Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to 24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.politics.scorched-earth,alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Will banning assault trucks stop more violence?
Leftist media outlets reacted to the devastating attack in Nice not by blaming Islam or even terrorists, but by suggesting that an inanimate object €“ the truck €“ was responsible for the carnage.
Instead of pointing the finger at Islamists, CNN, CBC and the New York Times all published headlines that served to hide the true nature of the attack. CBC reported, €śChildren feared killed in Nice as truck attacks family event€ť. Presumably, the truck was somehow able to manifest artificial intelligence and plough itself through dozens of victims. Not to be outdone, CNN reported €śTruck rams crowd; 84 dead in Nice,€ť again providing a convenient way of avoiding any mention of the ideology that inspired the driver The New York Times went with €śTruck attack on French crowd; Scores die,€ť again pinning the blame on the vehicle rather than the Islamist inside it. Given that the truck alone, and not the ideology that radicalized the terrorist who used one as a weapon, is to blame for the massacre in Nice, the solution to stop further violence is simple; Ban deadly assault trucks. |
#2
Posted to 24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.politics.scorched-earth,alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Will banning assault trucks stop more violence?
On 07/15/2016 12:48 PM, burfordTjustice wrote:
Leftist media outlets reacted to the devastating attack in Nice not by blaming Islam or even terrorists, but by suggesting that an inanimate object €“ the truck €“ was responsible for the carnage. Instead of pointing the finger at Islamists, CNN, CBC and the New York Times all published headlines that served to hide the true nature of the attack. CBC reported, €śChildren feared killed in Nice as truck attacks family event€ť. Presumably, the truck was somehow able to manifest artificial intelligence and plough itself through dozens of victims. Not to be outdone, CNN reported €śTruck rams crowd; 84 dead in Nice,€ť again providing a convenient way of avoiding any mention of the ideology that inspired the driver The New York Times went with €śTruck attack on French crowd; Scores die,€ť again pinning the blame on the vehicle rather than the Islamist inside it. Given that the truck alone, and not the ideology that radicalized the terrorist who used one as a weapon, is to blame for the massacre in Nice, the solution to stop further violence is simple; Ban deadly assault trucks. The Left Wing Regressive will only get on board with you if trucks can somehow be used in an insurrection. They don't care about anything that kills folks as long as those things can't be used to toss their asses out of power. They are only after banning "insurrection weapons". |
#3
Posted to 24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.politics.scorched-earth,alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Will banning assault trucks stop more violence?
On 07/15/2016 11:56 PM, T wrote:
The Left Wing Regressive will only get on board with you if trucks can somehow be used in an insurrection. They don't care about anything that kills folks as long as those things can't be used to toss their asses out of power. They are only after banning "insurrection weapons". Had Reginald Denny dropped it into first and kept on trucking he would have been a racist, right wing terrorist. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|