Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wasting taxpayer money - The FCC and over the air HDTV Rollout
"N8N" wrote in message
... On Jan 15, 11:28 am, N8N wrote: On Jan 15, 9:44 am, "Smarty" wrote: Many if not most homeowners who are trying to now get over the air HDTV reception are finding that indoor antennas are not adequate and often need to use expensive outdoor antennas. Ironically, the entire problem could have been avoided if the FCC had proper engineering people who had chosen / demanded higher transmitter power and transmitting antenna type and site choices. By increasing the effective radiated power by another 6 to 9 dB, they would have put a much smaller burden on the homeowner antenna, and lowered the deployment cost and risk for the homeowner tremendously. I gotta' believe that the choices they made were driven by sparing the broadcasters the extra operating costs of consuming all the extra kilowatt hours. The FCC would, if challenged, probably claim that they kept the ERP to a small number to prevent co-channel interference between neighboring cites. But in the UHF spectrum, they have so vastly more spectrum to allocate that they could have very, very easily chosen clear channels for every neighbor, and allowed homeowners to use simple rabbit ears and bow ties rather than need outdoor directional antennas even in urban and suburban areas to get all the local programming. Colin Powell's son, an attorney, headed the FCC during the HDTV planning and transition. Talk about technical qualifications for the job............. Smarty Oddly enough I find that I get the best reception with rabbit ears and bow ties. I've tried several fancier antennas and they've all been worthless junk. I think the only thing that would likely give an improvement, from what I've read, is either a) a homemade bow tie array (I may try this) b) either a "silver sensor" or Winegard SS-3000 type antenna or c) a proper roof or attic mounted antenna. It seems that there is a LOT of junk on the market at the moment, and if someone buys a new "amplified antenna" and then finds that they only get one channel, they may bitch and moan about how crappy DTV is but they may find that if they just try an old bowtie they get 20+ channels. I know that that's been my experience, I've returned several medium-priced antennas because they didn't work any better than a piece of wire jammed in the F-connector on the back of the box. nate Discovered something annoying last night... was watching the playoff game (go stillers) and decided to watch it OTA rather than off cable so I could see it in widescreen (well, letterboxed, but whatever) I am using a Channel Master CM7000 tuner box with aforementioned wabbit ears and bowtie. Every couple minutes the audio would drop out for a second or so then come back in, sometimes with some pixellation sometimes not. I thought it might be a problem with the station's sat feed because I have not noticed this on any other channels that I watch. But the same thing happened with the news this AM as I left it on Channel 9 (WUSA) rather than one of the other channels. Now I never watch Channel 9, so I have not noticed this before, but it doesn't appear to be a problem with my setup as I can leave the "info" menu on the screen and see that the signal strength remains pegged at 100% while it drops out. Also ran a long piece of coax up the stairs just to see if it was antenna position but with the antenna upstairs it still does this. Have not seen this with any other channels... if this is going to be permanent this kinda puts a damper on my TV watching experience, and I may just keep my cable and not install a roof mounted antenna like I'd originally planned. Based on the coverage maps I'm just outside the "red" zone for WUSA so this should not be a problem at all. nate Nate, "Multipath cancellation" can wreak havoc with digital signals, loosely analogous to "ghosts" which can show up on analog signals. The problem arises from the temporary or permanent bounce of the transmitted signal on some reflector between you and the transmitter. This bounced signal arrives slightly later, via a different path from the direct signal. The result at your antenna is a cancellation or smearing of digital data. Overhead aircraft can cause the problem. Fluttering tree limbs are also often the culprit. One problem I ultimately found was a large nearby traffic sign blowing in the wind which caused my relative to have drop-outs on windy days. Signal strengths can be very high but this effect will still show up. The modulation system used for over-the-air digital TV has some built-in immunity, using redundant bits, forward error correction, and other methods, but it is far from being perfect. Cable companies will normally site their receiving antennas at very high locations to ensure line of sight reception with little or no multipath degradation. Highly directional antennas can also help, but introduce their own new issues related to proper pointing. A brief description of how multipath is measurable with a Sencore test device is at: http://www.sencore.com/uploads/files...veGoodHDTV.pdf Smarty |
#42
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wasting taxpayer money - The FCC and over the air HDTV Rollout
On Jan 19, 2:35�pm, "Smarty" wrote:
