Clinton and the other Democratic presidential candidates in debate
decline to use term 'radical Islam'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015.../?intcmp=hpbt2

On 11/16/15 5:47 AM, Zak W wrote:
Clinton and the other Democratic presidential candidates in debate
decline to use term 'radical Islam'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015.../?intcmp=hpbt2

The interesting part about Dem rhetoric has been their inability to
use modifiers. She got all ****y with the GOP for going against Muslims
when the term used is radical Muslims. Sorta like they don't remember
to include the term illegal with immigrants.

On 11/16/2015 8:41 AM, Kurt V. Ullman wrote:
On 11/16/15 5:47 AM, Zak W wrote:
Clinton and the other Democratic presidential candidates in debate
decline to use term 'radical Islam'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015.../?intcmp=hpbt2


The interesting part about Dem rhetoric has been their inability to
use modifiers. She got all ****y with the GOP for going against Muslims
when the term used is radical Muslims. Sorta like they don't remember
to include the term illegal with immigrants.

Dems are well versed in George Orwell's novel "1984".

On 11/16/2015 8:41 AM, Kurt V. Ullman wrote:
On 11/16/15 5:47 AM, Zak W wrote:
Clinton and the other Democratic presidential candidates in debate
decline to use term 'radical Islam'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015.../?intcmp=hpbt2


The interesting part about Dem rhetoric has been their inability to
use modifiers. She got all ****y with the GOP for going against Muslims
when the term used is radical Muslims. Sorta like they don't remember
to include the term illegal with immigrants.

Then Timothy McVeigh is a "radical Christian"? Espousing one faith or
another does not attach validity to the cause of hating another
religion; it is just like gang colors; identifying a cause.

Norminn wrote:
On 11/16/2015 8:41 AM, Kurt V. Ullman wrote:
On 11/16/15 5:47 AM, Zak W wrote:
Clinton and the other Democratic presidential candidates in debate
decline to use term 'radical Islam'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015.../?intcmp=hpbt2


The interesting part about Dem rhetoric has been their inability
to use modifiers. She got all ****y with the GOP for going against
Muslims when the term used is radical Muslims. Sorta like they
don't remember to include the term illegal with immigrants.

Then Timothy McVeigh is a "radical Christian"? Espousing one faith or
another does not attach validity to the cause of hating another
religion; it is just like gang colors; identifying a cause.

It does when the religion teaches conversion or death .

--
Snag

On 11/16/2015 8:55 AM, Terry Coombs wrote:
Norminn wrote:
On 11/16/2015 8:41 AM, Kurt V. Ullman wrote:
On 11/16/15 5:47 AM, Zak W wrote:
Clinton and the other Democratic presidential candidates in debate
decline to use term 'radical Islam'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015.../?intcmp=hpbt2


The interesting part about Dem rhetoric has been their inability
to use modifiers. She got all ****y with the GOP for going against
Muslims when the term used is radical Muslims. Sorta like they
don't remember to include the term illegal with immigrants.

Then Timothy McVeigh is a "radical Christian"? Espousing one faith or
another does not attach validity to the cause of hating another
religion; it is just like gang colors; identifying a cause.

It does when the religion teaches conversion or death .

You mean, like The Crusades?

On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 11:01:02 AM UTC-5, Don Y wrote:
On 11/16/2015 8:55 AM, Terry Coombs wrote:
Norminn wrote:
On 11/16/2015 8:41 AM, Kurt V. Ullman wrote:
On 11/16/15 5:47 AM, Zak W wrote:
Clinton and the other Democratic presidential candidates in debate
decline to use term 'radical Islam'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015.../?intcmp=hpbt2


The interesting part about Dem rhetoric has been their inability
to use modifiers. She got all ****y with the GOP for going against
Muslims when the term used is radical Muslims. Sorta like they
don't remember to include the term illegal with immigrants.

Then Timothy McVeigh is a "radical Christian"? Espousing one faith or
another does not attach validity to the cause of hating another
religion; it is just like gang colors; identifying a cause.

