Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Computer Scientists Urge Clinton Campaign To Challenge ElectionResults
|
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Computer Scientists Urge Clinton Campaign To Challenge Election Results
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:44:08 -0600, STOP DAPL wrote:
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/201...lenge-results/ "Their group told Podesta and Elias that while they had not found any evidence of hacking, the pattern needs to be looked at by an independent review." Translation: We have no evidence, it's just a feeling......... |
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Computer Scientists Urge Clinton Campaign To Challenge ElectionResults
On 11/23/2016 11:59 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:44:08 -0600, STOP DAPL wrote: http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/201...lenge-results/ "Their group told Podesta and Elias that while they had not found any evidence of hacking, the pattern needs to be looked at by an independent review." Translation: We have no evidence, it's just a feeling......... That was my immediate reaction but, the statistical anomaly is puzzling. |
#4
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Computer Scientists Urge Clinton Campaign To Challenge ElectionResults
On 11/23/16 1:09 PM, STOP DAPL wrote:
On 11/23/2016 11:59 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:44:08 -0600, STOP DAPL wrote: http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/201...lenge-results/ "Their group told Podesta and Elias that while they had not found any evidence of hacking, the pattern needs to be looked at by an independent review." Translation: We have no evidence, it's just a feeling......... That was my immediate reaction but, the statistical anomaly is puzzling. Past things I have seen indicate that the computer machines have a lower error rate than the other two (especially to the extent that things like creases, etc., make it necessary to hand count the optical machines). It could just as easily be that the computer is more accurate and the problem is with the paper ballots and optical scanners. |
#5
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Computer Scientists Urge Clinton Campaign To Challenge ElectionResults
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:44:08 -0600
STOP DAPL wrote: http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/201...lenge-results/ Professor at center of report that Russia hacked the election walks back his claim http://www.theblaze.com/news/2016/11...ack-his-claim/ |
#6
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Computer Scientists Urge Clinton Campaign To Challenge Election Results
Per Kurt V. Ullman:
Past things I have seen indicate that the computer machines have a lower error rate than the other two (especially to the extent that things like creases, etc., make it necessary to hand count the optical machines). It could just as easily be that the computer is more accurate and the problem is with the paper ballots and optical scanners. I did not notice any reference to whether-or-not the suspect districts had paper backup. Seems like I have seen reference to computerized voting systems that are 100% digital - with no paper backup; but that was some years ago. As a computer application developer in my previous life, I would find lack of a paper trail disturbing - to say the least. Does anybody know? -- Pete Cresswell |
#7
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Computer Scientists Urge Clinton Campaign To Challenge ElectionResults
On 11/23/16 3:48 PM, (PeteCresswell) wrote:
Per Kurt V. Ullman: Past things I have seen indicate that the computer machines have a lower error rate than the other two (especially to the extent that things like creases, etc., make it necessary to hand count the optical machines). It could just as easily be that the computer is more accurate and the problem is with the paper ballots and optical scanners. I did not notice any reference to whether-or-not the suspect districts had paper backup. They didn't. They were comparing districts who had machine voting to those with the other two (hand counting and optical readers) and saying that the voting machine districts were wrong because of the difference. I was noting that the differences could have just as easily been because the machines are more better. |
#8
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Computer Scientists Urge Clinton Campaign To Challenge ElectionResults
On 11/23/16 9:59 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
"Their group told Podesta and Elias that while they had not found any evidence of hacking, the pattern needs to be looked at by an independent review." Translation: We have no evidence, it's just a feeling......... wasn't/isn't that the Trump playbook...I mean I'm still wait for proof those large crowds of Muslims celebrating 9/11 in New Jersey |
#9
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Computer Scientists Urge Clinton Campaign To Challenge ElectionResults
On 11/23/2016 02:14 PM, Kurt V. Ullman wrote:
On 11/23/16 3:48 PM, (PeteCresswell) wrote: Per Kurt V. Ullman: Past things I have seen indicate that the computer machines have a lower error rate than the other two (especially to the extent that things like creases, etc., make it necessary to hand count the optical machines). It could just as easily be that the computer is more accurate and the problem is with the paper ballots and optical scanners. I did not notice any reference to whether-or-not the suspect districts had paper backup. They didn't. They were comparing districts who had machine voting to those with the other two (hand counting and optical readers) and saying that the voting machine districts were wrong because of the difference. I was noting that the differences could have just as easily been because the machines are more better. http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...ction-results/ |
#10
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Computer Scientists Urge Clinton Campaign To Challenge Election Results
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 14:43:48 -0500, "Kurt V. Ullman"
wrote: On 11/23/16 1:09 PM, STOP DAPL wrote: On 11/23/2016 11:59 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:44:08 -0600, STOP DAPL wrote: http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/201...lenge-results/ "Their group told Podesta and Elias that while they had not found any evidence of hacking, the pattern needs to be looked at by an independent review." Translation: We have no evidence, it's just a feeling......... That was my immediate reaction but, the statistical anomaly is puzzling. Past things I have seen indicate that the computer machines have a lower error rate than the other two (especially to the extent that things like creases, etc., make it necessary to hand count the optical machines). It could just as easily be that the computer is more accurate and the problem is with the paper ballots and optical scanners. It is also "possible" that the computer had a "programming anomoly" - either a bug or a hack - that caused it to mis-report. Not saying it did - or that there were any voting problems in the last election - but any time a computer is exposed to the "wild" (i.e connected to a public network) the possibilty of hacking cannot be totally discounted. |
#11
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Computer Scientists Urge Clinton Campaign To Challenge Election Results
|
#12
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Computer Scientists Urge Clinton Campaign To Challenge Election Results
Per Kurt V. Ullman:
the machines are more better. Do you come from Hawaii? Bettah, Mo-Bettah, Mo-Bettah-Dakine.... nominative, comparative, superlative... -) -- Pete Cresswell |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hillary Clinton 'to announce 2016 presidential campaign' | Metalworking | |||
Hillary Clinton 'to announce 2016 presidential campaign' | Metalworking |