Now this is truly insane. The National Republican Congressional
Committee is tricking would-be Democratic campaign donors into making
donations to defeat the candidates they support -- with Republican
websites that look like they could easily be the campaign pages of
Democratic candidates.

First, after public backlash, they had to start offering refunds to
donors who'd been misled, and now, Google has put a "reported phishing
website" warning on at least the anti-Alex Sink site.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...cans-trick-vot
ers-donating-democratic-candidates/

On 2/6/2014 1:37 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:
Now this is truly insane. The National Republican Congressional
Committee is tricking would-be Democratic campaign donors into making
donations to defeat the candidates they support -- with Republican
websites that look like they could easily be the campaign pages of
Democratic candidates.

First, after public backlash, they had to start offering refunds to
donors who'd been misled, and now, Google has put a "reported phishing
website" warning on at least the anti-Alex Sink site.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...cans-trick-vot
ers-donating-democratic-candidates/


Standard Republican strategy: win elections through committing fraud,
because they know they can't win them by honest means.

On Thursday, February 6, 2014 3:04:03 PM UTC-5, Moe DeLoughan wrote:
On 2/6/2014 1:37 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:

Now this is truly insane. The National Republican Congressional

Committee is tricking would-be Democratic campaign donors into making

donations to defeat the candidates they support -- with Republican

websites that look like they could easily be the campaign pages of

Democratic candidates.



First, after public backlash, they had to start offering refunds to

donors who'd been misled, and now, Google has put a "reported phishing

website" warning on at least the anti-Alex Sink site.



http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...cans-trick-vot

ers-donating-democratic-candidates/





Standard Republican strategy: win elections through committing fraud,

because they know they can't win them by honest means.

Good grief you libs are stupid beyond belief. And I say
"you libs", not just malformend, because it came from a
leading lib website.
The three examples shown in that link are not fraud and
they are as clear as day.
You'd have to be incredibly stupid to not realize that the
website is seeking donations *against* the candidate:

"Make a contribution today to defeat Martha Robertson and
candidates like her"

Make a contribution today to defeat Ann Kirkpatrick and
candidates like her"

Are you libs so totally stupid that you can't read plain
English? Apparently so, or you wouldn't be here bitching.


How about some real fraud:

"If you like your current healthcare plan, you can keep it,
nothing changes"

"If you like your current doctor, you can keep him, nothing
changes"

"There's not aeven a smidgen of corruption at the IRS"


Where's your outrage about THAT?

On Thursday, February 6, 2014 1:37:15 PM UTC-6, Malcom Mal Reynolds wrote:
Now this is truly insane. The National Republican Congressional

Committee is tricking would-be Democratic campaign donors into making

donations to defeat the candidates they support -- with Republican

websites that look like they could easily be the campaign pages of

Democratic candidates.



First, after public backlash, they had to start offering refunds to

donors who'd been misled, and now, Google has put a "reported phishing

website" warning on at least the anti-Alex Sink site.



http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...cans-trick-vot

ers-donating-democratic-candidates/

The GOP are ****ing criminals.

On Thursday, February 6, 2014 2:04:03 PM UTC-6, Moe DeLoughan wrote:
On 2/6/2014 1:37 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:

Now this is truly insane. The National Republican Congressional

Committee is tricking would-be Democratic campaign donors into making

donations to defeat the candidates they support -- with Republican

websites that look like they could easily be the campaign pages of

Democratic candidates.



First, after public backlash, they had to start offering refunds to

donors who'd been misled, and now, Google has put a "reported phishing

website" warning on at least the anti-Alex Sink site.



http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...cans-trick-vot

ers-donating-democratic-candidates/





Standard Republican strategy: win elections through committing fraud,

because they know they can't win them by honest means.

the websites appear to violate a Federal Election Commission regulation prohibiting political committees and parties from using a candidate's name in special projects. The FEC considers websites, including microsites, a special project falling under this rule. The only exception is when the site makes it unambiguously clear it is opposed to the candidate. In Ryan's opinion, the page set up under Tierney's name "does not unambiguously show opposition to Tierney." However, he noted, the FEC is "not a nimble organization" and it can take two years to complete an investigation, well past election day.

On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:56:52 -0800 (PST), "
wrote:

Are you libs so totally stupid that you can't read plain
English? Apparently so, or you wouldn't be here bitching.


