http://www.examiner.com/atheism-in-a...schoolchildren


Is this true or just propaganda?
Are Americans really this weird?
Is it the inbreeding cause it?

On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:13:22 -0700 (PDT), harry
wrote:

http://www.examiner.com/atheism-in-a...schoolchildren


Is this true or just propaganda?
Are Americans really this weird?
Is it the inbreeding cause it?


This is the inbreeding of the Puritans that came from England. Some
sectors cannot shake their heritage.

On 4/16/2012 3:13 AM, harry wrote:
http://www.examiner.com/atheism-in-a...schoolchildren


Is this true or just propaganda?

Likely true

Are Americans really this weird?

Yes!
When it comes to nudity and sex, we're absolutely 100% certifiably nuts.

Is it the inbreeding cause it?

Maybe.

No problem harry. No problem. You have to try MUCH harder.

Now this I couldn't make up. Seriously.

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/polit...n-masturbation

On 04/16/12 03:13 am, harry wrote:

http://www.examiner.com/atheism-in-a...schoolchildren

Is this true or just propaganda?
Are Americans really this weird?
Is it the inbreeding cause it?

We have to nip this in the bud long before the hand-holding stage:
looking at a member of the opposite (or nowadays even the same) sex may
lead to smiling, which may lead to speaking, which may lead to the
handholding that the wise Tennessee legislators know may lead to sexual
activity. Therefore we must outlaw looking at other people. Even burqas
for women would be insufficient, because the women can still see the
men, so men must wear burqas too.

Perce

Need frontal lobotomies on anyone who has deviant thoughts such as kissing?

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

"Percival P. Cassidy" wrote in message
...

We have to nip this in the bud long before the hand-holding stage:
looking at a member of the opposite (or nowadays even the same) sex may
lead to smiling, which may lead to speaking, which may lead to the
handholding that the wise Tennessee legislators know may lead to sexual
activity. Therefore we must outlaw looking at other people. Even burqas
for women would be insufficient, because the women can still see the
men, so men must wear burqas too.

Perce

On Monday, April 16, 2012 12:13:22 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.examiner.com/atheism-in-a...schoolchildren


Is this true or just propaganda?
Are Americans really this weird?
Is it the inbreeding cause it?

Think of it this way: We have The South and you have your Middle East.

On Apr 16, 1:51*pm, gonjah gonjah.net wrote:
No problem harry. No problem. You have to try MUCH harder.

Now this I couldn't make up. Seriously.

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/polit...oklahoma-state...

So does that mean they're going ahead with it or not?
What happens in the event of rape?

Is it a form of Islaamification?

On Apr 16, 2:40*pm, "Percival P. Cassidy" wrote:
On 04/16/12 03:13 am, harry wrote:

http://www.examiner.com/atheism-in-a...nate-outlaws-h...

Is this true or just propaganda?
Are Americans really this weird?
Is it the inbreeding cause it?

We have to nip this in the bud long before the hand-holding stage:
looking at a member of the opposite (or nowadays even the same) sex may
lead to smiling, which may lead to speaking, which may lead to the
handholding that the wise Tennessee legislators know may lead to sexual
activity. Therefore we must outlaw looking at other people. Even burqas
for women would be insufficient, because the women can still see the
men, so men must wear burqas too.

Perce

Heh Heh!

On 4/16/2012 11:42 AM, harry wrote:
On Apr 16, 1:51 pm, gonjahgonjah.net wrote:
No problem harry. No problem. You have to try MUCH harder.

Now this I couldn't make up. Seriously.

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/polit...oklahoma-state...
So does that mean they're going ahead with it or not?

No. I wonder how she thought this could possibly be enforced?

What happens in the event of rape?

Is it a form of Islaamification?


It's a form of whackification. (same thing?)

On Apr 16, 7:42*pm, gonjah gonjah.net wrote:
On 4/16/2012 11:42 AM, harry wrote:

On Apr 16, 1:51 pm, gonjahgonjah.net *wrote:
No problem harry. No problem. You have to try MUCH harder.

Now this I couldn't make up. Seriously.

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/polit...oklahoma-state....
So does that mean they're going ahead with it or not?

No. I wonder how she thought this could possibly be enforced?

What happens in the event of rape?

Is it a form of Islaamification?

It's a form of whackification. *(same thing?)

The really weird bit is that it's OK to shoot someone but you can't
hold their hand. Seriously crazed.

On 4/17/2012 12:21 AM, harry wrote:
On Apr 16, 7:42 pm, gonjahgonjah.net wrote:
On 4/16/2012 11:42 AM, harry wrote:

On Apr 16, 1:51 pm, gonjahgonjah.net wrote:
No problem harry. No problem. You have to try MUCH harder.
Now this I couldn't make up. Seriously.
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/polit...oklahoma-state...
So does that mean they're going ahead with it or not?
No. I wonder how she thought this could possibly be enforced?