"N8N" wrote in message ... On Jan 15, 11:28 am, N8N wrote: On Jan 15, 9:44 am, "Smarty" wrote: Many if not most homeowners who are trying to now get over the air HDTV reception are finding that indoor antennas are not adequate and often need to use expensive outdoor antennas. Ironically, the entire problem could have been avoided if the FCC had proper engineering people who had chosen / demanded higher transmitter power and transmitting antenna type and site choices. By increasing the effective radiated power by another 6 to 9 dB, they would have put a much smaller burden on the homeowner antenna, and lowered the deployment cost and risk for the homeowner tremendously. I gotta' believe that the choices they made were driven by sparing the broadcasters the extra operating costs of consuming all the extra kilowatt hours. The FCC would, if challenged, probably claim that they kept the ERP to a small number to prevent co-channel interference between neighboring cites. But in the UHF spectrum, they have so vastly more spectrum to allocate that they could have very, very easily chosen clear channels for every neighbor, and allowed homeowners to use simple rabbit ears and bow ties rather than need outdoor directional antennas even in urban and suburban areas to get all the local programming. Colin Powell's son, an attorney, headed the FCC during the HDTV planning and transition. Talk about technical qualifications for the job.............. Smarty Oddly enough I find that I get the best reception with rabbit ears and bow ties. I've tried several fancier antennas and they've all been worthless junk. I think the only thing that would likely give an improvement, from what I've read, is either a) a homemade bow tie array (I may try this) b) either a "silver sensor" or Winegard SS-3000 type antenna or c) a proper roof or attic mounted antenna. It seems that there is a LOT of junk on the market at the moment, and if someone buys a new "amplified antenna" and then finds that they only get one channel, they may bitch and moan about how crappy DTV is but they may find that if they just try an old bowtie they get 20+ channels. I know that that's been my experience, I've returned several medium-priced antennas because they didn't work any better than a piece of wire jammed in the F-connector on the back of the box. nate Discovered something annoying last night... was watching the playoff game (go stillers) and decided to watch it OTA rather than off cable so I could see it in widescreen (well, letterboxed, but whatever) I am using a Channel Master CM7000 tuner box with aforementioned wabbit ears and bowtie. �Every couple minutes the audio would drop out for a second or so then come back in, sometimes with some pixellation sometimes not. �I thought it might be a problem with the station's sat feed because I have not noticed this on any other channels that I watch. �But the same thing happened with the news this AM as I left it on Channel 9 (WUSA) rather than one of the other channels. �Now I never watch Channel 9, so I have not noticed this before, but it doesn't appear to be a problem with my setup as I can leave the "info" menu on the screen and see that the signal strength remains pegged at 100% while it drops out. �Also ran a long piece of coax up the stairs just to see if it was antenna position but with the antenna upstairs it still does this. �Have not seen this with any other channels.... �if this is going to be permanent this kinda puts a damper on my TV watching experience, and I may just keep my cable and not install a roof mounted antenna like I'd originally planned. �Based on the coverage maps I'm just outside the "red" zone for WUSA so this should not be a problem at all. nate Nate, "Multipath cancellation" can wreak havoc with digital signals, loosely analogous to "ghosts" which can show up on analog signals. The problem arises from the temporary or permanent bounce of the transmitted signal on some reflector between you and the transmitter. This bounced signal arrives slightly later, via a different path from the direct signal. The result at your antenna is a cancellation or smearing of digital data. Overhead aircraft can cause the problem. Fluttering tree limbs are also often the culprit. One problem I ultimately found was a large nearby traffic sign blowing in the wind which caused my relative to have drop-outs on windy days. Signal strengths can be very high but this effect will still show up. The modulation system used for over-the-air digital TV has some built-in immunity, using redundant bits, forward error correction, and other methods, but it is far from being perfect. Cable companies will normally site their receiving antennas at very high locations to ensure line of sight reception with little or no multipath degradation. Highly directional antennas can also help, but introduce their own new issues related to proper pointing. A brief description of how multipath is measurable with a Sencore test device is at:http://www.sencore.com/uploads/files...veGoodHDTV.pdf Smarty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - gee I saw this last nite in pittsburgh but wasnt watching the game. signal strength bounces a lot over time, apparently on all channels I was watching RTN one of channel 11s feeds Its the super bowl bottom of the 4 quarter its a long pass, its going going (blank screen) the fans are going wild here! it was the pass of a century, the final score (blank screen) my normal signal strength is excellent on the channel blanking out |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT - Taxpayer ROI | Metalworking | |||
OT - Taxpayer ROI | Metalworking | |||
Ok am I wasting money on this? | Metalworking | |||
Recessed lights wasting lots of heat | Home Repair | |||
Flourescent lamp wasting power - Why? | Home Repair |