http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIivoqLbeeg

Pisano wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIivoqLbeeg

yuck

McCain: trash
Obama: liar and jerk
Hillary: co-murderer, failed bar exam, liar, co-drug lord

On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:51:02 -0600, Mike Dobony
wrote:

Pisano wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIivoqLbeeg

yuck

McCain: trash
Obama: liar and jerk
Hillary: co-murderer, failed bar exam, liar, co-drug lord


Ron Paul:

10 Term Congressman - Strong Voting Record

He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase power of the executive branch.

He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.

He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension
program.

He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget
to the U.S. treasury every year.

Congressman Paul introduces numerous pieces of substantive
legislation each year, probably more than any single member of
Congress.

Congressman Ron Paul is the leading advocate for freedom in
our nation’s capital. As a member of the U.S. House of
Representatives, Dr. Paul tirelessly works for limited constitutional
government, low taxes, free markets, and a return to sound monetary
policies. He is known among his congressional colleagues and his
constituents for his consistent voting record. Dr. Paul never votes
for legislation unless the proposed measure is expressly authorized by
the Constitution.In the words of former Treasury Secretary William
Simon, Dr. Paul is the “one exception to the Gang of 535” on Capitol
Hill.

Ron Paul was born and raised in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He
graduated from Gettysburg College and the Duke University School of
Medicine, before proudly serving as a flight surgeon in the U.S. Air
Force during the 1960s. He and his wife Carol moved to Texas in 1968,
where he began his medical practice in Brazoria County. As a
specialist in obstetrics/gynecology, Dr. Paul has delivered more than
4,000 babies. He and Carol, who reside in Lake Jackson, Texas, are the
proud parents of five children and have 17 grandchildren.

While serving in Congress during the late 1970s and early
1980s, Dr. Paul’s limited-government ideals were not popular in
Washington. In 1976, he was one of only four Republican congressmen to
endorse Ronald Reagan for president.

During that time, Congressman Paul served on the House Banking
committee, where he was a strong advocate for sound monetary policy
and an outspoken critic of the Federal Reserve’s inflationary
measures. He was an unwavering advocate of pro-life and pro-family
values. Dr. Paul consistently voted to lower or abolish federal taxes,
spending and regulation, and used his House seat to actively promote
the return of government to its proper constitutional levels. In 1984,
he voluntarily relinquished his House seat and returned to his medical
practice.

Dr. Paul returned to Congress in 1997 to represent the 14th
congressional district of Texas. He presently serves on the House
Committee on Financial Services and the House Committee on Foreign
Affairs. He continues to advocate a dramatic reduction in the size of
the federal government and a return to constitutional principles.

Congressman Paul’s consistent voting record prompted one of
his congressional colleagues to say, “Ron Paul personifies the
Founding Fathers’ ideal of the citizen-statesman. He makes it clear
that his principles will never be compromised, and they never are.”
Another colleague observed, “There are few people in public life who,
through thick and thin, rain or shine, stick to their principles. Ron
Paul is one of those few.”


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bse1Xax07ec


http://www.ronpaul2008.com

Pisano wrote:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:51:02 -0600, Mike Dobony
wrote:

Pisano wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIivoqLbeeg

yuck

McCain: trash
Obama: liar and jerk
Hillary: co-murderer, failed bar exam, liar, co-drug lord


Ron Paul:

10 Term Congressman - Strong Voting Record

[...]

Libertarians are much like the Celtic warriors of old hired by the English
kings as mercanaries: Loyal, brave, and fierce as hell! You just don't want
them to actually run things.

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 16:52:41 -0600, "HeyBub" wrote:

Pisano wrote:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:51:02 -0600, Mike Dobony
wrote:

Pisano wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIivoqLbeeg

yuck

McCain: trash
Obama: liar and jerk
Hillary: co-murderer, failed bar exam, liar, co-drug lord


Ron Paul:

10 Term Congressman - Strong Voting Record

[...]

Libertarians are much like the Celtic warriors of old hired by the English
kings as mercanaries: Loyal, brave, and fierce as hell! You just don't want
them to actually run things.



Our Founding Fathers were libertarians.

All intelligent people are.

Mike Dobony wrote:

Pisano wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIivoqLbeeg

yuck

McCain: trash
Obama: liar and jerk
Hillary: co-murderer, failed bar exam, liar, co-drug lord

Yup, thats just about the way i see it too.
I'd a voted for Fred T if he had stayed in it.
Now I'm hoping Romney will pull ahead - the choices absolutely suck.
I like some of Ron Paul's positions (go read them on wikipedia) but
I just dont think he has a chance of winning.
Eric

On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 18:51:52 -0800, Eric
wrote:

Mike Dobony wrote:

Pisano wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIivoqLbeeg

yuck

McCain: trash
Obama: liar and jerk
Hillary: co-murderer, failed bar exam, liar, co-drug lord

Yup, thats just about the way i see it too.
I'd a voted for Fred T if he had stayed in it.
Now I'm hoping Romney will pull ahead - the choices absolutely suck.
I like some of Ron Paul's positions (go read them on wikipedia) but
I just dont think he has a chance of winning.
Eric


If not, it's only because too many people think the same way.

