On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:48:50 +0000, Homer wrote:

They embraced, extended then tried to extinguish i4i:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?s...90909235419648

They sabotaged Sony's PS3 EU launch event:
http://xbox.joystiq.com/2007/03/24/r...s3-launch-fun/

They sabotaged the OLPC charity, to inhibit Linux adoption:
http://news.softpedia.com/news/One-L...el-71941.shtml

They forbid OEMs from selling competing products, by contract:
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-121675.html

They bribed Swedish ISO delegates to vote for OOXML:
http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/...invalid_1.html

They garnered fake grassroots support ... from dead people:
http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/871631

Their thugs leaned on Taiwanese OEM to dump Linux:
http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic....90619161307529

They bribed Nigerian school suppliers to break signed Linux contract:
http://www.computerworlduk.com/manag...wsid=6124&pn=2

Their "evangelism" training brief expounds benefits of "stacked panels":
http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic....71023002351958


The above is just a tiny sample of Microsoft's criminal behaviour, and
yet the EU Commission is branded as "scum" by the paid Microsoft shills,
for daring to challenge the gangsters at Microsoft.

The only "scum" here is Microsoft and its supporters.

They must be doing a bang up job because Windows has somewhere over 90
percent of the market place.

Isn't Linux free?

I've never used Linux myself, but it must really suck donkey dick if
it's free and still can't seem to encourage users to leave Windows in
favor of Linux. Why would someone pay $200.00 for Windows 7 when Linux
is free?

What do you use at work?

I'll bet it's Windows.