Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Facebook Walks Into Legal Trap After Claiming To Be 'Publisher' In LauraLoomer Lawsuit
Facebook Walks Into Legal Trap After Claiming To Be 'Publisher' In Laura
Loomer Lawsuit Fri, 09/20/2019 - 18:45 Facebook may have just stepped on a legal landmine amid an ongoing battle with journalist Laura Loomer - after the Silicon Valley giant claimed in a motion to dismiss Loomer's lawsuit that it can bar the political activist under their rights as a publisher, according to RT. Notably, Facebook has long defined itself as a tech company which simply provides a platform for users' free speech - maintaining that they're a neutral party which is protected from legal repercussions. "Under well-established law, neither Facebook nor any other publisher can be liable for failing to publish someone else's message," reads the company's motion to dismiss Loomer's defamation lawsuit - adding that terms like "dangerous" or "promoting hate" cannot be factually verified, and are therefore protected opinions for a publisher according to the report. That said, the company claims it never applied either term to Loomer despite banning her under their "dangerous individuals" policy. The company may have just stepped on a landmine, however. As RT notes: Defining itself as a publisher opens Facebook up to lawsuits for defamation and other liability for the content users publish, something they were previously immunized against. All the lies, personal attacks, and smears launched by users going forward can now be laid at Facebook's feet. That's a Pandora's box they might not want to open, legal analyst and radio host Lionel told RT. Platforms like Twitter, Google, and - until now, apparently - Facebook are protected from the legal consequences of their users' speech by section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Facebook even makes reference to section 230 later in its motion, suggesting that it is trying to have its cake and eat it too. Lionel points out that Facebook could go back to life as a platform, if it was willing to sacrifice its usefulness to those in power by allowing some political speech to reach users and blocking the rest. -RT https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...loomer-lawsuit |
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Facebook Walks Into Legal Trap After Claiming To Be 'Publisher' In Laura Loomer Lawsuit
In Home Guy writes:
Facebook Walks Into Legal Trap After Claiming To Be 'Publisher' In Laura Loomer Lawsuit Fri, 09/20/2019 - 18:45 Facebook may have just stepped on a legal landmine amid an ongoing battle with journalist Laura Loomer - after the Silicon Valley giant claimed in a motion to dismiss Loomer's lawsuit that it can bar the political activist under their rights as a publisher, according to RT. You and Laura Loonatic quoting _RUSSIA TODAY_, an acknowledged Putin mouthpiece, as a source? Hahahahaahhahahh -- __________________________________________________ ___ Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded] |
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Facebook Walks Into Legal Trap After Claiming To Be 'Publisher' InLaura Loomer Lawsuit
danny burstein wrote:
You and Laura Loonatic quoting _RUSSIA TODAY_, an acknowledged Putin mouthpiece, as a source? Facts are still facts regardless who has the courage to report them you liberal / leftist piece of trash (and obvious fecebook lover). Hahahahaahhahahh Says the laughing mindless monkey. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A gun walks into a bar | Home Repair | |||
EPA panel backs tough new ozone regs -- after getting $200M ingrants, lawsuit charges | Home Repair | |||
A man with a gun walks into a bar | Home Repair | |||
Cradle walks. Why? | Woodworking |