If I must answer, the answer is yes.

How about some real fraud:

"If you like your current healthcare plan, you can keep it,
nothing changes"

"If you like your current doctor, you can keep him, nothing
changes"

"There's not aeven a smidgen of corruption at the IRS"


Where's your outrage about THAT?

"Smidgen" is not a legal term. The proper words would have been
"scintilla of evidence" of criminality!

Now Lerner's name turned up on e-mails. See why she "tried" to take
the Fifth? The targeting of the Tea Party was not just some
"bone-headed" employees at the IRS. **** floated to the top.

Funny thing is, the lib's think they have cornered the market on
polite politics.

Make it stop.

Moe DeLoughan wrote in :

Standard Republican strategy: win elections through committing fraud,
because they know they can't win them by honest means.

You misspelled "Democrat".

In article ,
" wrote:

On Thursday, February 6, 2014 3:04:03 PM UTC-5, Moe DeLoughan wrote:
On 2/6/2014 1:37 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:

Now this is truly insane. The National Republican Congressional

Committee is tricking would-be Democratic campaign donors into making

donations to defeat the candidates they support -- with Republican

websites that look like they could easily be the campaign pages of

Democratic candidates.



First, after public backlash, they had to start offering refunds to

donors who'd been misled, and now, Google has put a "reported phishing

website" warning on at least the anti-Alex Sink site.



http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...cans-trick-vot

ers-donating-democratic-candidates/





Standard Republican strategy: win elections through committing fraud,

because they know they can't win them by honest means.

Good grief you libs are stupid beyond belief. And I say
"you libs", not just malformend, because it came from a
leading lib website.
The three examples shown in that link are not fraud and
they are as clear as day.
You'd have to be incredibly stupid to not realize that the
website is seeking donations *against* the candidate:

of course it is, by committing fraud




"Make a contribution today to defeat Martha Robertson and
candidates like her"

topped by a banner in large print that proclaimes "Martha Robertson for
Congress"



Make a contribution today to defeat Ann Kirkpatrick and
candidates like her"

topped by a banner in large print that proclaimes "Ann Kirkpatrick for
Congress"



Are you libs so totally stupid that you can't read plain
English? Apparently so, or you wouldn't be here bitching.


How about some real fraud:

"If you like your current healthcare plan, you can keep it,
nothing changes"

"If you like your current doctor, you can keep him, nothing
changes"

"There's not aeven a smidgen of corruption at the IRS"


Where's your outrage about THAT?

the same place your outrage at the voter fraud being demonstrated by the
NRCC

but if it's okay with you, I guess the Dems will be creating similar
websites and we'll see fox news and limbaugh raising hell about it like
they are now, wait a minute they aren't, are they

On Thursday, February 6, 2014 11:59:52 PM UTC-5, Malcom Mal Reynolds wrote:
In article ,

" wrote:



On Thursday, February 6, 2014 3:04:03 PM UTC-5, Moe DeLoughan wrote:

On 2/6/2014 1:37 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:



Now this is truly insane. The National Republican Congressional



Committee is tricking would-be Democratic campaign donors into making



donations to defeat the candidates they support -- with Republican



websites that look like they could easily be the campaign pages of



Democratic candidates.







First, after public backlash, they had to start offering refunds to



donors who'd been misled, and now, Google has put a "reported phishing



website" warning on at least the anti-Alex Sink site.







http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...cans-trick-vot



ers-donating-democratic-candidates/











Standard Republican strategy: win elections through committing fraud,



because they know they can't win them by honest means.



Good grief you libs are stupid beyond belief. And I say

"you libs", not just malformend, because it came from a

leading lib website.

The three examples shown in that link are not fraud and

they are as clear as day.