What happens in the event of rape?
Is it a form of Islaamification?
It's a form of whackification. (same thing?)
The really weird bit is that it's OK to shoot someone but you can't
hold their hand. Seriously crazed.


meh non-related.

You sort of remind me of another bloke in another ng. He spouts
inflammatory rhetoric to see people get up-in-arms (pun intended), but
you're much more pleasant about it.

The old idiom: "If guns were outlawed only outlaws would have guns"
applies here. In the UK you can get away with outlawing guns, but it
will never happen here. This isn't an island. Recent border violence
only supports the gun owner's position. Even with relatively high gun
homicides rates I still support the right to bear arms.

What do you think is the answer?

FWIW: I've never been threatened by a gun in the US, and I'm 57 y/o.
Good rule of thumb here is: "Don't go looking for it if you don't want
to find it."

On 4/17/2012 12:21 AM, harry wrote:
On Apr 16, 7:42 pm, gonjahgonjah.net wrote:
On 4/16/2012 11:42 AM, harry wrote:

On Apr 16, 1:51 pm, gonjahgonjah.net wrote:
No problem harry. No problem. You have to try MUCH harder.
Now this I couldn't make up. Seriously.
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/polit...oklahoma-state...
So does that mean they're going ahead with it or not?
No. I wonder how she thought this could possibly be enforced?

What happens in the event of rape?
Is it a form of Islaamification?
It's a form of whackification. (same thing?)
The really weird bit is that it's OK to shoot someone but you can't
hold their hand. Seriously crazed.

I guess I missed your main point. heh

Who is it okay to shoot?

"harry" wrote in message
...
http://www.examiner.com/atheism-in-a...schoolchildren


Is this true or just propaganda?
Are Americans really this weird?
Is it the inbreeding cause it?

YAWN
Your problem, dummy, is that you are stupid enough to forget that in a
population of 300+ million, there would not be a few crackpots.
And then you go and project that craziness of one individual on all the
rest.

One can only hope that all Brits are not as stupid as you.

On Apr 17, 8:13*am, gonjah wrote:
On 4/17/2012 12:21 AM, harry wrote:

On Apr 16, 7:42 pm, gonjahgonjah.net *wrote:
On 4/16/2012 11:42 AM, harry wrote:

On Apr 16, 1:51 pm, gonjahgonjah.net * *wrote:
No problem harry. No problem. You have to try MUCH harder.
Now this I couldn't make up. Seriously.
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/polit...oklahoma-state....
So does that mean they're going ahead with it or not?
No. I wonder how she thought this could possibly be enforced?

What happens in the event of rape?
Is it a form of Islaamification?
It's a form of whackification. *(same thing?)
The really weird bit is that it's OK to shoot someone but you can't
hold their hand. Seriously crazed.

I guess I missed your main point. heh

Who is it okay to shoot?

Seem to be what the police in Florida think.

On 4/17/2012 11:04 AM, harry wrote:
On Apr 17, 8:13 am, wrote:
On 4/17/2012 12:21 AM, harry wrote:

On Apr 16, 7:42 pm, gonjahgonjah.net wrote:
On 4/16/2012 11:42 AM, harry wrote:
On Apr 16, 1:51 pm, gonjahgonjah.net wrote:
No problem harry. No problem. You have to try MUCH harder.
Now this I couldn't make up. Seriously.
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/polit...oklahoma-state...
So does that mean they're going ahead with it or not?
No. I wonder how she thought this could possibly be enforced?
What happens in the event of rape?
Is it a form of Islaamification?
It's a form of whackification. (same thing?)
The really weird bit is that it's OK to shoot someone but you can't
hold their hand. Seriously crazed.
I guess I missed your main point.heh

Who is it okay to shoot?
Seem to be what the police in Florida think.

Yeah. Sorry I missed the point.

Attila.Iskander wrote:
"harry" wrote in message
...
http://www.examiner.com/atheism-in-a...schoolchildren


Is this true or just propaganda?
Are Americans really this weird?
Is it the inbreeding cause it?

YAWN
Your problem, dummy, is that you are stupid enough to forget that in a
population of 300+ million, there would not be a few crackpots.
And then you go and project that craziness of one individual on all
the rest.

One can only hope that all Brits are not as stupid as you.

Have they tried to outlaw holding hands?

"Bob F" wrote in message
...
Attila.Iskander wrote:
"harry" wrote in message
...
http://www.examiner.com/atheism-in-a...schoolchildren


Is this true or just propaganda?
Are Americans really this weird?
Is it the inbreeding cause it?

YAWN
Your problem, dummy, is that you are stupid enough to forget that in a
population of 300+ million, there would not be a few crackpots.
And then you go and project that craziness of one individual on all
the rest.

One can only hope that all Brits are not as stupid as you.

Have they tried to outlaw holding hands?



