On 07/21/2017 10:03 PM, Bod wrote:

In many countries women prostitute themselves to save their
children from starving. Is that classed as immoral or a force for
good?

You lost your argument when you used the term immoral.

That is a matter of survival and not one of moral or immoral.

When you allow them to dictate the terminology of the argument,
you lose the argument. That's the only way morons such as these
religious types can win any argument. By the way, what is the ratio
of religious felons to atheist felons in prisons?

I'm just adding the next item to give them more angst and an
opportunity to show even more what morons they are.

Atheists Are 0.07% of the Federal Prison Population,
Threatening Fact for Christian Fundamentalists

http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-an...ent-its-prison

In article , says...

On 07/21/2017 10:03 PM, Bod wrote:

In many countries women prostitute themselves to save their
children from starving. Is that classed as immoral or a force for
good?

You lost your argument when you used the term immoral.

That is a matter of survival and not one of moral or immoral.

When you allow them to dictate the terminology of the argument,
you lose the argument. That's the only way morons such as these
religious types can win any argument. By the way, what is the ratio
of religious felons to atheist felons in prisons?

I'm just adding the next item to give them more angst and an
opportunity to show even more what morons they are.

Atheists Are 0.07% of the Federal Prison Population,
Threatening Fact for Christian Fundamentalists

http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-an...ent-its-prison


If the morons want to argue the foregoing proof, Let them argue
the following links also. That ought to keep this moronic thread
going for another few months or so.

https://www.google.com/
#q=religious+prison+inmate+ratio+to+atheist+prison ers

On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 09:51:29 +0100, marco23 wrote:

On 07/21/2017 10:03 PM, Bod wrote:

In many countries women prostitute themselves to save their
children from starving. Is that classed as immoral or a force for
good?

You lost your argument when you used the term immoral.

That is a matter of survival and not one of moral or immoral.

When you allow them to dictate the terminology of the argument,
you lose the argument. That's the only way morons such as these
religious types can win any argument. By the way, what is the ratio
of religious felons to atheist felons in prisons?

I'm just adding the next item to give them more angst and an
opportunity to show even more what morons they are.

Atheists Are 0.07% of the Federal Prison Population,
Threatening Fact for Christian Fundamentalists

http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-an...ent-its-prison

Bookmarked!

--
The only intuitive user interface is the nipple.

On 7/24/2017 4:04 AM, marco23 wrote:
In article , says...

On 07/21/2017 10:03 PM, Bod wrote:

In many countries women prostitute themselves to save their
children from starving. Is that classed as immoral or a force for
good?

You lost your argument when you used the term immoral.

That is a matter of survival and not one of moral or immoral.

When you allow them to dictate the terminology of the argument,
you lose the argument. That's the only way morons such as these
religious types can win any argument. By the way, what is the ratio
of religious felons to atheist felons in prisons?

I'm just adding the next item to give them more angst and an
opportunity to show even more what morons they are.

Atheists Are 0.07% of the Federal Prison Population,
Threatening Fact for Christian Fundamentalists

http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-an...ent-its-prison


If the morons want to argue the foregoing proof, Let them argue
the following links also. That ought to keep this moronic thread
going for another few months or so.


Why are you resorting to character assassination? Do you think that
helps your position?

--
Maggie

On 7/24/2017 3:51 AM, marco23 wrote:
On 07/21/2017 10:03 PM, Bod wrote:

In many countries women prostitute themselves to save their
children from starving. Is that classed as immoral or a force for
good?


You lost your argument when you used the term immoral.

That is a matter of survival and not one of moral or immoral.

He lost his argument because he can't support his own viewpoint.

--
Maggie