It does when the religion teaches conversion or death .

You mean, like The Crusades?

Nice typical lib attempt at moral equivalency. The Crusades were
800 years ago. Most of us have changed our values since them.
A lot of muslims around the world, have not.

On 11/16/2015 11:01 AM, Don Y wrote:
On 11/16/2015 8:55 AM, Terry Coombs wrote:
Then Timothy McVeigh is a "radical Christian"? Espousing one faith or
another does not attach validity to the cause of hating another
religion; it is just like gang colors; identifying a cause.

It does when the religion teaches conversion or death .

You mean, like The Crusades?


You remember all those non-Mormons who converted
cause the missionaries threatened to strangle
them with brightly colored Moroni neck ties?
(I don't either.)

--
..
Christopher A. Young
learn more about Jesus
.. www.lds.org
..
..

On 11/16/15 10:55 AM, Terry Coombs wrote:
Norminn wrote:
On 11/16/2015 8:41 AM, Kurt V. Ullman wrote:
On 11/16/15 5:47 AM, Zak W wrote:
Clinton and the other Democratic presidential candidates in debate
decline to use term 'radical Islam'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015.../?intcmp=hpbt2


The interesting part about Dem rhetoric has been their inability
to use modifiers. She got all ****y with the GOP for going against
Muslims when the term used is radical Muslims. Sorta like they
don't remember to include the term illegal with immigrants.

Then Timothy McVeigh is a "radical Christian"? Espousing one faith or
another does not attach validity to the cause of hating another
religion; it is just like gang colors; identifying a cause.

It does when the religion teaches conversion or death .

This is bogus anyway since McVeigh stated over and over that his act
was political in nature and not religious.

On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 11:01:24 AM UTC-6, Kurt V. Ullman wrote:
On 11/16/15 10:55 AM, Terry Coombs wrote:
Norminn wrote:
On 11/16/2015 8:41 AM, Kurt V. Ullman wrote:
On 11/16/15 5:47 AM, Zak W wrote:
Clinton and the other Democratic presidential candidates in debate
decline to use term 'radical Islam'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015.../?intcmp=hpbt2

The interesting part about Dem rhetoric has been their inability
to use modifiers. She got all ****y with the GOP for going against
Muslims when the term used is radical Muslims. Sorta like they
don't remember to include the term illegal with immigrants.

Then Timothy McVeigh is a "radical Christian"? Espousing one faith or
another does not attach validity to the cause of hating another
religion; it is just like gang colors; identifying a cause.

It does when the religion teaches conversion or death .

This is bogus anyway since McVeigh stated over and over that his act
was political in nature and not religious.

The feds sure did kill McVeigh real quick. If he were a Muslim terrorist, he'd still be around sitting in a cell in that underground super max. o_O

[8~{} Uncle Terrorist Monster

On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 10:30:40 AM UTC-5, NorMinn wrote:
On 11/16/2015 8:41 AM, Kurt V. Ullman wrote:
On 11/16/15 5:47 AM, Zak W wrote:
Clinton and the other Democratic presidential candidates in debate
decline to use term 'radical Islam'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015.../?intcmp=hpbt2


The interesting part about Dem rhetoric has been their inability to
use modifiers. She got all ****y with the GOP for going against Muslims
when the term used is radical Muslims. Sorta like they don't remember
to include the term illegal with immigrants.

Then Timothy McVeigh is a "radical Christian"? Espousing one faith or
another does not attach validity to the cause of hating another
religion; it is just like gang colors; identifying a cause.

No, I wouldn't call McVeigh a radical Christian. I'd call him a radical,
anti-government nut. He did what he did because he hated the govt,
wanted revenge for Waco, Ruby Ridge, etc. No evidence he was religious,
attended any radical churches, or that religion played any role at all.
He wasn't screaming "God is great". Nor is there any evidence that he
was part of an organized group.

Radical muslims are obviously very different, at least for those willing
to open their eyes.