Maybe, maybe no.
But then they did produce you.
And there isn't even a population of 300+ million in the UK, but they still
produced you

On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:30:56 -0500, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:

Bu since we're on the subject, what kind of "weed bugger" are you to
tolerate that some Muslim emigrates with his up to 4 wives and them go on
the dole and live like a king.
I wouldn't go around pointing fingers, because I'm quite sure that it
wouldn't take much to find some even more stupid law in the UK.

Less than a mile from the 2012 Olympic stadium, on 18 acres of land:

Not long from now, harry will convert and be a devout rascal-Muslim.

"...the construction by Tablighi Jamaat of the largest mosque in
Europe.

These are our reasons: (opposition)

1.It is a prestigious project by a globally ambitious Islamic sect.
They are far from small, weak or vulnerable!

2.Tablighi Jamaat has a repressive and dehumanising attitude towards
women.

3.Militant Islam has stemmed from the supremacist and socially
divisive teaching of Tablighi Jamaat here in the UK.

4.Moderate Muslims are also against this mosque with us

5.The trustees have breached planning laws and irresponsibly allowed
people onto the ‘medium/high’ risk contaminated land.

6.Locals have not been consulted.

Get ready for "Mega-mousqe", harry!!

http://www.megamosquenothanks.com/

On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:27:40 -0700, Oren wrote:

On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:30:56 -0500, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:

Bu since we're on the subject, what kind of "weed bugger" are you to
tolerate that some Muslim emigrates with his up to 4 wives and them go on
the dole and live like a king.
I wouldn't go around pointing fingers, because I'm quite sure that it
wouldn't take much to find some even more stupid law in the UK.

Less than a mile from the 2012 Olympic stadium, on 18 acres of land:

Not long from now, harry will convert and be a devout rascal-Muslim.

"...the construction by Tablighi Jamaat of the largest mosque in
Europe.

These are our reasons: (opposition)

1.It is a prestigious project by a globally ambitious Islamic sect.
They are far from small, weak or vulnerable!

2.Tablighi Jamaat has a repressive and dehumanising attitude towards
women.

3.Militant Islam has stemmed from the supremacist and socially
divisive teaching of Tablighi Jamaat here in the UK.

4.Moderate Muslims are also against this mosque with us

5.The trustees have breached planning laws and irresponsibly allowed
people onto the ‘medium/high’ risk contaminated land.

6.Locals have not been consulted.

Get ready for "Mega-mousqe", harry!!

Relatives of Mini-Mousqe and Goofy?

http://www.megamosquenothanks.com/

On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:07:18 -0400, "
wrote:

On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:27:40 -0700, Oren wrote:

On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:30:56 -0500, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:

Bu since we're on the subject, what kind of "weed bugger" are you to
tolerate that some Muslim emigrates with his up to 4 wives and them go on
the dole and live like a king.
I wouldn't go around pointing fingers, because I'm quite sure that it
wouldn't take much to find some even more stupid law in the UK.

Less than a mile from the 2012 Olympic stadium, on 18 acres of land:

Not long from now, harry will convert and be a devout rascal-Muslim.

"...the construction by Tablighi Jamaat of the largest mosque in
Europe.

These are our reasons: (opposition)

1.It is a prestigious project by a globally ambitious Islamic sect.
They are far from small, weak or vulnerable!

2.Tablighi Jamaat has a repressive and dehumanising attitude towards
women.

3.Militant Islam has stemmed from the supremacist and socially
divisive teaching of Tablighi Jamaat here in the UK.

4.Moderate Muslims are also against this mosque with us

5.The trustees have breached planning laws and irresponsibly allowed
people onto the ‘medium/high’ risk contaminated land.

6.Locals have not been consulted.

Get ready for "Mega-mousqe", harry!!

Relatives of Mini-Mousqe and Goofy?

http://www.megamosquenothanks.com/

I can't speak for Goofy.

I found out some Dukes, married chorus girls, some even married
Americans. Not wonder harry hates Yanks.

I bet the 8th Air Force gave American cigarettes and chocolates to the
women, as they rotated in and out of service. I mean the Air Force...

On 4/16/2012 4:55 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:13:22 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

http://www.examiner.com/atheism-in-a...schoolchildren


Is this true or just propaganda?
Are Americans really this weird?
Is it the inbreeding cause it?


This is the inbreeding of the Puritans that came from England. Some
sectors cannot shake their heritage.

Well, our nation was started by people who were considered religious
wackos in their home countries so they left to go someplace where they
would be FREE to practice their faith without persecution. I suppose
religion is responsible for our country becoming The Land of The Free.
^_^

TDD

On 4/16/2012 10:20 AM, wrote:
On Monday, April 16, 2012 12:13:22 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.examiner.com/atheism-in-a...schoolchildren


Is this true or just propaganda?
Are Americans really this weird?
Is it the inbreeding cause it?

Think of it this way: We have The South and you have your Middle East.

And where do you reside? ^_^

TDD