On Mon, 1 Jan 2018 12:02:05 -0700, rbowman wrote:

On 01/01/2018 12:46 AM, Vidcapper wrote:
On 31/12/2017 11:15, BurfordTJustice wrote:
Another nail in the coffin for Britain.

Migrants Who Lie About Being Refugees Can Now Stay in the UK, Court Rules

I wonder why you didn't post the source for this - could it be because
it's from the infamous Breitbart!



https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/89...UK-immigration

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...t-citizenship/

Yeah, but Briebart is egging the pudding

"The migrants' court victory is expected to cost the taxpayer £1 million
and thousands more could now be allowed to stay, even if they have
committed serious crimes."

The Telegraph is not suggesting that this will apply to thousands more.

Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.

--
p-0.0-h the cat

Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, ******* hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath,
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infme,
the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll,
shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook,
smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag,
liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav,
lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball.

NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist

Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery.
By Appointment to God Frank-Lin.

Signature integrity check
md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896

I mark any message from »Q« the troll as stinky

On 01/01/2018 20:17, BurfordTJustice wrote:
So where is the evidence the court did not say they could stay??



Oh dear, I did give you the link. But you didn't read it.

Try this. Instead of quoting some nitwit journalist, I'm quoting the judge:

"Section 40 of the 1981 Act makes provision for the Secretary of State
to deprive a person of citizenship obtained by registration or
naturalisation if satisfied that the registration or naturalisation
was obtained by means of “fraud, false representation or concealment of
a material fact”. On the face of it, fraud or false representation would
include the sort of misrepresentations as to identity made by the
appellants, so that, if the Secretary of State sees fit, they could be
deprived of their citizenship under that provision".