You'd have to be incredibly stupid to not realize that the

website is seeking donations *against* the candidate:



of course it is, by committing fraud









"Make a contribution today to defeat Martha Robertson and

candidates like her"



topped by a banner in large print that proclaimes "Martha Robertson for

Congress"







Make a contribution today to defeat Ann Kirkpatrick and

candidates like her"



topped by a banner in large print that proclaimes "Ann Kirkpatrick for

Congress"



So, you admit you libs are too stupid to read.
For starters, you've swallowed the recycled dog
food presented to you by ThinkProgress. If there
is fraud going on, I'd say it's by them. In
the examples they show, they don't show the whole
web page, which would give you a fair picture.
They only show what they *chose* to
excerpt from it. The one link they do provide to
an actual website they are bitching about is John
Tierney and it's full page of why to vote against
him. It starts out with accusing Tierney's
family of being involved in illegal gambling operations:

"John Tierney may be infamous for his family's involvement with their illegal international gambling operation in Antigua, but Tierney is also one of the most extreme and partisan members of Congress whose unwillingness to work in a bipartisan way is holding our economy hostage. While middle class families in Massachusetts are trying their best to provide for their families, Tierney's out-of-the-mainstream policies will make it even harder for them to do that.



Here is what you need to know about John Tierney:
*John Tierney's brothers-in-law ran an illegal, international gambling ring in Antigua. Tierney's wife Patrice managed $7 million of that gambling money and she personally received close to a quarter-of-a-million in those gambling proceeds. Patrice went to jail for her involvement, but pleaded spousal privilege so that she would not have to testify against her husband, a sitting Congressman. Despite all of this, Tierney claims he knew nothing.
*In 2011 and 2013, Tierney voted for the Grijalva Budget, which would tax Massachusetts businesses at rates between 45% and 49% and would add a financial transactions tax that would harm middle class families saving for retirement.
*In fact, Tierney's budget vote was so out-of-the-mainstream that it couldn't get a majority of Democrats to vote for it, with even Nancy Pelosi voting against it. In talking about the budget that Tierney supports, former President Bill Clinton said: "Its corporate tax proposals are so at variance with even our high-tax competitors that multi-nationals may be tempted to relocate to other countries," and that the financial transactions tax could lead to "high-dollar transactions now done in the United States being moved overseas with a net loss in revenue from the taxable incomes of people who do the transactions." Moreover, Clinton notes that the budget Tierney supported does nothing to help save Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid."



Fed up with John Tierney? - Sign up Today



So, what you're saying is Democrats are so dumb
that when a website links a candidate to illegal
gambling at the very beginning, lists all kinds
of reasons not to vote for him and ends with
"Fed up with John Tierny?", they think it's one raising money for Tierney.

In article ,
" wrote:

On Thursday, February 6, 2014 11:59:52 PM UTC-5, Malcom Mal Reynolds wrote:
In article ,

" wrote:



On Thursday, February 6, 2014 3:04:03 PM UTC-5, Moe DeLoughan wrote:

On 2/6/2014 1:37 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:



Now this is truly insane. The National Republican Congressional



Committee is tricking would-be Democratic campaign donors into making



donations to defeat the candidates they support -- with Republican



websites that look like they could easily be the campaign pages of



Democratic candidates.







First, after public backlash, they had to start offering refunds to



donors who'd been misled, and now, Google has put a "reported
phishing



website" warning on at least the anti-Alex Sink site.







http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...blicans-trick-
vot



ers-donating-democratic-candidates/











Standard Republican strategy: win elections through committing fraud,



because they know they can't win them by honest means.



Good grief you libs are stupid beyond belief. And I say

"you libs", not just malformend, because it came from a

leading lib website.

The three examples shown in that link are not fraud and

they are as clear as day.

You'd have to be incredibly stupid to not realize that the

website is seeking donations *against* the candidate:



of course it is, by committing fraud









"Make a contribution today to defeat Martha Robertson and

candidates like her"



topped by a banner in large print that proclaimes "Martha Robertson for

Congress"







Make a contribution today to defeat Ann Kirkpatrick and

candidates like her"



topped by a banner in large print that proclaimes "Ann Kirkpatrick for

Congress"



So, you admit you libs are too stupid to read.
For starters, you've swallowed the recycled dog
food presented to you by ThinkProgress. If there
is fraud going on, I'd say it's by them. In
the examples they show, they don't show the whole
web page, which would give you a fair picture.
They only show what they *chose* to
excerpt from it. The one link they do provide to
an actual website they are bitching about is John
Tierney and it's full page of why to vote against
him. It starts out with accusing Tierney's
family of being involved in illegal gambling operations:

"John Tierney may be infamous for his family's involvement with their illegal
international gambling operation in Antigua, but Tierney is also one of the
most extreme and partisan members of Congress whose unwillingness to work in
a bipartisan way is holding our economy hostage. While middle class families
in Massachusetts are trying their best to provide for their families,
Tierney's out-of-the-mainstream policies will make it even harder for them to
do that.