Wow. Imagine what would happen if they didn't delude
themselves like that.

Vote for the one you think is most qualified to do the job,
not the one that is being sold like soap to the television audience.

Don't you people realize how important this election is?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_qgVn-Op7Q

Pisano wrote:

Vote for the one you think is most qualified to do the job,
not the one that is being sold like soap to the television audience.

Don't you people realize how important this election is?


The election's not very important. Country's doing well, things are humming.
With the exception of Supreme Court justices, not much of any consequence is
on the horizon.

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:17:07 -0600, "HeyBub" wrote:

Pisano wrote:

Vote for the one you think is most qualified to do the job,
not the one that is being sold like soap to the television audience.

Don't you people realize how important this election is?


The election's not very important. Country's doing well, things are humming.
With the exception of Supreme Court justices, not much of any consequence is
on the horizon.



More bull****.

On Feb 3, 2:10*pm, Pisano wrote:
* * * *http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIivoqLbeeg

Ron who?

Joe

HeyBub wrote:
The election's not very important. Country's doing well, things are humming.
With the exception of Supreme Court justices, not much of any consequence is
on the horizon.

See below.

--
God help us all,
The next President of the United States will be a liberal.

Pisano wrote:

The election's not very important. Country's doing well, things are
humming. With the exception of Supreme Court justices, not much of
any consequence is on the horizon.



More bull****.

Okay, you tell us what's crucial, necessary, urgent, or imperative that's
looming.

The economy? At a $12 trillion GDP, we can survive anything (witness WTC,
Katrina, and war going on simultaneously).

Health care? 260 million have insurance.

Terrorists? We've killed several tens of thousands, there can't be many
left.

Immigration? Oh well, it's a push.

On Feb 3, 7:51 pm, Eric wrote:

Yup, thats just about the way i see it too.
I'd a voted for Fred T if he had stayed in it.
Now I'm hoping Romney will pull ahead - the choices absolutely suck.
I like some of Ron Paul's positions (go read them on wikipedia) but
I just dont think he has a chance of winning.
Eric

Let's see. You like some of his positions, yet won't vote for him
because you "just don't think he has a chance of winning". I think
this reasoning ensures the lesser-of-two-evils syndrome that's been
perpetrated upon us far too long. Do any of the "viable" (read:
mainstream Dem or GOP) candidates' stands on issues resonate within
you? Anyone as much as Paul? Why are some afraid to vote for a
candidate who probably won't win, even in just a primary? They think
they're throwing away their vote to the greater of two evils? Send a
message: Vote the way you think you should, not the way you're told.
Be an independent person. In other words, don't be dependent upon
anyone else's dependancies. I think. Tom

On Feb 7, 12:07*pm, "HeyBub" wrote:
Pisano wrote:
The election's not very important. Country's doing well, things are
humming. With the exception of Supreme Court justices, not much of
any consequence is on the horizon.

More bull****.

Okay, you tell us what's crucial, necessary, urgent, or imperative that's
looming.

The economy? At a $12 trillion GDP, we can survive anything (witness WTC,
Katrina, and war going on simultaneously).

Health care? 260 million have insurance.

Terrorists? We've killed several tens of thousands, there can't be many
left.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wJsovPRTEM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zgj5KYn_bmw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuBo4E77ZXo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfqq3bELYhY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYPislFxkc0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeZdaF5Oln0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQxm0v6IQ4E

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGKbvGlaCZ4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghYwKifjEkQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bESN4SdAaXE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibpdwFjPMWE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmc60JmaLbE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTP2gs-NUtc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWfIhFhelm8



Immigration? Oh well, it's a push.

On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:42:39 -0800 (PST), tom wrote:

On Feb 3, 7:51 pm, Eric wrote:

Yup, thats just about the way i see it too.
I'd a voted for Fred T if he had stayed in it.
Now I'm hoping Romney will pull ahead - the choices absolutely suck.
I like some of Ron Paul's positions (go read them on wikipedia) but
I just dont think he has a chance of winning.
Eric

Let's see. You like some of his positions, yet won't vote for him
because you "just don't think he has a chance of winning". I think
this reasoning ensures the lesser-of-two-evils syndrome that's been
perpetrated upon us far too long. Do any of the "viable" (read:
mainstream Dem or GOP) candidates' stands on issues resonate within
you? Anyone as much as Paul? Why are some afraid to vote for a
candidate who probably won't win, even in just a primary? They think
they're throwing away their vote to the greater of two evils? Send a
message: Vote the way you think you should, not the way you're told.
Be an independent person. In other words, don't be dependent upon
anyone else's dependancies. I think. Tom


I think it's weird the way the public votes. I voted for Ron Paul and
could care less about "chances of winning." I really wish voting
would be easier than it was last Tuesday (a 40-minute wait with ONE
working machine!) I vote for Internet Voting!!!