angry and contentious, and cannot function in a structured
forum. My reason for staying out of those forums is because one is
always traceable on the Web after signing up for a forum. Who I am,
where I am, should make no difference to anyone. If it does, it proves
that the anti-privacy complainers are interested in more than just the
message.

One of these morons stated:

"There is no Nomen Nescio as it is an anonymous mailer for people that
don't have the balls to be traced. Not a trusted source of anything."

He's too stupid to realize the "source" is the URLS, not the poster.

And what need is there for someone to "trace" any poster?

I also use Tor for mere browsing. So, I guess that makes me doubly
dubious.

Great reasoning, fellas. : o )