Here is what you need to know about John Tierney:
*John Tierney's brothers-in-law ran an illegal, international gambling ring
in Antigua. Tierney's wife Patrice managed $7 million of that gambling money
and she personally received close to a quarter-of-a-million in those
gambling proceeds. Patrice went to jail for her involvement, but pleaded
spousal privilege so that she would not have to testify against her husband,
a sitting Congressman. Despite all of this, Tierney claims he knew nothing.
*In 2011 and 2013, Tierney voted for the Grijalva Budget, which would tax
Massachusetts businesses at rates between 45% and 49% and would add a
financial transactions tax that would harm middle class families saving for
retirement.
*In fact, Tierney's budget vote was so out-of-the-mainstream that it
couldn't get a majority of Democrats to vote for it, with even Nancy Pelosi
voting against it. In talking about the budget that Tierney supports, former
President Bill Clinton said: "Its corporate tax proposals are so at variance
with even our high-tax competitors that multi-nationals may be tempted to
relocate to other countries," and that the financial transactions tax could
lead to "high-dollar transactions now done in the United States being moved
overseas with a net loss in revenue from the taxable incomes of people who
do the transactions." Moreover, Clinton notes that the budget Tierney
supported does nothing to help save Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid."



Fed up with John Tierney? - Sign up Today



So, what you're saying is Democrats are so dumb
that when a website links a candidate to illegal
gambling at the very beginning, lists all kinds
of reasons not to vote for him and ends with
"Fed up with John Tierny?", they think it's one raising money for Tierney.




but the banner at the top of the page says "Vote for John Tierney" not
"Don't Vote for John Tierney" and even extremists like you should be
able to parse the difference

On Friday, February 7, 2014 1:31:17 PM UTC-5, Malcom Mal Reynolds wrote:
In article ,

" wrote:



On Thursday, February 6, 2014 11:59:52 PM UTC-5, Malcom Mal Reynolds wrote:

In article ,



" wrote:







On Thursday, February 6, 2014 3:04:03 PM UTC-5, Moe DeLoughan wrote:



On 2/6/2014 1:37 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:







Now this is truly insane. The National Republican Congressional







Committee is tricking would-be Democratic campaign donors into making







donations to defeat the candidates they support -- with Republican







websites that look like they could easily be the campaign pages of







Democratic candidates.















First, after public backlash, they had to start offering refunds to







donors who'd been misled, and now, Google has put a "reported

phishing







website" warning on at least the anti-Alex Sink site.















http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...blicans-trick-

vot







ers-donating-democratic-candidates/























Standard Republican strategy: win elections through committing fraud,







because they know they can't win them by honest means.







Good grief you libs are stupid beyond belief. And I say



"you libs", not just malformend, because it came from a



leading lib website.



The three examples shown in that link are not fraud and



they are as clear as day.



You'd have to be incredibly stupid to not realize that the



website is seeking donations *against* the candidate:







of course it is, by committing fraud



















"Make a contribution today to defeat Martha Robertson and



candidates like her"







topped by a banner in large print that proclaimes "Martha Robertson for



Congress"















Make a contribution today to defeat Ann Kirkpatrick and



candidates like her"







topped by a banner in large print that proclaimes "Ann Kirkpatrick for



Congress"







So, you admit you libs are too stupid to read.

For starters, you've swallowed the recycled dog

food presented to you by ThinkProgress. If there

is fraud going on, I'd say it's by them. In

the examples they show, they don't show the whole

web page, which would give you a fair picture.

They only show what they *chose* to

excerpt from it. The one link they do provide to

an actual website they are bitching about is John

Tierney and it's full page of why to vote against

him. It starts out with accusing Tierney's

family of being involved in illegal gambling operations:



"John Tierney may be infamous for his family's involvement with their illegal

international gambling operation in Antigua, but Tierney is also one of the

most extreme and partisan members of Congress whose unwillingness to work in

a bipartisan way is holding our economy hostage. While middle class families

in Massachusetts are trying their best to provide for their families,

Tierney's out-of-the-mainstream policies will make it even harder for them to

do that.







Here is what you need to know about John Tierney:

*John Tierney's brothers-in-law ran an illegal, international gambling ring

in Antigua. Tierney's wife Patrice managed $7 million of that gambling money

and she personally received close to a quarter-of-a-million in those

gambling proceeds. Patrice went to jail for her involvement, but pleaded

spousal privilege so that she would not have to testify against her husband,

a sitting Congressman. Despite all of this, Tierney claims he knew nothing.

*In 2011 and 2013, Tierney voted for the Grijalva Budget, which would tax

Massachusetts businesses at rates between 45% and 49% and would add a

financial transactions tax that would harm middle class families saving for

retirement.

*In fact, Tierney's budget vote was so out-of-the-mainstream that it

couldn't get a majority of Democrats to vote for it, with even Nancy Pelosi

voting against it. In talking about the budget that Tierney supports, former

President Bill Clinton said: "Its corporate tax proposals are so at variance

with even our high-tax competitors that multi-nationals may be tempted to

relocate to other countries," and that the financial transactions tax could

lead to "high-dollar transactions now done in the United States being moved

overseas with a net loss in revenue from the taxable incomes of people who

do the transactions." Moreover, Clinton notes that the budget Tierney

supported does nothing to help save Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid."







Fed up with John Tierney? - Sign up Today







So, what you're saying is Democrats are so dumb

that when a website links a candidate to illegal

gambling at the very beginning, lists all kinds

of reasons not to vote for him and ends with

"Fed up with John Tierny?", they think it's one raising money for Tierney.









but the banner at the top of the page says "Vote for John Tierney" not

"Don't Vote for John Tierney" and even extremists like you should be

able to parse the difference

I can parse that and the rest of the page too. It's not like
the rest of the page is in fine print. All the negatives one after
the other, slamming the candidate, are right there in front of anyone
looking at that webpage too. And right below where they have the
big button to click that says DONATE, it says in type half as big
as the button "Fed up with John Tierney - Sign up". It's not like
it's in fine print. People can't fathom that a website that
says that isn't his campaign? How dumb can you be? If you can't read,
you can ask for your money back and they have refunded it to at least one
dummy who complained

Is it playing a little dirty? Sure. Luring people in who are
interested in the guy and then showing them the GOP version of
what the guy is about. Comparing it to the IRS targeting
conservatives is a joke. It's a campaign. Is what they are doing
any worse than the Democrats running ads against Romney, lying about
his being responsible for the death of a wife of a steel worker,
years after Romney had anything to do with that company?
Being some robber barron that threw everyone out of their jobs?
You libs took a guy that's a classic American entrepreneur, helping create
hundreds of thousands of jobs at Staples, Sports Authority, Steel Dynamics,
Totes, Dominoes Pizza..... Rescuing businesses that were failing.
You found the few where they were not successful in turning them
around and successfully lied in ads to make people think that was
all he did. You ran ads that were total lies.
So, I guess if you can do that, then the Republicans can do these
websites. And note that both of those are about *campaigns*, where
a lot of that stuff goes on with both sides, not using one of the
most powerful and feared govt agencies for political purposes.

"Malcom "Mal" Reynolds" wrote in message
...
Now this is truly insane. The National Republican Congressional
Committee is tricking would-be Democratic campaign donors into making
donations to defeat the candidates they support -- with Republican
websites that look like they could easily be the campaign pages of
Democratic candidates.

First, after public backlash, they had to start offering refunds to
donors who'd been misled, and now, Google has put a "reported phishing
website" warning on at least the anti-Alex Sink site.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...cans-trick-vot
ers-donating-democratic-candidates/
--
Bet it hurts to know you can not read well and got your tactic thrown back
at ya,eh?

On 2/6/2014 3:05 PM, Daring Dufas: Hypocrite Sock Of Killer Loon wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2014 1:37:15 PM UTC-6, Malcom Mal Reynolds wrote:
Now this is truly insane. The National Republican Congressional

Committee is tricking would-be Democratic campaign donors into making
donations to defeat the candidates they support -- with Republican
websites that look like they could easily be the campaign pages of
Democratic candidates.

First, after public backlash, they had to start offering refunds to
donors who'd been misled, and now, Google has put a "reported phishing
website" warning on at least the anti-Alex Sink site.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...cans-trick-vot

ers-donating-democratic-candidates/

The GOP are ****ing criminals.


Why would the GOP be copulating with the DNC? Perhaps the DNC are ho's
and will do anything for money? ^_^

TDD